Site eval
Site eval
10
Vulnerabilities to Natural Hazard
Site shall be Site is less 5 Site is less 5 Site is within the 2
free of any susceptible to flood, (10%) susceptible to flood, (10%) active fault line and (4%)
potential landslides but is landslides but is is very highly
damage injury 1km from the fault 1km from the fault susceptible in
from natural line line landslides
hazards 10
Site Drainage
Site must
have definite
drainage with Site has proper 5 Site has proper 5 Site has proper 5
no drainage (10%) drainage (10%) drainage (10%)
unnecessary
water coming 10
from the
adjacent
properties
Topography
Site must have The site has 5 The site has very 5 The site has has 1
0-5% or very relatively (10%) relatively flat slope (10%) steep sloping (2%)
relatively flat 10 flat slope
slope
Site Drainage
Site must have Site has proper 5 Site has proper 5 Site has proper 5
definite drainage (10% drainage (10%) drainage (10%)
drainage with )
no
unnecessary
water coming 10
from the
adjacent
properties
Climate
Site shall have The site has fair 4 The site has fair 4 The site has 4
good climate climate and (8%) climate and weather (8%) fair climate and (8%)
and weather weather conditions weather
condition conditions conditions
10
Orientation and Views
Site must have The site has The site has natural a The site is at
good natural view of 4 partial view of a 4 the river and 2
orientation the good scenary (4%) natural scenary and (4%) doesn’t had a (2%)
scenic and mountains of Antipolo natural scenic
natural view 5 view
Future Expansion Plan
Site may have The site is enough 3 The site has enough 4 Some variance 4
a larger area for the facility and (3%) area for additional (4%) are approved (4%)
for additional no extra lot for the amenities for property for the future
amenities for future expansion development expansion
the property
development 10
Total 100% SITE A 55% SITE B 56% SITE C 47%
Land Cost
Site is at Site Area is 3.20 Site area is at 5.66 Site Area has 5.20
reasonable hectares and land 3 hectares and land hectares and land
value cost is 6,855 000 (26%) cost is 18, 022, 000 2 cost is 9, 722,750 2
million millioin (17%) million (17%)
35
Adjacent Land Use
Site should be The site is near The site is near The site is near
perfectly subdivision and 4 subdivision and 4 subdivision and 5
related with the adjacent to other (16%) adjacent to other (16%) adjacent to other (20%)
adjacent land commercial and commercial and commercial and
use and residential residential buildings. residential buildings.
surrounding 20 buildings. The site The site is The site is
context such is approximately approximately 500 approximately 900
as healthcare 500 meters away meters away from meters away from
facilities, from the barangay the barangay hall the barangay hall
barangay, hall and 280 and 280 meters and 1 kilometers
police station meters away from away from the police away from the police
and so on. the police station station station
TOTAL 100 % Site A. 37% Site B. 34% Site C. 35%
Socio- Economic Cultural Factors
Description Issues and Compliance
or
Parameters % Site A. (Dalig Site B. (San Jose Site C. (San Jose
Antipolo) Antipolo) Antipolo)
Rate Rate Rate
Site Potential
Site shall The lot is open for The lot is open for all The lot is open for all
open for all all possible users possible users to possible users to
possible to offer healthcare offer healthcare offer healthcare
users and to treatments treatments treatments
offer
healthcare Also to give 5 5 5
servces to oppurtunities for
25 the professionals (25%) (25%) (25%)
affected
barangays
and other
nearby sites
Must be within Urban Areas
Site shall be The site is within The site is within an The site is a
in an area an urbanized area urbanized area and progressive
where people and serves as the serves as the center urbanized area
have no center of the place 3 of the place 3 5
direct access
to heathcare (12%) (12%) (25%)
services 25
Site shall The site can have The site can have The site does not
have pedestrian access pedestrian access to have a good traffic
pedestrian to be constructed 5 be constructed 4 system since it is 2
access and and has two way (25%) (20%) near to intersection (10%)
traffic control path for lanes and no good
system transportation and traffic signs and
25 has traffic signs system
Average Percentage and Description of Evaluated Factors from the Three Potential Sites
SITES
SITE Site A. (Dalig Antipolo) Site B. (San Jose Site C. (San Jose
FACTORS Antipolo) Antipolo)
% % %
Natural Environmental 55% 56% 47%
and Physical Factors
Legal Administrative and 37% 34% 35%
Aesthetic Factors
Socio-Economic and 43% 43% 16%
Cultural Factors
Average Percentage 45% 44.33% 32.67%
and Description (Highly Feasible) (Highly Feasible) Feasible