Assignment 2 Real life reflective paper
Assignment 2 Real life reflective paper
Life Situation
Gurveer Kaur is a 32-year-old female employee. She is married with two children, aged 6 and
8, which places her in a stage of life where family responsibilities are significant. Her
husband works in a different city, so she often juggles her work and family duties alone. This
situation can lead to stress and divided attention between work and personal life.
Work Situation
Gurveer holds the position of Branch Manager at Testbuilders Academy. Her role involves
overseeing daily operations, managing staff, and ensuring that branch targets are met.
Despite her experience and qualifications, she has been struggling to meet performance
expectations.
1. Low Team Morale: Under her management, team morale has decreased. Staff
members often express dissatisfaction with her leadership style, citing lack of clear
communication and inadequate support.
2. Missed Targets: The branch has consistently failed to meet its quarterly targets,
leading to financial losses and a decrease in customer satisfaction.
Adam Grant categorizes individuals into four types: agreeable giver, agreeable
taker, disagreeable giver, and disagreeable taker. Based on observations, Gurveer can be
classified as an agreeable giver. She is generally cooperative and willing to help others, but
her eagerness to please often leads to overcommitting and under-delivering. This trait aligns
with the characteristics of an agreeable giver, who tends to prioritize others' needs over
their own, sometimes at the cost of their performance.
RESPECT Model
Recognition Drivers
1. Team Performance: Her leadership style affects team morale and productivity,
impacting overall branch performance.
2. Customer Satisfaction: Missed targets and poor service quality can lead to customer
dissatisfaction and loss of business.
3. Organizational Reputation: Consistent underperformance can tarnish the reputation
of Testbuilders Academy in the region.
Timing of Intervention
As a servant leader, it is crucial to approach the situation with empathy and support rather
than immediate discipline. Providing resources for improvement and setting clear
expectations can help Gurveer address her underperformance. Termination should be
considered only if significant efforts to improve yield no results. There has never been a
better time to rethink your employee engagement strategy and approach. And this new
edition features commentary, advice, case-studies and tools to address the latest employee
engagement challenges and seize the somewhat unexpected opportunities afforded by
Covid-19. There are new and updated contributions looking at the role of technology to
improve engagement, making the case for an increased focus on wellbeing, as well as
inclusion and diversity. And as the pandemic continues to play out, it’s clearer than ever that
a transactional approach to employee engagement is no longer fit for purpose. Now is the
time to make the move to a more transformational approach to engagement – an approach
that is both agile and human-centred. An approach that will help you navigate the
challenges of today and the coming months, as we continue to see the pandemic play out.
The time has come to inspire organizations to treat their people better, and empower
leaders to make positive change. The time has come to fight back against the status quo of
toxic workplaces. Because we know that when you get it right with your people great things
can happen. By following the guidance contained here practitioners will be able to
demonstrably improve and develop employee engagement within their organizations and
unleash the power of an engaged workforce.
My faith and core values emphasize compassion and support. As a servant leader, I believe
in empowering employees by providing them with the necessary tools and resources to
succeed. This approach aligns with the principles outlined in "Carrots and Sticks Don’t Work"
by Dr. Marciano, which highlights the importance of personal responsibility and respect in
motivating employees (Marciano, as cited in Boucher). Theories of motivation were helpful
in explaining bursts of energy in pursuit of a “carrot” but could not explain employee
engagement. Motivating employees and engaging them were very distinct concepts. By
focusing on building trust and fostering a supportive environment, I aim to help Gurveer
overcome her challenges and grow both personally and professionally. Skinner used
reinforcement and punishment techniques to motivate the behavior of lab animals such as
mice and pigeons. These same principles and techniques proved to be highly effective in
motivating human behavior and dovetailed perfectly with the field of scientific management
and its focus on behavior. There appeared to be no need to consider people’s thoughts or
feelings to explain behavior. Thus, in what was becoming a tug-of-war of competing
approaches to the study of motivation. The workplace and its employees are very different
today than they were prior to the second half of the twentieth century. One of the biggest
changes is employees’ expectations and their relationship to their work. Managers, leaders,
and human resources professionals must be willing to give up traditional beliefs about the
role of motivation and factors that affect employee motivation if they are to deal effectively
with today’s workforce
References
Boucher, J. (n.d.). How to Love the Job You Hate. [Advance Praise for "Carrots and Sticks
Don’t Work"].
Note: The references provided are based on the information available and may require
additional details for complete APA formatting.