Amended applications order 39 rule 1&2
Amended applications order 39 rule 1&2
sUBMTED BY .Samae.g.tht.galatk
PLAINTIFF /PETITIONER / DEFENDANT IACCUSED / OTHER/ ADvoATE
IN THE HON'BLE COURT OF SH SOMITRA KUMAR,
LD ADJ, EAST DISTRICT, KARKARDOOMA COURTS,
DELHI
VERSUS
INDEX
At7dauit.
PLAINTIFF
NIEW DELHI
DATED: o1 ] o8| 2024 THROUGI
MS POONAMRANI SINGII
ADVOCATE:
POONAM RANI SINGH
End, No. Di9640r2021 Advocate
NeAha ChkSeaJrks New Dei75
Emal: advpoonamrsinghgmal. co
Mobilo. 9811116J09
IN THE COURT OF SHRI
SUMITRAKUMAR,
DISTRICTJUDGE, EAST DISTRICT, KARKARDOOMA
COURTS, DELHI
CIVIL SUIT NO. 238 OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
CHITRA SHEELA ...PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
SMT. DEVKIDEVI& ORS.
...DEFENDANTS
APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF FOR
NECESSERY AMENDMENT OF APPLICATION
U/O 39 RULE 1&2 R/W 151
CPC.
PRAYER:
THROUGH
POONAMRANI SINGH
ADVOCATE
VERSUS
SMT. DEVKI DEVI&& ORS . DEFENDANTS
INJUNCTION
PLAINTIFF
NEW DELHI
THROUGH
DATED: -0.08.2024
POONAM RANI SINGH
ADVOCATE
POONAM
Enrl. No.
RANI SINGH
DI9640/2021
Ofice: 204.2nd Floo, Var-nan Bee As
Advocale
Near Ashiwad Chowk. Sec.-5, Dwarks, Plaza,
New
Pict No. 1.
Email: advpconamrsingh Delhi-75
[email protected]
Mobile: 9811116309
IN THE COURT OF SH.SoMLTRAKUMAR, LO. DISTRICT JUPGE)
EAST, KARKARDOOMA COURTS, NEW DELHI
CIVIL SUIT NO. OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
CHITRA SHEELA ..PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
SMT. DEVKI DEVI& ORS ..DEFENDANTS
AFFIDAVIT
has drafted by my
instructions and the same have been read
Counsel under my
|)
and explained to me in my vernacular
language and I Say that the Same are
In
my true and COrrect
the best of my to
DEPONENT
Khe
Seal r IFICATION:
Verified at New Delhi On ULAay of
Per Ap 2024 that the contents of my above
Warka KaCourts,O
31 NASM R
vit are true and Correct to the best of
ledge and belief and no part of it is
DEPOENT
idenaino. t i e t e
eh
has soby
New De! which
O:e lthe are
that the contents ai
- 6 JUL 2024
raac &
have tbeen
rue and correct
knowiouge
Amissionet
F|TA SHARMA