The Relationship Between Hamstring Injury Risk Screening Tests An
The Relationship Between Hamstring Injury Risk Screening Tests An
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between hamstring injury risk screening test
scores and lower limb biomechanical characteristics during sprint, and to select more appropriate
screening tests from the perspective of biomechanics. Soccer players(n=18) experienced three kinds of
hamstring injury screening tests(Nordic hamstring test, ultrasound test, straight-leg-raising test) and
collected kinematics data and dynamics data of the lower extremities during sprint. The result of the
Nordic Hamstring Test was significantly positively correlated with the peak force of semimembranosus
muscle, semitendinosus muscle and biceps femoris long head during sprint (P<0.05), and the correlation
coefficients were 0.504, 0.506 and 0.429, respectively. It was significantly negatively correlated with the
peak strain (P<0.05), and the correlation coefficients were -0.462, -0.460 and -0.385, respectively.There
was no significant correlation among other data. The Nordic hamstring test is the most suitable for the
risk screening of hamstring injury. Ultrasound test may has a certain screening effect, but it is difficult to
operate and spread. The straight-leg-raising test is not recommended for continued use.
INTRODUCTION:
Hamstring strain injuries (HSI) are common in sports and can reduce athletic performance,
resulting in financial losses for the athlete and sports team. Although there have been a large
number of prevention and rehabilitation exercises for HSI, the incidence of HSI is still
increasing(Ekstrand,Walden &Hagglund 2016). Therefore, it is important for injury prevention
to find out appropriate indicators of injury risk screening. The hamstring eccentric strength,
biceps femoris long head muscle fascicle length and flexibility of hamstring are risk factors of
HSI(Timmins,Bourne,Shield et al. 2016, Yu,Liu &Garrett 2017).The Nordic hamstring test
(NHT), ultrasound test, straight-leg-raising test (SLR) are common screening tests for these
factors. Their screening effects were inconsistent and their rationality needs to be further
verified.
Hamstring muscle force and strain are considered to be the biomechanical mechanisms of HSI
during sprint(Daly,Persson,Twycross-Lewis et al. 2016). These screening tests were all
measured in a static environment, and it remains to be seen whether the results correlate with
the biomechanical performance of sprint. The purpose of this study was to explore the
relationship between hamstring injury risk screening test scores and lower limb biomechanical
characteristics during sprint, and to provide a theoretical basis for the selection of the screening
test for hamstring strain.
METHODS:
Eighteen soccer players were selected for the study. The NBE-0530 equipment was used for
NHT test, it can output the peak torque of knee flexion. Each subject repeated the action five
times, and the results were averaged. Biceps femoris long head muscle fascicle length was
determined from GE color ultrasound images and it was estimated by Blazevich’s equation
(Blazevich,Gill &Zhou 2006). Finally, We used SLR test to estimated the range of motion
(ROM) in hip. A camra recorded the whole process and videos were analyzed by Kinovea
software. (Figure 1)
The kinematics and dynamics data of their bilateral lower limbs during sprint were
simultaneously collected by the 8-cameras Motion acquisition system and the Kistler three-
dimensional force platform, and the hamstring force and strain at vulnerable moments were
calculated by Static Optimization in OpenSim.
Pearson correlation was used to analyze the correlation between the results of each screening
test and the hamstring peak force and peak strain during sprint.
RESULTS:
There was no significant correlation between biceps femoris long head muscle fascicle
length measured by ultrasound and the peak force and peak strain of biceps femoris long
head during sprint (shown in Table 1).
Table 1:Relationship between bifemlh fascicle length and biomechanical characteristics during
sprint
Peak force Peak strain
Correlation coefficients -0.199 0.130
P value 0.244 0.448
There was no significant correlation between the ROM measured by the SLR test and the
hamstring peak force and peak strain during sprint (shown in Table 2).
Figure 2: Relationship between result of NHT and biomechanical characteristics during sprint
DISCUSSION:
Nordic hamstring test(NHT) is suitable as a screening test for HSI. Strong hamstring
eccentric strength leads to higher peak force and lower peak strain in sprinting. Lower strain
can reduce the load of hamstring. Although the athletes with strong hamstring eccentric
strength are also more heavily loaded during sprint, the stronger muscles can better protect
The results of ultrasound test showed that the longer muscle fascicle length did not directly
reduce the value of peak strain and force, but it may reflect the tolerance of muscles. Longer
fascicle lengths have a lower rate of injury, possibly because of the shift to the right of the
muscle length-force curve (Bourne,Timmins,Opar et al. 2018). It increases the muscle
optimal length and makes the muscle stronger in the eccentric state. In addition, the muscle
fascicle length measured by ultrasound mainly reflects the muscle fiber length, and the ratio
of muscle to tendon is not the same in each person, so it is understandable that the muscle
fascicle length is not related to the muscle-tendon length measured by OpenSim.
Hip range of motion (ROM ) as a screening indicator for HSI may not be reasonable. The
results of this paper show that ROM has no relationship with hamstring peak force and peak
strain during sprint, and seems to have no relationship with the tolerance of muscles.ROM as
a common indicator of flexibility has been controversial. ROM is easily confused with joint
relaxation, and it has also been suggested that static flexibility does not reflect the dynamic
flexibility of muscles(Wilson,Wood &Elliott 1991).
CONCLUSION: The score of the Nordic hamstring test reflects the load of hamstring during
sprint and is easy to operate. It is the most suitable for the risk screening of hamstring injury.
Ultrasound testing is more reflective of a muscle's ability to withstand loads, so it can also be
used as a screening test, but the limitations of location and operation make it difficult to
implement on a large scale. The ROM obtained by the straight-leg-raising test is not a good
reflection of muscle flexibility, it is not recommended to continue to choose.
REFERENCES
Blazevich, A. J.,N. D. Gill &S. Zhou (2006). "Intra- and intermuscular variation in human quadriceps
femoris architecture assessed in vivo." J Anat 209(3): 289-310.
Bourne, M. N.,R. G. Timmins,D. A. Opar, et al. (2018). "An Evidence-Based Framework for
Strengthening Exercises to Prevent Hamstring Injury." Sports Med 48(2): 251-267.
Daly, C.,U. M. Persson,R. Twycross-Lewis, et al. (2016). "The biomechanics of running in athletes with
previous hamstring injury: A case-control study." Scand J Med Sci Sports 26(4): 413-420.
Ekstrand, J.,M. Walden &M. Hagglund (2016). "Hamstring injuries have increased by 4% annually in
men's professional football, since 2001: a 13-year longitudinal analysis of the UEFA Elite Club injury
study." British Journal of Sports Medicine 50(12).
Timmins, R. G.,M. N. Bourne,A. J. Shield, et al. (2016). "Short biceps femoris fascicles and eccentric
knee flexor weakness increase the risk of hamstring injury in elite football (soccer): a prospective
cohort study." British Journal of Sports Medicine 50(24): 1524-1535.
Wilson, G. J.,G. A. Wood &B. C. Elliott (1991). "The relationship between stiffness of the musculature
and static flexibility: an alternative explanation for the occurrence of muscular injury." Int J Sports Med
12(4): 403-407.
Yu, B.,H. Liu &W. E. Garrett (2017). "Mechanism of hamstring muscle strain injury in sprinting." J Sport
Health Sci 6(2): 130-132.