262605ba5b20143c7ea9d1766a8245d9bc1b
262605ba5b20143c7ea9d1766a8245d9bc1b
Abstract—The rotor is a critical component in converting Fig. 1 shows the turbine classification. The turbine is
kinetic energy into electrical energy in the turbine. There divided into two types based on the flow, namely axial
are many types of turbines, one of which is the Savonius flow and cross-flow. Axial flow turbines have a similar
Turbine, a kind of cross-flow turbine. In recent years, working mechanism to propeller blades and rely on
research on improving the performance of the Savonius
turbine has continued to develop. Several factors that affect
generating lift [3]. Cross-flow turbines can generate
the performance of the Savonius turbine are external factors, power at moderate flow rates but experience high torque
geometry, and materials. One of the Savonius turbine fluctuations [3].
performances is influenced by the rotor geometry. Several
studies have shown that modification of the geometry of the
Savonius rotor can improve turbine performance. Some of
the changes made are variations in aspect ratio, overlap
ratio, the shape of a blade, number of blades, and multi-
stage. This research is a mini-review of the geometry
modifications that influence the performance of the
Savonius turbine. This study aims to show the geometric
factors that influence the performance of Savonius and
compare the magnitude of these factors' Influence in
increasing the Savonius turbine's performance. Reviews
show that the Aspect Ratio is directly proportional to
performance. Overlap variation of 0 to 0.3 has resulted in
the best performance on the Savonius turbine, but other
factors also influence this factor. The modified shape of the
blade provides an increase of 8% - 25%. Multi-Stage on the Figure 1. Classification of turbines [3].
Savonius can be a combination factor with other factors to
maximize the performance of the Savonius rotor. The
In recent years, the Savonius rotor is one type of cross-
number of blades that have resulted in the best performance
and stability against other factors is two-blades and three- flow turbine that has experienced many developments.
blades. Research to improve the performance of Savonius is
mainly done by modifying the rotor geometry. The
Index Terms—Savonius, turbine, geometry factor, geometry of the Savonius continues to develop, such as
coefficient of power the use of shaft [4], blade shape [4], aspect ratio [5],
overlap ratio [6], number of blades [7], and multi-stage
I. INTRODUCTION [8]. Blade profile changes have been carried out in the
study of Zain Ullah Khan et al. [9]. Changes in the blade
Research on renewable energy in Indonesia has profile resulted in an increase in the maximum power
increased yearly, both experimental studies [1] and coefficient against the conventional design from 0.128 to
simulations using software [2]. One renewable energy 0.38 [9].
that has excellent development is power generation, This research shows that geometry has an essential role
especially Hydro-power. The turbine is one of the in increasing turbine performance. Many changes to the
Machines used to utilize the Power System. Many main rotor parameters have been made. The main
research development of the turbine geometry design to parameters in question are many factors such as the
improve the turbine's performance. The rotor is the main number of blades, aspect ratio, and overlap ratio. Tests on
component that converts mechanical energy into the number of blades were carried out with various
electricity utilizing transmission systems [3]. variations, namely two, three, four, and five. Several
studies have shown that blade two has the best
Manuscript received March 17, 2022; revised August 29, 2022.
performance compared to other numbers. This is because operate at low velocities. The Savonius rotor has the
the net drag that affects the rotor on two blades is higher disadvantage of low efficiency in its conventional design
than the number of other blades [7]. [16]. Fig. 4 shows a comparison of the performance of
In contrast, other studies have shown that number the Savonius turbine with other types of turbines, where it
blade four has better performance [10]. Tests on the can be seen that the Savonius turbine is the turbine that
aspect and overlap ratios have been carried out has the lowest Cp [15]. Table I shows the difference
consecutively at 1.8 and 0.10 to 0.15. The tests show that between the savonius turbine and the Darrieus turbine in
the aspect ratio has a more significant influence than the general.
overlap ratio [5]. Overlap studies have also been carried
out at 0.12 to 0.21, showing that the optimal overlap is at TABLE I. COMPARISON OF THE SAVONIUS ROTOR WITH THE DARRIEUS
ROTOR.
0.16 [11].
Other research related to the rotor geometry factor is Savonius Darrieus
about the shape of the blade. There have been many has an ability to self-start do not have a self-start ability
has the Lower efficiency has the highest efficiency
designs of blade shapes that show an increase in turbine high starting torque low starting torque
performance. Changes to the blade in the form of blade Lower Noise Lower Noise
shape [4, 9], twisted/helical blade [12, 13], or the addition drag type turbine lift type turbine
of components to the blade [14]. This research is a mini-
review of the geometry change factor in the Savonius
turbine. This study aimed to show the geometry that
influenced the performance of Savonius and compare the
magnitude of the Influence of these factors in improving
performance. Several studies show a significant increase
in performance to be used to reference the following
research design.
Research on the performance of Savonius with the Table II shows the increase in the performance of the
CFD method has been carried out by Prabowoputra et al. Savonius turbine caused by the modification of the blade
[29]. Fig. 5a shows the L-Shape blade modifications that shape. This mini-review shows that the Sonu Sharma
have been made. Simulations were carried out in 3D model has the smallest gain of 8.89% compared to
using Ansys software and CFX Solver. The turbulence several blade shape modifications on the Savonius rotor.
model used in this study is k-epsilon. The aspect ratio The elliptical shape has the best increase, up to 25%. This
used on the rotor is 1, and the overlap ratio 0. The review shows the effect of blade shape modification on
increase in Cpmax resulting from the design modification the performance of the Savonius rotor in general. Fig. 7
is 10% [29]. shows a graph of the relationship between Cp and TSR
Shashikumar et al. have researched modifying the for each rotor variation.
blade with a v-shape model [30]. The V-shape model that
has been used in this study consists of 5 types. Some TABLE II. SAVONIUS PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT.
improve performance, while some do not. The No The shape of the blade type Increment
modifications made to the blade shape that has improved 1 Pranata Blade 17.85%
performance are shown in Fig. 5b. The research was 2 Serrated Blade 12.31%
conducted using experimental and simulation methods. 3 V-shape Blade 19.3%
4 Tandem Blade 8.89%
However, the comparison with the conventional Savonius 5 L-shape Blade 10%
design was only carried out in simulation research. The 6 Elliptical Blade 25%
resulting Cpmax is 0.22, and the increase obtained from the 7 Benesh Blade 15.64%
V-shape modification is 19.3% [30]. Fig. 5c shows a 8 Modified Batch 11.84%
modified design of a tandem blade with an aspect ratio of
1. The research uses the CFD method in 3D and ANSYS
CFX Slover. Blade design produces a Cpmax of 0.2266.
Compared to the conventional Savonius type, this new
design improves performance by 8.89% [31].
Figure 5. a) L-shape Blade [29], b) V-Shape Blade [30], and c) Tandem Figure 7. Graph of the relationship between Cp and TSR.
Blade [31].
The blade modification research that Nur Alom and C. Overlap Ratio
Ujjwal K. Saha have done shows the effect on the The overlap ratio is one of the parameters related to the
performance of the Savonius turbine [32]. Modification is turbine diameter, which is the ratio of the overlap
done with three variations: Benesh type, Elliptical type, distance between the turbine blades (e) to the turbine
and Modified batch type. Fig. 6 shows a visual of the diameter (D). The following equation 6 shows the
variations in the blade shape modifications that have been equation of the overlap ratio [6].
made. This research was conducted using the CFD
method in 2D unsteady conditions. The software used in (6)
this research is ANSYS Fluent. The results show that the
three-blade modifications increased the performance of Akwa et al. conducted a study on the effect of overlap
the Savonius turbine. The increase produced by the on the performance of the Savonius turbine [23]. The
elliptical type is 25%, the benefit type is 15.64%, and the blade used in this study is the conventional Savonius. The
Modified batch type is 11.84% [32]. The shape of the research was conducted in 3D simulation using the CFD
batch profile on the rotor shows an increase in the cp max method. There are 5 types of overlap modifications,
value. The increase in Cpmax was obtained by 36%, where namely 0, 0.15, 0.3, 0.45, and 0.6. The results show that
the Cpmax in the conventional design was 0.195, and the the overlap of 0.15 produces the best Cpmax, which is
batch profile was 0.2661 [33]. 0.3161. However, the position of Cpmax at overlap 0.15 is
almost the same as that produced by overlap 0.3 [23].
Research on the effect of overlap on Savonius with an
elliptical type blade shape has been carried out. The CFD
method is used in this study, and the simulation uses 2D
unsteady. The software used in this research is Ansys
Fluent. The overlap ratio variations given are 0, 0.1, 0.15,
Figure 6. a) Elliptical Blade, b) Benesh Blade, and c) Modified Batch
Blade [32]. 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3. The highest Cpmax of 0.34 was obtained
at an overlap ratio of 0.15 [34]. Simulation research on
the effect of overlap on the performance of Savonius has rotors, which conditions were set using Reynolds
been carried out. The type of blade used is conventional numbers 80,000 and 100,000. Both types reproduce the
Savonius, where this research was conducted using the same performance pattern: the more stages, the smaller
CFD method with 2D simulation. The overlaps used in the Cpmax produced. The overall Cpmax results are shown
this study were 0, 0.075, 0.15, 0.225, and 0.3. The highest in Table III [38].
Cpmax is obtained at overlap 0, which is 0.19. At 0.15 Frikha et al. have researched variations in the number
overlap, Cpmax is close to overlap 0, which is 0.186 [35]. of stages in Savonius. The CFD method is used in this
Another study was carried out using an experimental study with 3D simulation. The number of stages used in
method on conventional Savonius turbines using this study was two-stages, three-stages, four-stages, and
variations of the overlap ratio [36]. The overlap ratio used five-stages. The blade used is a conventional blade
is 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3. The study was conducted using a without using an endplate. This study indicates that the
tunnel in an experimental setup. The Cpmax produced by best performance is obtained on a rotor with five stages
each overlap variation of 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 are 0.105, producing a Cpmax of 0.132. The most negligible
0.138, 0.14, and 0.11. These results indicate that the performance is obtained on a two-stage rotor with a Cpmax
overlap that produces the best performance is 0.2, Cpmax is of 0.081[39].
0.14 [36]. Absi et al. conducted a study on the effect of
overlap on the new blade design on the performance of TABLE III. CPMAX RESULTS IN THE STUDY OF KAMOJI ET AL. [38].
the Savonius turbine [28]. This research was conducted Cpmax Cpmax
Type of Multi-stage
on a blade with a serrated shape on the blade surface. The at Re 80,000 at Re 100,000
method used in this study is the CFD method with 2D Single-Stage 0.17 0.18
simulation. The overlap variations used are 0.1, 0.15, and Two-Stages 0.13 0.15
Three-stages 0.10 0.13
0.2. The highest Cpmax is obtained at overlap 0.2 with a
value of 0.258. The overlap of 0.1 and 0.15 produces a E. Number of Blades
Cpmax of 0.246 and 0.25 [28]. Wenehenubun et al. conducted a study on the effect of
D. Multi-Stages the number of blades on the performance of the Savonius
rotor [10]. The number of blades used in this study was 2,
Prabowoputra et al. conducted a study on the
3, and 4, and used was the conventional blade. The
performance of the Savonius turbine [37]. The research
research method used in this research is an experimental
was conducted using an unsteady 3D simulation using the
and simulation method. The simulation used ANSYS, and
CFD method with the ANSYS CFX. The design used is
the results show that Cpmax is obtained at the number of
shown in Fig. 8. The variation used is the number of
blades 4 [10].
stages, namely single-stage, two-stage, and three-stages.
Experimental research has been carried out on blades 2,
The type of blade used is conventional Savonius. The
3, 4, 5, and 6 [36]. The blade used a conventional blade,
overlap used is 0, and the aspect ratio is 1. The kind of
with an aspect ratio of 2 and an overlap of 0. The results
turbulence used is K-epsilon. The results show that the
showed that the best performance was obtained at the
best performance is obtained on a three-stage rotor,
number of blades two because the net drag force affected
resulting in a Cpmax of 0.197. A two-stage rotor produces
on the rotor is higher than on other blades. A rotor with
a Cpmax of 0.178, and a single-stage produces a Cpmax of
two blades produces a Cpmax of 0.1 [36]. Research has
0.1 [37].
been carried out on the effect of the number of blades on
the performance of Savonius [15]. This research was
conducted using the CFD method with unsteady 3D
simulation. The software used is ANSYS CFX. The type
of turbulence used in this study is k-epsilon. The blades
used conventional and modified types, as shown in Fig. 8.
Variations in the number of blades used are 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Figure 8. a) Single-stage, b) Two-stages, and c) Three-stages [37]. Table IV shows the Cpmax results obtained. The largest
Cpmax is obtained for both blades at the number of blades
Saat et al. conducted a study on multi-stage [24]. This 3 [15].
study aimed to determine changes in the performance of
the Savonius turbine. This research was conducted on
twisted blade form. The aspect ratio used is 1 for single-
stage, 2 for two-stages, 3 for three-stages, and 4 for four-
stages. The research uses the CFD method with 3D
simulation. The results show that the higher the number
of stages, the higher the Cpmax. A four-stage rotor
produces the best performance with a Cpmax of 0.261. a
single-stage produces the most negligible performance
with a Cpmax value of 0.223 [24]. Kamoji et al. studied
multi-stages with experimental methods [38]. Tests were
carried out on single-stage, two-stage, and three-stage
Figure 8. Savonius rotor [15].
TABLE IV. CPMAX RESULTS IN THE STUDY OF PRABOWOPUTRA ET AL. [7] N. H. Mahmoud, “An experimental study on improvement of
[15]. Savonius rotor performance,” Alexandria Engineering Journal,
vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 19-25, 2012.
Cpmax
[8] D. M. Prabowoputra, S. Hadi, A. R. Prabowo, and J. M. Sohn,
Type of Number Number Number Number
“Performance investigation of the Savonius horizontal water
Blade of blades: of blades: of blades: of blades:
turbine accounting for stage rotor design,” International Journal
2 3 4 5
of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, vol. 9, pp.
Conventional 0.10 0.215 0.06 0.04 184-189, 2020.
Modification 0.11 0.18 0.08 0.05 [9] Z. U. Khan, Z. Ali, and A. Uddin, “Performance enhancement of
vertical axis hydrokinetic turbine using novel blade profile,”
V. CONCLUSION Renewable Energy, vol. 188, pp. 801-818, 2022.
[10] F. Wenehenubun, A. Saputra, and H. Sutanto, “An experimental
This mini-review shows several geometric factors that study on the performance of Savonius wind turbines related with
influence the performance of the Savonius turbine. These the number of blades,” Energy Procedia, vol. 68, pp. 297-304,
2015.
factors are aspect ratio, overlap ratio, shape of blade, [11] E. Kerikous and D. Thevenin, “Performance enhancement of a
multi-stages, and number of blades. The review shows hydraulic Savonius turbine by optimizing overlap and gap
that the higher the Aspect Ratio tends to increase the ratios,” in Proc. ASME 2019 Gas Turbine India Conference,
performance of the Savonius turbine. However, this GTINDIA2019-2670 (2019).
[12] A. Damak, Z. Driss, and M. S. Abid, “Experimental investigation
factor needs to be considered in terms of the ergonomics of helical Savonius rotor with a twist of 180,” Renewable Energy,
of turbine construction. In this simple review, changes in vol. 52, pp. 136-142, 2013.
performance caused by the shape of the blade can [13] M. D. M. Kamal and R. P. Saini, “A numerical investigation on
increase the performance of Savonius by 8% to 25%. The the influence of savonius blade helicity on the performance
characteristics of hybrid cross-flow hydrokinetic turbine,”
best performance is obtained on the rotor design with Renewable Energy, vol. 190, pp. 788-804, 2022.
0.15 overlap. Multi-Stage on the Savonius can be a [14] J. Thiyagaraj, I. Rahamathullah, and P. S. Prabu, “Experimental
combination factor with other factors to maximize the investigations on the performance characteristics of a modified
Savonius rotor performance. The best number of blades is four bladed Savonius hydro-kinetic turbine,” International
Journal of Renewable Energy Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1530-
generally achieved in numbers 2 and 3. For a number of 1536, 2016.
blades > 4 has different results for each researcher. [15] D. M. Prabowoputra, A. R. Prabowo, S. Hadi, and J. M. Dan
Sohn, “Assessment of turbine stages and blade numbers on
modified 3D Savonius hydrokinetic turbine performance using
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CFD analysis,” Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and
The authors declare no conflict of interest. Structures, vol. 17, pp. 253-272, 2021.
[16] J. L. Menet, “A double-step Savonius rotor for local production
of electricity: A design study,” Renewable Energy, vol. 29, pp.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS 1843–1862, 2004.
[17] V. Patel, T. I. Eldho, and S. V. Prabhu, “Velocity and
Dandun Mahesa Prabowoputra: Conceptualization, performance correction methodology for hydrokinetic turbines
methodology, software, formal analysis, data curation, experimented with different geometry of the channel,”
and writing—Original draft preparation. Renewable Energy, vol. 131, pp. 1300-1317, 2019.
[18] A. R. Prabowo and D. M. Prabowoputra, “Investigation on
Aditya Rio Prabowo: Methodology, conceptualization, Savonius turbine technology as harvesting instrument of non-
software, validation, resources, writing—Review and fossil,” Energy: Technical development and potential
editing, supervision, supervision, project administration, implementation Theoretical & Applied Mechanics Letters, vol. 10,
and funding acquisition. pp. 262-269, 2020.
[19] D. M. Prabowoputra, A. R. Prabowo, A. Bahatmaka, and S. Hadi,
“Analytical review of material criteria as supporting factors in
REFERENCES horizontal axis wind turbines: Effect to structural responses,”
Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 27, pp. 155–162, 2020.
[1] B. Abulnaga, “Water power without waterfalls,” Water
[20] A. Kumar and R. P. Saini, “Performance analysis of a Savonius
Resources Journal United Nation, pp. 57-60, 1988.
hydrokinetic turbine having twisted blades,” Renewable Energy,
[2] D. M. Prabowoputra, A. Sartomo, and Suyitno, “The effect of
vol. 108, pp. 502-522, 2017.
pressure and temperature on biodiesel production using castor
[21] S. Roy and U. K. Saha, “Investigations on the effect of aspect
oil,” in Proc. AIP Conference Proceedings 2217, 030051, 2020.
ratio into the performance of Savonius rotors,” in Proc. ASME
[3] N. R. Maldara, C. Y. Nga, and E. Oguzb, “A review of the
2013 Gas Turbine India Conference, V001T07A002, 2013.
optimization studies for Savonius turbine considering
[22] M. I. Nadhief, D. M. Prabowoputra, S. Hadi, and Tjahjana,
hydrokinetic,” Applications Energy Conversion and Management,
“DDDP: Experimental study on the effect of variation of blade
vol. 226, 2020.
arc angle to the performance of savonius water turbine flow in
[4] M. A. Kamoji, S. B. Kedare, S. V. and Prabhu, “Experimental
pipe,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and
investigations on single-stage modified Savonius rotor,” Applied
Robotics Research, vol. 9, no. 5, 2020.
Energy, vol. 86, pp. 1064–1073, 2009.
[23] J. V. Akwa, G. A. S. Júnior, and A. P. Petry, “Discussion on the
[5] V. Patel, G. Bhat, T. I. Eldho, and S. V. Prabhu, “Influence of
verification of the overlap ratio influence on performance
overlap ratio and aspect ratio on the performance of Savonius
coefficients of a Savonius wind rotor using computational fluid
hydrokinetic turbine,” International Journal of Energy Research,
dynamics,” Renewable Energy, vol. 38, pp. 141-149, 2012.
vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 829-844, 2016.
[24] A. S. Saada, A. Elwardanya, and I. I. El-Sharkawya, S.
[6] S. Hadi, H. Khuluqi, D. M. Prabowoputra, A. Prasetyo, D. D. D.
Ookawaraa, and M. Ahmeda, “Performance evaluation of a novel
P. Tjahjana, and A. Farkhan, “Performance of Savonius
vertical axis wind turbine using twisted blades in multi-stage
horizontal axis water turbine in free flow vertical pipe as effect of
Savonius rotors,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 235,
blade overlap,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid
114013, 2021.
Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 219-223,
[25] P. Jaohindy, S. F. Tavish, F. Garde, and A. Bastide, “An analysis
2019.
of the transient forces acting on Savonius rotors with different
aspect ratios,” Renewable Energy, vol. 55, pp. 286–295, 2013.
[26] M. H. Pranta, M. S. Rabbi, and M. M. Roshid, “A computational [37] D. Mahesa Prabowoputra, S. Hadi, J. M. Sohn, and A. R.
study on the aerodynamic performance of modified Savonius Prabowo, “The effect of multi-stage modification on the
wind turbine,” Results in Engineering, vol. 10, 100237, 2021. performance of Savonius water turbines under the horizontal axis
[27] M. R. Shouman, M. M. Helal, and A. A. El-Haroun, condition,” Open Engineering, vol. 10, pp. 793–803, 2020.
“Numerical prediction of improvement of a Savonius rotor [38] M. A. Kamoji, S. B. Kedare, and S. V. Prabhu, “Experimental
performance with curtaining and fifin addition on blade,” investigations on two and three stage modified Savonius rotor,”
Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 61, 10689–10699, 2022. Wind Engineering, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 483-510, 2011.
[28] S. M. A. Absi, A. H. Jabbar, S. O. Mezan, B. A. Al-Rawi, and S. [39] S. Frikha, Z. Driss, E. Ayadi, Z. Masmoudi, and M. S. Abid,
T. A. Attabi, “An experimental test of the performance “Numerical and experimental characterization of multi-stage
enhancement of a Savonius turbine by modifying the inner Savonius rotors,” Energy, vol. 114, pp. 382-404, 2016.
surface of a blade,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 42, pp.
2233–2240, 2021.
[29] D. M. Prabowoputra, S. Hadi, A. R. Prabowo, and J. M. Sohn, Copyright © 2022 by the authors. This is an open access article
“Performance assessment of water turbine subjected to distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-
geometrical alteration of Savonius rotor,” in Proc. the 6th NC-ND 4.0), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any
International Conference and Exhibition on Sustainable Energy medium, provided that the article is properly cited, the use is non-
and Advanced Materials, Lecture Notes in Mechanical commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Engineering, 2020, pp. 351-365.
[30] C. M. Shashikumar, R. Honnasiddaiah, V. Hindasageri, and V. Dandun Mahesa Prabowoputra graduated in
Madava, “Experimental and numerical investigation of novel V- Mechanical Engineering from Sebelas Maret
shaped rotor for hydropower utilization,” Ocean Engineering, vol. University. He performed a series of numerical
224, 108689, 2021. simulations based on heat transfer, which
[31] S. Sharma and R. K. Sharma, “Performance improvement of became the main topic for his undergraduate
Savonius rotor using multiple quarter blades–A CFD paper. He has completed his Master's degree
investigation,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 127, pp. from Sebelas Maret Unversity. He expanded his
43-54, 2016. research to other engineering phenomena, such
[32] N. Alom and U. K. Saha, “Influence of blade profiles on as Computational Fluid Dynamic on Hydro-
Savonius rotor performance: Numerical simulation and Turbine. He is a Lecturer in the Department of
experimental validation,” Energy Conversion and Management , Mechanical Engineering in Universitas Jenderal
vol. 186, pp. 267-277, 2019. Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia.
[33] L. A. Gallo, E. L. Chica, and E. G. Flórez, “Numerical
optimization of the blade profile of a savonius type rotor using Aditya Rio Prabowo graduated in Mechanical
the response surface methodology,” Sustainability 2022, 14. Engineering from Diponegoro University. He
[34] N. Alom and U. K. Saha, “Arriving at the optimum overlap ratio performed a series of numerical simulation
for an elliptical bladed Savonius,” in Proc. ASME Turbo Expo based on an incident of ship collision, which
2017 Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, pp. 1-10, also became main topic for his graduate thesis.
2017. After finishing double-degree program of a
[35] K. Kacprzak and K. Sobczak, “Computational assessment of the combined discipline, Naval Architecture and
influence of the overlap ratio on the power characteristics of a Marine Systems Engineering, and Mechanical
classical Savonius wind turbine,” Open Engineering, vol. 5, pp. Engineering, he continued to Marine
314–322, 2015. Convergence Design, Pukyong National
[36] J. Thiyagaraj, I. Rahamathullah, G. Anbuchezhiyan, R. University,South Korea. He expanded his
Barathiraja, and A. Ponshanmugakumar, “Influence of blade research to other engineering phenomena, such as grounding/stranding
numbers, overlap ratio and modified blades on performance and arctic engineering. He is a Professor and Lecturer in the Department
characteristics of the Savonius hydro-kinetic turbine,” Materials of Mechanical Engineering in Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia.
Today, Proceedings, vol. 46, pp. 4047–4053, 2021.