How to structure a report
How to structure a report
• A title.
• The aim of the experiment.
• The hypothesis.
• An introduction to the relevant background theory.
• The methods used.
• The results.
• A discussion of the results.
• The conclusions.
Scientific reports allow their readers to understand the experiment without doing it themselves.
In addition, scientific reports give others the opportunity to check the methodology of the
experiment to ensure the validity of the results.
Title:
The title page will include the following:
Abstract
The Abstract is a self-contained synopsis of the report - an informative summary of what
you did and what you found out.
• Literature citations.
• Formulae and abbreviations, references to tables.
Although the Abstract comes first in a report, it is best to write it last, after you have the
results and conclusions.
Introduction
This provides a summary of the analysis to be undertaken. The purpose of the
Introduction is to put the reader in the picture and place the research/experiment within
a context.
The Method should include such things as sample size, apparatus or equipment used,
experimental conditions, concentrations, times, controls etc.
While the Method does not need to include minute details (e.g. if you followed a set of
written instructions, you may not need to write out the full procedure - state briefly
what was done and cite the manual), there needs to be enough detail so that someone
could repeat the work.
Do not keep using the word "then" - the reader will understand that the steps were
carried out in the order in which they are written.
The Method must be written in the past tense and the passive voice.
Results
This section states what you found.
• What you expected to find or what you were supposed to have observed.
• References to other works (published data or statements of theory).
Use the Discussion section of the report for these.
The Results section should be written in the past tense and passive voice, avoiding the
use of "I" and "we".
Discussion
State your interpretation of your findings, perhaps comparing or contrasting them with
the literature. Reflect on your actual data and observations.
Explain or rationalize errant data or describe possible sources of error and how they may
have affected the outcome.
The Discussion must answer the question "What do the results mean?" It is an argument
based on the results.
Conclusion
This is the summing up of your argument or experiment/research and should relate back
to the Introduction.
The Conclusion should only consist of a few sentences and should reiterate the findings
of your experiment/research.
If appropriate, suggest how to improve the procedure, and what additional experiments
or research would be helpful.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
References
Cite any references that you have used, ensuring that each item in the reference list has
an in-text citation, and every in-text citation has a full reference in the reference list at
the end of your paper.
Ensure that the references are formatted according to the style required by the journal
(or your lecturer/supervisor) and be careful with spelling (the author whose name you
misspell may be asked to review the paper!)
Executive Summary
This would be situated at the beginning of the report (before the Abstract).
Acknowledgements
If other people or organizations assisted in any way with the experiments/research (e.g.
funding, facilities, guidance etc.), they should be thanked at the end of the document
(after Conclusion and Recommendations).
Emerson, L.; Hampton, J. Writing Guidelines for Science and Applied Science
Students, 2nd ed.; Thomson/Dunmore Press: Southbank, Vic., 2005.
Lobban, C. S.; Schefter, M. Successful Lab Reports: A Manual for Science Students;
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1992.