The Second Coming
The Second Coming
Commentary
Because of its stunning, violent imagery and terrifying ritualistic language, “The
Second Coming” is one of Yeats’s most famous and most anthologized poems;
it is also one of the most thematically obscure and difficult to understand. (It is
safe to say that very few people who love this poem could paraphrase its
meaning to satisfaction.) Structurally, the poem is quite simple—the first stanza
describes the conditions present in the world (things falling apart, anarchy, etc.),
and the second surmises from those conditions that a monstrous Second Coming
is about to take place, not of the Jesus we first knew, but of a new messiah, a
“rough beast,” the slouching sphinx rousing itself in the desert and lumbering
toward Bethlehem. This brief exposition, though intriguingly blasphemous, is
not terribly complicated; but the question of what it should signify to a reader is
another story entirely.
Yeats spent years crafting an elaborate, mystical theory of the universe that he
described in his book A Vision. This theory issued in part from Yeats’s lifelong
fascination with the occult and mystical, and in part from the sense of
responsibility Yeats felt to order his experience within a structured belief
system. The system is extremely complicated and not of any lasting importance
—except for the effect that it had on his poetry, which is of extraordinary
lasting importance. The theory of history Yeats articulated in A Vision centers
on a diagram made of two conical spirals, one inside the other, so that the
widest part of one of the spirals rings around the narrowest part of the other
spiral, and vice versa. Yeats believed that this image (he called the spirals
“gyres”) captured the contrary motions inherent within the historical process,
and he divided each gyre into specific regions that represented particular kinds
of historical periods (and could also represent the psychological phases of an
individual’s development).
“The Second Coming” was intended by Yeats to describe the current historical
moment (the poem appeared in 1921) in terms of these gyres. Yeats believed
that the world was on the threshold of an apocalyptic revelation, as history
reached the end of the outer gyre (to speak roughly) and began moving along
the inner gyre. In his definitive edition of Yeats’s poems, Richard J. Finneran
quotes Yeats’s own notes:
In other words, the world’s trajectory along the gyre of science, democracy, and
heterogeneity is now coming apart, like the frantically widening flight-path of
the falcon that has lost contact with the falconer; the next age will take its
character not from the gyre of science, democracy, and speed, but from the
contrary inner gyre—which, presumably, opposes mysticism, primal power, and
slowness to the science and democracy of the outer gyre. The “rough beast”
slouching toward Bethlehem is the symbol of this new age; the speaker’s vision
of the rising sphinx is his vision of the character of the new world.
Themes
The Swan
Swans are a common symbol in poetry, often used to depict idealized nature.
Yeats employs this convention in “The Wild Swans at Coole” (1919), in which
the regal birds represent an unchanging, flawless ideal. In “Leda and the Swan,”
Yeats rewrites the Greek myth of Zeus and Leda to comment on fate and
historical inevitability: Zeus disguises himself as a swan to rape the
unsuspecting Leda. In this poem, the bird is fearsome and destructive, and it
possesses a divine power that violates Leda and initiates the dire consequences
of war and devastation depicted in the final lines. Even though Yeats clearly
states that the swan is the god Zeus, he also emphasizes the physicality of the
swan: the beating wings, the dark webbed feet, the long neck and beak. Through
this description of its physical characteristics, the swan becomes a violent divine
force. By rendering a well-known poetic symbol as violent and terrifying rather
than idealized and beautiful, Yeats manipulates poetic conventions, an act of
literary modernism, and adds to the power of the poem.
The Falcon
Yeats places the falcon front and center in the opening lines of the poem to
represent humanity's control over the world. The fact that the falcon "cannot
hear" its master thus symbolizes a loss of that control.
To understand this symbol better, it's important to know a little bit about
falconry more generally. Falconry is a practice that goes back thousands of
years, and involves people training birds of prey to follow instructions. This was
often for hunting purposes, but is also practiced as a kind of art form. In both
instances, the falcon represents humanity exerting a type of intelligent control
over the natural world. Killer birds like hawks and falcons are brought under the
spell of humans.
The falcon's inability to hear the falconer's call (lines 1 and 2) means that the
relationship between them has been severed. This symbolizes chaos and
confusion, and specifically gestures towards a breakdown in communication.
With its animal body and human head, perhaps this beast says something about
the "nightmare" to come. Though humans have tried to civilize themselves and
improve their world, perhaps their more beastly animal nature has only been
hidden—not defeated.
In other words, the beast might symbolize that civilization itself is a kind of
illusion. The human head has a "gaze" that lacks empathy, suggesting that the
beast is ready to kill. Given that the poem was written between the two world
wars of the 20th century, this surreal image seems to gesture towards
humankind's ever-improving capacity for self-destruction.