Unit 2
Unit 2
COMPOSITION OF PARLIAMENT
The Parliament of India is the supreme legislative body that represents the people and enacts laws.
It consists of three components (Article 79):
India shall have a President who is the constitutional head of the Union Executive.
A person must:
1. Be a citizen of India.
2. Be at least 35 years old.
3. Be qualified to be a member of the Lok Sabha.
4. Not hold any office of profit under the Government.
If the President’s office falls vacant, a new election must be held within 6 months.
The Vice President is the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha but does not have voting
rights, except in case of a tie.
In case of death, resignation, or removal of the President, the Vice President acts
as President until a new election is held.
Article 68 – Time for Holding Election to Fill Vacancy in the Vice President’s
Office
A new Vice President must be elected before the expiration of the term or within 6
months of a vacancy.
If there is a situation where both the President and Vice President are absent,
Parliament may decide who will act as President.
The Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes relating to the election
of the President or Vice President.
o Union laws.
o Military court punishments.
o Death penalty cases.
o 238 members are elected by State Legislative Assemblies and Union Territories.
Special Powers:
o Article 249: Empowers Parliament to make laws on State List subjects in the national
interest.
o Article 312: Can create new All India Services (e.g., IAS, IPS) if approved by a two-
thirds majority.
Presiding Officer
The Vice President of India is the ex-officio Chairperson of the Rajya Sabha.
Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006): The Supreme Court upheld open ballot voting for
Rajya Sabha elections, ensuring transparency.
Election Method:
Can be dissolved earlier by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister.
Presiding Officer
Parliamentary sovereignty means Parliament has supreme power to make, amend, or repeal laws.
However, in India, Parliament’s sovereignty is not absolute due to constitutional limitations.
o Any law violating Fundamental Rights can be struck down by the Supreme Court or
High Courts.
o Case: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): The Supreme Court ruled that
Parliament cannot alter the Basic Structure of the Constitution.
o Case: State of West Bengal v. Union of India (1963): Parliament cannot interfere
arbitrarily in State matters.
o Case: Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980): Parliament’s power to amend the
Constitution was limited by the Basic Structure Doctrine.
o Certain amendments (e.g., changes in federal structure) require the approval of 50%
of State Legislatures.
Abolition of Article 370: The Parliament passed the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act,
2019, revoking its special status.
GST Act, 2017: Parliament exercised its power to introduce a unified Goods and Services Tax
(GST).
Parliamentary privileges are special rights and immunities granted to Members of Parliament to
perform their duties without external interference.
Constitutional Provisions
1. Individual Privileges
o Case: Pandit Sharma v. Sri Krishna Sinha (1959): Article 19(1)(a) does not apply
inside Parliament.
o MPs cannot be arrested during sessions in civil cases (but not in criminal cases).
2. Collective Privileges
Right to Punish for Contempt: Parliament can punish outsiders or MPs for breach of
privilege.
o Case: Raja Ram Pal v. Speaker, Lok Sabha (2007): The Supreme Court upheld
Parliament’s power to expel members.
Example: Arnab Goswami Case (2020): A breach of privilege motion was filed for allegedly
insulting the Maharashtra Assembly.
Conclusion
1. Composition: Parliament consists of Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, and the President, each
playing a crucial role.
3. Parliamentary Privileges: MPs enjoy special rights, but these are not absolute and must
align with democratic principles.
Executive Power: Position and Power of
President and Governor
The executive power in India is vested in the President at the Union level and the
Governor at the State level. Their powers, functions, and limitations are defined by the
Constitution of India, primarily in Articles 52-78 (for the President) and Articles 153-167
(for the Governor).
The President of India is the constitutional head and executive authority of the
country.
Under Article 53, the executive power of the Union is vested in the President, but
he exercises it on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers (Article 74).
India follows a parliamentary system, meaning the President is the nominal
executive, while the Prime Minister is the real executive.
The President is the supreme executive authority and all Union government actions
are taken in his name.
Article 74: The President must act on the advice of the Council of Ministers
(headed by the PM).
Article 77: All executive actions are taken in the name of the President.
Article 78: The President has the right to be informed of government affairs.
📌 Case Law:
Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974): The Supreme Court held that the
President is only a constitutional head and acts on ministerial advice.
Summoning & Dissolving Parliament (Article 85): The President can summon,
prorogue, or dissolve Parliament.
Special Address (Article 86): The President addresses Parliament at the start of
each session.
Assent to Bills (Article 111): The President can give, withhold, or return a bill
(except Money Bills).
Ordinance Making Power (Article 123): The President can issue ordinances
during Parliament recess, which must be approved within 6 weeks of reassembly.
📌 Case Law:
D.C. Wadhwa v. State of Bihar (1987): The Supreme Court ruled that repeated use
of ordinances to bypass the legislature is unconstitutional.
The President has the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, and remissions.
This applies to:
o Union laws.
o Court-martial (military) cases.
o Death sentence cases.
📌 Case Law:
Kehar Singh v. Union of India (1989): The Supreme Court held that the President's
pardon power is subject to judicial review in case of mala fide use.
Annual Budget (Article 112): The President lays the Union Budget before
Parliament.
Money Bills (Article 110, 265):
o Cannot be introduced without the President’s recommendation.
o The President cannot refuse assent to a Money Bill.
Finance Commission (Article 280): The President appoints the Finance
Commission every 5 years.
E. Diplomatic & Military Powers (Article 53, 72, 253, 246, 307)
📌 Case Law:
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994): The Supreme Court ruled that President’s
Rule under Article 356 is subject to judicial review.
All executive actions are taken in the name of the Governor (Article 166).
Acts on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers (Article 163).
Appoints the Chief Minister and other Ministers.
📌 Case Law:
B.P. Singhal v. Union of India (2010): The Supreme Court ruled that the Governor
cannot be removed arbitrarily.
📌 Case Law:
Krishna Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar (2017): The Supreme Court held that a
Governor's re-promulgation of ordinances is unconstitutional.
📌 Example:
Conclusion
The President is the head of the entire nation, while the Governor is the head of
an individual state.
Both are nominal heads, with real power exercised by the Council of Ministers.
The President’s powers are broader, especially in foreign affairs, defense, and
emergencies.
Judiciary in India
The Judiciary is the guardian of the Constitution and plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law.
It consists of the Supreme Court (Articles 124-147), High Courts (Articles 214-231), and Subordinate
Courts (Articles 233-237).
The Supreme Court is the apex court of India and has extensive powers and jurisdiction under the
Constitution.
3. Disputes between the Union and States on legal rights and obligations.
📌 Example:
State of Karnataka v. Union of India (1977) – The Supreme Court held that disputes between
the Centre and a State on constitutional provisions come under Article 131.
The Supreme Court is the guardian of fundamental rights and can issue writs for their
enforcement.
Writs include:
📌 Case Law:
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) – Expanded the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life
and Liberty).
The Supreme Court is the highest appellate authority and hears appeals from:
4. Special Leave Petitions (Article 136) – Allows appeals from any court or tribunal in India.
📌 Case Law:
Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) – Established the Basic Structure Doctrine.
The President can seek the opinion of the Supreme Court on any question of law or fact of
public importance.
📌 Example:
Re: Berubari Union Case (1960) – The Supreme Court advised that Parliament must pass a
constitutional amendment to transfer territory to another country.
Judicial Review is part of the Basic Structure of the Constitution (Kesavananda Bharati case,
1973).
📌 Case Law:
Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) – Ruled that Fundamental Rights cannot be amended
by Parliament.
Each state has a High Court, which exercises jurisdiction over the respective state.
A. Original Jurisdiction
📌 Example:
Delhi High Court ruling in the Vishaka case (1997) – Laid down guidelines against sexual
harassment at workplaces.
B. Writ Jurisdiction (Article 226)
Like the Supreme Court, High Courts can issue writs to enforce fundamental rights.
The scope of Article 226 is wider than Article 32, as it covers not only fundamental rights
but also other legal rights.
📌 Example:
Common Cause v. Union of India (2018) – The Delhi High Court directed the government to
frame policies for the Right to Die with Dignity.
C. Appellate Jurisdiction
1. Civil matters.
2. Criminal matters.
📌 Example:
Madhu Limaye v. State of Maharashtra (1978) – The Bombay High Court upheld the power
of High Courts to grant bail in preventive detention cases.
High Courts supervise all subordinate courts and tribunals within their jurisdiction.
📌 Case Law:
Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai (2003) – Held that High Courts can exercise supervisory
jurisdiction over lower courts.
1. Appointment of Judges
📌 Collegium System:
Evolved through case laws, where the CJI and senior judges recommend judicial
appointments.
📌 Case Law:
S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981) – Allowed greater executive control in appointments.
📌 Example:
National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Case (2015) – The Supreme Court struck
down NJAC, reaffirming the Collegium System.
2. Independence of Judiciary
A. Security of Tenure
📌 Example:
Justice V. Ramaswami impeachment case (1991) – The first judge against whom
impeachment proceedings were initiated.
Case Law:
Union of India v. Madras Bar Association (2010) – The Supreme Court upheld the
independence of tribunals from executive control.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court and High Courts play a crucial role in upholding constitutional values.
The independence of the judiciary is essential to maintain the rule of law and prevent
executive overreach.