2 TREMMEL the Legal and Procedural Framework of ACER
2 TREMMEL the Legal and Procedural Framework of ACER
procedural framework
of ACER
2
1. Establishment, status, mission,
governance
3
1. Establishment
Liberalisation of the national energy markets and creation of the internal energy market rests on a framework where NRAs play a key role
1st Package 2nd Package 3rd Package Clean Energy Measures linked
Fit for 55
“First common rules “Speeding up “EU-wide Institutional & Package (CEP) to high energy
Package
for the internal market liberalisation and market Regulatory Framework” “More robust EU prices and the
“Ensuring that
and liberalisation” integration” Harmonised cross- Framework” war in Ukraine
EU policies are in
Partial liberalisation Full market opening; border rules; Enhanced energy Repower EU;
line with the EU
establishment of NRAs strengthened NRAs’ market design; emergency
climate goals”
independent from independence & powers; reinforced ACER & measures,
Decarbonisation,
industry; legal & establishment of ACER & ENTSOs’ roles; e.g. LNG price
H2
functional unbundling ENTSOs; reinforced strengthened assessment &
unbundling regulatory oversight; benchmark,
creation of RCCs and market correction
EU DSO entity; mechanism;
emphasis on (longer term)
consumers electricity market
EMD-
design revision
Reform
REMIT II
H2/gas
1996 1998 2003 2005 2009 2019 2021 2022 - 2024
5
1. Mission - overview
fostering fully integrated EU markets for electricity & gas and cooperation of NRAs of
EU Member States
ACER’s mission 2009 ACER’s mission 2019
• assist NRAs in exercising, at Union level, the • assist NRAs in exercising, at Union level, the
regulatory tasks performed in the Member States regulatory tasks performed in the Member States
and, where necessary, to coordinate their action and, where necessary, to coordinate their action
• mediate and settle disagreements between NRAs
• contribute to the establishment of high-quality
common regulatory and supervisory practices,
contributing to the consistent, efficient and effective
application of EU legal acts to achieve the EU’s
climate and energy goals
• act independently, objectively, and in the
interest of the Union
• take autonomous decisions, independently of
private and corporate interests
6
1. Mission – activities & tools
Monitoring
Reports
Opinions
Recommendations
Cooperation Rulemaking
Framework Guidelines
Decisions (individual)
Advising
7
Organisation
1. Governance
Working
groups
(WGs)
Staff Director
8
1. Governance – Director
Director
Director
formal head, represents and manages the agency; 5 (+5) years
is in charge of the day-to-day management
prepares, adopts and publishes ACER opinions, recommendations and
decisions (subject to a favourable BoR opinion where required)
prepares the draft work programme and the draft annual activity report, and
implements the work programme
prepares the draft budget and implements the final budget
must neither seek nor follow any instruction from any government, the Union
institutions, or any other public or private entity or person
accountable to the AB re administrative/budgetary/managerial matters
works on regulatory issues under the guidance of the BoR/subject to BoR
opinions 9
1. Governance – AB
Board ofRegulators
Board of Regulators (BoR)
(BoR)
advisory and supervisory body for regulatory matters
27 voting members (+27 alternates): 1 (+1) per EU Member State NRA; 2/3
majority
non-voting: Commission, EEA EFTA States NRAs, EFTA Surveillance Authority
observer: Director
provides opinions to the Director for most ACER opinions/recommendations/
decisions
provides an opinion to the AB on the Director candidate
provides guidance to the Director and ACER’s WGs
must act independently, not seek or follow instructions from governments, the
Commission, or public or private entities, without prejudice to its members
acting on behalf of their respective NRA 11
1. Governance – WGs
Boardof
Board ofAppeal
Appeal(BoA)
(BoA)
internal review body, independent of ACER’s administrative and regulatory
structure
6 members (+ 6 alternates) from current/former senior staff of NRAs,
competition authorities or other Union or national institutions; 5 (+5) years;
4-out-of-6 majority
decides on appeals against ACER decisions
confirms the decision or remits the case to the competent body of ACER
(typically the Director)
its decisions can be challenged before the European Court of Justice, as
can be ACER decisions not appealable before the BoA and ACER’s failure
to act [26 General Court cases; 3 Court of Justice cases].
13
1. Governance – 3rd countries’ relations
14
1. Governance – 3rd countries’ relations:
institutional implications
15
1. Governance - relevant actors
RCCs
Regional level
Regional Coordination
Centres support regional
coordination of TSOs in a
number of areas, excluding
real time operation of the
electricity system
NRAs NEMOs
National level
TSOs
National regulatory Transmission system Nominated Electricity
authorities ensure a level- operators operate, Market Operators,
playing field, protect and maintain and develop designated by Member
empower customers, and the transmission States, perform single day-
contribute to the system. ahead and/or intraday
development of the 16
coupling.
internal energy market .
16 16
2. Rulemaking
17
2. Energy law framework (abridged overview)
Art. 194 AEUV
Treaties
COM Reg. 2016/631 establishing a network code (NC) on requirements for grid connection of generators
COM Reg. 2016/1388 establishing a NC code on demand connection
Delegated/
Implementing COM Reg. 2024/1366 establishing a NC on sector-specific rules for cybersecurity aspects of cross-border electricity flows
Acts
COM Reg. 2015/1222 establishing a guideline (GL) on capacity allocation and congestion management
COM Reg. 2016/1719 establishing a GL on forward capacity allocation Terms & conditions
or methodologies
COM Reg. 2017/1485 establishing a GL on electricity transmission system operation
COM Reg. 2017/2195 establishing a GL on electricity balancing
19
2. Terms & conditions or methodologies
TSOs/NEMOs propose to
TSO/NEMOs develop
amend the approved
TCM, on own initiative or
EU-wide ACER
draft proposal
upon request of
ACER/NRAs/NRA
ACER/NRAs/NRA
TSOs/NEMOs hold public
decide(s) on the proposal regional 1. NRAs 2. ACER
[in case of NRAs‘ joint • NRAs fail to agree within deadline
consultation
competence: after • NRAs jointly request ACER
reaching an agreement] • Director or BoR require referral,
due to impact on the internal
energy market or security of
supply beyond the region
20
2. Art. 41 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
Right to good administration
1. Every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable
time by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union.
2. This right includes:
(a) the right of every person to be heard, before any individual measure which would affect him or her
adversely is taken;
(b) the right of every person to have access to his or her file, while respecting the legitimate interests of
confidentiality and of professional and business secrecy;
(c) the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions (cf. Article 296 TFEU).
3. Every person has the right to have the Union make good any damage caused by its institutions or by its
servants in the performance of their duties, in accordance with the general principles common to the
laws of the Member States (cf. Article 340 TFEU).
4. Every person may write to the institutions of the Union in one of the languages of the Treaties and must
have an answer in the same language (cf. Article 20(2)(d) TFEU).
21
2. Art. 14 Reg. 2019/942
23
Decision making procedure
A
1 week 5 working days 1 week
AWG considers
Director’s
Director
takes AWG
O
proposal** comments Deadline for BoR
submission of documents:
R After the BoR
into account
**In exceptional and duly 1 week ahead of the
justified circumstances and Director takes amendments
BoR*** into account, provides written
upon the agreement of the
AWG Chairperson, the reasoning in case of deviation
Director may request the AWG BoR deadline to submit BoR adopts from proposed amendment(s) BoR
to provide its advice/ proposed FO
comments within a shorter
amendments
amendment(s)****
period. Director tables revised
***Exceptionally, it may be proposal at upcoming
necessary to submit documents
AWG deadline to
closer to the meeting date. Such
late submission will be subject to
meeting or through an
electronic procedure of 3 O
working days
provide advice and
justification and prior approval of the
R
OR
Chair.
report within one week
to the Director and BoR ****Tabled in writing by a member No BoR
one week before the BoR meeting FO
and may be accompanied by a Director withdraws
proposal (restart
short justification.
at A)
24
2. Administrative/judicial review
Art. 28 Reg. 2019/942; BoA RoP Art. 29 Reg. 2019/942
• (individual) decisions referred to in • decisions and failures to act within time
Art. 2(d) Reg. 2019/942 limits
• natural/legal persons, including • after exhaustion of the appeal
NRAs, addressed or directly and procedure
individually concerned
ACER Court of
Board of
Justice of
(Director) Appeal
the EU
confirms the decision or remits dismisses the action for
the case to the competent body annulment/failure to act, or annuls the
of ACER. decision/finds a failure to act.
• The competent body of ACER is • ACER must take the necessary measures
bound by the BoA decision. to comply with the judgements.
25
2. Administrative/judical review
27
Decision making procedure
a) ACER Director
b) ACER Board of Regulators (BoR)
c) other
29
3. Enforcement
30
3. General
31
3. Electricity (+Gas)
32
3. Electricity (+Gas)
33
3. ENTSOs/ENNOH/EU DSO Entity/RCCs
Art. 4 Reg. 2019/942:
6. The relevant regulatory authorities shall coordinate in order to jointly identify whether there is non-compliance of the
ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas, the ENNOH, the EU DSO entity or regional coordination centres with their
obligations under Union law, and shall take appropriate action in accordance with Article 59(1), point (c), and Article
62(1), point (f), of Directive (EU) 2019/944 or with Article 78(1), point (e), of Directive (EU) 2024/1788 of the European
Parliament and of the Council.
At the request of one or more regulatory authorities or at its own initiative, ACER shall issue a reasoned opinion as well
as a recommendation to the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas, the ENNOH, the EU DSO entity or the regional
coordination centres with regard to compliance with their obligations.
7. Where a reasoned opinion of ACER identifies a case of potential non-compliance of the ENTSO for Electricity, the
ENTSO for Gas, the ENNOH, the EU DSO entity or a regional coordination centre with their respective obligations, the
regulatory authorities concerned shall unanimously take coordinated decisions establishing whether there is non-
compliance with the relevant obligations and, where applicable, determining the measures to be taken by the ENTSO
for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas, the ENNOH, the EU DSO entity or the regional coordination centre to remedy that
non-compliance. Where the regulatory authorities fail to take such coordinated decisions unanimously within four
months of the date of receipt of ACER’s reasoned opinion, the matter shall be referred to ACER for a decision pursuant
to Article 6(10).
8. Where the non-compliance by the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas, the ENNOH, the EU DSO entity or a
regional coordination centre that was identified pursuant to paragraph 6 or 7 of this Article has not been remedied within
three months, or where the regulatory authority in the Member State in which the entity has its seat has not taken action
to ensure compliance, ACER shall issue a recommendation to the regulatory authority to take action in accordance with
Article 59(1), point (c), and Article 62(1), point (f), of Directive (EU) 2019/944 or with Article 78(1), point (f), of Directive
(EU) 2024/1788, in order to ensure that the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas, the ENNOH, the EU DSO entity
or the regional coordination centre comply with their obligations, and shall inform the Commission.
34
3. REMIT
• ACER shall impose periodic penalty payments in the cases of Art. 13g, i.e. to compel a person to:
o submit to an on-site inspection ordered by a decision;
o supply the information requested by a decision.
• ACER decisions ordering on-site inspections, requesting information or imposing periodic penalty
payments are subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice (not the BoA).
35
Quiz
What can ACER do if the addressees of its decision do not
comply with the decision?
36
Thank you.
Looking forward to the discussion.
[email protected] @eu_acer
acer.europa.eu linkedin.com/company/EU-ACER/