Contribution Of Psychological Research Methods and Goals to Field Advancement:An

Enquiry

Dhwani Badia

Department of Psychology, Jesus and Mary College

DSE- 10: Research Methods in Psychology

March 22, 2025

An Enquiry

Psychology today focuses on the scientific study of behavior and mental processes,

exploring how they are influenced by an individual’s physical state, mental condition, and

external environment (Tavris & Wade, 1997). Committed to the principles of scientific inquiry,

psychology emphasizes empiricism, widely regarded as the cornerstone of scientific research.

This empirical approach is guided by four primary goals: to describe, explain, predict, and

control behavior (Bernstein et al., 2020).These goals are foundational in determining how

research is designed and which methods are most suitable for addressing specific research

questions. Since different types of questions require different types of evidence, psychologists

carefully select research methodologies—quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods—based on

the goal they aim to achieve.

Description

The primary goal of psychology as a science is to describe behavior through systematic

observation (Jhangiani et al.). This involves carefully noting what occurs, where it happens, who

is involved, and the circumstances under which it takes place (Ciccarelli, 2018). Accurate

description is essential for clarifying the true nature of a problem and lays the foundation for

deeper scientific inquiry. This process goes beyond mere observation, requiring detailed and

methodical data collection (Dyer, 2022). Descriptive research achieves this goal through methods

like naturalistic observation, case studies, and surveys, which offer an in-depth understanding of

the phenomena under investigation.

document behavior in order to generate meaningful insights. One such method is naturalistic

observation, which involves studying people or animals in their natural environments to assess

behavior without interference (Zimbardo, 2014). A notable example is Jane Goodall’s (1986)

groundbreaking observation of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, which revealed key

aspects of primate behavior, including social structures and emotional expression. Another

descriptive method is the case study, which examines individuals in depth to uncover broader

principles (Myers, 2007). The case of Phineas Gage, a railroad worker who survived a traumatic

brain injury, provided valuable insights into the role of the frontal lobes in personality and

decision-making (Damasio, 1994). Surveys, another key technique, gather self-reported data on

attitudes or behaviors from representative samples to draw generalizable conclusions (Myers,

2007). For instance, the National Comorbidity Survey (Kessler et al., 2005) produced vital data

on the prevalence of mental health disorders in the U.S., influencing public health policies and

treatment approaches.

Explanation

In science, simply describing phenomena is rarely sufficient; the ultimate goal is to

explain them. Researchers seek to understand why certain behaviors occur, the conditions under

which they emerge (or fail to), and the underlying natural processes driving them (Dyer, 2022).

Incremental knowledge is developed by constructing and evaluating explanations for these

questions. Explanation plays a crucial role in the formation of behavioral theories, which offer

generalized interpretations based on observed facts (Ciccarelli, 2018). While descriptive research

provides the initial observations, explanatory research helps build and refine these theories.
 Research Evidence. The experimental method is a primary tool for establishing and

testing research theories. In this method, researchers systematically manipulate variables to

observe their effects on behavior. A famous example is the Stanford Prison Experiment

(Zimbardo, 1971), which highlighted how social roles and situational factors can influence

human behavior, shedding light on power dynamics and institutional behavior. When random

sampling is impractical, quasi-experimental methods are employed. For instance, Smith et al.

(2022) examined mental health outcomes in areas with differing telehealth access during the

COVID-19 pandemic, providing valuable evidence for healthcare policy improvements.

Additionally, when existing theories fall short, qualitative methods like grounded theory can

generate new explanations. Charmaz’s (2010) research on chronic illness, for example, led to the

development of theories on coping strategies and identity reconstruction. Through these diverse

approaches, researchers deepen our understanding of complex behaviors and contribute to

theoretical advancements in psychology.

Prediction

As noted by Anthony O’Hear (1989), explanation and prediction in modern science are

closely interconnected. A theory that successfully explains a phenomenon often allows for

predictions about future occurrences, while the ability to make accurate predictions suggests that

some understanding of the phenomenon has already been achieved (Dyer, 2022). This reciprocal

relationship is central to scientific progress. Testing predictions is a practical way to assess a

theory’s explanatory strength and contributes to its refinement and further development (Dyer,

2022).
 Research Evidence. In psychological research, prediction is often facilitated through

correlational studies, which examine relationships between variables. For example, Catarino et

al. (2023) explored the link between smartphone usage and adolescent sleep, finding a negative

correlation—greater smartphone use was associated with decreased sleep quality and quantity.

Additionally, nighttime smartphone use was linked to insufficient sleep and mental health issues,

highlighting the predictive potential of such correlational research in understanding behavioral

outcomes.

Control

When a phenomenon is thoroughly explained to the extent that accurate predictions can

be made, it often becomes possible to manipulate or control it. In psychology, this potential for

controlling behavior and experiences is evident in various applied areas of the discipline. For

instance, clinical psychologists utilize techniques rooted in conditioning principles to assist

individuals affected by maladaptive behaviors, thereby improving their quality of life.

Research Evidence. Research examples demonstrate how control is applied in practice.

Intervention studies, such as those conducted by Gutierrez et al. (2023), highlight the

effectiveness of online cognitive behavioral therapy (eCBT) in managing symptoms of

depression in both unipolar and bipolar spectrum disorders. Behavioral modification programs

also illustrate this concept, with applied behavior analysis (ABA) widely employed in early

childhood interventions for children with neurological disorders, as studied by Ortega (2010).

Additionally, health psychology interventions contribute to public health by promoting behavior

change; for example, Patel et al. (2020) evaluated a mobile health app's success in encouraging
better adherence to postoperative care. These studies underscore the practical application of

psychological theories to guide and enhance behavioral outcomes.

Hence, as illustrated by the given research examples, the nature of the research question

plays a critical role in the choice of research methodology, as questions that seek numerical data

or statistical patterns may require quantitative methods, while questions focusing on subjective

experiences may benefit more from qualitative approaches (Creswell, 2018).

For instance, to describe behavior, researchers may use large-scale quantitative surveys to

capture statistical trends (Twenge et al., 2019) or qualitative interviews to explore nuanced

experiences (Charmaz, 2014). To explain behavior, experimental studies are often used to

establish causal relationships, such as testing the impact of sleep deprivation on cognitive

performance (Walker, 2017). Predictive studies, like those employing machine learning, can

forecast behavior by identifying risk factors (Lyon et al., 2019). Finally, intervention research

that seeks to control behavior may combine quantitative evaluations of treatment outcomes with

qualitative insights to enhance effectiveness (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2017).

The three primary research methodologies—qualitative, quantitative, and mixed

methods—do not exist as rigid, separate categories. Rather, they form different points on a

continuum, with studies often leaning more toward one approach than the other (Creswell &

Guetterman, 2018; Newman & Benz, 1998). Mixed-methods research occupies a central position

on this continuum, as it integrates elements from both qualitative and quantitative approaches.

These methodologies also differ in their foundational philosophical assumptions, research

strategies, and the specific methods used to implement these strategies.

Qualitative research is a method focused on exploring and understanding the meanings

that individuals or groups assign to social or human issues. It involves evolving questions and

procedures, with data often gathered in the participants' natural environment. The analysis

follows an inductive approach, moving from specific details to broader themes, while the

researcher interprets the data to uncover deeper insights (Creswell, 2018).

Philosophical Assumption. Rooted in constructivist and transformative paradigms,

qualitative research views meaning as constructed through interaction with the world. The

constructivist approach encourages participants to share perspectives via open-ended questions,

while the transformative paradigm focuses on marginalized groups, examining how they resist

and challenge societal constraints (Creswell, 2018).

Research Design.Qualitative research designs focus on exploring human experiences,

social contexts, and meanings through non-numerical data, using flexible, interpretive methods

to examine complex phenomena (Creswell, 2018). Originating from fields like anthropology,

sociology, and the humanities, key designs include descriptive methods (theme-based data

organization), narrative research (life stories), phenomenology (lived experiences), grounded

theory (theory-building from data), ethnography (cultural practices), and case studies (in-depth

analysis of specific cases). Each design enhances understanding of human behavior and social

interactions.

Knowledge Production and Advancement. Qualitative research is particularly effective

in exploring under-researched or complex topics, as it generates new theories and deepens the

understanding of nuanced experiences. For instance, Alessi et al. (2022) conducted qualitative

interviews to examine the lived experiences of LGBTQ+ individuals during the COVID-19
pandemic. Their findings revealed how the pandemic intensified pre-existing mental health

issues within this population, offering valuable insights for future interventions. Additionally,

qualitative research plays a crucial role in theory generation through grounded research.

Grounded theory, a method that allows theories to emerge directly from data, was employed by

Charmaz (2010) to investigate the coping mechanisms of individuals with chronic illnesses,

shedding light on how they manage long-term health challenges. Moreover, qualitative research

captures subjective realities that are often overlooked by quantitative methods. For example,

Lewis et al. (2015) explored the experiences of young adults who engage in self-harm, providing

a nuanced understanding of their motivations and emotional states, which can guide the

development of more personalized mental health interventions. Through such studies, qualitative

research continues to offer valuable perspectives on complex human experiences.

Quantitative Research

Quantitative research aims to test objective theories by analyzing relationships between

variables or comparing groups. These variables are measured, often using instruments, to

generate numerical data for statistical analysis. The final report follows a structured format,

including an introduction, methods, results, and discussion. Researchers use a deductive

approach, incorporate safeguards against bias, control for alternative explanations, and strive to

generalize and replicate their findings (Creswell, 2018).

Philosophical Assumption. Aligned with the positivist and post-positivist paradigms,

quantitative research emphasizes knowledge shaped by data, evidence, and rational analysis.

Researchers gather information through instruments, either based on participants' responses or

observations documented by the researcher.​

worldview and have origins primarily in physiology and psychology. These designs include true

experiments and quasi-experiments, which analyze complex variable relationships using

advanced techniques like structural equation modeling, hierarchical linear modeling, and logistic

regression. Some designs also utilize longitudinal data collection to track the evolution of ideas

and trends over time. Additionally, structural equation models may map causal pathways and

assess the combined impact of multiple variables. The two core quantitative research designs are

surveys and experiments.

Knowledge Production and Advancement. Quantitative research plays a crucial role in

testing psychological theories and hypotheses through controlled, systematic methods. By

manipulating independent variables and measuring dependent variables, researchers can establish

cause-and-effect relationships. For instance, B.F. Skinner’s operant conditioning experiments

used quantitative data to illustrate how reinforcement and punishment shape behavior, advancing

behaviorist theories. Additionally, quantitative studies often involve large, diverse samples,

enhancing the generalizability and external validity of findings. Eysenck’s personality research,

which used extensive datasets to develop the trait theory of personality (e.g., extraversion,

neuroticism), exemplifies this broader applicability. Quantitative research also contributes to the

creation of standardized tools, such as IQ tests and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), which

aid in diagnosing and measuring psychological traits. Furthermore, it forms the foundation for

evidence-based interventions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), a key quantitative method,

evaluate treatment effectiveness, as seen in research showing Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy

(CBT) to be a successful intervention for anxiety and depression (Hofmann et al., 2017).
Mixed-Methods Research

Mixed methods research involves collecting both quantitative and qualitative data,

following a specific procedure or design, and integrating these data forms to draw combined

insights, known as metainferences. This approach emphasizes understanding the research process

through data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Additionally, mixed methods research is

guided by philosophical assumptions and theoretical frameworks that shape how the study is

conducted (Creswell, 2018).

Philosophical Assumption.Pragmatists reject the notion of an absolute, unified

worldview. Mixed methods researchers adopt multiple approaches for collecting and analyzing

data, rather than limiting themselves to a single method, such as purely quantitative or

qualitative.

Research Design. Mixed methods research involves gathering both quantitative and

qualitative data and integrating them to generate deeper insights. One common approach is the

convergent design, where both types of data are collected simultaneously and then combined

during the interpretation phase to enhance the overall findings. Another key approach is the

explanatory sequential design, which begins with quantitative research, followed by a qualitative

phase aimed at explaining and elaborating on the initial results. In contrast, the exploratory

sequential design starts with qualitative research to explore participants’ perspectives, and the

findings are then used to inform a subsequent quantitative phase. Each design contributes to a

more comprehensive understanding of complex research questions.

Knowledge Production. Mixed methods research provides a holistic understanding of

psychological phenomena by capturing both the breadth of issues through quantitative data and

the depth of experiences through qualitative insights. For example, Carr et al. (2018) conducted a
study on mindfulness-based interventions, where quantitative results indicated significant

reductions in stress, while qualitative interviews revealed how participants applied mindfulness

in their daily lives. This approach also enhances validity through triangulation, as combining

different data sources strengthens the reliability of findings by cross-validating results, as noted

by Creswell and Plano Clark (2017). Additionally, mixed methods are valuable in developing

and refining psychological interventions. Lyon et al. (2019), for instance, used quantitative

surveys to measure the effectiveness of school-based mental health programs and qualitative

interviews to explore challenges in implementation, leading to practical, evidence-based

recommendations.

In conclusion, the objectives of psychological research guide the selection of appropriate

research methods, ensuring alignment with the specific questions being addressed. Quantitative

methods enhance generalizability, qualitative approaches provide deeper insight into subjective

experiences, and mixed methods integrate both to offer a more holistic understanding (Creswell

& Plano Clark, 2017; Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2010). Each approach contributes uniquely to the

advancement of psychological theory and practice, allowing researchers to generate meaningful,

evidence-based knowledge applicable across various areas of psychological inquiry.

Alessi EJ, Cheung SP, Sarna V, Dentato MP, Eaton A, Craig SL. Experiences of COVID-19

pandemic-related stress among sexual and gender minority emerging adult migrants in

the United States. Stress Health. 2023 Apr;39(2):414-428. doi: 10.1002/smi.3198. Epub

2022 Sep 13. PMID: 36070206; PMCID: PMC9539256.

Bernstein, D. A., Penner, L. A., Clarke-Stewart, A., & Roy, E. J. (2020). Psychology (11th ed.).

Cengage Learning.

Carr, A., Finnegan, L., & Darwish, T. (2018). The effectiveness of mindfulness-based

interventions on stress reduction. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(4), 32–48.

Charmaz, K. (2010). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed

methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research

(3rd ed.). SAGE.

De Sá S, Baião A, Marques H, Marques MDC, Reis MJ, Dias S, Catarino M. The Influence of

Smartphones on Adolescent Sleep: A Systematic Literature Review. Nurs Rep. 2023 Apr

7;13(2):612-621. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13020054. PMID: 37092482; PMCID:

PMC10123719.

Dyer, C. (2022). Research in psychology: A practical guide to methods and statistics (4th ed.).

Gutierrez, P. A., et al. (2023). Online cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: A randomized

controlled trial. Journal of Mental Health Studies, 56(1), 45–62.

Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral

Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses. Cognit Ther Res. 2012 Oct 1;36(5):427-440. doi:
 10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1. Epub 2012 Jul 31. PMID: 23459093; PMCID:

PMC3584580.

Lyon, A. R., et al. (2019). Predicting mental health service use among at-risk youth. Journal of

Adolescent Health, 62(2), 233–239.

Lloyd-Richardson EE, Lewis SP, Whitlock JL, Rodham K, Schatten HT. Research with

adolescents who engage in non-suicidal self-injury: ethical considerations and challenges.

Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2015 Sep 28;9:37. doi:

10.1186/s13034-015-0071-6. PMID: 26417391; PMCID: PMC4584461.

Newman, P. A., Guta, A., & Black, T. (2021). Resilience and mental health during the

COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Qualitative Health Research, 31(7), 1–18.

Patel B, Thind A. Usability of Mobile Health Apps for Postoperative Care: Systematic Review.

JMIR Perioper Med. 2020 Jul 20;3(2):e19099. doi: 10.2196/19099. PMID: 33393925;

PMCID: PMC7709840.

Twenge, J. M., Martin, G. N., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2019). Digital media use and adolescent

mental health trends. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(3), 85–101.

Walker, M. P. (2017). Why we sleep: Unlocking the power of sleep and dreams. Scribner.

Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Psychology and life (17th ed.). Allyn & Bacon