Lab -squash and sensory evaluation
Lab -squash and sensory evaluation
Materials:
Ingredients:
o Watermelon (ripe and chilled)
o Oranges (ripe)
o Sugar
o Lemon juice
o Water
Equipment:
o Juicer
o Blender
o Measuring cups and spoons
o Sieve
o Mixing bowl
o Storage container (bottles/jars)
o Thermometer
o pH meter (optional)
o Refractometer (optional)
Procedure:
Mixing:
o Combine watermelon juice, orange juice, sugar, and lemon juice in a mixing bowl.
o Stir well until sugar is completely dissolved.
o Add water gradually while stirring continuously to achieve the desired consistency.
o pH: Measure the pH of the squash using a pH meter. Ideal pH for fruit juices is
around 3.5-4.5.
o Brix: Measure the Brix (sugar content) of the squash using a refractometer. This will
help determine the sweetness level.
Observations:
Materials:
Food Samples: Two coded samples of the food product to be evaluated (e.g., two types of
cookies, two brands of chocolate).
Reference Sample: A clearly identified sample of the food product.
Coding System: Unique three-digit codes for each sample (e.g., 123, 456, 789).
Tasting Booths: Individual booths or areas for each panelist to evaluate the samples.
Water: Bottled water for rinsing palates between samples.
Record Sheets: Pre-designed sheets for panelists to record their responses.
Pencils/Pens: For panelists to record their responses.
Hedonic Scale: A 9-point scale ranging from "dislike extremely" to "like extremely."
Procedure:
1. Duo-Trio Test:
Preparation:
o Prepare the three samples (reference and two coded samples) according to
standardized procedures.
o Code the samples randomly.
o Provide each panelist with a record sheet and a pencil/pen.
Instructions:
o Explain the Duo-Trio test to the panelists:
Testing:
Preparation:
Instructions:
o Explain the Hedonic Scale to the panelists.
o Instruct them to evaluate each sample individually based on their overall liking.
o Encourage them to use the entire scale to express their preferences.
Testing:
Data Analysis:
Duo-Trio Test:
Conclusion:
Based on the results of both tests, determine if there is a detectable sensory difference
between the two samples.
Discuss the implications of the findings for product development or quality control.
Note:
This is a basic framework for the experiment. Specific procedures and data analysis methods
may vary depending on the research objectives and the nature of the food product.
It is important to ensure that the testing environment is controlled and that panelists are
properly trained and motivated.
Ethical considerations, such as informed consent and confidentiality, should be addressed.
This experiment will provide students with practical experience in conducting sensory
evaluation tests and analyzing sensory data. It will also help them understand the
importance of sensory evaluation in the food industry
Headnoic scale
Evaluator -1 Evaluator -2 Evaluator -3 Evaluator -4
Name Score Score Score Score
Colour
Texture
Aroma
Flavour/Taste
Signature