General Introduction

Personality refers to the enduring characteristics and behavior that comprise a person’s unique
adjustment to life, including major traits, interests, drives, values, self-concept, abilities, and
emotional patterns. Various theories explain the structure and development of personality in
different ways, but all agree that personality helps determine behavior.

According to Sigmund Freud, human personality is complex and has more than a single
component. In his famous psychoanalytic theory, Freud states that personality is composed of
three elements known as the id, the ego, and the superego. These elements work together to
create complex human behaviors.
"The id is considered the basis of sexual and aggressive energy and is largely held in the
unconscious, emerging as illogical or wishful thinking,". "The superego is one’s conscience and
is established via identification with parental figures or social groups at large. The ego is tasked
with balancing reality with the demands of desire (id) and morality (superego)."
Psychological assessment is the systematic evaluation of a person's behavior. The components of
psychological assessment include the variables selected for measurement (e.g., beliefs, social
behaviors), the measurement methods used (e.g., interviews, observation), the reduction and
synthesis of derived data (e.g., whether summary scores are calculated for a questionnaire), and
the inferences drawn from the data (e.g., inferences about treatment effectiveness).

Personality assessment is a field of psychology that seeks to understand and measure individual
personality differences that characterize people across time and circumstance. Personality
assessment is used for a variety of purposes including the identification and description of
personality features among normal individuals as well as the assessment of abnormal personality
in patients receiving psychotherapy services.

Personality assessment also plays a major role in the field of neuropsychology, medical
psychology, industrial organizational psychology, and forensic psychology. The Society for
Personality Assessment and several divisions of the American Psychological Association are
also centrally involved in the development, promotion, and application of personality
assessment.

Types of personality assessments

OBJECTIVE TESTS

(A) Objective Personality Tests: - The objective approach to personality assessment is

characterized by the reliance on structured,
standardized measurement Devices, which are typically of a self-report nature.
"Structured" reflects the tendency to use straight
forward test stimuli, such as direct questions regarding
the person's opinion of themselves, and unambiguous instructions regarding the completion of
the test.
Many objective tests use a [true/false or yes/no response format
1. Self-Report Questionnaires

Self-report questionnaires are one of the most common and widely used forms of objective
personality testing. These assessments ask individuals to answer a series of standardized
questions regarding their behaviors, thoughts, emotions, and attitudes. The responses are
typically scored based on established criteria, and they allow for the efficient collection of data
on various aspects of personality. An example of a widely used self-report questionnaire is the
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2), which includes hundreds of items
designed to assess mental health symptoms and personality traits. Another example is the NEO
Personality Inventory (NEO-PI), which measures the Big Five personality traits—openness,
conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism—allowing clinicians to assess a
person’s broad personality profile.

2. Likert-Type Scales

Likert-type scales involve asking individuals to rate their agreement with statements on a scale,
typically ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." This type of objective test is used
to measure the intensity of traits or behaviors and provides a more nuanced understanding of an
individual’s personality. For example, the Big Five Inventory (BFI) uses a Likert-scale format
to assess the Five-Factor Model of personality. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) also
employs this type of scale to differentiate between state anxiety (temporary feelings of
nervousness) and trait anxiety (general anxiety tendencies), providing insights into how a person
experiences anxiety in different contexts.

3. True-False Personality Inventories

True-false inventories are objective personality tests where individuals are presented with
statements and asked to respond with "true" or "false" based on whether the statement accurately
describes them. This binary format simplifies scoring and is easy to administer, though it may
limit the depth of insight provided. A well-known example is the Minnesota Multiphasic
Personality Inventory (MMPI-2), which includes numerous true-false items to assess a range
of psychological conditions, from depression to psychopathy. The California Psychological
Inventory (CPI) is another example, focusing on social and personal adjustment, and using a
true-false format to evaluate behaviors and traits that influence a person’s interactions and
emotional stability.

4. Forced-Choice Questionnaires

Forced-choice questionnaires require individuals to select the most relevant response from two or
more options, often designed to be equally appealing or relevant, which reduces the potential for
response bias such as social desirability. By forcing a choice, these tests attempt to capture more
authentic responses, especially regarding traits that are harder to measure, like introversion
versus extraversion. An example is the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI), which uses
forced-choice items to assess core personality dimensions like extraversion and neuroticism.
Another widely used forced-choice instrument is the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule
(EPPS), which helps in evaluating personal preferences and motivation-driven behaviors across
various social and psychological contexts.

5. Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs)

Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) assess how individuals respond to hypothetical, realistic
scenarios or situations, often reflecting the type of judgments and decisions they would make in
real life. These tests measure not just cognitive abilities, but also personality traits, social
judgment, and emotional responses. In personality assessment, SJTs are often used to evaluate
traits such as agreeableness, conscientiousness, and interpersonal skills. While these tests are
more commonly applied in organizational settings, they are also used in clinical contexts to
evaluate how a person might react under stress or social pressure.

6. Behavioral Rating Scales

Behavioral rating scales are typically used by observers (such as clinicians, teachers, or parents)
to assess the frequency or intensity of certain behaviors displayed by the individual being
assessed. These scales are often used in clinical settings to rate behaviors in relation to
personality traits or psychological disorders. For example, the Conners' Rating Scales (CRS)
are commonly used to assess behavioral and emotional issues in children, such as hyperactivity,
impulsivity, and anxiety. The scales can help clinicians gauge the extent of problematic
behaviors and their impact on personality and functioning, thereby assisting in diagnosis and
treatment planning.

(B) Projective tests

Projective test represents the second broad approach to the assessment of personality, one that is
radically different from the methods used in objective personality tests. The format, items,
administration, andscoringof projective personality tests are all distinct from that of objective test
s,
whereas objective tests require responses to explicit verbal questions
or statements, projective tests ask
for responses to ambiguous and unstructured stimuli. Indeed, a major distinguishing feature of
projective techniques is the use of a relatively unstructured task that permits an almost unlimited
number of responses.

Nature of Projective Tests

Projective techniques involve examining individuals to impose their own structure on an

unstructured or ambiguous stimulus, revealing their needs, wishes, or conflicts. The test's
projective nature depends on the types of responses and how they are used. The instructions are
crucial, as the test becomes ambiguous when asked about the participants' needs. The test is
indirect, allowing patients to be more aware of the purpose and the significance of their
responses. Projective methods also allow for freedom of response, allowing clinicians to interpret
responses along multiple dimensions, unlike objective tests that provide a single score or scores
on a fixed number of dimensions.
Projective techniques offer advantages such as rich, accurate information, frequent use in
interviews, and open discussions on socially sensitive issues. They encourage freedom and
spontaneity of expression, but also require high-skilled interpreters and high administration costs
due to the complexity of data and the need for highly trained staff.

Types Include:

1. Rorschach Inkblot Test

The Rorschach Inkblot Test is one of the most famous projective personality tests. It consists of
a series of 10 inkblots that are presented to the individual, who is then asked to describe what
they see in each image. The responses are thought to reveal unconscious aspects of the
individual's thoughts, emotions, and personality. The test is based on the premise that people
project their own subjective experiences, desires, and conflicts onto ambiguous stimuli.
Psychologists analyze the content, themes, and structure of the responses to gain insights into the
person’s emotional functioning, thought processes, and interpersonal dynamics. The Rorschach
is often used in clinical settings to assess personality disorders, emotional functioning, and to
explore underlying psychological conflicts.

2. Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)

The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is another well-known projective test that involves a
series of ambiguous pictures depicting various scenes, often involving people in social situations.
The individual is asked to tell a story about each image, including what led up to the scene, what
is happening, and what the outcome might be. The goal of the TAT is to assess the individual’s
underlying drives, emotions, and interpersonal relationships by examining the themes and
narratives they create around the images. The test is based on the idea that people project their
own inner thoughts and feelings onto the characters and situations in the pictures. TAT is often
used to explore personality characteristics, motivations, emotional conflicts, and interpersonal
issues.

3. House-Tree-Person (HTP) Test

The House-Tree-Person (HTP) Test is a projective test that asks individuals to draw a house, a
tree, and a person. Each of these elements is interpreted symbolically to reveal aspects of the
individual's personality and psychological state. The house is thought to represent the self and
the family environment, the tree represents growth and development, and the person is seen as a
depiction of the individual's view of themselves and their relationships with others. Psychologists
analyze various elements of the drawings, such as the size, shape, and placement of each figure,
to understand emotional issues, self-esteem, and personality traits. Like other projective tests, the
HTP relies on the assumption that individuals project their own unconscious thoughts and
feelings into their drawings.

5. Sentence Completion Test

The Sentence Completion Test asks individuals to complete a series of unfinished sentences,
such as "I feel…" or "I wish…" The idea is that the way the individual finishes these sentences
can offer insights into their unconscious thoughts, emotions, and attitudes. This test is used to
explore personality traits, interpersonal issues, and emotional conflicts by evaluating how a
person completes the prompts. Responses are often analyzed for underlying themes, such as fear,
desires, or unresolved conflicts. The Sentence Completion Test can be helpful in uncovering
deep-seated psychological issues that might not be easily accessed through more direct
questioning or self-report techniques.

6. Word Association Test

The Word Association Test is a projective test in which individuals are presented with a series
of words and asked to respond with the first word that comes to mind. The response time, as well
as the content of the individual’s associations, can provide information about their thought
processes, emotional responses, and unconscious conflicts. The test is based on the idea that
people's associations reveal underlying psychological states or preoccupations. For example, if
an individual consistently associates negative words with neutral stimuli, this may indicate
underlying emotional issues such as anxiety or depression. This test is less commonly used today
but can still provide valuable insight into an individual’s mental state.

7.. Katina's Animal Test

In the Katina's Animal Test, the individual is shown a set of animal pictures and asked to
describe each one in terms of personality traits. The test assesses how people relate to or project
human characteristics onto animals, which is believed to reflect their own traits and emotions.
For example, an individual might describe a lion as aggressive, confident, or dominant, reflecting
their own sense of power or insecurity. This test is particularly useful in exploring aspects of
social functioning, self-esteem, and emotional dynamics. It allows for a less direct, more creative
projection of unconscious material and can be a good tool in therapy.

Behavioral observations are a method used in personality assessment to observe and record an
individual's behavior in various settings. They provide insight into an individual's actions,
reactions, and interpersonal interactions, helping to understand how personality traits manifest in
real-world situations. These observations are particularly useful for individuals who struggle to
articulate their inner experiences or those assessing traits like impulsivity or social withdrawal.

Importance of personality assessments in clinical settings

Personality assessments play a vital role in clinical medicine and psychology, offering valuable
insights into an individual’s personality traits, emotional states, and underlying psychological
conditions. These evaluations are essential for helping professionals to understand their clients’
thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.

As a result, clinicians are able to provide the most effective and tailored treatment for their
patients. In this article, we will delve into how personality assessments are utilized in clinical
settings, exploring the various techniques and applications they have in diagnosing, treating, and
understanding mental health disorders.

Understanding the Role of Personality Assessments

Personality assessments serve as a foundational tool for psychology and clinical medicine, as
they provide a unique and comprehensive approach to evaluating an individual’s mental and
emotional well-being. By applying these assessments, professionals can gain a deep
understanding of their client’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, which in turn allows them to
deliver a more targeted and effective therapeutic intervention.

Assessing Personality Traits, Emotional States, and Psychological Conditions

Personality assessments not only evaluate an individual’s personality traits but also their
emotional state and any underlying psychological conditions. This enables professionals to
identify any specific issues that may be affecting their clients and design bespoke treatment
strategies to address these concerns effectively. In this way, personality assessments form the
basis for informed decision-making in mental health care.

Various Applications in Clinical Settings

There are numerous ways in which personality assessments are used in clinical settings,
including:

 Diagnosing mental health disorders – by identifying specific traits or patterns, clinicians

can determine if a patient displays symptoms that match the criteria for certain mental
health conditions, aiding in the accurate diagnosis of their condition.
 Treatment planning – therapists use personality assessments to identify a client’s
emotional, psychological, and cognitive needs, allowing them to develop targeted
treatment plans that address the specific issues and challenges faced by their clients.
 Monitoring progress during ongoing treatment – personality assessments can help
monitor a patient’s progress by evaluating their response to different therapeutic
approaches and determining if their personality traits are changing, allowing clinicians to
modify treatment as needed.

Personality assessments play a critical role in clinical settings, providing a valuable resource for
diagnosing, treating, and understanding mental health disorders. By utilizing these assessments,
clinicians can deliver tailored and effective treatment plans that cater to each patient’s unique
needs and circumstances. With ongoing advancements in technology and research, the use of
personality assessments in mental health care is bound to continue evolving and improving.

Challenges of using psychometric tools

A critical weakness in the scientific study of personality is the relative lack of adequate
measurement operations. While many tests, instruments, and assessment devices are available,
each has its basic limitations. It is often held that the more penetrating techniques are not
objective while the so-called objective instruments are superficial. In the personality area, tests
and other measurement devices are the instruments by which systematic data are collected.

1. The Subjectivity of Personality Assessment

2. Cultural Influences on Personality Test Outcomes
3. The Role of Context in Shaping Behavior
4. Limitations of Standardized Testing Methods
5. The Impact of Social Desirability Bias
6. Overemphasis on Trait Characteristics
7. The Dynamic Nature of Human Personality
8. The inadequacy of definitions
9. The probabilistic nature of response tendencies;
10. The specificity of personality measurements
11. The distortion resulting from individuality
12. The peculiar situation in which personality is measured
13. The question of representativeness

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

(a) Neuroimaging study in subjects at high risk of psychosis revealed by the Rorschach test
and first-episode schizophrenia

The study aimed to examine whether changes exist prior to disease onset, especially in the
temporal lobes.

Methods: T1-weighted and diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging were performed on 9
first-episode schizophrenia patients, 10 patients who were at high risk of schizophrenia and 10
healthy controls. Voxel-based analysis using the normalised images of cortical volume data was
examined, and the fractional anisotropy value at three component fibres of the temporal lobes,
inferior longitudinal fasciculus, superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and cingulum
hippocampal part was compared among the three groups.

Results: There were statistically significant volume differences at the bilateral temporal lobe
between the healthy subjects and high-risk group. Between the schizophrenic group and healthy
subjects, statistically significant volume differences were detected at the bilateral temporal lobes
and anterior cingulate cortex. The fractional anisotropy values of the SLF in the schizophrenic
and high-risk groups were significantly lower than in the healthy subjects.
Findings indicate that some brain alterations may progress in patients at psychosis pre-onset,
possibly because of disrupted developmental mechanisms, and these pathological changes may
be predictive of functional outcome.
(b) Personality testing and workplace training: Exploring stakeholders, products and
purpose in Western Europe

The purpose of this paper is to explore how and why personality tests are used in workplace
training. This research paper is guided by three research questions that inquire about the role of
external and internal stakeholders, the value of psychometric and practical considerations in test
selection, and the purpose of personality test use in workplace training.

Design/methodology/approach
This research paper uses multiple-case study analysis. Interviews, test reports, product flyers and
email correspondence were collected and analyzed from publishers, associations, psychologists
and human resource development (HRD) practitioners in Germany, the UK and The Netherlands
between 2012 and 2016.

Findings
Themes emerge around industry tensions among practitioners and professional associations,
psychologists and non-psychologists. Ease of use is a more important factor than psychometrics
in the decision-making process. Also, practitioners welcome publishers that offer free coaching
support. In the process of using tests for development rather than assessment, re-labeling takes
place when practitioners and publishers use positive terms for personality tests as tools for
personal stocktaking and development.
REFERENCES

Handbook of personality assessment. (n.d.-a).

http://www.lasorsa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Handbook-of-Personality-
Assessment.pdf

Kendra Cherry, Mse. (2024, March 5). Id, ego, and superego are part of a structural model of
personality. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/the-id-ego-and-superego-
2795951

Lundgren, H., Kroon, B., & Poell, R. F. (2017, April 3). Personality testing and workplace
training: Exploring stakeholders, products and purpose in Western Europe. European
Journal of Training and Development.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ejtd-03-2016-0015/full/html

Personality assessment. Personality Assessment - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics. (n.d.).

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/nursing-and-health-professions/personality-
assessment#:~:text=Personality%20assessment%20refers%20to%20the,of%20psychology
%2C%20including%20clinical%20psychology

Personality assessments in clinical settings. West Georgia Psychiatric Center. (n.d.).

https://www.westgeorgiapsychiatriccenter.com/personality-assessments-in-clinical-
settings.html#Self-Report_Inventories

Psico-Smart.com. (n.d.). What are the limitations of personality tests in understanding human
behavior? https://psico-smart.com/en/blogs/blog-what-are-the-limitations-of-personality-
tests-in-understanding-human-behavior-101061

Psychological assessment - an overview | sciencedirect topics. (n.d.-b).

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/psychological-assessment