military in the HAfirca
military in the HAfirca
The Horn of Africa is undergoing far-reaching changes in its external security environment. A wide
variety of international security actors from Europe, the United States, the Middle East, the Gulf, and
Asia are currently operating in the region. As a result, the Horn of Africa has experienced a proliferation
of foreign military bases and a build-up of naval forces. The external militarization of the Horn poses
major questions for the future security and stability of the region.
The Horn of Africa is one of the most important strategically located regions in the world. When we talk
about this region, different authors attempt to include and exclude some countries based on their
understanding of the concept of region. For some, the Horn of Africa includes the whole of eastern part
of Africa including the great lakes region for some other mainly the North Eastern parts of Africa that
includes Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, and Somalia consider as part of the Horn of Africa. However, the
disagreement over the members, the Horn Africa is one of the most important regions characterized by
insecurity and volatile political situation
There had been different history occupation and colonial threats at different times; it was the British,
French as well as the Italian powers that succeeded in occupying various parts of the Horn of Africa. At
the beginning of the 20th Century, Ethiopia was the only state in the region successfully averted the
threat of colonialism; all the rest parts of the Horn of Africa were under grip of colonial powers. Then
after, in the 1960s, dubbed as ‘Africa’s independence decade’ most of the colonial powers left the
region except in Djibouti and for many pundits it was this period that marked the beginning today’s
Horn of Africa, characterized by volatile politics, war and impoverishment yet significant geopolitically.
Vine (2015) conceptualises military bases as military installations of a certain nation on the sovereign
land of another state. As part of their foreign policy, nations establish military bases in a place where
they think have strategic advantage in attaining their objective. It is prudent for one to argue that
military bases are the means through which states attempt to project their power as well as protect
their economic and security interest in a region where they stationed. Therefore, military bases are one
of the instruments of foreign policy of a state.
The importance of the Horn of Africa may vary from time to time. However, there are always attention-
grabbing events that lure the mind of the world. Historically because of its geographic significance,
beginning from the medieval period when Ottoman Turkey and the Portuguese set their foot through
the times of the cold war rivalry between the Soviet and U.S.A to the current new kind of competition
among different countries in the region, Horn of Africa has been the playing arena of world powers, big,
medium, or small. The importance of the region is attributed to different natural and manmade factors.
Naturally the region is adjacent to the Red Sea, the Indian Ocean and the Strait of Babel Mandeb, R.
Nile-the longest and most controversial river system in the whole world. As a result, it serves as the
most important passageway for oil from the gulf region.
The Horn of Africa had also been important even before the discovery of oil in the gulf region. The
building of the Suez Canal in 1869 and the interest of the West to protect it, gave way to the
colonization of the region and opening of different ports along the coast of the Red Sea by the French
and British colonial powers. In the current milieu, except for Ethiopia and the newborn state of South
Sudan all members of the region, meaning Eritrea, Djibouti, Somalia, and Sudan all have a coastal area
Different countries beginning from superpowers, emerging powers and regional power rivals have
stationed their military forces in the horn of Africa. It has been argued that that historically the
concentration of military bases in a certain region has huge implication and has always been used as an
infrastructure for war. The Horn of Africa, the most militarized region in the world by far, hosts over ten
military bases in three different countries, by nine different states with other imminent bases expected.
Even if the strategic location of the region is very significant, there is not any region in the world that
hosts such concentration of foreign military powers. Some have gone as far as describing Djibouti as a
‘military Garrison’. The country has become the only place in the world where US, French, German,
Italian, Spanish, Chinese and Japanese military forces are stationed simultaneously and Saudi Arabia
being the latest candidate.
In Eritrea, years have passed since the United Arab Emirates military force stationed. Egypt’s interest to
build a military base in Eritrea has also been reported. Furthermore, the Somaliland government has
allowed the Emirati government to establish a military base along the coast of Berbera. Besides the
physical presence of those countries, various nations have vested interest in the region; Egypt, Qatar,
Russia, and Iran being the prominent ones.
Ethiopia uses primarily the Djibouti port for its external trade and has ongoing plan of economic
integration, which also includes diversifying Ethiopia’s port option in the region including to Somaliland
(Tedros, 2015). However, with the expansion of military bases in Djibouti, the reliability of the port is in
question. In Eritrea, the continued political standoff between the two countries coupled with UAE’s
military presence and the potential coming of Egypt, Ethiopia’s survival in the region would be in
jeopardy. In Somaliland, Ethiopia’s interest could be challenged by the presence of UAE.
Furthermore, considering the historical uneasy relationship between Arabs and Ethiopia and now the
issue of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) as well as the ongoing Gulf crisis, the presence of
the Gulf States military in the region requires us to investigate the concept of ‘Siege mentality’ which
has been refuted by the incumbent governments and some literatures. In other words, the influx of
foreign military has rather exacerbated the already existing inter-state mistrust, tension, fear, and the
fragility and fluidity of a state in the Horn of Africa. This, therefore, has very serious ramifications for the
region’s peace and security.
Paradoxically, though, with the highest concentration of foreign military bases in the world, the horn of
Africa has since remained both intra and inter-state conflicts prone part of the world with frightening
threats of terrorism and piracy and their accompanying unstoppable spill over effects to the entire
continent of Africa and the world. Above all what makes the concentration of those foreign military
bases in the region unique is, the variety of the forces in terms of power, ideology as well as level of
adversity, making the Horn of Africa the hub of adversarial powers.
In conclusion therefore, with the highest concentration of foreign military bases, the horn of Africa has
remained the most turbulent region in the whole world. Currently the Horn of Africa is hosting most of
the Veto powers as well as strong emerging powers, which makes the region a playing field of
superpower politics. Currently, the Horn of Africa is hosting several military bases of various countries
mostly rivals, on permanent bases. China and USA are ardent rivals politically as well as economically on
global level, China and Japan are regional as well as global rivals and finally the two leading Gulf powers,
UAE, and Saudi Arabia, among others are there to counter the coming of Iran as well as deter Qatar’s
influence in the region. In an already conflict-ridden region, the existence of rival powers could fuel
tension in the entire region and instigate direct military confrontations among states. This order of
things puts the stability in the region and survival of individual states in a very complicated security
puzzle.