Implementing Eye Gaze Computer Technology to Promote Communication, Participation and Fun for Young Children with Complex Communication and Motor Needs
Implementing Eye Gaze Computer Technology to Promote Communication, Participation and Fun for Young Children with Complex Communication and Motor Needs
Session 128
April 3, 2025
Joy McGowan, M.S., CCC-SLP, Director of Assistive Technology & AAC, Easterseals SE PA,
Philadelphia, PA [email protected]
Topics:
https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00100
Instruments Used: “Functional outcomes of children’s uses of their single most advanced AAC
device” (Calculator, 2014); Gross Motor Function Classification System, Expanded and Revised
(2007); Manual Abilities Classification System for Children with Cerebral Palsy (2010);
Communication Function Classification System (2011); Vision Function Classification (2020);
with additional questions posed by the investigators.
Description of Children
5 boys, 4 girls, current ages 7-16. All trialed eye gaze technology while in preschool or early
intervention. Multi racial. All speak English at home and 2 speak additional languages at home.
Diagnoses: Cerebral Palsy (CP)=7; Arthrogryposis & CP=1; genetic disorder with ataxia=1;
Cortical Visual Impairment=2. All have limitations of mobility, hand use & communication.
Computer based (8 students): Eye gaze control only=56%; Touch activation only=11%; Eye gaze
& touch with keyguard=11%; Eye gaze with switch=11%.
Amount & Location of AAC Use for Computer Based AAC (8 students)
100% of parents agreed that child understands purpose of the device and uses device for
school.
84% of parents agreed that child: seems satisfied with the device; uses device effectively with
people who are unfamiliar; values the device; has figured out how to operate device; uses device
to communicate with many different people.
84% of parents agreed that the device enables child to make friendships with others and has
contributed to overall effectiveness in communication.
Only 25% use the device for Internet; only 13% use device for environmental control; only 13%
can independently get to the device.
50% use the device to access recreation, but this appears to be limited to games. Few use the
device to access music, art or social media.
Most parents (78% ) felt they received sufficient help to implement the technology. SLPs were
reported most often as providing assistance (77%), followed by AT (33%), OT and PT (22%
each) then other professionals.
Conclusions
Parents perceive eye gaze technology to be a powerful means for their children to communicate.
There appears to be a need to employ the multiple capabilities of computer based AAC to meet
recreational and environmental needs. More research is needed.
Blackstone, S. W., Luo, F., Canchola, J., Wilkinson, K. M., & Roman-Lantzy, C. (2021,
February). Children With Cortical Visual Impairment and Complex Communication
Borgestig, M., Al Khatib, I., Masayko, S., & Hemmingsson, H. (2021). The impact of eye-gaze
controlled computer on communication and functional independence in children and
young people with complex needs – a multicenter intervention study. Developmental
Neurorehabilitation, 24(8), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2021.1903603
Communication Function Classification System. CFCS. (2010). Retrieved October 29, 2022,
from http://cfcs.us/
Eye-Gaze Control Technology for people with cerebral palsy. 2021 clinical guidelines.
AusACPDM. (2021, August 22). Retrieved October 29, 2022, from
https://www.ausacpdm.org.au/resources/eye-gaze-control-technology-for-people-with-
cerebral-palsy-2021-clinical-guidelines/
Galli, J., Loi, E., Gaza, S., Michelette, S., Molinaro, A., Franzoni, A., Rossi, A., Semararo, F.,
Merabet, L., Fazzi, E. (2024). Natural history of cerebral visual impairment in children
with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2024; 00:1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16096
Karlsson, P., Allsop, A., Dee-Price, B.-J., & Wallen, M. (2018). Eye-Gaze Control Technology
for children, adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy with significant physical
disability: Findings from a systematic review. Taylor & Francis. Retrieved October 29,
2022, from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17518423.2017.1362057
Kuhaneck, H., Bundy, A., Fabrizi, S., Lynch, H., Moore, A., Román-Oyola, R., Stagnitti, K., &
Waldman-Levi, A. (2024). Play as Occupation: the state of our science and a research
https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050824
Manual Ability Classification system for children with cerebral palsy--MACS. (2010). Retrieved
October 30, 2022, from https://www.macs.nu/files/MACS_English_2010.pdf
Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Bartlett, D., & Livingston, M. (2007). GMFCS - E & R Gross
Motor Function Classification System Expanded & Revised English - CanChild.
Retrieved October 29, 2022, from
https://canchild.ca/system/tenon/assets/attachments/000/000/058/original/GMFCS-
ER_English.pdf
Powrie, B., Kolehmainen, N., Turpin, M., Ziviani, J., & Copley, J. (2015). The meaning of
leisure for children and young people with physical disabilities: A systematic evidence
synthesis. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 57(11), 993–1010.
https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12788
Visual function classification. SMILE Lab. (2020). Retrieved October 29, 2022, from
https://www.pisasmilelab.it/vfcs
Wilkinson, K.M., Elko, L., Elko, R., McCarty, T., Sowers, D. J., Blackstone, S., & Roman-
Lantzy, C. An Evidence-Based Approach to Augmentative and Alternative
Communication Design for Individuals with Cortical Visual Impairment. American
Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32 (5). https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-
00397