0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

why_use_sources

The Harvard Guide to Using Sources outlines the importance of utilizing various types of sources for college writing, distinguishing between primary and secondary sources across different fields. It emphasizes the need for original thinking in writing assignments, encouraging students to engage with sources to develop their own arguments rather than merely summarizing existing ideas. The guide also provides context-specific advice for writing assignments, from short papers to extensive research projects, highlighting the evolving expectations for originality as students progress in their academic careers.

Uploaded by

Vincent Berry
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

why_use_sources

The Harvard Guide to Using Sources outlines the importance of utilizing various types of sources for college writing, distinguishing between primary and secondary sources across different fields. It emphasizes the need for original thinking in writing assignments, encouraging students to engage with sources to develop their own arguments rather than merely summarizing existing ideas. The guide also provides context-specific advice for writing assignments, from short papers to extensive research projects, highlighting the evolving expectations for originality as students progress in their academic careers.

Uploaded by

Vincent Berry
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Harvard Guide to Using Sources

Why Use Sources?


College writing assignments generally ask you to respond in some way to sources. Some
assignments will require you to consult only sources assigned in class, while others will require
you to locate your own sources relevant to a specific research topic. In many of your courses, your
research will focus primarily on written texts such as books and scholarly articles, but you may
also be asked to consult a variety of other sources, including letters, diaries, films, works of art,
data from experiments, numerical data, surveys, and transcripts of interviews.

What constitutes a useful and reliable source will vary according to both your assignment and the
methods used in a particular field of study. As you approach a paper in an unfamiliar field, it will
be important to remember that within each field of study, scholars distinguish between primary
sources, or the raw material that they analyze as they attempt to answer a question, and
secondary sources, or the analyses of that raw material done by other scholars in the field. For
example, for literary scholars, primary sources include fiction and poetry, while secondary sources
include criticism written by other scholars about those literary texts. Historians, on the other
hand, grapple with primary sources such as letters, diaries, and eyewitness accounts produced at
the time of an event, as well as with secondary sources such as arguments presented by other
historians. Sociologists tend to rely for raw material on quantitative data, such as surveys,
censuses, and other statistics, or qualitative data, such as observation and interviews.

Social scientists in some fields, such as psychology and economics, also consider empirical journal
articles (articles that describe the results of original research) published in peer-reviewed journals
to be primary sources. These articles provide raw material for other scholars, who may then raise
questions about the published results or develop new research based on these results. Social
scientists in other fields, such as anthropology and history, however, do not consider research
articles primary sources because articles in these fields do not typically present raw data. For
these social scientists, journal articles would be secondary sources. For all social scientists,
literature reviews and published books are considered secondary sources.

Natural scientists consider empirical articles published in peer-reviewed journals to be primary


sources. These published results of experiments and analyses of data provide the raw material for
other scientists to consider as they pursue their own research. Secondary sources in the natural
sciences include literature reviews and books.

As a college student taking courses in many different fields, you will need to ask questions about
what is considered a reliable source in each new field, and about how sources can be used
appropriately in that field. At the same time, there are many common principles for using
sources effectively that you will be able to carry with you from course to course. For more

Harvard College Writing Program


One Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 1
Harvard Guide to Using Sources

information on using sources in different disciplines, you can consult the Harvard Writing
Project series of writing guides for specific courses and concentrations. If you are writing a paper
for a course in the Government department, you should consult GovWrites for guidance. If you
are writing for an anthropology course, you should consult AnthroWrites. If you are writing for a
course in one of the Life Sciences fields, you should consult ScienceWrites.

When in doubt, of course, you should always consult your instructor.

Harvard College Writing Program


One Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 2
Harvard Guide to Using Sources

What Are You Supposed to Do with Sources?


No matter what sources you consult, it's important to understand what you're actually doing with
sources when you use them to write a paper. It’s also important to understand why writing papers
is such a significant component of your college education. While you may be asked to provide a
summary of other people's ideas for some assignments, most of your writing assignments at
Harvard will ask you to answer a question or series of questions—either posed by you or posed
for you by your instructor. Your answer to a question will generally come in the form of an
argument in which you make a claim, marshal evidence to support it, analyze that evidence, and
cogently explain to your readers why you have taken this position. The strongest arguments in
any field are those that don't simply repeat what has already been said, but instead survey the
relevant data, arguments, or documents—i.e., the sources—and, taking those sources into
account, offer an original response to the question.

When you consider sources as you seek to answer a research question, you are engaging with the
work of scholars in your field and the work that they have written about. By doing so, you are
joining the ongoing conversation about ideas that your professors and TFs have introduced you
to in lecture and seminar, and that they themselves engage in as they conduct their own research
and do their own writing. If you think of your work as playing a part in this larger conversation,
it becomes easier to understand what you are doing with sources in your own writing: you are
responding to and building on the work that has come before your own.

As you consult sources, you should ask yourself questions about what a source adds to your
understanding of a topic and how it might be helpful to you as you write your own paper. For
example, a source might help you answer the question you've raised, or it might raise another
question for you that suggests a path for further research. A source might influence your thinking
about a particular topic or question, but it might also contradict your thinking, which would
require you to do more research to figure out how to understand this conflicting point of view.

The question you are trying to answer will determine the types of sources you consider within a
specific field, as will the scope of the paper you're writing. For example, if you are writing a close
reading paper about a poem, you will likely be expected to focus only on the poem itself. For
another assignment, you may be asked to consider how other critics have responded to that
poem, and so your sources would be articles by those critics. Similarly, if you are asked to analyze
an author’s argument about how to combat climate change, that argument may be your only
source—or you may consider that argument in relation to a larger context that includes historical
documents, arguments by other scholars, and other sources.

If you are asked to write a literature review paper for a psychology course, your sources will
include journal articles that report studies on your topic. If you were writing a senior thesis about
the same topic, , you would consider those articles, but you would probably also produce your
own raw data through interviews or other studies.

Harvard College Writing Program


One Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 3
Harvard Guide to Using Sources

Just as the ideas you develop in a paper will be shaped by your response to the sources you
consider, the ideas presented by the scholars you read in your courses are built on their responses
to the sources they consulted. This is important to keep in mind as you begin the process of
writing papers and as you think about what it means to make an original claim. It's also
important to remember that your plans for a paper can—and should—be shaped by what you
encounter in a source. You may start out with one assumption and then end up shifting gears
when you read something that convincingly challenges that assumption. Or you may find that a
source raises a question that prompts you to revisit your original assumption.

For more information on the ways that sources function in a paper, and for advice about how to
make them work most effectively in your own paper, consult the section of this guide on
integrating sources.

Harvard College Writing Program


One Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 4
Harvard Guide to Using Sources

Writing "Original" Papers


Some of your writing assignments at Harvard will explicitly ask you to present an "original"
thesis, claim, or idea. But even when the word "original" isn't mentioned, you should assume that
your professor expects you to develop a thesis that is the product of your own thinking and not
something drawn directly from a source. Occasionally an assignment will require only a summary
of your reading, particularly if the instructor wants to make sure you have understood a
particularly complex concept; however, some assignments may be worded in a way that leaves
expectations ambiguous (you may be asked, for example, to "discuss" or "consider" a source), and
you may think you are only expected to summarize when, in fact, you are expected to make an
argument. When in doubt about whether you are supposed to make an argument in your paper,
always check with your instructor to make sure you understand what you're expected to do.

The expectation that you will say something original in every college paper may seem daunting.
After all, how can you, an undergraduate who has been studying a particular subject for as little
as one semester, know enough to make an original contribution to a field that your professor may
have spent a career studying? Indeed, it would be impossible for you to come up with an idea for
every paper you write that no one has ever thought of before, and your instructors realize this.
When they ask you to come up with an original idea, they may be signaling different
expectations, depending on the context of the assignment. Below, you'll find a general
framework for thinking about originality in different situations you will encounter in college.

Writing Situation #1: Short Non-Research Papers


In the context of certain assignments, it's enough to come up with a thesis that's original to
you—a thesis that you arrived at after thinking about the material you read, rather than an idea
you encountered in one of the assigned sources. This will be true for the papers you write in
Expos, as well as for many of the short papers you write in your Gen Ed and concentration
courses. For these papers, your instructor does not expect you to come up with an idea that no
one else has ever written about. Instead, your instructor is most interested in your thought
process, your analytical skills, and the way you explain why you think what you think. But why,
you may be wondering, would anyone bother writing a paper that presents an idea that other
scholars have written about already?

Here's the short answer to that question: There is real value in discovering an idea for yourself,
selecting the best evidence to support it, and taking the necessary steps to argue for it. Taking
these steps helps you learn both what you think about a topic or issue and how to think through
a problem or set of problems. This kind of thinking is necessary preparation for the longer
projects you'll do later in your college career when you will be expected to say something truly
original. It's impossible to tackle those projects—from a senior thesis to original lab research—if
you haven't had the experience of arriving at an idea, fleshing out an argument, and presenting it
to an audience. This preparation will serve you well as your college coursework becomes more

Harvard College Writing Program


One Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 5
Harvard Guide to Using Sources

specialized, and it will also benefit you when you leave college. Whatever field you go into, you'll
find yourself in situations where your analysis of a particular problem—and your use of sources to
solve that problem—will be crucial to your success.

While the specifics of the assignments for short papers will vary, remember that whenever you're
asked to make a claim, you're expected to do your own thinking. In other words, writing a paper
about a claim that has been worked over in class, in section, or in your readings will not leave you
room to do much thinking of your own. Nor will writing a paper about a claim that will strike
your readers as obvious, simple, and unarguable. If you are interested in an idea that has come up
in class, or one that seems obvious, you should work on extending or complicating this idea, or
coming up with a counterargument that changes the way the idea should be considered. Also,
keep in mind that when your instructors tell you not to consult outside sources, they are often
doing so precisely to encourage your original thinking, and you should follow their instructions.
When an assignment specifies that you avoid outside sources, you should generally take this to
mean that you should not do any outside reading in preparation for the assignment.

Writing Situation #2: Short Research Papers and Term Papers


When you are assigned a research paper or term paper for a course, you will often be asked to
write 10-20 pages in which you respond to sources you identify and locate yourself. As with the
shorter papers you write for your courses, you will generally not be expected to come up with an
idea that has never been considered before (although your instructors will certainly be pleased if
you do). So how will you know if your idea is original enough?

The key to answering this question is to think carefully about the context of the course and to
decide what's reasonable for you to do given the scope of the assignment. For example, if you've
been asked to find five sources of your own, your paper will not be original enough if your
argument simply echoes one of these sources, or if it echoes a source that was assigned in class.
On the other hand, if you locate three sources, each of which offers different answers to the same
question, your paper will be original if you can make your own argument for which answer makes
the most sense and why.

Your argument will not, however, be original enough if you make the same argument as one of
the sources without acknowledging why that source makes the strongest argument. For example,
if you were writing about climate change and you were asked to read and consider an argument
for investing in nuclear energy and an argument against investing in nuclear energy, you might
agree with one of those arguments and present your argument for why it is the stronger idea. Or
you might decide that both arguments fall short. You might decide that you support or oppose
investing in nuclear energy for reasons other than those offered in the source’s argument. Or you
might decide that the argument opposing nuclear energy misses a key factor. The result of doing
your own thinking about the topic would be a paper that does not simply restate the position of
one of your sources but, rather, uses those sources to inform your own thinking. And the process

Harvard College Writing Program


One Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 6
Harvard Guide to Using Sources

of writing that paper would have gotten you closer to figuring out what you think about the
topic. When you are doing research, it's always a good idea to check in with your instructor to
make sure that you are not overlooking important work in that field and that the sources you are
choosing are significant and appropriate for your project.

Writing Situation #3: The Junior Tutorial and Senior Thesis


When you write a substantial piece of work that takes a semester or more (like a junior tutorial
paper or a senior thesis), the expectations for originality are different because of the length of the
essay you'll write and because of your level of expertise in the field. As you gain experience in
your concentration, your knowledge of the major ideas in your chosen field will expand, you will
develop your ability to ask more rigorous questions in that field, and you will be able to answer
those questions in ways that are original not just to you but to your readers. At this point in your
college career, you'll have had the opportunity to learn who the major thinkers are in your field
and how to identify the important literature on what research has taken place on your topic.
You'll be able to find the most important current scholarship on a topic or the most recent
findings related to your research question. Your expertise, along with the time you'll have to
devote to the project, means that you will be well-equipped to say something original about your
topic.

Even when you write these longer papers, it's still important to understand what it means to say
something original. Academic work is very specialized, and scholars build theories and ideas
based on the knowledge and ideas that they have studied. In practical terms, this means that
ideas evolve slowly, and every original idea doesn't have to be E=mc2 or Kierkegaard's "leap of
faith." While there's nothing wrong with hoping to discover a new element to add to the
periodic table or trying to figure out the true identity of Shakespeare, it's more likely that your
ideas will be original in any of the following ways.

You might discover, in your study of a particular topic, that no one has considered a question or
problem that interests you. Or you might bring new information or a new perspective to a
question that others have asked. For example, you might look at newly released government
documents to consider a question about how the Reagan administration shaped economic
policies. While the question may have been asked before, the newly available data will allow you
to provide a fresh, original perspective. Similarly, while many people have written about
Shakespeare’s plays, you might find that comparing a new production to a more traditional
version would bring you a fresh perspective on the play.

Sometimes collecting and analyzing your own data will provide an original take on a topic. For
example, if you were writing a senior thesis in a lab science or social science concentration, you
might collect and analyze your own data in pursuit of an answer to a question that other scholars
have attempted to answer before with different types of data. In psychology, for example, you
might conduct an experiment under the supervision of a professor and then analyze your data. In

Harvard College Writing Program


One Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 7
Harvard Guide to Using Sources

a sociology or anthropology course, you might conduct a series of interviews and analyze them in
order to answer a question in a new way.

As appealing as it might seem to discover an entirely new idea, it's just as valuable to add a new
step or a new way of thinking to an idea that someone else has already presented. It's also
valuable—and original—to consider ideas in relation to each other that have not been considered
or connected to each other in this way before.

Whether you're working on a short assignment or a semester-long project, remember that even
in the context of all the thinking that has come before yours, you are always capable of bringing
your own unique point of view to a paper. In fact, you're doing your own thinking all the time,
long before you start writing—in class discussion, in the dining hall, and in your instructor's
office hours. When you bring sources into the equation, you're able to go beyond your gut
reactions and feelings ("capitalism is good" or “capitalism is bad”) to develop more nuanced ideas
("capitalism does a better job of creating incentives for innovation than other systems" or "a
capitalist society cannot protect the most vulnerable"). Sources also introduce you to competing
arguments and interpretations and help to lay the groundwork for your own thinking. When you
read what has already been written on a particular topic, or when you analyze data that has
already been produced in addition to new data, you become more qualified to contribute to the
conversation.

Many students tackling college-level writing for the first time find the expectations of college
writing new and difficult. There are resources to help you as you embark on your writing
assignments at Harvard, and you should feel free to make use of them. Writing Center tutors,
Departmental Writing Fellows, and House tutors are all excellent resources. The Harvard
Writing Project publishes a number of guides to writing in different fields, and the Writing
Center offers general writing resources in addition to individual conferences.

Before you can use sources effectively, you need to know how to locate them, how to know if
they are reliable, and how to distinguish clearly between the ideas in a source and your own ideas.
The information on this site provides an introduction to the research process, including how and
where to find sources, how to decide if a source is reliable and useful, how to use sources
accurately and effectively in your papers both to strengthen your own thinking and writing and to
avoid plagiarism, and finally, how to integrate source material into your writing and how to cite
sources responsibly.

What Does It Mean to Be Controversial?


Most of your college writing assignments will instruct you to take a position or to make an
argument. While it's important to learn how to weigh the evidence and draw conclusions that
may be different from those of other scholars, it's also important to remember that in academic
writing, the most controversial position isn't necessarily the strongest one to take. It might be

Harvard College Writing Program


One Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 8
Harvard Guide to Using Sources

tempting to manufacture a controversial argument by over-generalizing or caricaturing the ideas


you oppose, but ultimately this kind of argument will be neither convincing nor interesting. Any
argument you make should be the result of careful thought, and it should follow from a fair
reading of the evidence available to you.

Consider, for example, an essay that Aishani Aatresh wrote for her ESPP class, Technology,
Environment, and Society. In the paper, Aatresh tries to answer the question of why hydrogen-
powered vehicles have not been as successful as electric vehicles in the United States. While it
would have sounded most controversial to argue something like “hydrogen-powered vehicles will
always be too dangerous because hydrogen is so flammable,” or “hydrogen-powered vehicles are
inferior to electric vehicles in every way,” Aatresh’s research suggested that this type of statement
would oversimplify a complex situation. She ended up with a thesis that is still controversial in
the sense that readers may disagree with it, but one that does not depend on over-simplifying the
issues at stake.

Here is the thesis statement she drafted:

Instead of being a contest of modes of sustainability or “superior” technology, FCEVs


largely fit into familiar modes of movement while EVs represent elite, material, and
innovative “progress” and thus are differentially situated in American society based on
how these visions relate to the idea of independence.

With this thesis statement, Aatresh was able to use the evidence that she uncovered to take a
position on a controversial topic (alternative fuels) that was both nuanced and arguable.

Harvard College Writing Program


One Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 9
Harvard Guide to Using Sources

Using Sources Beyond Harvard


Writing in Business—by Vaughn Tan '05, '14 PhD
An organization often needs to develop plans or strategies for action and to persuade people both
inside and outside the organization that these plans will lead to success. The job of developing
and explaining pieces of an organization's strategy frequently falls to its employees. As someone
tasked with developing a strategy (say, for a new product line), you may need to consult sources
such as industry reports, economic indicators from federal sources, and internal analysis
documents. You'll then have to make a persuasive case about the proposed strategy so that
decision-makers adopt it. To do this effectively, you may need to draw on sources such as
analyses of previous product launches, news reports of competitors' activities, financial reports,
and projections.

Writing in Law—by Nora Flum '07, HLS '11


As a new associate at a law firm, you will likely be asked to determine if the law supports your
client's position. To do this, you will begin to research cases, looking for precedents and
analyzing them for fact patterns that can be analogized to your situation. You will also look for
legal doctrines and patterns of logic that can be imported into your argument to organize the
structure of your propositions. You might also conduct a historical analysis, researching the
legislative history to understand why a particular law was passed and how the historical
perspective should impact its current application. Additionally, you could look through law
reviews and academic journals for broad theoretical perspectives that inform the way you
approach the problem.

Once you have done your research, you will need to write up your conclusions in the form of an
argument that the partner can use to make the case.

Writing in Medicine—by Alon Geva '05, HMS '10


As a medical student, you are asked on a regular basis to write admission notes and discharge
notes about patients. At first, you may find yourself transcribing every piece of information you
learn from the patient, no matter how disjointed, along with every other bit of available data
from other physicians and from laboratory results. After your first few attempts, you may be told
that your notes are muddled, disjointed, and difficult to follow. When you begin to think of your
task as one of analyzing available sources and distilling the most salient details from each, your
notes will take shape, and you will be able to present a clear thought process to the other doctors
involved in a patient's care. Your notes then become an argument for what those doctors should
consider as they make a diagnosis, and you are contributing to the patient's care by ensuring that

Harvard College Writing Program


One Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 10
Harvard Guide to Using Sources

the attending physicians can readily see what evidence supports the working diagnosis, what
evidence does not, and what information is still missing.

Harvard College Writing Program


One Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 11

You might also like