Chapter_04_revised2 (1)
Chapter_04_revised2 (1)
Chapter 4
한경국립대학교 화학공학전공
정 문 근 교수
The Young equation of contact angle
• The component theories (in Chapter 3) are useful for estimating the
interfacial tensions of solid-interfaces (solid–liquid, solid–solid) and for
characterizing solid surfaces using the experimental data for the few
properties that can be measured (liquid–gas surface tension, liquid–liquid
interfacial tension, contact angle).
• Important equations are the Young equation for contact angle and the
work of adhesion (Equations 4.1–4.3).
• Solid surfaces are much more complex than liquids because of roughness,
chemical heterogeneity, impurities and other phenomena and the contact
angle plays an important role in understanding them.
As Figure 4.1 shows, the contact angle is the angle
between the liquid and the solid, a property that
can be measured and is, together with the theories
for interfacial tension.
• When a drop of liquid is placed in contact with a solid, we have three interfaces: the
solid/liquid, solid/vapour and liquid/vapour interfaces.
• Each of these has its own interfacial energy. For a drop that partially wets a solid, the
total interfacial energy is minimal when the horizontal components of the interfacial
tensions are in equilibrium. At this point, the contact angle between liquid and solid
has a value that is determined by the three interfacial energies.
• The relation is known as the Young equation (Equation 4.1). Thus, the Young
equation is derived as a force balance across the x-axis ( ) and
provides the relationship between the contact angle (ϑ) and surface tensions of solid
and liquid (s, l) and the liquid–solid interfacial tension (sl):
• Equation 4.1 is correct if the spreading pressure is zero, which is almost always true for
low energy surfaces like polymers. The spreading pressure ( ) is the
difference between the solid surface tension (in contact with vacuum or air) and the
solid surface tension in presence with vapour coming from the liquid drop.
• Solid surfaces are complex in many ways; they are often heterogeneous (chemically or geometrically)
and rough, they easily become dirty or contaminated (adsorbed liquids or solids, e.g. dust), and their
properties change with time due to chemical or physical adsorption.
• Especially on high energy surfaces, part of the vapour of the liquid will adsorb on the solid. This
lowers the energy of the solid–vapour interface. On a rough solid, the actual interfacial area is larger
than the one that we see: this causes the effective energies of the solid interfaces to be larger than
those of a flat surface.
• If there are contaminants (dirt) in the system, these will adsorb on the solid and lower the effective
interfacial energies of the solid. As a result, simple calculations using “pure” interfacial energies
are often inaccurate.
• Clean metals, metal oxides, glass and ceramics are high energy surfaces, while polymers and fabrics
are low energy surfaces. However, for the high energy surfaces, cleaning of the surface is of
paramount importance. Even the thinnest monolayer of adsorbed oil/grease can dominate the surface
properties. “Clean tin cans” have been reported with surface tensions as low as 31 mN m–1.
• Aging phenomena are also crucial. Even carefully prepared surfaces under vacuum rapidly adsorb
(physically or chemically) material from the environment, e.g. water, hydrocarbons, dirt, etc. For
example, Mica prepared under vacuum has a surface energy of 4500 mN m–1 but the surface energy
decreases to about 300 mN m–1 under normal laboratory conditions, where water can easily adsorb.
Moreover, the way the solid surface is prepared (crystallized in water or air) may have a large effect
on its surface properties.
• Let us look closer now at the well-established phenomenon of “contact angle hysteresis”. As
mentioned, if we have contamination, roughness, significant spreading pressure, heterogeneity or even
when equilibrium is not reached we can experience the phenomenon called “contact angle hysteresis”.
• This means that larger particles grow by the transference of material from the smaller
particles, the phenomenon we called Ostwald ripening.
• As most suspensions are polydispersed, the Kelvin equation is a crucial indicator of their
stability.
• The smaller particles will have a greater solubility and will tend to dissolve, and the
larger particles will tend to grow at their expense. In a suspension of a highly insoluble
substance, such as silver iodide (AgI) hydrosol, this phenomenon will be of little
consequence, since both large and small particles have extremely little tendency to dissolve.