why_use_sources
why_use_sources
What constitutes a useful and reliable source will vary according to both your assignment and the
methods used in a particular field of study. As you approach a paper in an unfamiliar field, it will
be important to remember that within each field of study, scholars distinguish between primary
sources, or the raw material that they analyze as they attempt to answer a question, and
secondary sources, or the analyses of that raw material done by other scholars in the field. For
example, for literary scholars, primary sources include fiction and poetry, while secondary sources
include criticism written by other scholars about those literary texts. Historians, on the other
hand, grapple with primary sources such as letters, diaries, and eyewitness accounts produced at
the time of an event, as well as with secondary sources such as arguments presented by other
historians. Sociologists tend to rely for raw material on quantitative data, such as surveys,
censuses, and other statistics, or qualitative data, such as observation and interviews.
Social scientists in some fields, such as psychology and economics, also consider empirical journal
articles (articles that describe the results of original research) published in peer-reviewed journals
to be primary sources. These articles provide raw material for other scholars, who may then raise
questions about the published results or develop new research based on these results. Social
scientists in other fields, such as anthropology and history, however, do not consider research
articles primary sources because articles in these fields do not typically present raw data. For
these social scientists, journal articles would be secondary sources. For all social scientists,
literature reviews and published books are considered secondary sources.
As a college student taking courses in many different fields, you will need to ask questions about
what is considered a reliable source in each new field, and about how sources can be used
appropriately in that field. At the same time, there are many common principles for using
sources effectively that you will be able to carry with you from course to course. For more
information on using sources in different disciplines, you can consult the Harvard Writing
Project series of writing guides for specific courses and concentrations. If you are writing a paper
for a course in the Government department, you should consult GovWrites for guidance. If you
are writing for an anthropology course, you should consult AnthroWrites. If you are writing for a
course in one of the Life Sciences fields, you should consult ScienceWrites.
When you consider sources as you seek to answer a research question, you are engaging with the
work of scholars in your field and the work that they have written about. By doing so, you are
joining the ongoing conversation about ideas that your professors and TFs have introduced you
to in lecture and seminar, and that they themselves engage in as they conduct their own research
and do their own writing. If you think of your work as playing a part in this larger conversation,
it becomes easier to understand what you are doing with sources in your own writing: you are
responding to and building on the work that has come before your own.
As you consult sources, you should ask yourself questions about what a source adds to your
understanding of a topic and how it might be helpful to you as you write your own paper. For
example, a source might help you answer the question you've raised, or it might raise another
question for you that suggests a path for further research. A source might influence your thinking
about a particular topic or question, but it might also contradict your thinking, which would
require you to do more research to figure out how to understand this conflicting point of view.
The question you are trying to answer will determine the types of sources you consider within a
specific field, as will the scope of the paper you're writing. For example, if you are writing a close
reading paper about a poem, you will likely be expected to focus only on the poem itself. For
another assignment, you may be asked to consider how other critics have responded to that
poem, and so your sources would be articles by those critics. Similarly, if you are asked to analyze
an author’s argument about how to combat climate change, that argument may be your only
source—or you may consider that argument in relation to a larger context that includes historical
documents, arguments by other scholars, and other sources.
If you are asked to write a literature review paper for a psychology course, your sources will
include journal articles that report studies on your topic. If you were writing a senior thesis about
the same topic, , you would consider those articles, but you would probably also produce your
own raw data through interviews or other studies.
Just as the ideas you develop in a paper will be shaped by your response to the sources you
consider, the ideas presented by the scholars you read in your courses are built on their responses
to the sources they consulted. This is important to keep in mind as you begin the process of
writing papers and as you think about what it means to make an original claim. It's also
important to remember that your plans for a paper can—and should—be shaped by what you
encounter in a source. You may start out with one assumption and then end up shifting gears
when you read something that convincingly challenges that assumption. Or you may find that a
source raises a question that prompts you to revisit your original assumption.
For more information on the ways that sources function in a paper, and for advice about how to
make them work most effectively in your own paper, consult the section of this guide on
integrating sources.
The expectation that you will say something original in every college paper may seem daunting.
After all, how can you, an undergraduate who has been studying a particular subject for as little
as one semester, know enough to make an original contribution to a field that your professor may
have spent a career studying? Indeed, it would be impossible for you to come up with an idea for
every paper you write that no one has ever thought of before, and your instructors realize this.
When they ask you to come up with an original idea, they may be signaling different
expectations, depending on the context of the assignment. Below, you'll find a general
framework for thinking about originality in different situations you will encounter in college.
Here's the short answer to that question: There is real value in discovering an idea for yourself,
selecting the best evidence to support it, and taking the necessary steps to argue for it. Taking
these steps helps you learn both what you think about a topic or issue and how to think through
a problem or set of problems. This kind of thinking is necessary preparation for the longer
projects you'll do later in your college career when you will be expected to say something truly
original. It's impossible to tackle those projects—from a senior thesis to original lab research—if
you haven't had the experience of arriving at an idea, fleshing out an argument, and presenting it
to an audience. This preparation will serve you well as your college coursework becomes more
specialized, and it will also benefit you when you leave college. Whatever field you go into, you'll
find yourself in situations where your analysis of a particular problem—and your use of sources to
solve that problem—will be crucial to your success.
While the specifics of the assignments for short papers will vary, remember that whenever you're
asked to make a claim, you're expected to do your own thinking. In other words, writing a paper
about a claim that has been worked over in class, in section, or in your readings will not leave you
room to do much thinking of your own. Nor will writing a paper about a claim that will strike
your readers as obvious, simple, and unarguable. If you are interested in an idea that has come up
in class, or one that seems obvious, you should work on extending or complicating this idea, or
coming up with a counterargument that changes the way the idea should be considered. Also,
keep in mind that when your instructors tell you not to consult outside sources, they are often
doing so precisely to encourage your original thinking, and you should follow their instructions.
When an assignment specifies that you avoid outside sources, you should generally take this to
mean that you should not do any outside reading in preparation for the assignment.
The key to answering this question is to think carefully about the context of the course and to
decide what's reasonable for you to do given the scope of the assignment. For example, if you've
been asked to find five sources of your own, your paper will not be original enough if your
argument simply echoes one of these sources, or if it echoes a source that was assigned in class.
On the other hand, if you locate three sources, each of which offers different answers to the same
question, your paper will be original if you can make your own argument for which answer makes
the most sense and why.
Your argument will not, however, be original enough if you make the same argument as one of
the sources without acknowledging why that source makes the strongest argument. For example,
if you were writing about climate change and you were asked to read and consider an argument
for investing in nuclear energy and an argument against investing in nuclear energy, you might
agree with one of those arguments and present your argument for why it is the stronger idea. Or
you might decide that both arguments fall short. You might decide that you support or oppose
investing in nuclear energy for reasons other than those offered in the source’s argument. Or you
might decide that the argument opposing nuclear energy misses a key factor. The result of doing
your own thinking about the topic would be a paper that does not simply restate the position of
one of your sources but, rather, uses those sources to inform your own thinking. And the process
of writing that paper would have gotten you closer to figuring out what you think about the
topic. When you are doing research, it's always a good idea to check in with your instructor to
make sure that you are not overlooking important work in that field and that the sources you are
choosing are significant and appropriate for your project.
Even when you write these longer papers, it's still important to understand what it means to say
something original. Academic work is very specialized, and scholars build theories and ideas
based on the knowledge and ideas that they have studied. In practical terms, this means that
ideas evolve slowly, and every original idea doesn't have to be E=mc2 or Kierkegaard's "leap of
faith." While there's nothing wrong with hoping to discover a new element to add to the
periodic table or trying to figure out the true identity of Shakespeare, it's more likely that your
ideas will be original in any of the following ways.
You might discover, in your study of a particular topic, that no one has considered a question or
problem that interests you. Or you might bring new information or a new perspective to a
question that others have asked. For example, you might look at newly released government
documents to consider a question about how the Reagan administration shaped economic
policies. While the question may have been asked before, the newly available data will allow you
to provide a fresh, original perspective. Similarly, while many people have written about
Shakespeare’s plays, you might find that comparing a new production to a more traditional
version would bring you a fresh perspective on the play.
Sometimes collecting and analyzing your own data will provide an original take on a topic. For
example, if you were writing a senior thesis in a lab science or social science concentration, you
might collect and analyze your own data in pursuit of an answer to a question that other scholars
have attempted to answer before with different types of data. In psychology, for example, you
might conduct an experiment under the supervision of a professor and then analyze your data. In
a sociology or anthropology course, you might conduct a series of interviews and analyze them in
order to answer a question in a new way.
As appealing as it might seem to discover an entirely new idea, it's just as valuable to add a new
step or a new way of thinking to an idea that someone else has already presented. It's also
valuable—and original—to consider ideas in relation to each other that have not been considered
or connected to each other in this way before.
Whether you're working on a short assignment or a semester-long project, remember that even
in the context of all the thinking that has come before yours, you are always capable of bringing
your own unique point of view to a paper. In fact, you're doing your own thinking all the time,
long before you start writing—in class discussion, in the dining hall, and in your instructor's
office hours. When you bring sources into the equation, you're able to go beyond your gut
reactions and feelings ("capitalism is good" or “capitalism is bad”) to develop more nuanced ideas
("capitalism does a better job of creating incentives for innovation than other systems" or "a
capitalist society cannot protect the most vulnerable"). Sources also introduce you to competing
arguments and interpretations and help to lay the groundwork for your own thinking. When you
read what has already been written on a particular topic, or when you analyze data that has
already been produced in addition to new data, you become more qualified to contribute to the
conversation.
Many students tackling college-level writing for the first time find the expectations of college
writing new and difficult. There are resources to help you as you embark on your writing
assignments at Harvard, and you should feel free to make use of them. Writing Center tutors,
Departmental Writing Fellows, and House tutors are all excellent resources. The Harvard
Writing Project publishes a number of guides to writing in different fields, and the Writing
Center offers general writing resources in addition to individual conferences.
Before you can use sources effectively, you need to know how to locate them, how to know if
they are reliable, and how to distinguish clearly between the ideas in a source and your own ideas.
The information on this site provides an introduction to the research process, including how and
where to find sources, how to decide if a source is reliable and useful, how to use sources
accurately and effectively in your papers both to strengthen your own thinking and writing and to
avoid plagiarism, and finally, how to integrate source material into your writing and how to cite
sources responsibly.
Consider, for example, an essay that Aishani Aatresh wrote for her ESPP class, Technology,
Environment, and Society. In the paper, Aatresh tries to answer the question of why hydrogen-
powered vehicles have not been as successful as electric vehicles in the United States. While it
would have sounded most controversial to argue something like “hydrogen-powered vehicles will
always be too dangerous because hydrogen is so flammable,” or “hydrogen-powered vehicles are
inferior to electric vehicles in every way,” Aatresh’s research suggested that this type of statement
would oversimplify a complex situation. She ended up with a thesis that is still controversial in
the sense that readers may disagree with it, but one that does not depend on over-simplifying the
issues at stake.
With this thesis statement, Aatresh was able to use the evidence that she uncovered to take a
position on a controversial topic (alternative fuels) that was both nuanced and arguable.
Once you have done your research, you will need to write up your conclusions in the form of an
argument that the partner can use to make the case.
the attending physicians can readily see what evidence supports the working diagnosis, what
evidence does not, and what information is still missing.