Chapter 2, Concepts and principles of ecologic design
Chapter 2, Concepts and principles of ecologic design
“Ecological design is a large concept that joins science and the practical arts with ethics, politics
and economics;” David W. Orr. For him, ecological designs not so much about how we make
things as about how we make things that fit gracefully over long periods of time in a particular
ecological, social, and cultural context.
Ecological design is a large concept because it calls for an integration of the way we meet human
needs for shelter, food, education, community, clean air & water, transport, energy and a
meaningful life into the opportunities and limits set by local and regional ecosystems as well as
the biosphere as a whole.
Ecological designs are important in enhancing ecosystem services. Ecosystem services are
functions performed by the natural environment that enhance human well-being and are directly
useful to people. They involve the interaction of living elements, such as vegetation and soil
organisms, and nonliving elements, such as bedrock, water, and air. Ecosystem services have
four categories that are:
1. Provisioning services: Products obtained from nature, such as food, fresh water, wood,
fiber, and fuel.
2. Regulating services: Climate, flood, and disease control.
3. Cultural services: Aesthetics, spirituality, knowledge, and recreation.
4. Supporting services: Nutrient cycling, soil formation, water cycling, oxygen, and
biomass production. Necessary for all other ecosystem services.
1. Nothing stands alone: Account should be taken of the local, regional and global implications
of urban activities and urban environmental policies
2. Thinking as a System: Connectivity, Not Fragmentation
When ecologists study a particular system or biome, they start by defining its boundary
as the next larger system. The sustainable design challenge starts similarly by studying the
environmental context at the next larger scale, as a living pattern are interdependent system.
In ecology the connections between systems are vital to life whereas in conventional
designing and planning only legal boundaries are used, as opportunities to integrate a site's
resources and microclimate are typically left unexplored.
Consequently, when designing sustainably, if the project is architectural in scale, the
neighborhood system must be included in the study; if the neighborhood is the project, then the
city must be studied; and if the city, then the study starts with the regional scale. For this reason,
the new challenge may well be to think globally live locally, and act regionally.
Designing regionally is the scale at which the most benefit toward sustainable living can
be achieved. The need and the ability to design at this scale exist, but the will to do it does not.
Design for connectivity, avoiding fragmentation, therefore, and means: fragmentation of
land, waterways, and forests decreases functional choices for species survival. In design,
connectivity of natural systems such as watershed streams and open spaces creates logical places
for pedestrian, walkways, bikeways and recreation, alongside protected corridors for wildlife and
plant habitat.
Conceive of projects and plans in terms of watershed viability and creating or restoring a
green infrastructure that is as powerful and important in community life as any utility grid.
Conceive of local rainfall as precious and limited resources: Depending on the rainfall
conditions prevailing at a site, the water goals of a project can be established so that the building
roofs and landscape can serve to store water (reducing and slowing storm water flow impacts), to
clean water (improving water quality by filtration as it returns to the local aquifer), and to
recycle and reuse water (reducing the drawdown of precious fresh water resources).
Since ecology is the study of the relationship of plants and animals to their environment,
designing ecologically requires the incorporation of sustainable relationships to power the
design. The ecological model illustrates the foundation of the sustainable model and,
consequently, a model for sustainable design. The resulting design will be planned to receive,
store, and distribute sustainable energy and resources.
3. Prevention is better than cure: this stresses the importance of a precautionary approach to
urban development; environmental impact assessment must be conducted on all major
development projects.
4. Minimize waste; maximize the use of renewable and recyclable materials: In moving towards
greater urban self-reliance, maximize reuse and recycling of materials; minimize unnecessary
wastage of resources; and encourage built-in longevity in products. The use of low- and non-
waste technology should be especially encouraged; maximize the use of renewable resources
within sustainable limits.
5. Identify and respect local, regional and global environmental tolerances. This ensures that
urban development is sensitized to its capacity to interact with, and indeed alter, local and
global capacities to cope with environmental disturbances.
6. Enhance environmental understanding through research: This ensures that complex
environmental and economic interdependencies are better understood as a basis for informed
decision-making.
1.3.2. Social and economic principles
1. Use of appropriate technologies, materials and design. This is particularly useful where low
cost indigenous solutions take precedence over expensive imported models. Pollution is the
consequence of bad design
2. Create new indicators for economic and environmental wealth. Move away from relying on
Gross National Product as the primary indicator of national wealth, since it ignores
environmental 'capital stocks’.
3. Creating new indicators for economic and environmental productivity. This will encourage a
shift away from wasteful production and from unsustainable use of non-renewable
resources; productivity must be gauged as an outcome of the inputs of natural resources.
4. Establishing acceptable minimum standards through regulatory control: Improved market
incentives will always need to be accompanied by legislative back-up which sets minimum
standards in environmental matters.
5. Continuing action to internalize environmental costs into the market. This guideline
subsumes such well-known environmental principles as 'polluter pays' and 'user pays'.
6. Ensure social acceptability of environmental policies; Policies designed to improve the
urban environment should not result in a net decline in the quality of life of disadvantaged
groups, both in cities and globally.
7. Widespread public participation; This should be encouraged in strategy formulation, policy
implementation and project management