Progress Report Table
Progress Report Table
PROGRESS REPORT
Dust and gaseous - The contractor shall use Contractor and Monitoring Action:
emissions generated water to suppress any dust SHE officer - Incident Register
by excavators, that may arise during Responsible Party:
vehicles and drill rug infrastructure improvement. - Compliance Officer (ECO)
Frequency:
- In cases where-by workers
- Daily
are to work in dusty
conditions, standard dust
masks should be worn.
- All machinery in the camp
should be inspected and
serviced accordingly.
- Green technology should be
Activities Impact Mitigation Measures Implementation Monitoring Action Progress to date
of Mitigation (Frequency and Responsible
(Responsible Party)
Party)
used as much as possible.
-
- Store all hazardous
substances in a secondary
containments system capable
of storing at least 110% of
the liquid capacity.
Potential littering and - Ensure sufficient waste bins Project Manager Monitoring Action:
polluting of the on site and within office - Audit Checklist; and
surrounding buildings Photographs;
environment. - Ensure the sufficient removal
Activities Impact Mitigation Measures Implementation Monitoring Action Progress to date
of Mitigation (Frequency and Responsible
(Responsible Party)
Party)
of waste from site on a Responsible Party:
regular basis to a registered - ECO
landfill site. Frequency:
- Provide environmental Monthly
awareness training to all
personnel.
- Where applicable, waste
should be reused, and
recycled.
- Sell scrap metal to steel
manufacturing companies.
Uncontrollable fire -The potential risk of veld fires is Project Manager Monitoring Action:
heightened by windy conditions in the - Audit Checklist; and
area, specifically during the dry, Photographs; incident
windy winter months; register
Responsible Party:
- Assume acceptable precautions to - ECO
guarantee that fires are not started as a Frequency:
result of Works on site as specified Monthly
below: the Contractor will be held
responsible for any damage to
Activities Impact Mitigation Measures Implementation Monitoring Action Progress to date
of Mitigation (Frequency and Responsible
(Responsible Party)
Party)
structures or property on or
neighbouring the Site as a result of
any fire caused by personnel;
The activities may - Stockpile should be done in Project Manager Monitoring Action:
change the visual accordance with global - Audit Checklist; and
quality of the area geotechnical engineering Photographs;
including landscaping standards and DoE legislation - Complaint register
Responsible Party:
- Project Manager
Frequency
Impact on health and - New or the upkeep of fences Contractor Monitoring Action:
safety of personnel should align to ensure safety - Audit Checklist; and
and surrounding of animals and maintain a Photographs;
workers, reliable boundary area; Responsible Party:
communities and - - ECO
animals. - Should construction activity Frequency:
require the removal of fences Monthly
or gates to execute tasks, this
must be replaced as soon as
possible following
Activities Impact Mitigation Measures Implementation Monitoring Action Progress to date
of Mitigation (Frequency and Responsible
(Responsible Party)
Party)
completion;
- Ensure that material safety
data sheets are provided for
all substances used in the
process.
- Refer to the material safety
data sheet for the storage,
handling and transportation
of all substances used in the
operating process.
- Standard operating
procedures must be followed
during the operation phase.
- Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE) must be
used were applicable and
must be provided by the
owner.
- Ensure that all personnel on
site are aware of the content
of this EMP.
Activities Impact Mitigation Measures Implementation Monitoring Action Progress to date
of Mitigation (Frequency and Responsible
(Responsible Party)
Party)
- Implement an Emergency
preparedness and response
plan.
Social Activities Potential spread of - HIV awareness campaigns. Project Manager Monitoring Action:
HIV & AIDS - Both male and female and SHE officer - Audit Checklist; and
condoms should be available Photographs;
on site. Responsible Party:
- ECO
Frequency:
Monthly
Potential generation - Labour work should be Project Manager Monitoring Action:
of temporary prioritised for locals. and SHE officer - Audit Checklist; and
employment Photographs;
Responsible Party:
- ECO
Frequency:
Monthly
1.1 Emergency response plan
The objective of this section is to provide a brief summary of options available to the project
manager. The details of the design will reside with the designers, but cognizance should be
taken of the design philosophy and key aspects given in the guidelines to problem solving given
below.
The following table is provided to assist the inspector and project manager with problem solving:
Spillage of diesel or Report to Project Manager and Action will be required as soon as
hydrocarbons on soil continue observations. possible by following the next steps:
Also check: Dig down into the soil to see how far
down the pollution penetrated,
That the source causing the
spillage is decommissioned, If less than 300mm penetration:
and that the affected area is
a. Turn the soil over to expose it to
isolated to prevent spreading of
the air,
the hazardous substance.
b. Apply Mono Ammonium
Phosphate (MAP) at a rate of
58gr/m² to the dug up soil
Erosion of access road Report to Project Manager and Action will be required ASAP:
continue observations.
Implement erosion protection works
Also check: at identified problem areas,
The contents of this report have sought to identify and assess key issues relating to the proposed
Cannabis production at Ha Bua Sono in Berea. In consolidation no environmental fatal flaws
were identified to be associated with the proposed activity. The majority of impacts identified
were of a medium to low significance and can be suitably mitigated to acceptable levels,
provided that specifications are stipulated in the EMP-r are followed and adhered to.
It is thus the opinion of the Environmental Practitioner that the EMP be approved. The
Environmental Practitioner further recommends that:
REFERENCES
1. CBL Economic Review. 2008: Official opening of a new University: Implications for
Economic Development
http://www.centralbank.org.ls/publications/MonthlyEonomicReview/2008/Econo-
Review-Oct-2008.pdf
2. Crecar, S. and Weston, D. 2014. Integrated Water Resources Management plan for the
Orange-Senqu River Basin, Report No. ORASECOM 019/2014. Pretoria.
3. Davies, J. 2003. Hydrological atlas of Lowland Lesotho. British Geological Survey.
https://www.bgs.ac.uk/sadc/fulldetails.cfm?id=LS4009. Accessed on the 08th June 2016.
4. Hilliard, O. M. and Burtt, B. L. 1987. The Botany of the Southern Natal Drakensburg.
CTP Book Printers. Cape.
5. Kornelius, G. 2007. Summer ambient air quality assessment in urban Lesotho.
Conference paper. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.3517.6645.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268205370. Accessed on 09th June 2016.
6. KoL, 2015. Lesotho Energy Policy (2015 – 2025)
7. http://www.lewa.org.ls/legisltion/Policy/ENERGYPOLICY,pdf
8. GIBB, 2009: Stutter Filling Station and Tourism Centre
9. http://project.gibb.co.za/LinkClink.aspx?
fileticket=k9vg9jkRZGe8%3D&tabid=263&mid=722
10. Ministry of Health [Lesotho] and ICF International. 2016. Lesotho Demographic and
Health Survey 2014. Maseru, Lesotho: Ministry of Health and ICF International.
11. MoET, 2005. Education Sector Strategic Plan 2005 – 2015, Government of Lesotho
12. http://www.unesco.org/education/edurights/media/docs/
11a1cd1054eebdfd5af318634aa1307aca7fc688.pdf
13. WHO, 2005. WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide
and sulfur dioxide: Global update 2005 - Summary of risk assessment.
WHO/SDE/PHE/OEH/06.02. Geneva.
APPENDICES.
Appendix A: Locality Map