Contract_of_Indemnity_Assignment
Contract_of_Indemnity_Assignment
1. Introduction
In today's era of complex commercial transactions, legal protection against unforeseen risks and losses is
essential. One of the most important legal instruments that serves this purpose is a contract of indemnity. A
contract of indemnity is widely used in areas such as insurance, agency relationships, and financial guarantees.
Its main purpose is to safeguard a party against losses or damages caused by certain defined events or actions.
In India, contracts of indemnity are governed by the Indian Contract Act, 1872, particularly under Section 124.
This assignment provides a detailed overview of the nature, essentials, rights, and liabilities related to
indemnity contracts, supported with relevant case laws and legal interpretations.
Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines a contract of indemnity as:
"A contract by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused to him by the conduct of the
The nature of indemnity contracts can be understood through the following features:
For example, in insurance contracts, the insurer indemnifies the insured for losses arising from events like fire,
theft, or accident.
Just like other contracts, an indemnity contract must satisfy the general conditions of a valid contract under the
2. The promise must relate to saving the other from a specific kind of loss.
In the case of Gajanan Moreshwar v. Moreshwar Madan, the Bombay High Court held that an indemnity
contract can be enforced even before actual loss occurs if liability has become certain.
Section 125 of the Indian Contract Act provides the indemnity-holder with certain rights:
1. The right to recover all damages which he may be compelled to pay in a suit.
2. The right to recover all costs lawfully incurred in defending the suit.
3. The right to recover all sums paid under a compromise, if made in good faith.
The indemnifier must compensate the indemnity-holder when loss is incurred under the terms of the contract.
He must:
In Adamson v. Jarvis, the court held that when an agent acted on the instructions of the principal and suffered
- Contract of Insurance
- Contract of Agency
---------------------|----------|-----------
Number of Parties | Two (Indemnifier and Indemnified) | Three (Creditor, Principal Debtor, Surety)
1. Gajanan Moreshwar v. Moreshwar Madan (AIR 1942 Bom 302) - held that indemnity can be enforced even
2. Adamson v. Jarvis (1827) 4 Bing. 66 - agent entitled to indemnity for losses suffered while acting on
principal's instructions.
3. Osman Jamal & Sons Ltd. v. Gopal Purshottam - clarified that indemnity can be implied through conduct.
10. Conclusion
The contract of indemnity plays a vital role in commercial transactions by ensuring protection against
unforeseen losses. It builds confidence between parties by shifting the burden of risk. Indian courts have
contributed significantly in interpreting the provisions of indemnity to suit modern commercial needs.
Understanding its nature, rights and duties, and differences from other contracts like guarantee is essential for
legal and business professionals. The flexibility and enforceability of indemnity contracts make them
indispensable in today's legal and financial system.
11. Footnotes
4. Avtar Singh, Law of Contract and Specific Relief, Eastern Book Company
9. Osman Jamal & Sons Ltd. v. Gopal Purshottam (1928) ILR 56 Cal 262
12. Bibliography
- www.indiankanoon.org