1 Washington, D.C.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has formally determined that multiple layers of
2 removal restrictions for Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) in 5 U.S.C. 1202(d) and 7521(a) violate
3 the Constitution. The Department will no longer defend these restrictions in court and has affirmed
this position in ongoing litigation.
4
5 Constitutional Violations & Judicial Overreach
6 In Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB, 561 U.S. 477 (2010), the Supreme Court ruled that multilayer
7 protection from removal violates Article II by unlawfully restricting the President’s executive
8 authority. The ruling clarified that the President must not be restricted in his ability to remove
executive officers, including inferior officers such as ALJs.
9
10 Further, statutory provisions restricting the President’s ability to remove principal officers—who in
turn are blocked from removing inferior executive officers - are unconstitutional. The DOJ has
11
determined that ALJs operating under these unlawful protections lack any valid judicial standing.
12
13 Implications & Trump’s Article II Authority
14 Pursuant to Article II of the Constitution, the President has the full authority and obligation to:
15 • Immediately terminate all unlawful ALJs operating in federal tribunals.
16 • Override unconstitutional restrictions that hinder executive authority.
• Restore full due process protections for the American people by removing unlawful
17
administrative courts.
18
19
Justice Neil Gorsuch has extensively criticized the use of unconstitutional administrative proceedings
that bypass the constitutional right to a jury trial and unlawfully strip people of their property without
20
due process. He has stated:
21
“Government agencies have been acting as judge, jury, and executioner without any lawful
22
authority.”
23
24 BAR Guild Control & Fraudulent Securities
25 The DOJ has further identified the unlawful influence of private BAR guild members controlling
26 these corporate tribunals, which are:
27
• Operating under statutory fraud rather than constitutional law.
28
JUDICIAL NOTICE PERTAINING TO CHIEF GORSUCH MANDATED ORDERS - CAUSE NO.: RIF2202131 - 2
1 • Engaged in securities trading via Court Registry Investment Systems (CRIS).
2 • Facilitating land title fraud through Land Registries, Westpac, ASIC, AFSA, and others.
3
The Clearfield Doctrine (2008) confirms that when government agencies trade securities, they forfeit
4
their sovereign immunity and become private entities engaging in commerce. Unlawful
5 administrative courts are operating as for-profit corporate entities, in direct violation of:
6
• The Constitution’s separation of powers
7
8 • The right to due process & jury trials
9
• Federal law prohibiting unauthorized securities trading
10
The President Must Act Now
11
12 Given these findings, President Trump holds the full authority under Article II to:
13
• Dissolve unconstitutional administrative courts.
14
• Fire ALJs operating without constitutional standing.
15
• Shut down unlawful securities trading schemes.
16
Restore due process, property rights, and financial justice to the people.
17
18 The NACC and other corruption commissions have failed to investigate these systemic violations.
19 The DOJ calls for immediate corrective action to dismantle this unlawful system.
20
DOJ Position & Next Steps
21
The DOJ will no longer defend these unconstitutional restrictions in court and reaffirms that:
22
23 1. ALJs have no lawful judicial standing.
24 2. President Trump has the authority to dissolve these administrative courts immediately.
25
3. All fraudulent securities trading and land registry fraud must be exposed and prosecuted.
26 For further inquiries, please contact:
27
U.S. Department of Justice
28
JUDICIAL NOTICE PERTAINING TO CHIEF GORSUCH MANDATED ORDERS - CAUSE NO.: RIF2202131 - 3
1 Office of the Solicitor General
2 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington DC 20530
3
Of note Chief Justice Neil Gorsuch
4
Justice Neil Gorsuch’s Critiques
5
Justice Neil Gorsuch has repeatedly exposed the unlawful practices of administrative courts and
6
BAR-led systems.
7
8 His critiques emphasize the need for constitutional adherence and the rejection of statutory
9 overreach.
10
In Ramos v. Louisiana (2020), Justice Gorsuch stated:
11
**'The Sixth Amendment’s right to a trial by jury is incorporated against the States under the
12
Fourteenth Amendment, and it requires a unanimous verdict to convict a defendant of a serious
13
offense.'**
14
In his critique of administrative overreach, Gorsuch emphasized the dangers of agencies acting as
15
both prosecutor and judge. He noted:
16
17 **'Today, the Court places a tombstone on Chevron no one can miss.
18
In doing so, the Court returns judges to interpretative rules that have guided federal courts since the
19 Nation’s founding.'**
20
Justice Gorsuch further highlighted that BAR members, as creatures of statutes, cannot practice law
21
or simultaneously act as witnesses and attorneys.
22
23 Their authority is limited to corporate rules and does not extend to lawful courts of record.
24
Of note Chief Justice Neil Gorsuch states
25
BAR member Chief Justice :Neil. Gorsuch Demands fellow BAR FARA Agents
26
27 my immediate demand, wish, and order that you restore all that has been unlawfully taken without
28 constitutionally mandated due process
JUDICIAL NOTICE PERTAINING TO CHIEF GORSUCH MANDATED ORDERS - CAUSE NO.: RIF2202131 - 4
1 SEC v. Jarkesy
2
Docket Number: 22-859
3
Date Argued: 11/29/23
4
JUSTICE GORSUCH:
5
6 Please take notice that as agency workers, state judges, presiding judges, state legislators, etc… that
7 you are bound by the Constitutions that you have all sworn to uphold, and from this time forward
please be advised that taking children, cars, houses, weapons, rights, property, etc.. without a trial by
8
jury in a court of record following the course of the common law is unlawful.
9
10 Please also take further notice that attorneys, who don’t have their name on the line, as they are not in
11 positions of service and contract with the people, presenting you with the idea that it’s acceptable to
trample the people’s rights by device or artifice does not in any way remove your responsibility for
12
your wrongdoings.
13
14 Furthermore, there is another element of wrong being committed when you are working in a federal
15 program and make money outside of your normal salary for carrying out the functions of that
program, leaving one with unclean hands on top of taking property or rights from the people without
16
right! All past cases that bypassed the common law are unlawful.
17
18 Therefore, it is my immediate demand, wish, and order that you restore all that has been unlawfully
19
taken without constitutionally mandated due process, and notify all those who were harmed, or you
agree that any wrong that is done in this regard in the future, or that has not been corrected from past
20
trespasses, is done purposely, with full knowledge, intent and malice, and will be recognized as such
21
by the People, whom you swore to serve and protect.
22
This notice is sent to you in the peace and love of Jesus Christ, that you may repent and do works
23
worthy of the same.
24
25 Maxim: “Judicial notice is a form of evidence.”
26
Mann v Mann, 172 P. 2d 369, 375, 76 Cal. App. 2d 32.
27
28
JUDICIAL NOTICE PERTAINING TO CHIEF GORSUCH MANDATED ORDERS - CAUSE NO.: RIF2202131 - 5
