UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF LEGAL STUDIES

PANJAB UNIVERSITY CHANDIGARH

Topic- Types of Legal Research

A Project Report submitted as a part of curriculum of B. Com LLB. (Hons)

in the subject of Research Methodology

Submitted to: - Submitted by: -

Dr. Gulshan Kumar Aastha

Professor B.Com LLB. (Hons)
UILS Roll no: - 199/22
Semester- 6
Section – D
Session- 2024- 2025
1|Page
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to all the individuals and

organizations that directly or indirectly helped in the completion of this project
file.

I take this opportunity to extend my most sincere appreciation towards my

Research Methodology professor, Dr. Gulshan Kumar for his constant support
and guidance during the preparation of this project, and his thorough suggestions
and instructions that aided me in culmination of this file. This file would have
been left lacking if not for his efforts. Last but the least; I extend my boundless
regards to my friends and family who were a constant source of encouragement
during the entirety of this project.

Aastha

B. Com LL.B.(Hons)

Roll No. 199/22

2|Page
 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The primary objectives of this project are:

1. To understand the concept and importance of legal research in the context of

legal education and practice.

2. To identify and explain various types of legal research, including doctrinal, non-
doctrinal, descriptive, analytical, comparative, and interdisciplinary approaches.

3. To explore the methodology and scope of each type of legal research through
examples and case references.

4. To distinguish between theoretical and empirical legal research and examine how
both contribute to the development of legal knowledge.

5. To assess the relevance of different types of legal research in academic, judicial,

and legislative contexts.

METHODOLOGY
This project is primarily doctrinal in nature. The following methodology was adopted:

1. Nature of Research:
o The study is qualitative and descriptive, focusing on the classification,
explanation, and analysis of various legal research types.
2. Sources of Data:
o Secondary sources of data were used, including:
 Books on legal research and methodology
 Academic articles and journals
 Bare acts and judicial decisions for examples
 Online legal databases like SCC Online, Manupatra, and JStor (where
applicable)
3. Research Tools and Techniques:
o Analytical and comparative methods were used to explain and contrast
different types of legal research.
o Theoretical frameworks were studied through literature review.
o Examples and illustrations were incorporated for clarity and practical
relevance.
4. Scope and Limitations:
o The project covers only major types of legal research relevant to Indian legal
education and practice.
o It does not include empirical fieldwork or quantitative surveys, as the focus
is on understanding the types rather than applying them in a real-world setting.

3|Page
 INDEX

S. No. Title Pages

1. Introduction 5-6

2. Meaning of Research 7-8

3. Meaning of Legal Research 9-10

4. Purpose of Legal Research 11-12

5. Types of Legal Research- 13- 22

- Comparative Legal Research
- Descriptive Legal Research
- Interdisciplinary Legal Research
6. Comparative Chart- Types of Legal Research 23-24

7. Conclusion 25-26

8. Bibliography 27

4|Page
 INTRODUCTION

‗Research‘ – a practice that we follow in our daily life. From researching about brands,
clothing, educational and job opportunities, the process is repeated on a regular basis. If not
consciously then definitely sub-consciously. Many may participate in this process and if not,
the results of such outcome may have a direct or an indirect impact on the lives of many. The
policy makers also go through elaborate research as a part of their job to inquiry into the
desirable changes.

The process of research is a scientific investigation aimed to increase knowledge. It is a

process of investigating a ‗fact‘ to acquire insight into it and finding a solution to therefor. If
such an investigation is pursued with scientific methods, it becomes systematic. With this
view, legal research is a systematic finding law on a particular topic and making an
advancement to the literature of it. However, this process is complex as it involves looking
into a plethora of law available as statutes, legal materials and judicial pronouncements etc.

Hence, research is of crucial importance to home-makers, scholars, government, policy

makers, students, academicians, advocates and even judges like everyone else. And the
process becomes systematic to achieve desired results and to avoid absurdities by following
scientific methods.

Legal research is the intellectual backbone of the legal profession. It forms the foundation for
all aspects of legal practice, policy formulation, judicial reasoning, and academic inquiry. As
law is not static but an ever-evolving mechanism shaped by social, economic, political, and
technological developments, legal research ensures that this evolution is guided by logic,
consistency, and equity.

In the modern legal world, where laws must respond to complex societal challenges—ranging
from digital privacy to environmental protection—research is critical in crafting solutions

5|Page
that are both effective and just. Whether it involves studying constitutional principles,
analysing statutory provisions, examining case law, or exploring the socio-economic impact
of legal policies, legal research offers a systematic way to approach legal problems and find
grounded solutions.

The methodology of legal research can vary significantly depending on the objective of the
study. Legal research is not limited to understanding ―what the law is,‖ but often expands to
question ―why the law is the way it is‖ and ―how it can be improved.‖ For this purpose,
different types of legal research methods are employed.

Legal research is a cornerstone of the legal profession, enabling practitioners, scholars, and
policymakers to navigate the complexities of law effectively. Understanding the types of
legal research is crucial for achieving accuracy, advocating persuasively, and contributing to
the evolution of legal frameworks. Each type of legal research serves a unique purpose, from
analyzing statutes and case laws to exploring the societal impact of legal systems.

Among these, Comparative, Descriptive, and Interdisciplinary legal research are three
major approaches that help in shaping a complete understanding of the legal domain.
Comparative legal research helps in drawing insights from foreign legal systems, descriptive
legal research helps in documenting and presenting existing legal materials, and
interdisciplinary legal research helps in connecting law with social science, economics, and
other fields. Each type serves a unique purpose and offers specific advantages and
limitations.

This project aims to define, elaborate, and analyse these three types of legal research in detail,
including their methodology, uses, real-life examples, and critical evaluations, while also
providing insights into their respective merits and demerits.

6|Page
 MEANING OF RESEARCH
The word research is derived from the French term rechercher, meaning ―to search again‖ or
―to investigate thoroughly.‖ At its core, research is a careful, systematic, and objective
investigation carried out to discover new facts, verify existing knowledge, or explore
relationships between variables. It is a fundamental tool for advancing knowledge across all
disciplines—be it science, social sciences, humanities, or law.

Research involves a structured process that typically includes the identification of a problem,
formulation of a hypothesis or research question, collection and analysis of data,
interpretation of results, and drawing of conclusions. It is not merely the gathering of
information, but a deliberate and methodical inquiry aimed at uncovering truth and expanding
the boundaries of understanding.

According to C.R. Kothari:

"Research is a scientific and systematic search for pertinent information on a specific
topic1."

o Research is a careful inquiry or examination in seeking facts or principles; a diligent

investigation to ascertain something.2

In a broader sense, research serves various objectives:

 Exploratory: To explore a phenomenon not previously studied in depth.

 Descriptive: To describe characteristics or functions of a particular object or process.

 Explanatory: To explain relationships between variables.

 Analytical: To analyze and interpret data or existing information.

An important feature of research is its objectivity. A researcher must maintain a neutral

perspective and avoid letting personal biases or opinions influence the outcome. Additionally,
replicability and transparency are crucial, as they allow others to verify or reproduce the
findings.

In legal studies, research often involves navigating complex legal texts, understanding
contextual backgrounds, and evaluating the implications of legal provisions and judicial
interpretations. As such, research in the field of law must be equally rigorous and reflective,
combining theoretical and practical elements.

Thus, research is not simply about finding information—it is about discovering insights,
developing new interpretations, challenging old assumptions, and contributing meaningfully
to the body of knowledge.

1
C.R. Kothari, Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, 2nd edn., New Age International (2004)
2
The Law Lexicon by P. Ramanatha Aiyar, 3rd edn., 2012

7|Page
The flowchart below illustrates the step-by-step process involved in conducting
research. It begins with the identification of a research problem and proceeds through
literature review, hypothesis formulation, data collection, and analysis, ending with report
writing and presentation.

8|Page
 MEANING OF LEGAL RESEARCH
Legal research refers to the process of identifying and retrieving information necessary to
support legal decision-making. It involves a detailed and systematic examination of statutes,
case laws, legal principles, doctrines, commentaries, and other legal sources to solve a legal
issue, understand the current state of the law, or propose reforms.

Legal research is not confined to lawyers or judges alone; it plays a pivotal role for law
students, academicians, policymakers, and even legislators. In essence, it is the method
through which individuals in the legal field expand their knowledge of the law, interpret legal
provisions, and apply legal reasoning.

According to Pauline C. Westermann:

"Legal research means finding the law that governs an activity and materials that explain or
analyze that law3."

Characteristics of Legal Research:

 Doctrinal or Non-Doctrinal: Legal research may be purely theoretical (based on

statutes, case law, and legal doctrines) or empirical (based on observation, interviews,
surveys, etc.).

 Purpose-Driven: It is usually undertaken with a specific legal objective—such as

understanding a legal principle, analyzing a statute, or preparing a case.

 Analytical and Logical: Legal research requires critical thinking and logical
structuring to interpret and apply legal rules.

 Normative in Nature: Legal research often deals with what the law ought to be, not
just what the law is.

Sources Used in Legal Research:

1. Primary Sources – Statutes, Constitution, case law, government notifications, etc.

2. Secondary Sources – Commentaries, legal journals, law commission reports,

textbooks, etc.

Illustration/Example:

Suppose a law student is writing a paper on Freedom of Speech and Hate Speech Laws in
India. The student would:

 Analyze Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution (primary source),

 Refer to landmark judgments like Shreya Singhal v. Union of India [(2015) 5 SCC 1],

3
Pauline C. Westermann, Effective Legal Research (6th ed., Sweet & Maxwell, 2001)

9|Page
  Read academic opinions and legal commentaries on the subject (secondary sources),
and

 Use legal databases like SCC Online or Manupatra for comprehensive research.

Legal research is a fundamental process that allows one to:

 Understand how laws operate,

 Examine the intent behind legislation,

 Resolve disputes efficiently, and

 Suggest reforms where existing laws fall short.

It helps bridge the gap between legal theory and legal practice, ensuring justice is served with
accuracy, clarity, and consistency.

10 | P a g e
 PURPOSE OF LEGAL RESEARCH
Legal research serves as the backbone of the legal system, offering clarity, consistency, and
depth to legal processes. Its primary objective is not merely to gather legal information but to
analyze, interpret, and apply it in real-life contexts. The ultimate aim is to achieve justice,
guide legal decision-making, and contribute to legal reform.

1. To Understand and Interpret the Law

One of the core purposes of legal research is to understand existing legal principles,
doctrines, statutes, and constitutional provisions. Laws are often written in complex language
and may have different interpretations. Legal research helps interpret these texts accurately
and understand their implications.

Example: Researching Article 21 of the Indian Constitution helped the judiciary interpret
it expansively to include the Right to Privacy in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India4.

2. To Solve Legal Problems

Lawyers, judges, and students use legal research to find precedents and legal rules that can be
applied to specific cases. It provides a logical and fact-based foundation for legal arguments.

Example: When a lawyer defends a client in a criminal case, they must research previous
case law, procedural statutes like the CrPC, and evidentiary rules to build a strong defense.

3. To Aid in Legal Drafting and Policy Making

Legal research is essential when drafting new laws or amending existing ones. It ensures that
legislation is aligned with constitutional mandates, current societal needs, and international
norms.

Example: The drafting of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 involved comparative research
with consumer protection laws in other countries.

4. To Develop Legal Theory and Scholarship

Academicians and researchers conduct legal research to critique laws, propose reforms, and
build theories. This scholarly work contributes to the evolution of legal thought.

Example: The feminist legal theory emerged through extensive legal research challenging
patriarchal interpretations of law.

4
(2017) 10 SCC 1

11 | P a g e
5. To Support Judicial Decision-Making

Judges rely on legal research to justify their rulings. This includes analyzing case laws,
statutory interpretations, and legal doctrines to deliver reasoned judgments.

Example: In Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India5, the Supreme Court relied on extensive
research, including international human rights law, to strike down Section 377 IPC as
unconstitutional.

6. To Promote Legal Awareness and Education

Legal research enhances public knowledge about rights, duties, and remedies under the law.
It also plays a vital role in legal education, helping students grasp complex legal concepts.

7. To Compare Legal Systems and Practices

Comparative legal research helps identify strengths and weaknesses in different legal
systems. This can guide reform and modernization of domestic laws.

Example: Indian courts have often referred to U.S. and U.K. decisions on privacy, free
speech, and due process.

The purpose of legal research goes far beyond academic curiosity. It is a practical tool that
enhances the administration of justice, supports legal reasoning, and helps societies adapt to
changing legal needs. Whether for litigation, legislation, or legal reform, research provides
the analytical foundation upon which sound legal systems are built.

5
(2018) 10 SCC 1

12 | P a g e
 TYPES OF LEGAL RESEARCH
Legal research can be classified into various types based on its nature, scope, methodology,
and objective. Among these, Comparative, Descriptive, and Interdisciplinary legal
research are highly relevant in the contemporary legal landscape.

COMPARATIVE LEGAL RESEARCH

 Meaning
Comparative legal research refers to the methodical study of different legal systems or legal
rules across various jurisdictions. It involves identifying the similarities and differences in
legal doctrines, statutes, case laws, institutions, and legal cultures between two or more legal
systems. This type of research is not only theoretical but can also have practical
applications—such as in drafting legislation, reforming laws, or facilitating international
cooperation.
It is an essential tool for understanding how various legal systems tackle similar legal issues
and for identifying best practices that can be borrowed or adapted. Comparative legal
research may involve vertical comparisons (e.g., between international and domestic laws) or
horizontal comparisons (e.g., between two national legal systems).

―Comparative research seeks to contrast legal systems to uncover underlying principles and
norms6.‖

 Objectives and Purpose:-

1. To Borrow Foreign Legal Concepts:

Legislators or judges may adopt solutions from other jurisdictions that have dealt with
similar issues more effectively.

2. To Understand Legal Systems in Context:

It helps legal scholars and professionals grasp the cultural, economic, and historical
factors that influence the development of law.

3. To Assist in Legal Reform:

Comparative studies often expose the strengths and weaknesses of a legal system,
offering a framework for reform.

4. To Promote Harmonization of Laws:

Especially in international and regional integration efforts (e.g., European Union),
comparative research helps align diverse legal systems.

6
Konrad Zweigert & Hein Kötz, An Introduction to Comparative Law, Oxford University Press (1998)

13 | P a g e
5. To Enhance Global Legal Understanding:
As globalization increases, cross-border legal understanding is crucial in areas like
trade, environment, and human rights.

 Key Features:

 Involves cross-jurisdictional study of laws.

 May include statutory provisions, judicial decisions, constitutional principles, or

customary laws.

 Often applied in areas of human rights, international law, constitutional law,

commercial law, etc.

 Requires an understanding of the historical, cultural, and political background of

the systems being compared.

 Scope of Comparative Legal Research:

 Constitutional law (e.g., fundamental rights, judicial review)

 Criminal justice systems (e.g., penal codes, trial procedures)

 Civil law (e.g., family law, contract law)

 Administrative law (e.g., regulatory frameworks)

 Emerging areas like digital law, artificial intelligence, and environmental law

 Methodology:

 Selection of Jurisdictions: Choose countries based on commonalities or contrasts

(e.g., Common Law vs. Civil Law systems).

 Identification of Legal Issues: Focus on a specific legal principle or statute for

comparison.

 Legal Translation: In cases involving foreign languages, accurate legal translation is

essential.

 Functional Approach: Compare legal solutions based on how they address the same
social or legal function.

 Contextualization: Understand legal provisions in the context of that country's social,

political, and cultural background.

14 | P a g e
  Examples:

 The Indian Constitution borrowed key elements from various legal systems:
o Fundamental Rights from the U.S. Constitution
o Directive Principles of State Policy from the Irish Constitution
o Parliamentary system from the UK
 Consumer Protection Laws in India were reformed in 2019 using models from
countries like the U.S., Australia, and the EU.

 Case Study:

Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan7,

In this landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India laid down guidelines to prevent
sexual harassment at the workplace. Since there was no specific domestic law at the time, the
Court relied heavily on international conventions, particularly the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). This decision is
a prime example of how comparative and international legal research filled a legislative
vacuum.

 Merits of Comparative Legal Research:

1. Promotes Legal Innovation: Encourages the adaptation of progressive legal ideas

and institutions.
2. Aids Legal Reform: Helps lawmakers and reform commissions draft more effective
laws.
3. Global Legal Understanding: Facilitates cooperation and uniformity in cross-border
legal matters.
4. Enhances Jurisprudence: Offers fresh perspectives for judicial reasoning.
5. Assists in International Treaties and Obligations: Helps comply with global legal
norms.

 Demerits of Comparative Legal Research:

1. Cultural and Legal Diversity: What works in one country may not suit another due
to socio-cultural differences.
2. Language and Terminology Barriers: Laws and legal systems are deeply rooted in
linguistic context, which can lead to misinterpretation.

7
AIR 1997 SC 3011

15 | P a g e
 3. Legal Transplantation Issues: Blindly copying foreign laws without local
adaptation can lead to poor implementation.
4. Resource Intensive: Requires deep legal knowledge, access to international legal
databases, and often foreign language skills.
5. Complex Methodology: Demands a multi-disciplinary approach that can be difficult
for a single researcher to manage.

DESCRIPTIVE LEGAL RESEARCH

 Meaning

Descriptive legal research is a form of doctrinal research that focuses on describing,

analysing, and interpreting the existing state of legal norms, statutes, principles, and
judicial decisions. It seeks to systematically present ―what the law is‖ rather than
evaluating ―what the law ought to be.‖

This type of research is fundamental in legal scholarship because it builds the groundwork for
other types of legal inquiry. It emphasizes precision, organization, and clarity, documenting
the legal status quo without necessarily suggesting changes or reforms.

Descriptive legal research is often equated with analytical or doctrinal research, but while
analytical research may go into interpretations or critical evaluations, descriptive research
stops short of critique and primarily catalogs and explains.

 Purpose and Objectives

1. To Document Legal Provisions and Doctrines

It catalogs and describes legislation, regulations, and judicial interpretations with
accuracy.

2. To Enhance Understanding
Clarifies complex legal language and helps non-specialists, students, and even judges
grasp legal provisions.

3. To Provide a Basis for Further Research

Forms the foundation for analytical, comparative, or reformative studies.

4. To Support Legal Practice and Teaching

Essential for creating legal commentaries, textbooks, practice guides, and case
digests.

5. To Preserve Legal Development

Tracks how statutes and case laws have evolved over time.

16 | P a g e
  Key Characteristics

 Library-Based: Relies heavily on statutes, case law, legal treatises, journals, law
commission reports, and official commentaries.

 Non-Empirical: It does not include fieldwork, interviews, or surveys.

 Systematic and Structured: Follows a methodical approach to present facts clearly.

 Static Perspective: It looks at the law as it exists, not as it could be.

 Scope of Descriptive Legal Research

Descriptive research is widely used in:

 Statutory interpretation

 Constitutional law analysis

 Case law summaries

 Legal history and development

 Preparation of digests or law guides

 Curriculum development for law teaching

 Example

A researcher conducts a study on Article 15 of the Indian Constitution (prohibition of

discrimination) by analyzing:

 The text of the Article

 Related case laws

 Amendments

 Government notifications or circulars

 Commentaries by legal scholars

Such research does not question the validity of Article 15, but explains its application,
scope, and development.

 Case Study

17 | P a g e
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461

Descriptive research on this case would involve:

 Analyzing the constitutional background of the 24th and 25th Amendments

 Explaining the evolution of the "Basic Structure Doctrine"

 Compiling majority and dissenting opinions

 Recording its impact on subsequent cases

The focus remains on what the judgment held, not whether it was correct or needs revision.

 Methodology Used

 Statute-based Research: Examination of statutory texts and their commentaries.

 Case Law Compilation: Identifying and summarizing leading judicial precedents.

 Thematic Categorization: Grouping similar legal principles under a common theme.

 Chronological Analysis: Presenting the development of legal ideas over time.

 Merits of Descriptive Legal Research

 Clarity and Precision:
Explains complex legal texts in a simplified, accurate manner.
 Time and Cost Efficient:
Does not involve extensive fieldwork or data collection.
 Useful for Legal Education and Practice:
Creates the foundation for teaching materials, commentaries, and bar exam guides.
 Preserves Legal Evolution:
Acts as a repository of legal developments over time.
 Highly Accessible:
Suitable for novice researchers and legal professionals alike.
 Supports Doctrinal Understanding:
Helps in decoding the black-letter law essential for practitioners and judges.

 Demerits of Descriptive Legal Research

 Lacks Critical Insight:
Does not question the justice, fairness, or utility of the law.
 Ignores Social Impact:
Fails to evaluate how laws are implemented or affect people on the ground.

18 | P a g e
  Limited Policy Value:
Cannot be directly used for making reforms or suggesting policy changes.
 Static in Nature:
Focuses only on the present state of the law, not on evolving social contexts.
 No Empirical Data:
Doesn‘t account for real-life challenges in applying legal norms.

INTERDISCIPLINARY LEGAL RESEARCH

 Meaning

Interdisciplinary legal research is a research methodology that combines legal analysis

with insights, theories, and methods from other disciplines such as sociology, economics,
psychology, political science, anthropology, philosophy, and technology. This approach goes
beyond the traditional doctrinal study of statutes and case laws, aiming to understand law as
a social institution embedded within the broader human experience.

It recognizes that law is not created or enforced in a vacuum. Legal rules and principles
have profound effects on, and are influenced by, human behavior, societal structures,
economic forces, political ideologies, cultural norms, and technological innovations. Hence,
interdisciplinary research seeks to examine how legal systems operate in real-world
contexts and how they interact with other domains of knowledge.

 Purpose and Objectives

1. To Explore the Social Function of Law

Understand how legal rules impact and are shaped by social realities.

2. To Improve Legal Effectiveness

Identify gaps between law in theory and law in practice using social or empirical
studies.

3. To Support Evidence-Based Lawmaking

Assist lawmakers in designing laws based on real-world data and societal needs.

4. To Critically Assess the Law

Use ethical, psychological, or economic frameworks to critique existing legal
doctrines.

5. To Address Contemporary Challenges

Tackle emerging issues such as AI, privacy, climate change, and gender justice using
multiple disciplinary perspectives.

19 | P a g e
  Features of Interdisciplinary Legal Research

 Empirical or Conceptual: Can involve data collection (e.g., surveys) or theoretical

engagement (e.g., philosophical analysis).

 Collaborative: Often requires working with experts from other fields.

 Problem-Oriented: Focuses on solving real-world legal and policy issues.

 Dynamic and Evolving: Responds to changes in society, science, and politics.

 Innovative: Generates new insights and frameworks not possible through pure legal
reasoning.

 Common Disciplines Integrated with Law

Discipline Example of Integration with Law

Studying caste-based discrimination and the effectiveness of affirmative

Sociology
action

Economics Analyzing the impact of tax laws or antitrust regulations

Psychology Understanding criminal behavior or eyewitness testimony reliability

Political
Studying judicial independence and the role of courts in democracy
Science

Philosophy Addressing questions of justice, rights, and ethics in constitutional law

Technology Evaluating legal frameworks for AI, cybersecurity, and data privacy

 Methodologies in Interdisciplinary Legal Research

 Qualitative Methods: Interviews, focus groups, ethnographies.

 Quantitative Methods: Surveys, statistical analysis, econometric models.

 Content Analysis: Studying judgments, legislation, and media from a thematic or

critical perspective.

 Case Studies: In-depth examination of specific legal problems in real contexts.

20 | P a g e
  Example Topics

 Studying the mental health of undertrial prisoners through legal provisions and
psychological frameworks.

 Analyzing the economic implications of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on
small businesses.

 Researching domestic violence laws and their effectiveness in rural India through
field surveys.

 Using sociological tools to assess the implementation of environmental laws in

tribal regions.

 Case Study

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India8,

The Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the IT Act for violating the right to freedom
of speech and expression. In arriving at this decision, the Court did not just rely on
constitutional law but also incorporated sociological and psychological concerns, such as:

 The "chilling effect" on speech caused by vague laws.

 Misuse of the law to stifle dissent, especially against students and activists.

 Insights from freedom of expression jurisprudence in other democratic countries.

This case illustrates the interdisciplinary nature of legal reasoning that combines
constitutional law, sociology, psychology, and digital ethics.

 Merits of Interdisciplinary Legal Research

 Holistic Understanding:
Enables a deeper understanding of the law in its real-world social, economic, and
political contexts.
 Addresses Gaps Between Law and Reality:
Identifies how laws work in practice, not just in theory.
 Promotes Innovation and Reform:
Helps craft better laws based on empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks.

8
(2015) 5 SCC 1

21 | P a g e
 Fosters Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration:
Encourages interaction between legal scholars, economists, sociologists, and
scientists.
 Highly Relevant in Contemporary Issues:
Crucial in addressing modern challenges like climate change, AI regulation, digital
privacy, and access to justice.

 Demerits of Interdisciplinary Legal Research

 Complex and Demanding:
Requires knowledge and training in multiple disciplines.
 Time and Resource Intensive:
Empirical research often needs fieldwork, data collection, and analysis tools.
 Risk of Losing Legal Focus:
Excessive reliance on other disciplines may dilute legal reasoning.
 Methodological Conflicts:
Legal positivism may clash with empirical or interpretive methods from other fields.
 Limited Accessibility:
Not every legal researcher has access to data sets, survey tools, or interdisciplinary
training.

22 | P a g e
 COMPARATIVE CHART: Types of Legal Research

Comparative Descriptive Legal Interdisciplinary

Criteria
Legal Research Research Legal Research

Integrates law
Compares legal with other
systems, laws, disciplines to
Describes and explains the current
Definition or principles understand law in
state of laws, doctrines, and statutes.
across social, economic,
jurisdictions. or political
contexts.

Multi-
Analytical and
Nature Expository and systematic disciplinary and
evaluative
problem-solving

To identify
To analyze how
similarities,
law interacts with
differences, and To catalog and clarify existing legal
Purpose society,
best practices provisions and decisions.
economics,
across legal
psychology, etc.
systems.

Cross- Conceptual or
jurisdictional, empirical,
Approach Purely doctrinal
doctrinal + depending on
contextual discipline used

Surveys,
Legal fieldwork,
comparison, interviews,
Statutory and case law analysis,
Methodology case studies, statistical
legal commentary
legislative analysis,
analysis theoretical
models

Comparing
Studying the
Indian contract
impact of data
law with Explaining the evolution of Article
Examples privacy laws
English or 21 in Indian Constitution
using technology
French contract
and psychology
law

23 | P a g e
 Comparative Descriptive Legal Interdisciplinary
Criteria
Legal Research Research Legal Research

➤ Holistic
➤ Broadens
insights
legal ➤ Accurate legal mapping
➤ Real-world
Merits understanding ➤ Easy reference for
relevance
➤ Facilitates students/practitioners
➤ Policy-
legal reforms
oriented

➤
Jurisdictional
➤ Demanding
differences may
➤ Lacks critical perspective methodology
Demerits hinder
➤ Ignores practical enforcement ➤ May lack legal
comparison
precision
➤ Complex
interpretation

Law reform Policy research,

commissions, law & society,
Legal education, commentaries,
Usefulness international cyber law,
judiciary
law studies, environmental
global policy law

Foreign statutes, Interdisciplinary

international Indian statutes, case law, law journals,
Sources
treaties, judicial commission reports empirical data,
decisions expert reports

Vishaka Shreya Singhal

Guidelines v. Kesavananda Bharati Case – Case – digital
Case Study International interpretation of constitutional rights +
Conventions on amendments constitutional law
Women‘s Rights + sociology

24 | P a g e
 CONCLUSION
Legal research is the cornerstone of understanding, interpreting, and developing the law. In
an era where law increasingly intersects with global, social, and technological forces, the role
of legal research becomes not only academic but profoundly practical. This project has
comprehensively explored three major types of legal research—Comparative,
Descriptive, and Interdisciplinary—each with distinct methodologies, objectives, and
impacts on legal scholarship and practice.

Comparative legal research empowers legal scholars and lawmakers to study foreign legal
systems, doctrines, and practices to understand how similar problems are approached
across jurisdictions. This type of research is immensely valuable in the context of
globalization, where legal systems are constantly learning from each other. By identifying
similarities and differences, comparative research facilitates legal harmonization, reform,
and modernization, especially in areas like constitutional law, environmental law, and
human rights. However, it also presents challenges in terms of linguistic, cultural, and
systemic differences, which must be navigated with caution and expertise.

Descriptive legal research remains a core component of doctrinal legal study. It focuses
on explaining the existing position of law, including statutes, judicial decisions, and
commentaries. Though often seen as foundational and static, descriptive research plays a
crucial role in clarifying legal rules, assisting courts, practitioners, academicians, and
students in understanding the structure and evolution of legal principles. It forms the bedrock
of legal education and is indispensable for building legal resources like textbooks, casebooks,
and digests. Yet, by not questioning or evaluating the law, descriptive research may fall short
in promoting reform or addressing real-world inefficiencies.

On the other hand, interdisciplinary legal research represents a progressive shift in legal
methodology, responding to the complex realities of modern society. Law is not just a set of
abstract rules—it operates within a matrix of societal, economic, psychological,
technological, and political influences. Interdisciplinary research bridges this gap by
integrating tools and perspectives from other fields to analyze the law's real-world impact
and effectiveness. Whether it's examining the socioeconomic effects of taxation laws, the
psychological dynamics in criminal justice, or the ethical implications of artificial
intelligence, this approach deepens the relevance and applicability of legal research.
However, its success depends on the researcher‘s ability to navigate multiple disciplines,
which may be challenging without adequate training and resources.

25 | P a g e
Together, these three types of research underscore the multifaceted nature of legal inquiry.
Each contributes uniquely:

 Descriptive research tells us what the law is.

 Comparative research helps us see how others approach similar legal questions.

 Interdisciplinary research reveals why the law functions the way it does—and how it
can be improved.

In conclusion, no single type of legal research can suffice in isolation. Legal scholars,
practitioners, and policymakers must adopt a pluralistic and flexible approach, choosing
the appropriate method—or combination of methods—based on the problem at hand, the
purpose of the research, and the audience being addressed. The future of legal research
lies in its ability to remain rigorous, context-sensitive, and socially responsive. As legal
challenges grow in complexity and scope, the integration of descriptive clarity, comparative
wisdom, and interdisciplinary insight will be vital in shaping a just, effective, and dynamic
legal system.

26 | P a g e
 BIBLIOGRAPHY
 BOOKS:-
 SR Myneni, (2012) Legal Research Methodology (5th) Faridabad, Allahabad Law
Agency
 M.P. Jain, Indian Constitutional Law, 8th edn., LexisNexis, 2018.

 JOURNALS:-

 S.N. Jain, ―Legal Research and Methodology‖, (1972) 14 Journal of the Indian Law
Institute 487.

 Sally Engle Merry, ―What is Legal Culture? An Anthropological Perspective‖, (1990) 5(1)
Journal of Comparative Law 1.

 Upendra Baxi, Law and Poverty: Critical Essays, N.M. Tripathi, 1988.

 WEBSITES

• https://www.lawjournals.org/assets/archives/2020/vol6issue3/6-3-38-642.pdf

[Last accessed on 2nd April, 2025]

• https://blog.ipleaders.in/law

[Last accessed on 5th April, 2025]

• https://www.slideshare.net/sebis1

[Last accessed on 6th April, 2025]

27 | P a g e