International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)

Vol. 13, No. 4, August 2024, pp. 2060~2067

ISSN: 2252-8822, DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v13i4.28513  2060

Determining youths’ computational thinking skills using

confirmatory factor analysis

Mira Qerul Barriah Muhamad1, Indrajit Ajit Doddanavar2, Shanjida Chowdhury3

1
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam Campus, Shah Alam, Malaysia
2
Jain College of MCA & MBA, Rani Channamma University, Karnataka, India
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Southeast Business School, Southeast University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Article Info ABSTRACT

Article history: As technological advancements shape the workforce, computational thinking
skills (CTS) are becoming increasingly crucial. The objective of the study is
Received Sep 2, 2023 to explore the potential mediating role of professional development and
Revised Nov 19, 2023 career planning in the association between robotic coding and software and
Accepted Dec 26, 2023 computational thinking. The study selected 308 youths using simple random
sampling and the collected data was subjected to structural equation
modelling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using SmartPLS.
Keywords: Additionally, demographic data were analyzed using statistical package for
social sciences (SPSS). The results concluded that the instrument adopted
Computational thinking skills fulfilled the requirements and was valid for measuring CTS. This indicates
Confirmatory factor analysis that the instrument effectively assessed the participants’ proficiency in CTS.
Industry 4.0 The findings of this study have implications for addressing the skills gaps
Skills gap among youths. The outcomes of this research can aid in designing
Youth educational interventions and policies that focus on developing
computational thinking skills among new graduates. By fostering these
skills, youths can better adapt to the demands of the rapidly evolving
technological landscape and contribute effectively to the industries and job
market influenced by industry 4.0. Further research on longitudinal studies
may be beneficial to assess the long-term impact of CTS development
initiatives on reducing skills gaps and ensuring youths are equipped for
future workforce requirements.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA license.

Corresponding Author:
Indrajit Ajit Doddanavar
Jain College of MCA & MBA, Rani Channamma University
Karnataka 591156, India
Email: [email protected]

1. INTRODUCTION
Computational thinking has emerged as a progressive field of study in recent years. Its significance
is acknowledged by educational reforms worldwide, as it plays a crucial role in preparing individuals for the
demands of the 21st-century economy. Computational thinking skills (CTS) are important in making
advancements in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields and are highly demand
by industries undergoing the transformative changes of industry 4.0 [1]. Developing CTS can enhance
employability by providing individuals with valuable skills for technology-driven industries. Lacking these
skills may contribute to higher unemployment rates due to automation. According to previous study [2], it is
projected that highly demanded positions in the country by 2025 will include data analysts, software
engineers, and application developers.

Journal homepage: http://ijere.iaescore.com

Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN: 2252-8822  2061

These roles are expected to be in high demand due to the increasing reliance on technology and
data-driven decision-making in various industries. Several studies [3]–[7] on CTS were not explicitly focused
on the research subjects of robotics coding and software with professional career planning. As a result, a new
scale has been developed to serve the purpose [8]. The scale is designed with an interdisciplinary approach in
mind, allowing its application across various fields and subjects. This study determines youths’ CTS using
the instrument adapted from Ertugrul-Akyol [8] in Malaysia. The research aims to identify professional
development and career planning that is likely expected to mediate the relationship between robotic coding
and software and computational thinking. Exploring the influence of computational thinking on youth can
provide valuable insights into its long-term effects on their educational and career pathways. It can help
identify how CTS contribute to their academic success, career readiness and developing skills relevant to the
digital age of industry 4.0.
The rapid evolution of technologies in industry 4.0 presents a significant challenge for organizations
as they strive to acquire the high value skills to adapt to the changing job functions brought by technological
disruptions [9]. A study [10] cited various reasons for the gap in graduate skills, including graduates'
preparedness to enter the workforce, a lack of job creation and a skills gap. The rapid advancement of
technologies in Malaysia has created a demand for professionals with expertise in areas like AI, IoT, robotics
and cybersecurity. However, a shortage of qualified workers in these fields results in a skills gap. The limited
availability of skilled professionals in these areas poses challenges to Malaysia's ability to exploit the
opportunities presented by industry 4.0 and the ongoing digital transformation [11]. Therefore, in order to
harness the potential of youths as a dynamic asset for development, it is essential to formulate a youth
strategy aiming to capitalize on the capabilities and energy of young people to drive progress and growth
[12]. While many previous researchers have contributed significant work to a growing knowledge base on
teaching and learning computational thinking, studies do not often focus from the youth's perspective.
Previous researchers prioritized the perspectives of educators, curriculum designers and policymakers rather
than comprehensively examined the influence of computational thinking on youths. Thus, there is limited
research that has comprehensively examined the influence of computational thinking and how to nurture it in
today’s youth [13]. Exploring this issue may help shed light on how to promote awareness on the importance
of CTS among youth as preparation for their future job hunting and successful career.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. Computational thinking
The field of computational thinking has been a subject of active exploration and research in recent
years. Scholars have dedicated their efforts to understanding and advancing this field, leading to significant
advancements and progress. This area of study has become a focal point for educational reforms worldwide,
as many countries recognize the importance of computer technology in preparing their citizens for the
demands of the 21st-century economy [14], [15]. Computational thinking has long been recognized as a
valuable skill set that contributes to breakthroughs in STEM fields. By applying principles and concepts from
computer science, experts have been able to make significant advancements in their respective domains.
As a result, students who possess knowledge of computational thinking and understand its
underlying concepts are more likely to pursue further education in STEM-related disciplines and consider
careers in STEM fields upon graduation. This is particularly relevant in the context of the labor needs in the
era of industry 4.0, where skills related to computational thinking are in high demand. The term
“computational thinking” was initially defined by Wing [16] as the ability to solve problems, build systems,
and understand human behavior using principles derived from computer science. Regardless, a recent study
has expanded upon this definition. They describe computational thinking as a set of thinking skills that can be
effectively taught, implemented and utilized in real-world scenarios and large-scale problem-solving
processes [17].

2.2. Robotic coding and software

The expansion of educational robotics into the curriculum beyond traditional STEM fields aligns
with the broader recognition of the importance of computational thinking in the 21st century. This expansion
recognizes the value of robotics as a tool to foster CTS among students [18]. This has led to a growing
exploration of robotics as a prospective educational environment for acquiring CTS. A research on a robotics
curriculum found that the activities and curriculum had a positive impact on students' CTS, particularly in the
context of robotics coding [19]. The hands-on nature of robotics activities and the application of coding
principles enable students to develop problem-solving abilities and algorithmic reasoning. This suggests that
the integration of robotics activities and coding exercises can effectively enhance students' CTS. Coding
robotics can significantly increase participants' CTS [20], [21]. Robotic coding and software development
skills are increasingly valued in the job market, particularly as automation and technology-driven industries
Determining youths’ computational thinking skills using confirmatory … (Mira Qerul Barriah Muhamad)
2062  ISSN: 2252-8822

grow. Proficiency in these areas can enhance one’s employability by providing the skills needed to work in
robotics, artificial intelligence, software development and data analysis. Therefore, by developing CTS since
they were in school, youths may enhance their job prospects and reduce the risk of unemployment. Industries
that require technological expertise often seek individuals with strong CTS, making these individuals more
competitive in the job market [22]. Thus, the first hypothesis of the study: Robotic coding and software have
a significant positive relationship with computational thinking skills (H1).

2.3. Professional development and career planning

Professional development is defined as the continuous process of acquiring new knowledge, skills,
and competencies relevant to one's chosen profession. It provides individuals with opportunities to expand
their understanding and expertise in specific areas, including computational thinking. Career planning refers
to the proactive process individuals engage in to prepare for their desired occupations and positions,
especially when they are not currently in the workforce or have not yet attained their desired positions [23].
Career planning enables youth to identify how CTS can enhance career opportunities and contribute to
professional growth. Moreover, professional development and career planning provide individuals with the
necessary resources, guidance, and support to develop and strengthen their CTS. They offer access to
relevant training programs, mentorship, networking opportunities and industry insights, all of which
contribute to acquiring and applying the skills. By integrating professional development and career planning
into their journey, young individuals can enhance their CTS effectively and consequently leverage them in
their professional pursuits. Thus, the hypothesis of the study: Professional development and career planning
are significantly related to computational thinking skills (H2) and robotic coding and software positively
correlate with computational thinking skills through professional development and career planning (H3).
Figure 1 illustrates the theoretical framework of the study.

H2

H3

H1

Direct effect
Indirect effect

Figure 1. Theoretical framework of the study

3. RESEARCH METHOD
This study employed a quantitative research study via survey online questionnaire using non-
probability and convenience sampling techniques. Regardless of gender and educational level, 308 young
individuals (aged 15 to 30) from different states in Malaysia took part in this study. A total of 30 items were
measured through a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 signifying ‘strongly disagree’ to 5 signifying
‘strongly agree’. The 30 items represent constructs of computational thinking (CT) (15 items), robotic coding
(RC) (10 items), and personal development (PD) (5 items). The items were adapted from a scale development
study by Ertugrul-Akyol [8], in which the author established a questionnaire set to measure computational
thinking scale. The proposed hypotheses were analyzed using SmartPLS (v.3.3.9) software to perform PLS-
SEM. SPSS (v27) was used for demographic analysis. The total sample size of 308 met the requirement to
apply SEM since a minimum sample size of 200 is considered suitable [24]. First, we used the two-stage
approach to analyze the constructs' reliability and validity. In the second stage, we tested the hypotheses by
running bootstrapping in SmartPLS.

Int J Eval & Res Educ, Vol. 13, No. 4, August 2024: 2060-2067
Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN: 2252-8822  2063

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1. Demographic analysis
For the demographic analysis, out of the 308 participants, 67% were female, while males accounted
for 32.80%. Although the gender distribution was not balanced, previous research studies have indicated that
both males and females can have positive and satisfying experiences when engaging in robotics-related
activities [25]. The age range of the surveyed youth in Malaysia was between 15 and 30 years old. The
largest age group was 27-30 years old, comprising 35.40% of the respondents. The second-largest age group
was 19-22 years old, representing 29.50% of the participants. The age group of 23-26 years old accounted for
28.90%, while the smallest group was 15-18 years old, constituting 6.20% of the respondents. In terms of
educational background, the majority of respondents had a bachelor's degree, making up 54.20% of the
participants. Youths who graduated with a diploma comprised 15.90%, while with a master's degree
accounted for 15.60%. Respondents with SPM/O-Level qualifications represented 14.30% of the sample.
Regarding employment status, the study found that 54.20% of the respondents were students, 29.50% were
employed, 8.40% were self-employed, and 7.80% were unemployed. In terms of awareness of the term
“Industry 4.0,” 62% of the respondents reported being familiar with it, while 38% had not heard of it before.

4.2. Assessment of measurement and structural models

We used structural equation modelling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tools for data
analysis and testing relationships between variables. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a family of
multivariate statistical analysis methods used to model complex structural relationships between measured
variables and latent constructs [26]. CFA is commonly used to verify or confirm the factor structure of a set
of observed variables [27]. It examines the strength and significance of the relationships between the
observed variables and their corresponding latent factors, represented by factor loadings. The validity of the
measurement model for latent constructs was evaluated using three types: convergent validity, construct
validity, and discriminant validity [27], [28]. The average variance extracted (AVE) was calculated to assess
convergent validity. Construct validity was evaluated by examining the fitness indices of the measurement
model. Discriminant validity was established through the development of the Discriminant Validity Index
Summary. Composite reliability (CR) was used instead of the traditional Cronbach alpha method of analysis
to determine the reliability of CRIS. These approaches were suggested by various studies [24], [27], provided
more robust measures for assessing validity and reliability. The measurement model depicted in Figure 2,
consists of the indicators and the path coefficients between constructs.

Figure 2. PLS-SEM model

Determining youths’ computational thinking skills using confirmatory … (Mira Qerul Barriah Muhamad)
2064  ISSN: 2252-8822

According to Table 1, no multicollinearity was found between the constructs. The outer and inner
models of Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) values must be less than 10 [24], [27]. The values were ranging
from 1.930 to 3.360, supporting the assessment of low multicollinearity. Since the collinearity value VIF < 3
except one (RC_03=3.360), the collinearity issues in this study are uncritical. All indicators are significantly
and accurately assessing their respective latent variables. According to the rule of thumb, the outside loading
values must exceed 0.7 [29]. Hence, it can be concluded that the outer loading, which ranges from 0.704 to
0.859 with a p-value <0.001, indicates that the convergent validity has been reached or indicator reliability
exists, and all the latent variables of this study are valid and reliable. Consequently, all reflective indicators
have been retained in the study.
The internal consistency reliability is evaluated using composite reliability and Cronbach’s alpha
values. The acceptable range for composite reliability is typically between 0.70 and 0.90 [30]. Values
exceeding 0.90 to 0.95 may indicate redundant effects on the content validity of the measures [31]. In this
study, the composite reliability value for computational thinking approaches 0.95, but it does not have an
adverse impact on the model. Convergent validity is established when a significant amount of variance is
shared among the indicators, indicating convergence on a specific construct. This can be assessed through the
AVE. The AVE value should exceed 0.5 to establish convergent validity [24]. We observed sufficient outer
loadings, and all AVE values exceed 0.5, indicating that convergent validity has been achieved.
Table 2 summarizes the findings, indicating that factors such as robotic coding software,
professional development, and career planning collectively account for 65.70% of the variation in the
computational thinking construct. Professional development and career planning contribute to 53.90% of the
robotic coding and software construct variation. The R2 values, which exceed 0.50, indicate that the
independent variable moderately explains the dependent variable [28]. In a similar vein, the R2 values imply
that the model may be overly tailored to the data, indicating an appropriate fit for the proposed theoretical
framework [24]. The impact of the exogenous constructs on the endogenous constructs is moderate, as
evidenced by f2 values ranging from 0.15 to 0.34, in accordance with Cohen [32]. The Q2 value, which
reflects the predictive relevance of the model, is 0.407 for computational thinking and 0.327 for robotic
coding and software. These values surpass the threshold of 0.350, thus indicating a substantial level of
predictive relevance in the study.

Table 1. Assessment of consistency, validity, and reliability

Cronbach’s Composite Average variance
Items VIF CT PD RC
alpha reliability extracted
CT_03 1.930 0.732
CT_04 2.442 0.790
CT_05 2.528 0.796
CT_06 2.654 0.818
CT_07 2.516 0.806
CT_08 2.765 0.821
0.947 0.953 0.631
CT_09 2.442 0.780
CT_10 2.647 0.808
CT_11 2.812 0.822
CT_12 2.744 0.815
CT_13 2.024 0.731
CT_14 2.515 0.806
PD_01 1.774 0.809
PD_02 1.642 0.748
PD_03 2.112 0.774 0.845 0.889 0.616
PD_04 2.007 0.822
PD_05 2.099 0.769
RC_01 2.729 0.814
RC_02 2.319 0.807
RC_03 3.360 0.859
RC_04 2.179 0.793 0.899 0.920 0.624
RC_05 1.955 0.772
RC_07 2.169 0.771
RC_08 1.719 0.704
Note: VIF = Collinearity Assessment, CT = Computational thinking, PD = Professional development and career
planning, RC =Robotic coding and software and all the loadings (estimates) are significant at a p-value of 0.001

Table 2. Assessment of the structural model

Inner Collinearity statistics R Square F² Q²
Computational thinking 2.171 0.657 0.242 0.0407
Robotic coding and software 2.171 0.539 0.267 0.327

Int J Eval & Res Educ, Vol. 13, No. 4, August 2024: 2060-2067
Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN: 2252-8822  2065

Table 3 presents the path coefficients, standard deviations, absolute T values, and significance
values. The significance of the coefficients was determined through bootstrapping, considering a significance
level of 5% and critical values of 1.96 for two-tailed tests. All T values exceed 1.96, and the p-values are
<0.05, indicating the significance of the relationships between the latent variables. The path coefficients are
examined to evaluate the strength of these significant relationships. Notably, the path coefficients from
professional development and career planning to computational thinking and from robotic coding and
software to computational thinking are moderately strong, surpassing 0.4. The path coefficient from
professional development and career planning to robotic coding and software demonstrates a strong
relationship with a coefficient of 0.734. Consequently, we draw a conclusion that the three proposed paths
are relevant and significant. According to Awang [27], when path coefficients are close to +1, it indicates a
robust positive relationship. Apart from assessing the sizes of the path coefficients, it is crucial to establish
their statistical significance. Based on the path coefficient values presented in Table 4 for the theoretical
model, all estimated values exceed 0.4 and are statistically significant (p<0.05).

Table 3. Structural model (Inner model) and path coefficients

Original Sample Standard deviation T Statistics
P values
sample (O) mean (M) (STDEV) (|O/STDEV|)
Structural model
Professional development and career planning → 0.424 0.427 0.057 7.498 0.000
Computational thinking scale
Professional development and career planning → 0.734 0.734 0.029 25.066 0.000
Robotic coding and software
Robotic coding and software → Computational 0.446 0.445 0.062 7.203 0.000
thinking scale
Path coefficients
Direct effects
Professional development and career planning → 0.424 0.43 0.055 7.663 0.000
Computational thinking scale
Professional development and career planning → 0.734 0.736 0.028 25.978 0.000
Robotic coding and software
Robotic coding and software → Computational 0.446 0.44 0.06 7.487 0.000
thinking scale
Indirect effect
Professional development and career planning → 0.328 0.324 0.044 7.498 0.000
Computational thinking scale

With reference to the Table 4, the researchers found that the indirect effect size is 0.324, and it is
statistically significant (p value<0.05). This suggests that professional development and career planning
partially mediate the relationship between the role of robotic coding and software and computational
thinking. Additionally, the researchers found that the direct path from professional development and career
planning to computational thinking has a coefficient of 0.430 and is statistically significant (p value<0.05).
This indicates that there is also a direct effect of professional development and career planning on
computational thinking. Overall, based on the results of the mediation analysis, the researchers have
established that the independent latent variable (role of robotic coding and software) predicts the dependent
variable (computational thinking) both directly and indirectly through the mediator variable (career
planning). The significant indirect effect size supports the mediation effect, while a significant direct path
suggests a partial mediation effect.

Table 4. Hypotheses results

Path coefficient t-value p-value Results
H1: Robotic coding and software have a significant positive relationship 0.424 7.498 0.000 Accepted
with computational thinking skills.
H2: Professional development and career planning are significantly related 0.734 25.066 0.000 Accepted
to computational thinking skills.
H3: Robotic coding and software positively correlate with computational 0.446 7.203 0.000 Accepted
thinking skills through professional development and career planning.

5. CONCLUSION
It is concluded that professional development and career planning moderately mediate the
relationship between robotic coding and software and computational thinking. The findings are hoped to
assist educators, higher education institutions and policymakers in developing new insights relevant to
Determining youths’ computational thinking skills using confirmatory … (Mira Qerul Barriah Muhamad)
2066  ISSN: 2252-8822

identifying the requirements for continually improving future industrial employability. This study was
undertaken to validate a survey instrument for measuring CTS among Malaysian youths. The CFA then
confirmed that the survey instrument fulfils the requirements for convergent, construct and discriminant
validity. The scale is deemed valid and reliable for measuring the CTS, adding to the advancement of
research and practice in this area. The instrument developed to assess CTS among Malaysian youths has
potential interdisciplinary applications. Therefore, it may be applicable in various research settings, allowing
for comparative studies and the examination of CTS across different populations. However, it is essential to
consider cultural and contextual factors when applying the instrument in different settings. Some adaptations
and modifications may be necessary to ensure its validity and reliability in specific cultural or educational
contexts. Certainly, future research can explore additional factors that may influence young individuals’ CTS.
Understanding these factors can provide a more nuanced comprehension of the determinants of the
computational thinking scale. Regarding mediating variable, future scholars can explore additional variables
that may enhance the strengths of the CTS instrument and provide a more inclusive perspective of the
relationship between different constructs.

REFERENCES
[1] C. Wang, J. Shen, and J. Chao, “Integrating Computational Thinking in STEM Education: A Literature Review,” International
Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1949–1972, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10763-021-10227-5.
[2] J. Nadarajah, “Measuring the Gap in Employability Skills Among Malaysian Graduates,” International Journal of Modern
Trends in Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 15, pp. 81–87, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.35631/IJMTSS.415007.
[3] D. A. Whetten and K. S. Cameron, Developing management skills, 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall/Pearson, 2011.
[4] Ö. Korkmaz, R. Çakir, and M. Y. Özden, “A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS),”
Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 72, pp. 558–569, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005.
[5] Ö. Korkmaz and X. Bai, “Adapting Computational Thinking Scale (CTS) for Chinese High School Students and Their Thinking
Scale Skills Level,” Participatory Educational Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 10–26, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.17275/per.19.2.6.1.
[6] M. Yagci, “A valid and reliable tool for examining computational thinking skills,” Education and Information Technologies,
vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 929–951, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10639-018-9801-8.
[7] Y. Gulbahar, S. B. Kert, and F. Kalelioğlu, “The Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Computational Thinking Skill: Validity and
Reliability Study,” Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–29, Oct. 2018,
doi: 10.16949/turkbilmat.385097.
[8] B. Ertugrul-Akyol, “Development of Computational Thinking Scale: Validity and Reliability Study,” International Journal of
Educational Methodology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 421–432, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.12973/ijem.5.3.421.
[9] M. A. Mokhtar and N. Noordin, “An exploratory study of industry 4.0 in Malaysia: a case study of higher education institution in
Malaysia,” Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (IJEECS), vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 978–987, Nov.
2019, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v16.i2.pp978-987.
[10] Department of Statistics Malaysia, “Press Release Labour Force Survey Report, Malaysia, 2020,” Department of Statistics
Malaysia, Apr. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php
[11] Y. M. Ling, N. A. Abdul Hamid, and L. T. Chuan, “Is Malaysia ready for Industry 4.0? Issues and Challenges in Manufacturing
Industry,” International Journal of Integrated Engineering, vol. 12, no. 7, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.30880/ijie.2020.12.07.016.
[12] H. M. Kaidi et al., “Engaging youths in skill development through network system wiring workshop in rural area,” Indonesian
Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (IJEECS), vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 950–955, Nov. 2019, doi:
10.11591/ijeecs.v16.i2.pp950-955.
[13] I. Lee et al., “Computational thinking for youth in practice,” ACM Inroads, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 32–37, Feb. 2011, doi:
10.1145/1929887.1929902.
[14] A. Yadav, H. Hong, and C. Stephenson, “Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century
Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms,” TechTrends, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 565–568, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7.
[15] J. Nouri, L. Zhang, L. Mannila, and E. Norén, “Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century
skills when learning programming in K-9,” Education Inquiry, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–17, Jan. 2020, doi:
10.1080/20004508.2019.1627844.
[16] J. M. Wing, “Computational thinking,” Commun. ACM, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 33–35, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1145/1118178.1118215.
[17] M. Román-González, J. Moreno-León, and G. Robles, “Combining Assessment Tools for a Comprehensive Evaluation of
Computational Thinking Interventions,” in Computational Thinking Education, Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019, pp. 79–98.
doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-6528-7_6.
[18] W. H. Stewart, Y. Baek, G. Kwid, and K. Taylor, “Exploring Factors That Influence Computational Thinking Skills in
Elementary Students’ Collaborative Robotics,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1208–1239, Oct.
2021, doi: 10.1177/0735633121992479.
[19] G. Chen, J. Shen, L. Barth-Cohen, S. Jiang, X. Huang, and M. Eltoukhy, “Assessing elementary students’ computational thinking
in everyday reasoning and robotics programming,” Computers & Education, vol. 109, pp. 162–175, Jun. 2017, doi:
10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.001.
[20] Y. Baek, S. Wang, D. Yang, Y.-H. Ching, S. Swanson, and B. Chittoori, “Revisiting Second Graders’ Robotics with an
Understand/Use-Modify-Create (U2MC) Strategy,” European Journal of STEM Education, vol. 4, no. 1, May 2019, doi:
10.20897/ejsteme/5772.
[21] M. U. Bers, C. González-González, and M. B. Armas–Torres, “Coding as a playground: Promoting positive learning experiences
in childhood classrooms,” Computers & Education, vol. 138, pp. 130–145, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.013.
[22] S. Othman and A. H. A. Hamid, “Exploring Women’s Transformational Leadership Style and Competency: A Higher Education
Malaysia Perspective,” Asian Journal of University Education, vol. 19, no. 2, 2023.
[23] K. Gökoğlan and U. Kaval, “A study on students’ career strategies: example of Dicle University,” Turkish Business Journal,
vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2020.

Int J Eval & Res Educ, Vol. 13, No. 4, August 2024: 2060-2067
Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN: 2252-8822  2067

[24] J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” European
Business Review, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
[25] S. Atmatzidou and S. Demetriadis, “Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on
age and gender relevant differences,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 75, pp. 661–670, Jan. 2016, doi:
10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008.
[26] S. Abrahim, B. A. Mir, H. Suhara, F. A. Mohamed, and M. Sato, “Structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis
of social media use and education,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 32,
Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0157-y.
[27] Z. Awang, SEM Made Simple. MPWS Publisher, 2015.
[28] J. F. Hair, Ed., A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage, 2017.
[29] M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and J. F. Hair, “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling,” in Handbook of Market
Research, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 1–47. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2.
[30] J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory 3E. New York, NY: Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 1994.
[31] J. R. Rossiter, “The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing,” International Journal of Research in Marketing,
vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 305–335, Dec. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00097-6.
[32] J. Cohen, “Quantitative Methods in Psychology,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 155–159, 1992.

BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS

Mira Qerul Barriah Muhamad has just graduated with a PhD in Business
Management from the Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi Mara Shah
Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. She has a strong interest in the domain of Industry 4.0 from the
conceptual towards the applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in education, businesses and
industries. She worked as a University Tutor for 2 years and a half. She is looking forward to
opportunities in pursuing meaningful research collaborations in modern methods of
construction. She can be contacted at email: [email protected].

Indrajit Ajit Doddanavar is a full-time Assistant Professor of Business

Management at Jain College of MCA & MBA, R.S. No. 19, Block ‘D’, Near Panchayat Water
Tank, Piranwadi, Belagavi, Karnataka, India– 590014, affiliated to Rani Channamma
University, Karnataka. In 2019, he earned a Ph.D. in ‘Branding’ from Jain Deemed-to-be
University. His research and interest areas include topics in marketing, human resources, and
general management that are relevant to industry and consumers. He has fourteen years of
extensive expertise across many sectors of Industry. He wants to work as a researcher to
investigate relevant and current research premises. He can be contacted at email:
[email protected].

Shanjida Chowdhury is an Assistant Professor at Southeast University under the

Southeast Business School. She has completed her B.Sc. and MSc. degrees from the
Department of Statistics, Biostatistics, and Informatics, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. She
is currently continuing her Ph.D. in the Department of Population Sciences at the University of
Dhaka, Bangladesh. During her ten-year teaching and research career, she has contributed to
several scientific articles in the fields of statistics and applied statistics. She has also attended
national and international conferences and workshops organized by different universities and
research bodies. Her areas of research interest include econometric analysis, biostatistics, and
demographic health surveys. She can be contacted at email: [email protected]

Determining youths’ computational thinking skills using confirmatory … (Mira Qerul Barriah Muhamad)