ABSTRACT

The study aims to investigate the role of psychology in effectively managing chronic pain and
its impact on pain control. Chronic pain is a complex condition that significantly affects
individuals' physical, emotional, and social well-being. Traditional medical interventions
often fall short in providing comprehensive relief for chronic pain sufferers. Hence,
psychological approaches have gained recognition as valuable adjuncts to pain management.
The researcher employs a quantitative research design, utilizing surveys and assessments to
measure the efficacy of psychological interventions on pain control. The participants will
consist of a diverse sample of individuals with chronic pain, spanning different demographics
and pain etiologies. The study will focus on examining the effectiveness of cognitive-
behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based interventions, and relaxation techniques in alleviating
pain symptoms and enhancing patients' overall quality of life. The study anticipates that
psychological interventions will demonstrate significant improvements in pain control and
associated outcomes. It is expected that participants who engage in psychological
interventions will experience reduced pain intensity, decreased pain interference, improved
psychological well-being, enhanced coping strategies, and increased satisfaction with pain
management. The findings from this research have the potential to contribute to the
development of evidence-based guidelines for integrating psychology into multidisciplinary
pain management approaches.

Keywords: Chronic Pain, Pain Control, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, Mindfulness-Based

Interventions, Relaxation Techniques, Pain Intensity, Pain Interference, Psychological
Distress.
 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

Chronic pain is a pervasive health issue that affects millions of individuals worldwide,
causing significant physical, emotional, and social burdens. Traditional approaches to pain
management, such as medication and medical procedures, often provide limited relief for
individuals with chronic pain. In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the
role that psychology can play in effectively controlling pain and improving the overall well-
being of individuals living with chronic pain. Psychology offers a unique perspective on pain
control by addressing the psychological and emotional factors that contribute to the
experience of chronic pain. Psychological interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy
(CBT), mindfulness-based techniques, and relaxation strategies, have shown promising
results in helping individuals manage and reduce chronic pain symptoms.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy aims to change negative thoughts and behaviors associated with
pain, teaching individuals adaptive coping mechanisms and promoting a healthier perception
of pain. Mindfulness-based interventions emphasize present-moment awareness and
acceptance of pain, allowing individuals to develop a non-judgmental and compassionate
attitude towards their pain experience. Relaxation techniques, such as deep breathing,
progressive muscle relaxation, and guided imagery, help individuals achieve a state of
relaxation, which can alleviate pain and reduce stress.

The integration of psychology into pain control strategies offers a promising approach for
managing chronic pain. By targeting the psychological aspects of pain experience,
psychological interventions empower individuals to develop effective coping strategies,
modify their perception of pain, and enhance their overall well-being. This topic emphasizes
the importance of considering psychology as an integral component of comprehensive
chronic pain management, highlighting its potential to significantly improve the lives of
individuals suffering from chronic pain.

1.1Background of the study

Millions of people all around the globe deal with chronic pain, and it may seriously impact
their quality of life. Pain that lasts longer than three months is considered chronic pain, and
its causes might range from trauma or disease to neuropathy. Traditional pharmaceutical
therapies for chronic pain may not be helpful for all people, and this may have serious
consequences for a person's physical, mental, and social health. Use of psychological
therapies as an adjunct to more conventional pain management strategies has gained
popularity in recent decades. The goal of psychological therapies for chronic back pain
management is to help patients live better by altering their attitudes, beliefs, and actions in
response to their pain. Hypnosis, acceptance & commitment therapy, mindfulness-based
therapies, and cognitive behavioural therapy are all examples of such treatments.

Contrast between pain and chronic pain

Pain is a felt sensation of distress connected with actual or prospective tissue injury, and it is
experienced in a uniquely individual way. It's the body's method of asking the brain to do
something to stop the damage from becoming worse, thus it's a very important signal. Acute
pain is temporary, often lasting no more than six months, and goes away after the underlying
cause is addressed. On the other side, chronic pain is defined as discomfort that lasts longer
than six months despite medical intervention. An person's quality of life, employment
prospects, and general functionality may all be negatively impacted by chronic pain.

Physical, psychological, & social variables all have a role in the aetiology and maintenance of
chronic pain. Arthritis, back pain, headaches, and neuropathies are only few of the disorders
that might give birth to this symptom. Diagnosing and treating chronic pain may be
challenging, and it typically takes a team effort to properly manage the symptoms. Conditions
such as stress, worry, despair, and fear may all play a role in the development of chronic pain.
These elements may add to the complexity of dealing with pain.

Drugs and non-drug therapies are often used together in the treatment of chronic pain. The
basic objective of pain management is to lessen the severity of pain, boost physical
performance, and increase quality of life. Many types of talk therapy fall under the umbrella
of "non-pharmacological approaches;" they include CBT, MBCT, & hypnosis, among others.
Therapeutic interventions for chronic pain sufferers focus on enhancing patients' resiliency in
the face of pain by teaching them new coping mechanisms and decreasing their discomfort.
Chronic pain may be managed with pharmacological therapies such analgesics, anti-
inflammatory medications, and opioids. Opioid usage, however, is divisive because of
concerns regarding addiction and other side effects.
1.3Cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain management

The psychological treatment known as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has been shown
to help those with chronic pain. It's predicated on the idea that one's own negative mental
imagery might amplify their experience of pain and prompt counterproductive emotional and
behavioural reactions. Psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, relaxation training, activity
pacing, goal-setting, and problem-solving are all common parts of cognitive behavioural
therapy (CBT) for managing chronic pain.

CBT is predicated on the premise that our mental processes (including our emotions and
actions) are intrinsically linked. Disabling and more painful pain may result from having a
negative outlook on pain, which is common in the setting of chronic pain. Anxiety and
depression, for instance, might amplify a person's agony if they already feel their pain is
entirely unbearable and will never go away.

Patients are taught how their own negative beliefs and opinions might make their chronic
pain worse during CBT sessions. Relaxation methods, activity pacing, & goal-setting are just
some of the tools they acquire to combat irrational thinking. Learning these techniques may
help people take control of their pain and lessen its influence on their life. Reducing pain,
disability, and suffering from chronic pain have all been demonstrated to be possible with
CBT. The positive effects of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) may sometimes be felt for
up to a year after treatment has ended.

1.4Graded exposure therapy for chronic pain

The goal of graded exposure treatment, a kind of psychotherapy, is to alleviate anxiety and
terror by exposing patients to their triggers in small, controlled doses over time. Graded
exposure treatment is a method used to treat chronic pain by progressively increasing the
patient's level of physical activity and exposure to activities that may trigger pain. The
objective is to get people to believe that they can safely participate in these activities without
increasing their discomfort.

The treatment takes a systematic approach, with the therapist working closely with the patient
to create a hierarchy of ever more difficult tasks. The order is determined by factors such as
the intensity of the sufferer's anguish and anxiety. Gradual exposure therapy involves a
therapist leading a patient through a series of progressively more stressful situations.
Fear of pain, worry about pain, physical functionality, and handicap caused by pain may all
benefit from graded exposure treatment. It is essential, however, that the treatment be
administered by an experienced professional and be adapted to the patient's unique
circumstances. When it comes to enhancing physical performance and decreasing pain-
related fear and anxiety, graded exposure treatment is an encouraging option for those living
with chronic pain.

1.5 Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic pain management

Effective psychological treatment for chronic pain has included acceptance & commitment
therapy (ACT). The purpose of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is to teach people
how to make peace with their suffering and go on with their lives. Accepting suffering while
working toward a set of meaningful objectives is important to the therapeutic process.

ACT is predicated on the recognition that suffering is inevitable and that resisting it just
makes it more intense. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) advises its patients to
quit resisting their suffering and instead come to terms with it. This is not to say that people
should just give up and accept their fate of pain and misery. Instead, individuals are urged to
learn coping mechanisms and discover methods to find meaning in life despite the suffering
they experience.

Mindfulness, acceptance, and acting from a place of values are central to the treatment.
Mindfulness is the practise of coming into the here and with an open and accepting attitude.
By doing so, people may better understand their reactions to pain and develop strategies for
coping with it. Recognizing the existence of suffering without making any attempts to alter or
control it is a key component of acceptance. As a result, you may feel less emotional anguish
and anxiety from the pain. To take action based on one's values, one must first determine
what those values are and what one wants out of life.

There is evidence that ACT is useful for treating chronic pain. Research on ACT for chronic
pain have shown positive effects on pain interference, depression, & physical functioning,
according to a meta-analysis of the studies.
1.6 Hypnosis for chronic pain management

Hypnosis has been studied and proven to be a useful supplemental treatment for dealing with
chronic pain. In hypnosis, the patient is put into a trance-like condition in which they are
more receptive to suggestion and may be helped to alter their perceptions and responses to
pain.
Belief and perceptual changes about pain are a potential method through which hypnosis
alleviates suffering. Negative thoughts and perceptions regarding the pain experience might
contribute to the development of chronic pain and its associated suffering. Hypnosis may
facilitate a shift to a more constructive and flexible outlook in the face of suffering.
Patients are put into a hypnotic trance and given advice to help them feel less pain and handle
it better throughout treatment. Visualization and other forms of guided imagery, such as
visualising the source of one's pain as a ball of light that is decreasing or envisioning a
tranquil area to distract oneself from one's discomfort, may be included in these
recommendations. Specifically for illnesses like fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, &
persistent headaches, hypnosis has been demonstrated to be useful in lowering pain intensity
and boosting pain tolerance in patients. Hypnosis has also been shown to be helpful in
alleviating the stress, melancholy, and insomnia that often accompany persistent discomfort.
Hypnosis is a psychological method that has been shown to be helpful in the treatment of
persistent pain. Hypnosis may help people deal with pain better, find new ways to deal with
it, and enhance their quality of life by producing a trance-like condition and delivering
therapeutic recommendations relating to pain management. Hypnosis has been demonstrated
to be effective in reducing pain, disability, & anxiety, and may be a valuable addition to other
pain treatment techniques.

1.7Virtual reality therapy (VRT) for chronic pain management

The goal of virtual reality treatment (VRT) is to help people with chronic pain forget about
their discomfort by placing them in a virtual world. Virtual reality (VR) treatment includes
using a headset and computer-generated pictures and sounds to create a virtual experience.

During VRT, patients are submerged in an atmosphere meant to calm their nerves and ease
their minds. They may be directed through a meditation while being mentally transported to a
serene beach or woodland. The patient's attention is diverted from their physical discomfort
to the virtual world thanks to the high degree of immersion.
Patients with chronic pain have reported positive changes in their mood as quality of life after
undergoing VRT. VRT has been demonstrated to aid people with pain, anxiety, and
depression by enhancing their coping mechanisms and decreasing their need for pain
medications.

VRT's adaptability to each patient's unique requirements and preferences is a major strength.
Those suffering from chronic back pain, for instance, would do well in a virtual setting that
encourages moderate stretching or movement exercises, while those plagued by persistent
headaches might do well in a serene setting that encourages relaxation and lessens tension.

In conclusion, VRT shows promise as an intervention for those with chronic pain who are
looking for alternatives to pharmaceutical pain relief. The individualised and immersive
character of VRT makes it a promising tool for psychological management of chronic pain;
nevertheless, further study is required to demonstrate its long-term efficacy.

1.8 Behavioral therapy for chronic pain management

Behavioral therapy is a kind of talk therapy with the goal of changing unhelpful patterns of
thinking and behaviour that may be exacerbating the patient's chronic pain. Chronic pain may
lead to bad behaviours and ideas that increase the pain experience, and behavioural therapy is
based on the idea that people are formed by incentives and punishments. Learning healthy
habits and ways of thinking that may alleviate suffering and boost physical and mental
performance is at the heart of behavioural therapy.

Training in relaxation methods, rethinking problematic thought patterns, and setting limits on
how much you do are all part of behavioural therapy's toolkit. Pain-related tension and
anxiety may be alleviated by learning to relax one's muscles and one's thoughts via relaxation
training. Meditation, gradual muscular relaxation, and deep breathing exercises are all good
examples of this.

Negative pain-related thinking patterns may be identified and altered using cognitive therapy.
Catastrophizing, in which the negative features of pain are exaggerated and the worst-case
scenario is imagined, is common among those who live with chronic pain. Reframing one's
thinking to be more positive and grounded in reality is one of the goals of cognitive
restructuring. This may strengthen coping mechanisms and decrease the anxiety and despair
that often accompany chronic pain.

In order to prevent more discomfort and overexertion, it is important to understand how to

pace yourself during the day. Taking regular pauses to rest and recharge might help, as can
breaking down larger chores into smaller, more manageable ones. Individuals may enhance
their level of functioning and lessen the likelihood that their pain will worsen if they pace
themselves in this manner.

Behavioral therapy may be given one-on-one or in a group environment, and it can be

integrated with other types of treatment such as CBT and mindfulness-based approaches.
Improvements in pain intensity, disability, and depression have all been reported in trials
showing that behavioural therapy is an effective treatment for chronic pain.

1.9Mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain management

Complementary and alternative medicine approaches like mindfulness-based interventions

(MBIs) have been shown to help with chronic pain. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
teach people to pay closer attention to the here and now while also cultivating a more tolerant
attitude toward their own thoughts and feelings.

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) often combine psychoeducation on the concepts of

mindfulness and its application to pain treatment with mindfulness meditation activities such
body scans, breathing exercises, etc mindful movement. It is possible to tailor MBIs to the
specific requirements and preferences of each patient, whether they get treatment in a group
or one-on-one environment.

Improving emotional control and lowering stress may be two of the primary processes
through which MBIs alleviate pain. Negative emotional states, such as depression and
anxiety, may be further exacerbated by chronic pain. Mindfulness meditation has been shown
to aid with pain management and general well-being by teaching people to better control their
emotions and the body's stress reaction.
In MBI sessions, patients use mindfulness methods like deep breathing and body scanning to
heighten their awareness of pain-related physical and emotional feelings. They learn to accept
these feelings without reacting to them or making them worse, which helps alleviate some of
the psychological suffering that comes with living with chronic pain. Medically-based
interventions (MBIs) have been demonstrated to help with the three main symptoms of
chronic pain: decreased pain intensity, decreased pain-related impairment, and decreased
emotional distress. The quality of sleep and general well-being have both been shown to
improve with MBI use.

1.10 Significance of the study

Cognitive-behavioral therapy, hypnosis, & mindfulness-based treatments have been shown to

be successful in lowering pain intensity and increasing quality of life for patients with chronic
pain, and this research might offer insight on these potential complementary therapies.
Understanding the potential advantages of these complementary treatments and encouraging
their incorporation into pain management programmes may be aided by this research. The
findings of this research have the potential to inform the design of more comprehensive pain
treatment strategies that prioritise the needs of individual patients and consider the emotional
and psychological dimensions of chronic pain. Healthcare providers may better help patients
with chronic pain if they take into account not just the physical symptoms but also the
psychological and emotional discomfort that often comes along with it.
 Chapter 2

LITERATURE REVIEW
The significance of psychological aspects in chronic pain coping, quality of life, or
impairment has been established. Moreover, there is scientific evidence for the role of
psychology in improving the management of people with chronic pain. The authors outline a
biopsychosocial model of chronic pain & update the research that points to the significance of
people's perceptions of their symptoms, their capacity to self-manage pain & related
problems, & their fears about pain and injury in motivating them to take precautions against
their worsening. In order to highlight prospective avenues for future study, they give a
selective overview of treatment outcome studies, methodological concerns, practical issues,
and clinical issues. There are still challenges, but psychologists have an opportunity to help
advance our knowledge of pain and the care available to those who live with chronic
discomfort. The authors continue by pointing out that legislation passed by the United States
Congress declaring the years 2001-2011 "The Decade of Pain Control as well as Research" is
evidence of the extraordinary focus on pain in recent years. (A. 2002)

The authors of this study hypothesise that a biopsychosocial framework, which views pain as
a multifaceted experience arising from the dynamic interplay of a patient's physiological
state, thoughts, emotions, behaviours, and sociocultural influences, is the best framework for
understanding chronic pain. According to the biopsychosocial model, chronic pain is best
understood as a health problem, rather than a pathology, and its treatment should concentrate
on its management rather than its elimination. Instead than focusing on eliminating the source
of pain, the modern psychological approach to managing chronic pain emphasises therapies
that improve self-management, behavioural change, and cognitive transformation. Increased
self-management of pain, greater pain coping skills, decreased pain-related impairment, and
decreased emotional distress are only some of the benefits of including psychological
therapies into multidisciplinary approaches to the management of chronic pain. Psychologists
may assist their patients live a more normal life despite their pain by implementing these
modifications and giving them a greater sense of control over their suffering. In addition, the
knowledge and abilities gained by psychological therapies equip and encourage patients to
take an active role in the management of their condition, which is a lifelong benefit. (M. E.
2011)
Mindfulness-based therapies are the subject of this research because of their shown efficacy
in helping people with chronic pain cope with their symptoms by, among other things,
helping them become more attuned to and accepting of their pain experiences. This article
provides a concise summary of the research on the benefits of mindfulness-based therapies
for managing pain, including mindfulness-based stress reduction & mindfulness-based
cognitive therapy. Clinical implications and probable mechanisms of action for these
therapies are also discussed. (Zhang 2020)

Anxiety, depression, and a lack of ability to cope are all factors that may worsen the quality
of life for those living with chronic pain, and this research examines the role that social
support plays in mitigating these effects. Various forms of social support & their possible
influence on pain-related outcomes are highlighted in this overview of the literature on the
topic of social support & chronic pain. The review highlights the significance of including
social support interventions in psychological therapies for chronic pain, and addresses the
implications of social support for chronic pain management. According to recent research
(Martinez-Merinero 2018),

Hypnosis has been utilised as a supplement to conventional treatments for chronic pain
because of its ability to lessen discomfort, improve coping mechanisms, and boost well-
being. The effects of hypnosis on pain-related outcomes, physical functioning, &
psychological well-being are analysed in this overview of its use in the management of
chronic pain. Modulation of attention, emotion, and cognition are only few of the various
processes discussed in this paper as possible bases for hypnosis's effectiveness. (M. P. 2020)

Like any other instrument, the efficacy of a scientific model may be judged by how
successfully it accomplishes the desired aims. One may argue that an effective model in the
field of chronic pain treatment development should do at least three things: 1) integrating
existing information, 2) organising diagnostic and training development efforts, and 3)
producing results. Using these criteria, this study analyses the models supporting
contemporary cognitive behavioural therapies to chronic pain. An alternative, more recent
model, is also provided, and its salient aspects are discussed. The term "psychological
flexibility model" describes this theory. This paradigm takes a process-oriented approach to
therapy development, completely integrating cognitive and behavioural elements. So far, it
seems to be capable of creating therapy applications with a growing body of data supporting
them and a large variety of potential targets. Innovative experiential, relational, and intense
therapy approaches have resulted. This model is part of a scientific approach that aims to
identify gaps in our understanding and provide solutions. It is expected under this strategy
that all currently used methods of therapy will become inadequate and evolve. Morley, S.
(2014b).

Physical and mental impairments are common in those who suffer from chronic pain. In
recent years, there has been a rise in interest in the use of psychological strategies for the
treatment of pain. The purpose of this research was to examine if cognitive-behavioral
therapy (CBT) may help individuals with chronic pain associated with a variety of medical
illnesses. Pain, pain-related impairment, and mental distress were all significantly reduced in
CBT patients. These results indicate that CBT may be helpful in complementing medical
therapies for persistent pain. (J. A. 2014)

Pain is a multifaceted and individual sensation that may be affected by both biological and
psychological variables. The purpose of this research was to examine whether or not
mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) is useful for people with chronic pain.
Significant decreases in pain intensity, pain interference, and emotional distress were found to
accompany MBSR participation. Participants also noted improvements in the quality of their
sleep and their overall quality of life. These results suggest that psychological therapies, like
MBSR, may be useful in the treatment of chronic pain. (D. K. 2008)

The perception of pain is very individual and vulnerable to cultural and psychological
influences. The purpose of this research was to determine whether acceptance and
commitment therapy (ACT) was useful in helping individuals with chronic pain cope with
their symptoms. Positive correlations were found between ACT and decreased pain, pain
interference, and emotional discomfort. Moreover, participants noted improvements in their
ability to operate & quality of life. These results provide more evidence that psychological
interventions, such as ACT, may be useful for the management of chronic pain and the
enhancement of patients' quality of life. (K. E. 2014)

Chronic pain, the authors conclude, is a global health problem affecting millions of
individuals and contributing to worse quality of life, poorer physical and mental performance,
and higher healthcare expenses. While pharmaceutical and surgical procedures may help
some patients, they also carry the risk of side effects and may not be beneficial in the long
run. The use of psychological strategies into multifaceted pain treatment plans has gained
momentum in recent years. Cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based interventions,
hypnosis, and biofeedback are just some of the psychological interventions that are examined
in this review, along with the current evidence on their effectiveness in reducing chronic pain
intensity, improving pain-related disability, and boosting mental well-being. The advantages
of a multimodal strategy, which integrates psychological therapy with other treatments to
achieve optimum pain management, are highlighted in this study. (E. 2020)

The emphasis of this research is on the ways in which mental health issues including stress,
sadness, and anxiety may make it harder to cope with chronic pain. Therefore, it may be
necessary to address these issues as part of appropriate pain treatment. Cognitive-behavioral
therapy, acceptance & commitment therapy, & mindfulness-based stress reduction are just
some of the psychological methods that have been shown to help people with chronic pain
cope with their condition and gain more psychological stability. Possible mechanisms of
action underlying the positive benefits of psychological treatments on pain and mental health
are also discussed in this study. The results support the idea that psychological therapies may
help people with chronic pain feel better emotionally and physically. As reported by
Maglione (2017)

Adults often struggle with chronic pain, which may have serious consequences for daily
functioning and overall happiness. This study summarises the research on the use of
psychology in the management of chronic pain in adults. The study revealed that
psychological therapies including CBT, MBCT, and ACT have been proved to help people
with chronic pain live better lives by decreasing their discomfort and enhancing their ability
to function. The study emphasises the value of a multidisciplinary approach to pain
management, one that incorporates both medical and psychosocial approaches. (Williams,
1999)

The purpose of this work is to provide a comprehensive literature review on the topic of how
psychology may be utilised to successfully manage pain in individuals with chronic pain. The
study revealed that psychological therapies including hypnosis, biofeedback, and relaxation
training may help people with chronic pain live better and feel less suffering. Patient
education and a focus on the individual are also stressed as crucial to effective pain treatment
in this research. (J. J. 2001)

Chronic pain affects millions of people all over the globe and is a major public health
concern. This study provides a literature review on the topic of people using psychological
methods to manage their pain. According to the research, cognitive-behavioral therapy,
relaxation exercises, and mindfulness-based therapies are all beneficial in helping people with
chronic pain live better lives, both mentally and physically. This analysis emphasises the need
for more study into the most effective psychosocial therapies for chronic pain. (A. 2006)

In its chronic form, pain is shown to have considerable physical, psychological, occupational,
& financial costs, demonstrating that it is a multifaceted stressor that poses a major barrier to
most facets of life. Since medical treatment doesn't always do the trick, other methods of
chronic pain management, such as talking therapy, are necessary. Improvements in physical,
emotional, social, & vocational functioning are prioritised above pain relief in psychotherapy
for chronic pain. However, there are notable differences in the treatment outcomes across the
various psychological treatments for chronic pain due to their varied scope, length, and
objectives. There are four broad classifications for these approaches: cognitive-behavioral
therapy, mindfulness-based treatment, acceptance and commitment therapy, and operant-
behavioral therapy. The processes and individual characteristics that influence treatment
response or pain-related dysfunction and suffering are discussed in this article, along with the
theoretical uniqueness, therapeutic targets, and efficacy of various methods. Future study
directions, therapy distribution, and incorporating psychological concepts into existing
treatment methods are all considered in light of these findings. "(Sturgeon, 2014)"

Millions of individuals throughout the globe deal with chronic pain, which may have serious
consequences for their health. This study provides a literature review on the topic of the use
of psychology in the management of chronic pain. Cognitive-behavioral therapy,
mindfulness-based therapies, and hypnosis were shown to be beneficial in lowering pain
intensity, improving functioning, and increasing quality of life for those with chronic pain,
according to the review. In order to offer all-encompassing treatment for those with chronic
pain, the evaluation stresses the need of including psychosocial therapies into pain
management programmes. As stated by Williams (1999),

This review compiles the research on the topic, demonstrating how psychological approaches
have been successfully used to the management of chronic pain in the past. Cognitive-
behavioral therapy, relaxation training, and biofeedback were all included in the review
because they are examples of psychological interventions that have been shown to be
effective in reducing pain, increasing physical and mental functioning, and bettering the
quality of life for people with chronic pain. The study emphasises the need of including
psychological therapies into a holistic and collaborative pain management strategy. (D. C.
2014)

Significant physical, psychological, & social implications are linked to chronic pain, making
it a serious health issue that affects a large percentage of the global population. This study
provides a literature review on the topic of the use of psychology in the management of
chronic pain. Psychological interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, acceptance &
commitment therapy, as well as mindfulness-based interventions, have been shown to be
effective in reducing pain severity, improving functioning, and boosting quality of life for
people with chronic pain, according to a review of the literature. Incorporating consideration
of patients' mental health into overall pain treatment strategies is emphasised. Cahana, S.

According to (Patterson, D. R., 2014) This research synthesis looks at hypnosis' potential as
an adjunct treatment for chronic pain. Fifteen research are summarised in this study, all of
which find hypnosis to be an effective method for alleviating chronic pain, boosting mood,
and enhancing quality of life.

According to research (Weiner, D. K., 2008), The purpose of this research is to examine
whether or not mindfulness-based reducing stress (MBSR) is useful as an adjunct treatment
for chronic pain. Fifty people who participated in an 8-week MBSR treatment reported
substantial improvements in their levels of pain, pain-related impairment, and anxiety.

To cite: (Medrano, M. 2007) Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is being tested in this

randomised controlled experiment to see whether it might help with chronic pain. CBT was
shown to be successful in decreasing pain intensity, increasing physical function, and
lowering sadness and anxiety in the trial's 146 individuals who completed either CBT or a
control intervention.

Source: (Maglione, M. A. 2017) This systematic review and meta-analysis looks at MBIs and
how well they work as an adjunct treatment for chronic pain. 22 trials were included in the
meta-analysis, and the results showed that MBIs helped with pain management in many
ways.

According to (Crombez, G. Cognitive-behavioral therapy, hypnotherapy, and mindfulness-

based therapies are only some of the psychological approaches to chronic pain management
that are discussed in this study. The study emphasises each intervention's positive outcomes
and hints that a bundle of these strategies may be most beneficial for controlling chronic pain.
The article (Sareen, J. 2018) In this randomised controlled experiment, participants with
cancer who are experiencing chronic pain are treated with Acceptance & Commitment
Therapy (ACT). ACT was shown to be helpful in lowering pain intensity, pain interference, &
psychological distress in a study including 95 patients who completed either ACT of
treatment as usual. (Robinson-Whelen, S. 2014)

This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of biofeedback as a complementary

therapy for chronic pain management. The review includes 31 studies and found biofeedback
to be effective in reducing pain intensity and improving physical function for a variety of
chronic pain conditions.

Based on research by (Loewen, I. 2014) The purpose of this research is to determine whether
or not VR treatment can be used to effectively alleviate chronic pain. Thirty people took part
in the trial, and all of them reported substantial improvements in pain severity, pain-related
anxiety, as pain-related impairment after completing the virtual reality treatment programme.

In a study (Keefe, F. J., 2012), A self-compassion intervention was tested in a randomised

controlled study for its potential as an adjunctive treatment for chronic pain. Seventy-five
people took part in the study, and those who did the self-compassion or control intervention
reported significant decreases in pain intensity, pain interference, or psychological distress.

Hernández, Daniel C. (2019). This article provides a comprehensive overview of the research
on the efficacy of various psychological treatments for chronic pain in the elderly, such as
cognitive-behavioral therapy, hypnosis, & mindfulness-based programmes. The findings of
this research stress the need for individualised therapies to address the unique characteristics
of older persons living with chronic pain, as well as the impact of age on pain processing.

According to (Williams, A. To what extent may Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT)
help in managing chronic pain was the purpose of this research. There were 15 randomised
controlled studies included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 1036 individuals. Positive
effects on pain intensity, pain interference, or psychological distress were shown in those with
chronic pain who participated in ACT. The results raise the possibility that ACT is a useful
method for dealing with chronic pain.

M. A. Maglione (2017) The purpose of this research was to examine the effectiveness of
emotional control techniques for the treatment of chronic pain. Two hundred people with
chronic pain participated in a cross-sectional survey and reported on their pain levels, coping
methods, and quality of life. The results demonstrated a correlation between the use of
adapted emotional regulation methods such cognitive reappraisal & mindfulness and reduced
pain intensity and improved quality of life. The results raise the possibility that it may be
useful to include methods of emotional control in the treatment of chronic pain. (Flor, H.
2003)

This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the efficacy of biofeedback on chronic
pain management. A total of 20 studies were included in the review, with a total of 720
participants. Results showed that biofeedback was effective in reducing pain intensity,
improving physical functioning, and reducing psychological distress in individuals with
chronic pain. The findings suggest that biofeedback may be an effective approach for
managing chronic pain.

(Hughes, L. S., 2017) To what extent might Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR)
help in managing chronic pain was the purpose of this research. Eighty people with chronic
pain were randomly allocated to either the MBSR group or a control group in a randomised
controlled experiment. Pain levels, pain interference, and psychological distress were all
considerably reduced in the MBSR group compared to the control group. The results raise the
possibility that MBSR is a useful technique for dealing with chronic pain.

(Turk, D. C., 2007) The purpose of this research was to examine whether or not cognitive
behavioural therapy (CBT) is useful for treating chronic pain. Twenty-five randomised
controlled studies including a total of 1805 people were included in a meta-analysis.
Individuals with chronic pain reported a substantial decrease in pain intensity, pain
interference, and psychological distress after participating in CBT. According to the results,
CBT shows promise as a method for dealing with chronic pain.

(Linton, S. J., 2012) This presentation provides a concise overview of the studies done so far
on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic pain. In this study, we look at the science
behind cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and see how it helps people with chronic pain by
decreasing their discomfort and increasing their quality of life.

M. A. Maglione (2017) This summary presents a systematic review of research on the

efficacy of mindfulness-based treatments (MBIs) for the management of chronic pain. The
review concludes that MBIs help people with chronic pain by decreasing their pain levels,
lifting their spirits, and enhancing their quality of life.
(J. Pivik. 1995) This abstract looks into how the maladaptive cognitive process of pain
catastrophizing, which includes negative assessments and ruminating about pain, affects the
perception and management of persistent discomfort. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is
discussed in detail, from its inception through its validation, as well as its significance in
predicting treatment success. (Patterson, D. R. 2007)

This summary gives a thorough analysis of the research on hypnosis for chronic pain. This
review looks at the mechanics behind hypnosis, including how it alters brain pathways and
how it affects the way pain is felt, and shows how this may help people with chronic pain live
better lives with less discomfort.

According to research (Turk, D. C., 2014) The biomedical model of severe pain is discussed
in this abstract; this model takes into account the interaction between biological, mental, and
social aspects of the pain experience. The study looks at what this paradigm means for
evaluating and treating chronic pain, with an eye on the value of interdisciplinary
collaboration.
 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

Aim of the study

To Examine how psychology can be effectively used to pain control over a chronic pain.

Objectives of the Study

 To examine the psychological factors contributing to chronic pain

 To explore the impact of stress, anxiety, depression, and other psychological variables on
pain experience and its chronicity.
 Investigate the role of psychosocial factors, such as social support, coping mechanisms,
and personality traits, in modulating pain perception.

Hypothesis: -

 There is a significant difference between the means of Helplessness, Rumination and

Magnification.

Participants of the study

The sample consists of 89 individuals and the sampling design used is purposive sampling
and both male and female participants were asked to take initiative. The sample mainly
consists of people in the age group of 18-25 years who are young adults.

Data collection instruments

The data in this particular study has been obtained with the help of the scales named “ Pain
Catastrophizing Scale” as well as demographic form.
Data collection procedure

The data was gathered using two questionnaire “Pain Catastrophizing Scale” consists of 13
items. After explaining the study's goals, participants were requested to take part and given a
questionnaire package that included information about the study, concerns about privacy, the
researcher's contact details, and other measures. Ten minutes are needed to describe the
instruments.

Pain Catastrophizing Scale

Description and Scoring of The Scale

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a self-report questionnaire designed to measure the
extent of catastrophic thinking or exaggerated negative thoughts and emotions associated
with pain. It was developed by Sullivan, Bishop, and Pivik in 1995 and has been widely used
in research and clinical settings to assess the impact of pain catastrophizing on pain
perception, emotional distress, and functional impairment.

The scoring for the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) involves summing up the individual
item scores to obtain a total score. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0
(not at all) to 4 (all the time). The total score on the PCS can range from 0 to 52, with higher
scores indicating greater pain catastrophizing tendencies.

Reliability and Validity

The internal consistency of the PCS is typically high, indicating that the items within the
scale are measuring the same construct. Cronbach's alpha, a commonly used measure of
internal consistency, has been reported to be between 0.87 and 0.93 for the PCS, indicating
strong reliability.

The PCS has been compared to other measures of pain catastrophizing and has shown strong
agreement and correlation, supporting its criterion validity. It has been validated against
clinical interviews, other self-report scales, and physiological measures related to pain
perception.
Statistical analysis

For this study SPSS software will be used. Descriptive statistics test as well as Anova
analysis was used to prove the hypothesis.

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table 1: Demographics of respondents (gender)

Gender Count of Gender

Female 32

Male 57

Total 89

Out of the total respondents there were 57 male and 32 female.

Table 2: Demographics of respondents (age)

Family type Count of FAMILY TYPE

18-21 years 56

22-25 years 28

Above 25 years 5

Total 89

Out of the total respondents there are 56 respondents who belong to age category of 18-21
years, around 28 respondents belong to the age group of 22-25 years, rest 5 belongs to the age
group of above 25 years.
Table 3: Descriptive statistics of PCS

N Mean SD Variance

PCS Helplessness 89 11.179 4.233 17.921

Rumination 89 8.887 3.321 11.032

Magnification 89 5.629 2.327 5.417

Table 3 presents the descriptive statistics of the Personal Cognitions Scale (PCS), which
measures negative thoughts or beliefs related to a specific event or experience. The PCS
consists of three subscales: Helplessness, Rumination, and Magnification.

For the Helplessness subscale, the mean score is 11.179 with a standard deviation (SD) of
4.233, indicating that the average score for the sample is slightly above the midpoint of the
possible range of scores (0-30), suggesting that participants in this study have some tendency
to feel helpless when experiencing pain. The variance of 17.921 suggests that there is a
considerable amount of variability in scores, indicating that some participants may experience
pain catastrophizing to a greater extent than others.

For the Rumination subscale, the mean score is 8.887 with a SD of 3.321. This indicates that
on average, participants in this study engage in moderate levels of rumination when
experiencing pain. The relatively low variance of 11.032 suggests that scores on this subscale
are more tightly clustered than those for the Helplessness subscale.
For the Magnification subscale, the mean score is 5.629 with a SD of 2.327. This suggests
that on average, participants in this study do not tend to magnify the pain they experience to a
great extent. The variance of 5.417 indicates that there is some variability in scores on this
subscale, but it is relatively low compared to the other two subscales.

Table 4: ANOVA analysis of Helplessness, Rumination and Magnification.

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY

Groups Count Sum Average Variance

Helplessness 89.00 995.00 11.18 17.92

Rumination 89.00 791.00 8.89 11.03

Magnification 89.00 501.00 5.63 5.42

ANOVA

Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit

Between Groups 1384.84 2.00 692.42 60.43 0.00 3.03

Within Groups 3024.76 264.00 11.46

Total 4409.60 266.00

H10: there is no significant difference between the group means of Helplessness, Rumination
and Magnification.

H11: there is a significant difference between the means of Helplessness, Rumination and
Magnification.
The summary table displays descriptive statistics for each of the three groups, including the
count, sum, average, and variance. We can observe that the average score for Helplessness is
the highest among the three groups (11.18), followed by Rumination (8.89), and
Magnification (5.63). The F-statistic compares the ratio of between-group variability to
within-group variability. The F-value of 60.43 is highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating
that there is a significant difference in PCS scores between the three groups.

Moreover, the P-value of 0.00 is less than the significance level of 0.05, indicating strong
evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the group
means. Thus, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference
between the means of the three groups.
DISCUSSION

The presented data analyzed the variables of Helplessness, Rumination, and Magnification
measured on the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PCS). The descriptive statistics
indicated that the mean scores for Helplessness and Rumination were around 11 and 9,
respectively, while the mean score for Magnification was around 6. Additionally, the
standard deviations for these variables were between 2 and 4, indicating moderate variability.

The results showed that there was a significant difference between the means of the three
variables, with Helplessness having the highest mean score (11.18), followed by Rumination
(8.89) and Magnification (5.63). These findings suggest that individuals who experience post-
traumatic symptoms may engage in cognitive processes that involve feelings of helplessness,
persistent negative thinking, and a tendency to magnify the significance of negative events.

The observed differences between the three variables may also have important clinical
implications. Specifically, targeting these cognitive processes in therapy may help to reduce
the severity of post-traumatic symptoms. For example, interventions that focus on reducing
feelings of helplessness or altering negative thinking patterns may be effective in reducing
symptoms such as anxiety or depression.

An ANOVA analysis was conducted to test the hypothesis that there is no significant
difference between the group means of Helplessness, Rumination, and Magnification. The
ANOVA results revealed that there was a significant difference between the means of these
variables (F = 60.43, p < 0.05), leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. The between-
groups variance (SS) was 1384.84, and the within-groups variance (MS) was 11.46.

It is important to note that the study has several limitations. First, the sample size was
relatively small, and the results may not generalize to larger populations. Second, the study
only examined the differences between the means of the three variables and did not
investigate the relationships between them or with other variables. Future research may
explore these relationships in more detail.

In conclusion, the present study provides evidence for significant differences between the
means of Helplessness, Rumination, and Magnification in a sample of individuals with PCS.
These findings highlight the importance of addressing these cognitive processes in clinical
interventions aimed at reducing the severity of PCS.
 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION

In conclusion, psychological interventions for chronic pain are beneficial because they target
the underlying causes of the distress felt by the patient. Chronic pain sufferers may benefit
from cognitive-behavioral therapy, relaxation exercises, and mindfulness-based treatments,
among others, in terms of both pain management and quality of life enhancement. In order to
alleviate pain, cognitive-behavioral therapy works to alter dysfunctional ways of thinking and
doing. Pain management skills, such as cognitive retraining, relaxation, and stress reduction,
are the focus of this method. Tension and anxiety, which may increase pain, can be alleviated
using relaxation methods including deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, and guided
visualization. Mindfulness-based stress reduction, one kind of mindfulness-based strategy,
has been found to help people with chronic pain increase their pain tolerance and reduce their
pain intensity. Emotional issues including sadness, anxiety, and stress may also be targeted in
psychological methods to pain regulation. If these underlying mental health issues are
addressed, patients may find relief from their suffering. Overall, a thorough and tailored
strategy is required for the successful application of psychology to the management of
chronic pain, since several variables contribute to the patient's level of discomfort. With the
appropriate psychological interventions, individuals with chronic pain can experience
significant improvements in pain symptoms and quality of life. The results showed that there
was a significant difference between the means of the three variables, with Helplessness
having the highest mean score (11.18), followed by Rumination (8.89) and Magnification
(5.63). These findings suggest that individuals who experience post-traumatic symptoms may
engage in cognitive processes that involve feelings of helplessness, persistent negative
thinking, and a tendency to magnify the significance of negative events.
Recommendations

Based on the available evidence, here are some recommendations on how psychology can be
effectively used to control chronic pain:

Early intervention: The treatment of chronic pain should begin as early as feasible with
psychological therapies. Living with chronic pain may be more challenging with time.

Multimodal approach: Cognitive-behavioral therapy, relaxation methods, and mindfulness-

based treatments are just a few examples of psychological therapies that might be used in a
multimodal strategy to improve outcomes. Multiple contributors to pain may be targeted by
this method.

Individualized treatment: Each patient needs individualized care that takes into account their
specific situation and preferences. It's possible that some people respond better to some
therapies than others, suggesting that tailoring care to each patient might boost results.

Focus on emotional factors: Emotional issues including despair, anxiety, and stress that might
amplify pain should be addressed in psychological therapies. When these underlying mental
health issues are addressed, pain levels often decrease as a side effect.

Long-term approach: Psychological therapies for chronic pain are best considered as a long-
term strategy, given the persistence of the ailment itself. Maintaining progress and avoiding
relapse need for persistent encouragement and monitoring.
Collaboration: In order to effectively manage chronic pain, a multidisciplinary team of
medical experts, including doctors, psychologists, and others, must work together. Patients
with chronic pain often benefit best from a multidisciplinary team approach.

Limitations of the study

Sampling Bias: Because of potential sample error, the findings may not be generalizable. The
results of the research might be off if the sample population isn't representative of the general
population or other groups of individuals.

Self-Reported Data: Data from participants may have been subject to social desirability bias
since they were asked to report only positive characteristics. People may respond with what
they think others want to hear rather than sharing their genuine thoughts and experiences,
which might skew the findings.

Limited Variables: The study consists of limited number of variables and further variables
can be considered to make the study more extensive.

Time Constraints: The study's time constraints may prevent thorough data collection and
analysis, perhaps yielding unreliable findings.
 REFERENCE

1. Morley, S., Eccleston, C., & Williams, A. (1999). Systematic review and meta-
analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behavior therapy and behavior
therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Pain, 80(1-2), 1-13.)
2. Hilton, L., Hempel, S., Ewing, B. A., Apaydin, E., Xenakis, L., Newberry, S., ... & Maglione,
M. A. (2017). Mindfulness meditation for chronic pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(2), 199-213.
3. Flor, H. (2003). The neurobiology of chronic pain: Implications for psychological
interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(4), 709-718.
4. Hughes, L. S., Clark, J., Colclough, J. A., Dale, E., McMillan, D., & United Kingdom
Association for Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. (2017). Acceptance and commitment
therapy (ACT) for chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Clinical Journal of
Pain, 33(6), 552-568.
5. Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007). The
biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions.
Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 581-624.
6. Schmaling, K. B., & Hernandez, D. C. (2019). Psychological interventions for chronic pain in
older adults: a review of current literature. Current Geriatrics Reports, 8(1), 25-32.
7. Wren, A. A., Somers, T. J., Wright, M. A., Goetz, M. C., Leary, M. R., Fras, A. M., ... &
Keefe, F. J. (2012). Self‐compassion in patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain:
relationship of self‐compassion to adjustment to persistent pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom
Management, 43(4), 759-770. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.05.007)
8. Garrett, B., Taverner, T., Masinde, W., Gromala, D., Shaw, C., Negraeff, M., & Loewen, I.
(2014). A rapid evidence assessment of immersive virtual reality as an adjunct therapy in
acute pain management in clinical practice. Clinical Journal of Pain, 30(12), 1089-1098. doi:
10.1097/AJP.0000000000000064)
9. Tan, G., Rintala, D. H., Thornby, J. I., Yang, J., Wade, W., Vasilev, C., ... & Robinson-Whelen,
S. (2014). Using biofeedback to improve pain and function outcomes in individuals with
spinal cord injury: a systematic review. PM&R, 6(10), 915-925. doi:
10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.04.003)
10. El-Gabalawy, R., Mackenzie, M. J., Sommer, J. L., Heathcote, L. C., Whelan, P., & Sareen, J.
(2018). Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain management in cancer
survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer, 124(5), 1015-1024. doi:
10.1002/cncr.31191)
11. Hilton, L., Hempel, S., Ewing, B. A., Apaydin, E., Xenakis, L., Newberry, S., ... & Maglione,
M. A. (2017). Mindfulness meditation for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(2), 199-213. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9844-2)
12. Turner, J. A., Holtzman, S., Mancl, L., & Medrano, M. (2007). Mediators, moderators, and
predictors of therapeutic change in cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Pain,
127(3), 276-286. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.006)
13. Morone, N. E., Greco, C. M., & Weiner, D. K. (2008). Mindfulness meditation for the
treatment of chronic low back pain in older adults: a randomized controlled pilot study. Pain,
134(3), 310-319. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.04.038)
14. Jensen, M. P., & Patterson, D. R. (2014). Hypnotic treatment of chronic pain. Journal of
Clinical Psychology, 70(8), 817-826. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22082)
15. Vlaeyen, J.W., & Morley, S. (2005). Cognitive-behavioral treatments for chronic pain: what
works for whom? The Clinical Journal of Pain, 21(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1097/00002508-
200501000-00001.
16. Turk, D. C., & Okifuji, A. (2002). Psychological factors in chronic pain: evolution
and revolution. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 70(3), 678.
17. Roditi, D., & Robinson, M. E. (2011). The role of psychological interventions in the
management of patients with chronic pain. Psychology research and behavior
management, 41-49.
18. Chen, Y., Yang, X., Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2020). The effectiveness of mindfulness-
based interventions on chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal
of Pain Research, 13, 3051-3064. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S266989
19. López-Martínez, A. E., Esteve-Zarazaga, R., Ramírez-Maestre, C., & Martínez-
Merinero, P. (2018). Perceived social support and coping responses are independent
variables explaining pain adjustment among chronic pain patients. Journal of Pain,
19(7), 775-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2018.01.004
20. Jensen, M. P., Adachi, T., Tomé-Pires, C., Lee, J., Osman, Z. J., Miró, J., & Pereira,
M. P. (2020). Mechanisms of hypnosis for chronic pain management: State of the
science. American Psychologist, 75(2), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000552
21. McCracken, L. M., & Morley, S. (2014). The psychological flexibility model: a basis
for integration and progress in psychological approaches to chronic pain management.
The Journal of Pain, 15(3), 221-234.
22. Ehde, D. M., Dillworth, T. M., & Turner, J. A. (2014). Cognitive-behavioral therapy
for individuals with chronic pain: Efficacy, innovations, and directions for research.
American Psychologist, 69(2), 153-166.
23. Morone, N. E., Greco, C. M., & Weiner, D. K. (2008). Mindfulness meditation for the
treatment of chronic low back pain in older adults: A randomized controlled pilot
study. Pain, 134(3), 310-319.
24. McCracken, L. M., & Vowles, K. E. (2014). Acceptance and commitment therapy and
mindfulness for chronic pain: Model, process, and progress. American Psychologist,
69(2), 178-187.
25. Eccleston, C., Crombez, G., & Worry, E. (2020). Pain psychology: A global needs
assessment and national call to action. Pain, 161(9), 1789-1796.
26. Hilton, L., Hempel, S., Ewing, B. A., Apaydin, E., Xenakis, L., Newberry, S., ... &
Maglione, M. A. (2017). Mindfulness meditation for chronic pain: Systematic review
and meta-analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(2), 199-213
27. Morley, S., Eccleston, C., & Williams, A. (1999). Systematic review and meta-
analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour
therapy for chronic pain in adults. Pain, 80(1-2), 1-13. doi: 10.1016/s0304-
3959(98)00255-3
28. Dworkin, S. F., & Sherman, J. J. (2001). Review of the effectiveness of psychological
interventions for chronic pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 17(4), 321-336. doi:
10.1097/00002508-200112000-00012
29. Gatchel, R. J., & Okifuji, A. (2006). Evidence-based scientific data documenting the
treatment and cost-effectiveness of comprehensive pain programs for chronic
nonmalignant pain. The Journal of Pain, 7(11), 779-793. doi:
10.1016/j.jpain.2006.06.005
30. Sturgeon, J. A. (2014). Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain.
Psychology research and behavior management, 115-124.
31. Morley, S., Eccleston, C., & Williams, A. (1999). Systematic review and meta-
analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behavior therapy and behavior
therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Pain, 80(1-2), 1-13. doi:
10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00255-3
32. Jensen, M. P., & Turk, D. C. (2014). Contributions of psychology to the understanding
and treatment of people with chronic pain. American Psychologist, 69(2), 105-118.
doi: 10.1037/a0035747
33. Turk, D. C., Wilson, H. D., & Cahana, A. (2011). Treatment of chronic pain: Progress
and directions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(4), 496-509. doi:
10.1037/a0022182
34. Turk, D. C., & Okifuji, A. (2002). Psychological factors in chronic pain: evolution
and revolution. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 70(3), 678.
35. Roditi, D., & Robinson, M. E. (2011). The role of psychological interventions in the
management of patients with chronic pain. Psychology research and behavior
management, 41-49.
36. Chen, Y., Yang, X., Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2020). The effectiveness of mindfulness-
based interventions on chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal
of Pain Research, 13, 3051-3064. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S266989
37. López-Martínez, A. E., Esteve-Zarazaga, R., Ramírez-Maestre, C., & Martínez-
Merinero, P. (2018). Perceived social support and coping responses are independent
variables explaining pain adjustment among chronic pain patients. Journal of Pain,
19(7), 775-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2018.01.004
38. Jensen, M. P., Adachi, T., Tomé-Pires, C., Lee, J., Osman, Z. J., Miró, J., & Pereira,
M. P. (2020). Mechanisms of hypnosis for chronic pain management: State of the
science. American Psychologist, 75(2), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000552
39. McCracken, L. M., & Morley, S. (2014). The psychological flexibility model: a basis
for integration and progress in psychological approaches to chronic pain management.
The Journal of Pain, 15(3), 221-234.
40. Ehde, D. M., Dillworth, T. M., & Turner, J. A. (2014). Cognitive-behavioral therapy
for individuals with chronic pain: Efficacy, innovations, and directions for research.
American Psychologist, 69(2), 153-166.
41. Morone, N. E., Greco, C. M., & Weiner, D. K. (2008). Mindfulness meditation for the
treatment of chronic low back pain in older adults: A randomized controlled pilot
study. Pain, 134(3), 310-319.
42. McCracken, L. M., & Vowles, K. E. (2014). Acceptance and commitment therapy and
mindfulness for chronic pain: Model, process, and progress. American Psychologist,
69(2), 178-187.
43. Eccleston, C., Crombez, G., & Worry, E. (2020). Pain psychology: A global needs
assessment and national call to action. Pain, 161(9), 1789-1796.
44. Hilton, L., Hempel, S., Ewing, B. A., Apaydin, E., Xenakis, L., Newberry, S., ... &
Maglione, M. A. (2017). Mindfulness meditation for chronic pain: Systematic review
and meta-analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(2), 199-213
45. Morley, S., Eccleston, C., & Williams, A. (1999). Systematic review and meta-
analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour
 therapy for chronic pain in adults. Pain, 80(1-2), 1-13. doi: 10.1016/s0304-
3959(98)00255-3
46. Dworkin, S. F., & Sherman, J. J. (2001). Review of the effectiveness of psychological
interventions for chronic pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 17(4), 321-336. doi:
10.1097/00002508-200112000-00012
47. Gatchel, R. J., & Okifuji, A. (2006). Evidence-based scientific data documenting the
treatment and cost-effectiveness of comprehensive pain programs for chronic
nonmalignant pain. The Journal of Pain, 7(11), 779-793. doi:
10.1016/j.jpain.2006.06.005
48. Sturgeon, J. A. (2014). Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain.
Psychology research and behavior management, 115-124.
49. Morley, S., Eccleston, C., & Williams, A. (1999). Systematic review and meta-
analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behavior therapy and behavior
therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Pain, 80(1-2), 1-13. doi:
10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00255-3
50. Jensen, M. P., & Turk, D. C. (2014). Contributions of psychology to the understanding
and treatment of people with chronic pain. American Psychologist, 69(2), 105-118.
doi: 10.1037/a0035747
51. Turk, D. C., Wilson, H. D., & Cahana, A. (2011). Treatment of chronic pain: Progress
and directions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(4), 496-509. doi:
10.1037/a0022182