Chapter 3: Absorption Costing and Variable Costing Example: Per Aircraft Per Month
Chapter 3: Absorption Costing and Variable Costing Example: Per Aircraft Per Month
Fixed selling and administrative expense 20,000 20,000 20,000 Total contribution margin $65,000 $65,000 $325,000
Total selling and administrative expense $30,000 $30,000 $70,000 Total fixed expenses 90,000 90,000 90,000
ote:IntheVCcontributionformatincomestatement,VSellingandAdminis
N
expens are in Variable expenses (vice versa with fixed)
Absorption Costing Income Statement: Reconciliation of Variable Costing with Absorption Costing Income
1. Conduct Absorption Costing Unit Product Cost → Income statement → There are certain differences between VC and AC in IncStatement:
+ Under absorption costing some fixedmanufacturingoverheadiscapitalized
Absorption Costing Unit Product Cost in inventories (included in Product Cost) rather than expenses on the
IncStatement → some cases net operating income is lower than VC
January February March
→ Differences occurs when Inventories increase or decrease:
Direct materials $19,000 $19,000 $19,000
Net operating income (loss) $(25,000) $10,000 $200,000 I n contrast, variable costing provides a clearer
picture becausenet operating income is
CONCLUSION directly linked to sales volume rather than
production levels. This makes it easier for
- Có nhiều điểm khác nhau giữ a absorption costing và variable costing
managers to predict profitability, as income
- The selling and administrative expenses equal the amounts reported in the only changes when sales change,aligning
variable costing income statements; however they are reported as one with their expectations.
amount rather than being separated into variable and fixed components -
khô ng report 2 cái variable và fixed
bsorption
A VP Analysis, and Decision
C C treats fixed manufacturing overhead as a
A Variable Costing and Theory of constraint (TOC)
costing Making variable cost. It assigns per unit fixed
I n the Theory ofConstraints(TOC)approach,companiesuseaformofvariable
manufacturing overhead costs to production.
1. Treating fixed manufacturing overhead as a costing but treat direct labor as a fixed cost instead of a variable cost. This is
variable cost can: → Lead tofaulty pricing because:
decisions andfaulty keep-or-dropdecisions. 1. Many companies guarantee employees a minimum number of paid hours,
2. Assigning per unit fixed manufacturing making direct labor costs relatively fixed.
overhead costs to production can: → 2. Direct labor is usuallynotthe main bottleneck (constraint)in production, so
Potentially producepositive net operating
treating it as variable isn’t useful for decision-making.
incomeeven when thenumber of units sold
is less than the breakeven point. 3. TOC focuses on continuous improvement, and layoffs hurt employee morale.
Managers prefer to retain workers to sustain long-term efficiency gains.
bsorption
A xternal Reporting and
E - In many countries, including US, absorption Essentially, TOC sees direct labor as a long-term investment rather than a
costing Income Taxes costing must be used when filling out income short-term cost to cut.
tax returns.
- Absorption costing must be used for external Impact of Lean Production:
financial reports → shareholders may feel that
decisions should be based on absorption WhencompaniesuseLeanProduction,Productiontendstoequalsales→So,the
→
costing data difference between variable and absorption income tends to disappear.
Advantages of VC
PREDETERMINED OVERHEAD RATES - ABSORPTION COSTING Application of Manufacturing Overhead
ow to compute underapplied and overapplied overhead and how to dispose
h
of any balance remaining in the Manufacturing Overhead account at the end
of a period. Overhead applied = POHR x Actual activity
a ssume actual overhead for the year was $120,000, the total direct labor hours
incurred were 50,000. The rest remains the same.
HowmuchtotaloverheadwasappliedtoHarveyFresh’sproductsduringtheyear?
Use Harvey’s predetermined overhead rate of $3.00 per direct labor hour
→ Overhead Applied During the Period = POHR x Actual Direct Labor Hours
= 3 x 50,000 = $150,000
→ 150,000 - 120,000 = 30,000Overapplied overhead
Allocation of
$30,000
Percent of overapplied
Amount Total overhead
Total 150,000 100% 30,000 1. Creating Extra Profit Without Increase In Sales: (Overapplied in COGS)