Ubiquitously Continuous
Ubiquitously Continuous
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Keywords:
Infinite-dimensional vector spaces
Norms
Seminorms
Norm-topologies
Continuity
Throughout this note let X be a vector space over a field F , either R or C. As usual,
a real-valued function N : X → R is said to be a norm on X if, for all x, y ∈ X and
α ∈ F,
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (J. Chmieliński), [email protected] (M. Goldberg).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2019.05.003
0024-3795/© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
154 J. Chmieliński, M. Goldberg / Linear Algebra and its Applications 578 (2019) 153–158
N (x) > 0, x = 0,
N (αx) = |α|N (x),
N (x + y) ≤ N (x) + N (y).
S(x) ≥ 0,
S(αx) = |α|S(x),
S(x + y) ≤ S(x) + S(y);
(a) Continuity of S at the origin implies ubiquitous continuity with respect to the topology
induced by N .
(b) Discontinuity of S at the origin implies ubiquitous discontinuity with respect to the
above mentioned topology.
Proof. The assertion in (a) is well known to many, old and young. Yet, for the reader’s
convenience, we provide a short proof.
Let S be continuous at x = 0 with respect to the topology induced by the given norm;
hence, if {xn }∞
n=1 is any sequence in X, then
S(x − yn ) → 0 as n → ∞.
J. Chmieliński, M. Goldberg / Linear Algebra and its Applications 578 (2019) 153–158 155
|S(x) − S(yn )| → 0,
S(xn ) ≥ κ, n = 1, 2, 3, . . . .
yn = nxn , n = 1, 2, 3, . . . .
Since N (yn ) ≤ 1
n and S(yn ) ≥ nκ, we see that
zn = x + yn , n = 1, 2, 3, . . . ,
satisfies
N (x − zn ) = N (yn ) → 0.
S(x − zn ) = S(yn ) → ∞,
From the above lemma we may deduce the following result which hardly requires a
proof.
We turn now to the main purpose of this note, which is to show that given a nontrivial
seminorm S on X, there exist two different norms, such that S is ubiquitously continuous
in X with respect to one of them, and ubiquitously discontinuous with respect to the
other.
where {b ∈ B : αb (x) = 0} is a finite set. With this representation at hand, we can easily
confirm that the real-valued function
N (x) = |αb (x)|, x ∈ X, (4)
b∈B
S(x) = S αb (x)b ≤ |αb (x)|S(b) ≤ |αb (x)| = N (x). (5)
b∈B b∈B b∈B
span A = X. (6)
Indeed, assume on the contrary that span A X. Then there exists an element y ∈ X
such that y ∈
/ span A and S(y) = 0. Now, for every z in A, we have
nhn
bn = , n = 1, 2, 3, . . . ,
S(hn )
S(bn ) = n, n = 1, 2, 3, . . . .
Further, modifying the representation in (3) and the norm N in (4) by replacing the
underlying basis B by the new basis B , we get,
N (bn ) = 1, n = 1, 2, 3, . . . .
Hence, setting
bn
xn = , n = 1, 2, 3, . . . ,
n
158 J. Chmieliński, M. Goldberg / Linear Algebra and its Applications 578 (2019) 153–158
we obtain
1
N (xn ) = → 0,
n
whereas
S(xn ) = 1, n = 1, 2, 3, . . . .
Falling back on Theorems 1 and 3(b), we may record now the following simple obser-
vation.
References
[1] Moshe Goldberg, Continuity of seminorms on finite-dimensional vector spaces, Linear Algebra Appl.
515 (2017) 175–179.
[2] James D. Halpern, Bases in vector spaces and the axiom of choice, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (3)
(1966) 670–673.
[3] Marek Kuczma, An Introduction to the Theory of Functional Equations and Inequalities. Cauchy’s
Equation and Jensen’s Inequality, 2nd edition, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2009, edited by Attila
Gilányi.