DD
Uploaded by
ME I AMDD
Uploaded by
ME I AMCriteria Specifications
Aesthetics Homepage
1. The heading would be
in the top left corner.
2. Log in and sign up page
top right corner
3. News on the section
below the homepage
4. Picture on the top left
corner of the main
page.
5. Text in between
6. Important news on the
right of the text
7. Text describing the
news below the news.
Webpage
1. Heading, menu and
login is the same.
2. Main text below on the
left corner of the body
text.
3. Images on the side.
Client Young people (10-16 years old)
and sports enthusiasts.
Environment Online version won’t harm the
environment.
Safety No bad words, no links to
malicious websites, suitable for
all ages
Size 5 images in the webpages, 2 in
the homepage, simplistic
homepage, one video in the
homepage.
Functionality Serves as a guide to all sports
enthusiasts, making them
believe in themselves, along
with staying updated
throughout.
Materials CSS, JavaScript, HTML,
Microsoft Expressions Web 4,
Google Chrome.
Aesthetics
The first design matches the aesthetics the most. It has the title on the top, menu below and the content
page is also designed as intended and designed. The webpage is also very similar and simplistic as
intended.
The third design does not match the aesthetics because it lacks a sign up page, and there is a
background image which was not intended.
Client
All the designs except design 3 matches with the client requirements because design 3 contains less
information about the website, making it less reliable.
Safety
All the designs are safe as it uses appropriate language, but in terms of contrast, design three is darker.
Size
Design 2 follows the size the best as it contains a video and several images, matching with the
specifications to some extent.
Functionality
Design 2 gives a lot of information on the functionality, as it is more factual and based on everything,
however design 1 is mostly news related.
Based on my evaluations, design one goes well with all if we just change its content.
Baed on client and peer evaluation, Design 2 suited my needs the most.
