HARAMAYA UNIVERSITY

College of social science and Humanities

School of History and Heritage Management

Course Introduction to Archaeology
Group two assignment
NAME ID
1 FALMATA SUFIYAN 3337/16
2 Ibsa Sharef 3537/16
3 FIKIRU GETU 3375/16
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Submitted to Mr. Abubeker
Introduction
Archaeology serves as a window into humanity’s past, offering insights into ancient cultures,
technologies, and environments through the systematic study of material remains. Central to
this discipline are the diverse forms of archaeological data—artifacts, ecofacts, features, and
sites—each contributing unique perspectives on past human activities. Equally critical are the
methods employed to recover and interpret these data, which range from non-destructive
reconnaissance techniques to meticulous excavation and post-analysis. This discussion explores
the significance of archaeological data types and their recovery processes, emphasizing the
interdependence of contextual understanding and ethical stewardship. Additionally, it
examines how reconnaissance and surface survey methods synergize to enhance archaeological
investigations, ensuring both efficiency and depth in uncovering the stories buried beneath our
feet.

1.Discuss the various forms of archaeological data and the methods used for their
recovery?

Archaeological Data Types and Significance

Archaeological data comprises all the physical remains of past human activity. Understanding
the diverse forms this data takes is crucial for reconstructing the past. The key lies not just in the
objects themselves, but in their context. A single artifact is interesting, but its meaning is
exponentially amplified when we know where it was found, what it was associated with, and
how it relates to its surrounding environment.

We can categorize archaeological data into four major types:

Artifacts:

Portable objects made or modified by humans. These are often the most recognizable form
of archaeological data and offer direct insights into past technology, behavior, and culture.

o Examples: Stone tools (arrowheads, axes), pottery shards, metal objects (jewelry,
weapons), bone tools (needles, awls), beads, textiles (rarely preserved).
o Significance: Artifacts reveal information about subsistence strategies (hunting,
gathering, agriculture), craftsmanship, trade, social status, and symbolic
expression. The style and technology of artifacts can also help to trace cultural
change over time.
 Ecofacts:

Natural objects used or affected by humans. These provide valuable information about
past environments, diets, and resource management. Their presence in archaeological
sites indicates how humans interacted with the natural world.

o Examples: Plant remains (seeds, pollen, charcoal), animal bones, shells, soil
samples.
o Significance: Ecofacts allow us to reconstruct past climates, vegetation patterns,
and animal populations. They provide direct evidence of human diets (what
people ate) and how they exploited natural resources. Soil analysis can reveal
agricultural practices or evidence of pollution.

Features:

Non-portable human-made structures or alterations to the landscape. These fixed

elements offer insights into architecture, settlement patterns, and social organization.
Because they are often large and complex, features can provide a wealth of information
about past activities.

o Examples: Hearths (fire pits), storage pits, burials, house foundations, walls,
irrigation canals, roads, middens (trash heaps).
o Significance: Features reveal how people organized their living spaces, how they
built their homes, how they managed their resources, and how they treated their
dead. They can provide clues about social hierarchies, ritual practices, and
technological capabilities.
 Sites: Locations where evidence of past human activity is found. A site can be a small,
isolated find spot or a large, complex settlement. The site itself represents the spatial
distribution of artifacts, ecofacts, and features, providing crucial context for
understanding past human behavior.
o Examples: Habitation sites (villages, towns, cities), campsites, quarries,
workshops, cemeteries, ceremonial centers, rock art sites.
o Significance: Sites provide a framework for understanding the spatial
relationships between different types of archaeological data. They allow us to
examine settlement patterns, activity areas, and the organization of human
societies across the landscape. The size, location, and contents of a site can reflect
its importance and function within a broader cultural system.

Understanding the context of archaeological data is paramount. This includes the stratum (layer
of soil) in which an item is found, its relationship to other artifacts and features, and its location
within the site. This contextual information is meticulously recorded during the recovery process.
Methods of Archaeological Data Recovery: Survey and Excavation
Archaeological data recovery involves two main stages: survey (locating sites) and excavation
(uncovering and recording site contents). Both require careful planning and execution.

Archaeological Survey:

The goal of survey is to identify archaeological sites and understand their distribution
across a landscape. This is often the first step in an archaeological project.

o Remote Sensing: Non-destructive techniques to detect subsurface features.

 Aerial Photography/Satellite Imagery: Reveals cropmarks, soil marks, and
other subtle features indicating buried sites.
 LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging): Creates high-resolution
topographic maps, revealing subtle features like earthworks.
 Geophysical Survey (Magnetometry, GPR): Measures physical properties
of the soil to detect buried features without excavation.
o Surface Survey: Direct examination of the ground surface for artifacts and
features.
 Pedestrian Survey: Walking systematically across the landscape,
recording finds.
 Shovel Testing: Digging small holes to examine soil and look for buried
artifacts.
o Significance: Survey helps archaeologists to identify potential excavation sites,
understand settlement patterns, and assess the archaeological potential of a region.
The integration of different survey methods (remote sensing combined with
ground-truthing) is often the most effective approach.
 Archaeological Excavation: The controlled and systematic removal of soil and other
materials to uncover and record artifacts, ecofacts, and features. Excavation is
destructive, so meticulous documentation is crucial.
o Site Gridding and Mapping: Dividing the site into a grid for precise spatial
control.
o Stratigraphic Excavation: Excavating layer by layer (following natural soil
strata) to establish the relative chronology of the site. The Law of Superposition
(older layers below younger layers) is key.
o Screening: Sifting soil to recover small artifacts and ecofacts.
o Documentation: Detailed records, including:
 Photographs: Documenting each layer and significant finds.
 Drawings and Plans: Creating detailed maps and diagrams.
 Written Notes: Recording context, observations, and excavation
procedures.
 Digital Databases: Managing the vast amounts of data generated.
 o Significance: Excavation provides the most detailed information about past
human activities. By carefully recording the context of artifacts, ecofacts, and
features, archaeologists can reconstruct past lifeways, social structures, and
environmental conditions. However, excavation should only be undertaken when
necessary and with a clear research plan, as it alters the site permanently.
 Post-Excavation Analysis: Once the excavation is complete, the real work of analysis
begins. This involves:
o Artifact Processing and Cataloging: Cleaning, labeling, and classifying
artifacts.
o Dating Methods (Radiocarbon, Dendrochronology, TL): Determining the age
of the site and its contents.
o Artifact and Ecofact Analysis: Studying the function, manufacturing techniques,
and origin of artifacts and ecofacts.
o Spatial Analysis (GIS): Analyzing the spatial distribution of data to understand
activity areas and settlement patterns.
o Interpretation and Publication: Synthesizing all the data and publishing the
results.

Ethical Considerations Preservation, respect for cultural heritage, responsible excavation, data
sharing, and combating looting are all crucial ethical considerations in archaeology. The goal is
not just to uncover the past, but to preserve it responsibly for future generations.

2. Discuss how reconnaissance and surface survey methods can complement each other in
archaeological studies. Provide examples from the text to illustrate your points.

Reconnaissance and Surface Survey: A Synergistic Relationship

Reconnaissance and surface survey are distinct but highly complementary methods used in
archaeology to identify, assess, and understand archaeological sites and landscapes. The key lies
in their different scales and intensities: reconnaissance provides a broad overview, while surface
survey offers a more detailed examination. They work best in tandem, informing and refining
each other.

 Reconnaissance: The Big Picture Finder: Reconnaissance is an exploratory phase of

archaeological investigation, aiming to identify potential archaeological sites or areas of
interest across a larger region. It's essentially a "scouting mission" that helps
archaeologists prioritize areas for more intensive study. It often employs a range of
methods, including:
 o Documentary Research: Examining historical maps, records, and literature for
clues about past settlements and activities.
o Oral Histories: Gathering information from local communities about known or
rumored archaeological sites. Local knowledge can be invaluable.
o Aerial Reconnaissance: Utilizing aerial photography and satellite imagery to
identify potential sites based on cropmarks, soil marks, or other visible features.
o Geophysical Survey (Limited Scale): Using techniques like magnetometry to
quickly scan large areas for potential subsurface anomalies.
o Limited Field Walking: Preliminary assessment of surface finds in readily
accessible areas.

The goal of reconnaissance is to provide a general understanding of the archaeological

potential of a region. It's less intensive and less systematic than surface survey. Think of
it as painting with a broad brush. It helps to answer the initial question: "Where are the
likely places to find archaeological evidence?"

 Surface Survey: The Detail-Oriented Examiner: Surface survey is a more intensive

and systematic method for collecting data from the ground surface within a defined area.
It aims to document the distribution of artifacts and features, providing a more detailed
picture of the archaeological landscape. This often involves:
o Systematic Pedestrian Survey: Archaeologists walk along predetermined
transects (parallel lines or grid squares), meticulously recording the location of all
artifacts and features encountered.
o Shovel Testing: Small holes are strategically dug at regular intervals to examine
the soil profile and look for buried artifacts. This helps assess subsurface artifact
density and site boundaries.
o Artifact Collection: Artifacts may be collected from the surface, either
selectively (collecting only specific types of artifacts) or non-selectively
(collecting all artifacts). The collection strategy is determined by the research
questions.
o Mapping and Documentation: All finds are carefully mapped and documented,
using GPS for accurate spatial data.

Surface survey provides a more detailed picture of the archaeological landscape. It's like
painting with a fine-tipped brush, adding the specific details. Surface survey helps answer
the questions: "What kind of archaeological materials are present? How are they
distributed across the landscape? What is the size and extent of the site?
 Interdependence and Examples
The true power of reconnaissance and surface survey lies in their synergistic relationship. Data
from reconnaissance guides surface survey, and surface survey data refines the interpretations
made during reconnaissance Here's how they complement each other:

1. Reconnaissance Identifies Targets for Surface Survey: Reconnaissance narrows down

a large region to smaller, manageable areas for intensive surface survey. By identifying
potential sites or areas with high artifact density, it directs survey efforts efficiently.
<em>Example: Aerial reconnaissance reveals cropmarks suggesting buried structures in a
specific field. This field becomes the target of a subsequent surface survey.</em>
2. Reconnaissance Provides Context for Surface Survey Results: Reconnaissance offers
a broader regional context for surface survey findings. Understanding regional settlement
patterns helps interpret artifact distribution patterns within a specific site. <em>Example:
A surface survey identifies a cluster of farmsteads. Reconnaissance, through documentary
research, reveals this area was historically known for its fertile soil, explaining the
farmstead concentration.</em>
3. Surface Survey Validates and Refines Reconnaissance Interpretations: Surface
survey confirms or refines the findings of reconnaissance. Cropmarks suggesting a site
from aerial photos can be verified with surface finds. Systematic collection during survey
reveals details invisible from above. <em>Example: Aerial reconnaissance suggests a
buried site based on cropmarks. Surface survey uncovers artifacts, confirming the site's
existence and defining its boundaries, types of artifacts found, and potential dates of
occupation.</em>
4. The Feedback Loop: The relationship is iterative. Reconnaissance informs surface
survey design, and surface survey results lead to further reconnaissance. This creates a
dynamic cycle of discovery and refinement.

Concrete Hypothetical Examples:

 Scenario: Investigating a potential Roman Villa:

o Reconnaissance: Examination of historical maps suggests a Roman villa existed
near a stream. Aerial photos show subtle soil variations in a field nearby.
o Surface Survey: A systematic grid survey is conducted in the field. Roman
pottery, roof tiles, and tesserae (mosaic pieces) are recovered.
o <em>The Reconnaissance data directed the Surface Survey to a specific location.
The Surface Survey confirmed the presence of the villa and provided details about
its materials and construction.</em>
 Scenario: Locating Prehistoric Campsites in a Mountain Pass:
o <em>Reconnaissance:* LiDAR data reveals potential terrace-like features in a
mountain pass. Oral histories suggest the area was traditionally used for seasonal
hunting.
o Surface Survey: Targeted survey of the terrace features reveals a scatter of lithic
artifacts (arrowheads, scrapers).
 o The Reconnaissance data pointed to specific areas to search. The Surface Survey
located artifacts demonstrating human activity and hinting at the site’s function,
such as hunting-related activities.

Reconnaissance and surface survey methods are essential tools for archaeological
investigation, achieving optimal results when used in a coordinated manner.
Reconnaissance sets the stage with a regional overview, directing surface survey to
promising areas. Surface survey, in turn, provides detailed information, confirming and
refining initial interpretations. This synergistic relationship allows archaeologists to
efficiently and effectively locate, document, and understand archaeological sites and
landscapes, building a comprehensive understanding of the past.

Conclusion
The study of archaeological data—artifacts, ecofacts, features, and sites—underscores the
importance of context in reconstructing past human lifeways. Recovery methods, such as remote
sensing, systematic excavation, and post-analysis, highlight the discipline’s meticulous nature
and its reliance on interdisciplinary collaboration. Equally vital is the complementary
relationship between reconnaissance and surface survey methods: reconnaissance provides a
broad regional framework, guiding targeted surveys that yield detailed artifact distributions and
site boundaries. Examples like the identification of Roman villas through aerial imagery or
prehistoric campsites via LiDAR and oral histories illustrate how these methods validate and
refine each other. Ultimately, archaeology’s ethical commitment to preservation and responsible
data sharing ensures that these fragments of the past remain accessible for future generations,
bridging the gap between ancient histories and modern understanding. Through such integrative
approaches, archaeologists continue to piece together the intricate mosaic of human heritage.