MSPM S21004 Thesis Final (Rectified)
MSPM S21004 Thesis Final (Rectified)
Projects in Pakistan”
I Muhammad Zain Naqi hereby state that my MS/M.Phil. thesis titled “Factors of Escalation and
its Effects on Cost of Construction Projects in Pakistan” is my own work and has not been
submitted previously by me for taking any degree from this University.
At any time if my statement is found to be incorrect even after my Graduate the university
Date: 28-04-2023
i
Plagiarism Undertaking
I solemnly declare that research work presented in the thesis titled “Factors of Escalation and its
Effects on Cost of Construction Projects in Pakistan” is solely my research work with no significant
contribution from any other person. Small contribution/help wherever taken has been duly acknowledged
and that complete thesis has been written by me.
Towards plagiarism.
Therefore, I, as the author of the above-titled thesis, declare that no portion of my thesis has
been plagiarized and any material used as reference is properly referred to or cited. I
undertake that if I am found guilty of any formal plagiarism in the above-titled thesis, even
after being awarded an MS/M.Phil. degree, the University reserves the right to
withdraw/revoke my MS/M.Phil. degree and that HEC and the University have the right to
publish my name on the HEC/University Website on which names of students who submitted
Student/Author Signature:
ii
Certificate of Approval
This is to certify that the research work presented in this thesis, entitled “Factors of
Escalation and its Effects on Cost of Construction Projects in Pakistan” was conducted by
Muhammad Zain Naqi Under the supervision of “Dr. Shahid Naveed.”
No Part of this thesis has been submitted anywhere else for any other degree. This thesis is
submitted to the Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, Superior University,
Lahore in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in field
of Project Management in Faculty of Business and Management Sciences at Superior
University, Lahore.
Examination Committee:
a) External Examiner 1:
Dr. Signature:
b) Supervisor Name:
Dr. Shahid Naveed Signature:
iii
DECLARATION OF FINAL VIVA
research has been conducted in The Superior College Lahore on 15 April 2023
at 2:00pm and it is duly cleared by the internal and external supervisors. This is
the submitted copy of the research thesis incorporated after the comments of the
external supervisor
5. Student Signature
_________________________ ________________________
Prof. Prof. Dr. Shahid Naveed
External Examiner Internal Examiner
iv
Thesis Submitted to
v
The Superior College, Lahore
SUPERVISOR’S CERTIFICATE ON
THESIS SUBMITTED BY A STUDENT
Section 1A: Particulars of the Supervisor
1.1 Full Name Prof. Dr. Shahid Naveed
1.2 Address The Superior College, Lahore, 17-km, Raiwind Road, Lahore
I certify that:
a. The above-named student has completed the cited thesis under my guidance and supervision.
b. I am satisfied with quality of the student’s research work, and
c. I consider it worthy of submission for external evaluation.
4.2 Date
vi
PROJECT MODULE SUPERVISOR CONTACT SHEET
Student Details:
Supervisor’s
Date Purpose of Meeting and Agreed Actions Signatures
5-Jan-22 Discussion about various topics
22-Jan-17 Selection of topic & Proposal Submission
15-Feb-22 Proposal Review, Corrections & Literature
26-Feb-22 Proposal Finalization
Discussion on Introduction, Literature (Baseline Papers)
14-Mar-22
& Questionnaire
Discussion on Introduction, Literature & Questionnaire
4-Apr-22
Revision
Discussion & Finalization of Introduction, Literature &
11-Apr-22
Questionnaire
Discussion on Methodology & Result & Discussion
5-May-22
Chapters
27-May-22 Finalization of Methodology & Review of Results
Finalization of Results, Discussion, Conclusion &
18-Jun-22
Recommendations
21-June-22 Thesis Submission for Review for Final Viva
25-Jun-22 Thesis Approval for Final Viva
Title of Project: Factors of Escalation and its Effects on Cost of Construction Projects in
Pakistan
Supervisor Details:
Name: Prof. Dr. Shahid Naveed
Email: [email protected]
Cell No.: 0342-5005005
c) Shall not be submitted by me in future for obtaining any degree from this or other
university or institution.
30.04.2023
3.2 Date
viii
DEDICATION
I also dedicate this thesis for our “Shuhada” of Pak Army, Police and other law
enforcement agencies as their sacrifices are countless for Pakistan.
ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
x
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
Chapter 3: Methodology 14
3.1 Description 14
Chapter 5: Conclusion 33
Recommendations 33
References 34
xi
List of Tables & Figures
Sr # Description Page #
xii
Abstract
Construction is one of the main business domains in developing countries like Pakistan, etc.
as it provides employment, business opportunities and infrastructure development.
Construction of a mega project is a complex thing to tackle. Many problems and challenges
are linked with it, among one of them is cost which is a backbone for any project. Costing of
a project is done at very initial stage and its accuracy level increases with the phases of
construction from initiation to execution and completion phase. Price escalation or inflation
hampers the progress and timely completion of construction projects. In this research, basic
aim is focused on the factors which through light on the root causes of inflation and what are
the aftereffects of escalation, how construction industry of Pakistan is affected due to
inflation. Escalation refers to the increase in time, cost, or scope of a project beyond the
originally planned level. It is a common problem in the construction industry and can have a
significant impact on project outcomes. It will be analyzed with help of questionnaire and
historical data analysis. It adopts a mixed-methods research approach, which involves
collecting both quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data refers to numerical data
that can be analysed statistically, such as project cost and duration. Qualitative data refers to
non-numerical data that can provide insights into project management practices, such as
taking data with project stakeholders through survey forms. The study finds that several factors
contribute to project escalation in the construction industry in Pakistan. These include inflation,
fluctuation in material prices and design errors. Inflation refers to general increase in prices over a
given period due to demand pull, cost push, increased money supply, devaluation, unstable political
situation, monetary and fiscal policies, or any other unexpected events. Design errors refer to
mistakes or oversights in the project design, such as incorrect calculations or inadequate
specifications. The consequences of escalation include project delays, cost overruns, quality
issues, and strained relationships between project stakeholders. Project delays refer to the
extension of the project timeline beyond the planned duration. Cost overruns refer to the
increase in project cost beyond the budgeted amount. Quality issues refer to problems with
the project's final product or service, such as defects or functional issues. Furthermore, cost
index factor while considering some items also calculated with the help of Market Rate
System of Government of Punjab, Finance Department of Pakistan. Results are concluded at
the end which highlights the critical factors causing time and cost overrun with some
suggestions for further research work.
xiii
CHAPTER - 1 Introduction
1.1 Background
Construction sector is linked with a wide range of activities which is related to all types of
structures i.e., buildings, dams, power plants, etc., and it further ensures the planning,
execution, repair and maintenance domains also [Sweis, G., Sweis, R., Hammad, A. A., &
Shboul, 2008]. Construction is a vital point which shows progress and development in social,
economic & financial domains of developing countries. It provides millions of jobs, linked
many business sectors, betterment of infrastructure and business growth [Anaman, K.A. and
Osei-Amponsah, C, 2007]. Construction project is an idea which is defined by owner/client,
expand on paper/ designed by designer, executed by contractor which is handed over to client
in the end [Gould, F. E., & Joyce, N, 2009].
There are three most important domains within a construction project i.e., Cost, Scope and
Time. They are also commonly known as triple constraints of a project. Time is required to
complete a specific activity or also applicable for completion of project till handing over
phase from contractor to client/owner. Time management is about understanding and
knowing the type, nature, criticality, and intensities of activities which are linked within a
whole project life cycle and thus defines the whole timeline for a project [Low Sui Pheng,
2018]. Cost is the budget allocated to complete a project mutually accepted by all
stakeholders of project. Cost management or cost control is linked with engineering
estimates, rate analysis, billing, and budgeting so the project can be completed in allocated
budget [Eda Buchner, 2015]. Scope of any project is defined as finalizing the work details,
activities. Project milestones and deliverables or it can be defined to find answers to these
questions which is accepted by all parties involved within a project.
● How to do?
● What to do?
● Where to do? and
● What time it requires to complete?
Furthermore, project scope management is the process in which all deliverables, milestones
are shifted into reality started from paperwork. In this complete procedure, many stake-
holders like project manager and his team, investor, customer, third party investigation teams,
1
etc. are involved and a well-defined scope of work is defined and then tracked for
implementation [Yana Derenskaya, 2018].
There are many risks which are involved in a project which can create problems, issues and
challenges within whole project timeline. A construction project may be successful or not. A
successful project is defined as the project which ensures its timely completion within
specified approved budget and as per required standards and quality parameters [Olawale, Y.,
& Sun, M, 2012]. It can also be explained as if it accomplishes all the objectives as per
approved initial scope, budget, and required quality milestones in accordance with
environmental conditions as per location, workers safety [Frimpong, Y.; Oluwoye, J.;
Crawford, L, 2003]. Cost is of highest priority factor which is important for client, and it also
defines the success and performance of project, thus indicates the project delivery is
successful or not [Dey, P. K.; Tabucanon, M. T.; Ogunlana, S. O, 1996].
As cost is one of most important factors so the price escalation or inflation is the root cause
attached to cost which increase the budgeted cost. Cost overrun is a common problem which
is observed in developed and developing countries also while Developing countries like
Pakistan, Nigeria, Indonesia, etc. had faced this serious problem in past years, tendency is
more dangerous and it is increasing with time which overall results in economic and financial
loss for a country as sometimes more than 100% of cost increase is recorded as compare to
initial cost estimate in some cases. [Azhar, N.; Farooqui, R. U.; and Ahmed, S. M.; 2008].
Escalation is among the major cause which has negative impacts on construction industry and
2
results in increased price of labor, material and machinery, so there is no option for the
investors to delay the project or involve more money to complete it [Alinaitwe H, Apolot R,
Tindiwensi D. 2013]. As an instance, in case of Indonesia, a research work highlights that
47% of the construction projects were finished within its approved schedule, only 15% of
construction project were ahead of timeline and remaining 38% were behind the approved
timeline [Trigunarsyah, B. 2004].
At global level, same problem is observed, and it had been recorded that 9 out of 10 projects
had faced cost overrun problem [Flyvbjerg, B.; Skamris Holm, M. K.; and Buhl, S. L. 2003].
An international survey was done in 2017 and it was recorded that Globally Construction cost
inflation was 3.7% in 2016 as compared to Global construction cost inflation for 2015 was
2.9% and for year of 2017, it was recorded as 3.5% [International construction market survey,
2017]. Research revealed that up to 70% projects in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia face delays in
completion [Al-Khalil M.I. and M.A. Al-Ghafly, 1999], in Qatar, up to 80% of total
infrastructure development projects face delays and additional 25% time were recorded in
general for their completion [Emam, H., P. Farrell and M. Abdelaal, 2015]. Further, a
research study done in Brazil highlights 82% increase in costing domain for 238 projects
[França A. and A.N. Haddad, 2018]. As mentioned earlier, construction industry is one of
main industry in Pakistan, but it is facing very critical problem of both time and cost overrun.
For example, projects initiated by Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) has
been recorded increase in time domain for more than 200% while more than 25% of cost
overrun is recorded also [Hussain S., F. Zhu, Z. Ali, H. Aslam and A. Hussain, 2018].
Due to increase in labor charges, material cost, equipment rental charges, taxes, etc., it results
in increasing the overall initial engineering estimates for any construction project. As prices
are volatile and continuously increasing, it hampers the economic growth but also the labor
market and consumer price index is also badly affected [Islam R, Ghani ABA, Mahyudin E,
Manickam N, 2017 & Johnson RM, Babu RII. 2018]. Escalation in construction industry is
different in various sectors and changes from market to market and material to material
[Zarenski E. 2019].
There are following research gaps for problem of escalation on construction projects:
3
- |What kind and type of factors involve which causes escalation on construction projects in
Pakistan as there are many articles and research available, but we need to explain it more
effectively through case study of real time project?
- Effects of escalation on projects that how it disturbs the successful completion of project?
- There is how much escalation observed in form of cost index in recent years in Pakistan?
4
CHAPTER – 2: Literature Review
From beginning to this modern era, shelter is one of necessity of human. Human has made
progress in every aspect of his life and community after thousands of years to this modern
period so same is the case with building. Living from cave to skyscrapers is one of the
biggest achievements which human has attained. As the population increases in last century,
concept of high-rise buildings was developed and one of the most prominent and famous
building was Empire State Building in New York City in 1930’s. The progress in this phase
is continuing in developing and developed countries both. Population of Pakistan has
increased from 130.5 million in 1998 to 213.2 million in 2017 so the demand of housing is
increased exponentially as it is directly proportional to population growth
[https://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/final-results-census-2017]. As per vision of Prime Minister
Imran Khan, government of Pakistan from 2018 is encouraging the construction of multi-
story buildings in metropolitan cities of Pakistan i.e., Karachi, Lahore, etc. to encounter the
problem of shelter for every day increasing population. By-laws are also changed, updated
and some relaxations are given to developers, clients in order to oblige this vision as LDA
has allowed construction height up to 35’ for 10 Marla plots as compared to 25’ earlier and
likewise relaxation in other limitations are allowed in revised version of building by-laws.
There is a long range of factors which are causing the escalation like natural disasters, design
flaws, change orders, financial condition of stakeholders, etc. In case of UK, a study
highlighted the poor project scheduling and management, lack of information between
stakeholders, design flaws, less accuracy in initial engineering estimation and time limitation
as main factors for escalation [Simon Jackson, 2002]. Research done in 2010 highlights the
inaccurate engineering estimate as the most common factor for cost overrun problem in
construction projects [A.S. Ali*, S.N. Kamaruzzaman, 2010]. Design changes, latent
condition, as per site design changes due to weather and local population needs, removal and
replacement of unsuitable material are designated as major factors for cost overrun in
highway projects of Australia [Garry D.Creedy, 2005].
In Zambia, research declared the bad weather conditions like flood, etc., change in scope,
political pressure, labor strikes, schedule delays and design changes as the main factors for
5
cost overrun problem [Kaliba, C.; Muya, M.; and Mumba, K. 2009]. For public sector
projects of Jordan, material shortage, fuel price increase, unskilled labor, in-accurate
estimation, less awareness of local by-laws and limitations for construction and unsuitable
weather conditions are indicated as major points for this problem [Sweis, J. G., Sweis, R.,
Rumman. A., Hussein, A. R., and Dahiyat, E. S., 2013].
For residential construction projects in Turkey, research highlights more than 40 factors of
cost increase. Among them some factors are wrong estimation, poor project planning, inflated
price of construction materials, high cost of land, less skill of work force and high cost of
rental machinery which cause it [Serdar Durdyev *, Syuhaida Ismail and Nooh Abu Bakar,
2012].
In case of construction projects in Nigeria, researcher highlighted 35 factors and with the help
of survey, economic stability, design changes and flaws, high interest rate by banks, less
skilled labor financing mode, currency exchange rate and inadequacy of a contractor to
execute the assigned job are revealed as main points to be considered for cost increase
[Ameh, O.J., A.A. Soyingbe and K.T. Odusami, 2010]. Some factors like long delays in land
acquisition approval for government authorities, scope change, law and order situation, late
procurement of both material and equipment, unskilled contractor and delayed payment from
relevant government organizations are indicated as root cause for cost overrun problem in
India [Salunkhe, A. A. and Patil, S. R., 2014].
Lack of suitable planning as per requirements, absence of proper procurement plans, political
instability, less supportive documentation as per laws, higher interest rates for loans and
delayed payments are figured as major factors for construction projects in Iran [Vafaiee, M.;
Saleh Owlia, M.; Vahdat, M. A, 2010]. After research work from all stakeholders of typical
building construction project i.e., Client, Consultant & Contractor, inaccurate estimation,
delay in execution unavailability of funds, using low quality material, corruption, poor
planning and poor site management are the basic causes for extra budgeting in order to
complete the project in Gaza strip was recorded [Enshassi, A.; Al-Najjar, J.; and
Kumaraswamy, M. 2009].
Main factors for time and cost overrun in construction projects of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
are poor planning and scheduling, poor site management, lack of communication or
communication gap between main contractor and sub-contractors has been observed [Alhajri
A. and A. Alshibani, 2018]. Another research nominates unjustified cash flows on site, poor
6
planning and scheduling, less experience in analyzing and monitoring the contractors
between various parties and poor estimation as main factors for cost overrun problem in KSA
[Abdulaziz A Bubshait; Yaser A AL-Juwariah, 2002].
Extreme weather conditions or force majeure i.e., floods, high speed, winds, etc. also enhance
the cost of construction material. For its instance, research done in USA after Hurricane
Katrina, 2005 reveals that hurricane had damaged the public properties three times more than
in a typical year, so the demand of construction material is increased for rehabilitation. As
demand is high, so the cost goes up also in accordance with it [Peter Morris and William F.
Willson, 2006].
For a case study of a construction project in India, poor material procurement, less skill level
of labor, labor strikes, machinery problems and weak financial condition of contractor are
recorded as main factor of cost increase [Sanjeet Kumar and Surabattuni Murali, 2021].
A research work in 2008 was done in Pakistan and it highlighted the 44 factors which are
causing the escalation, further divided in three categories of macroeconomic factors,
management factors and business and regulatory related factors [Azhar, N.; Farooqui, R. U.;
and Ahmed, S. M.; 2008]. Some of them are less production of labor, inaccurate planning,
poor site management and financial problems of client are highlighted. Furthermore, in
another research paper, less HSE practices on site, funding issues, inadequate planning,
expensive machinery, old and outdated government policies, less accuracy in engineering
estimates, unskilled labor, poor project management, less tools and equipment as per site
schedule and requirements, delayed approvals from government bodies and political
instability are most significant reasons for cost increase of construction projects in Pakistan
[Nasir, A. R.; Gabriel, H. F.; and Choudhry, R. M. 2012].
A study done in Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan highlights allocation of land for certain
usage, progress delays and payment delay as main factors for cost and time increase in
construction projects [Hussain S., F. Zhu, Z. Ali, H. Aslam and A. Hussain, 2018]. For a case
7
study done in Sindh province of Pakistan revealed delayed payments to contractor against
work done, communication gap between stakeholders within a project, increase in price of
raw material, poor site management and financial issue of client as major reasons for cost
overrun problem [Sohu S., A.H. Abdullah, S. Nagapan, N.A. Memon, R. Yunus and M.F.
Hasmori, 2019].
With reference to two research studies carried out in Pakistan, more than 70 factors are listed
out for escalating the cost of material [Memon A.H., I.A. Rahman and A.A.A. Azis, 2011 &
Sarwar, M.K., M.A. Khan and Z. Iqbal, 2002]. Some of these factors are as follows:
8
24. Land acquisition delay
25. Political instability
26. Lack of proper material procurement plan
27. Poor contract management
28. Social and cultural issues and impacts
29. Rework and frequent dismantling
30. HSE issues
31. Insufficient equipment
32. Incompetency of contractor
33. Low skill level of labor
34. Policy to select a lowest bidder for any work
35. High rental cost of machinery and equipment
Building material consists of about 35-60% cost of total budgeted cost for any construction
project [Bourne LS. The geography of housing / Larry S. Bourne. London: Edward Arnold;
1981]. Escalation is attached with construction projects from old era, but it is heavily
indulged and observed in construction projects due to complex construction projects,
technological advancement, client’s involvement and many other factors to meet the
requirements of a project. Budget for completion for any construction project is directly
attached with inflation so the clients pay for this increase or goes for time delay [Shah RK.,
2016].
A significant relation is present between cost overrun and escalation in both public funded
and privately funded projects [Altaf M, Musarat MA, Khan A, Shoukat Z, Salahuddin U.,
2019 & Diugwu IA, Etuk EH, Baba DL, Mohammed M, Yakubu HA., 2017]. As
Oghenekevwe et al., inflation/escalation is basic purpose of cost overrun [Oghenekevwe O,
Olusola O, Chukwudi US., 2014]. Another research study concludes escalation as the basic
reason for material prices, labor wages, thus results in overall increase of earlier approved
budgeted cost for that project [Tang CF., 2014].
9
Table # 1: Effects of Escalation in Different Regions of World
Remarks: inflation/escalation is the main reason for increase in material cost, thus results
in overall increase of initially estimated cost of project.
Tang [58] Malaysia Bounds - Increase -
Testing
Approach
Remarks: There is direct relationship between labor productivity, labor charges and
inflation.
Leavitt et al. USA Cost escalation Increase Increase Increase
[59] of previous
projects
Remarks: Inflation is one of major reason for cost overrun problem in construction
projects in United States of America.
Olawale & UK Relative Increase
Sun [60] Importance
Index
Remarks: One of key factors for cost overrun is escalation.
Le-Hoai et al. Vietnam Spearman’s Increase Increase
[33] Rank
Correlation
test
Remarks: Three major factors i.e., escalation, wrong estimation, increased labor cost are
reasons for cost overrun problem.
Alinaitwe et Uganda Relative Increase Increase
al. [52] Importance
10
Index
Remarks: Inflation is main reason for increase in cost of equipment and labor in
construction projects.
Kaliba et al. Zambia Average Increase Increase Increase
[61] Weightage
Significance
Index
Remarks: Cost escalation is due to various factors; inflation is one of them. It results in
time delay and cost escalation.
A table of cost of different materials used in construction projects in Lahore, Pakistan are as
follows:
SR# Item description 1st Bi-Annual 1st Bi-Annual 15-June 2022 Market
MRS 2019 (63) MRS 2022 Based Rates
(62) (Market Suppliers)
1 OPC Cement (Bag) Rs. 590 Rs. 720 Rs. 1125
2 1st Class Brick 9” x 4.5” Rs. 8.5 Rs. 12.5 Rs. 14.5
x 3” (No.)
3 Brick Tile 9” 4.5” x Rs. 6.5 Rs. 10.5 Rs. 12.3
1.5” (No.)
4 Binding Wire (per Kg) Rs. 93 Rs 150 Rs. 250
5 Brick Ballast 1.5” (Cft) Rs 14.5 Rs. 22 Rs. 36
6 Deformed MS Bars 60 Rs. 98.5 Rs. 193 Rs. 230
Grade (Kg)
7 Kerosene Oil (Ltr) Rs. 83 Rs. 115 Rs. 185
8 Diesel (Ltr) Rs. 107 Rs. 143 Rs. 204
9 Petrol (Ltr) Rs. 91 Rs. 147 Rs. 210
10 Charcoal (Kg) Rs. 13 Rs. 18 Rs. 25
11 Polythene 0.03” or 0.08 Rs. 139 Rs. 280 Rs. 355
mm (Kg)
11
12 Thermopore ½” thick Rs. 3 Rs. 9 Rs. 13
(Sft)
13 Thermopore 3/4” thick Rs. 4 Rs. 10 Rs. 15
(Sft)
14 Thermopore 1” thick Rs. 5 Rs. 12 Rs. 17
(Sft)
15 Sandpaper (Dozen) Rs. 140 Rs. 240 Rs. 340
16 Terpentine Oil (Ltr) Rs. 95 Rs. 200 Rs. 280
17 Spirit (Ltr) Rs. 70 Rs. 150 Rs. 215
18 White Enamel paint Rs. 1050 RS. 2500 Rs.3500
Local (Gallon)
19 Deodar Wood Best Rs. 4000 Rs. 7000 Rs. 8800
Quality (Cft)
20 Deodar Wood 2nd Class Rs. 2800 Rs. 5500 Rs. 7200
(Cft)
21 PVC Insulated Single Rs. 17 Rs. 33 Rs. 40
Core Copper Conductor
Cable 3/0.029” (Metre)
22 PVC Insulated Single Rs. 28 Rs. 65 Rs. 90
Core Copper Conductor
Cable 7/0.029” (Metre)
23 PVC Pipe ½” (Metre) Rs. 20 Rs. 38 Rs. 50
24 PVC Pipe 3/4” (Metre) Rs. 29 Rs. 60 Rs. 82
25 PVC Pipe 1” (Metre) Rs. 36 Rs. 75 Rs. 104
26 Commercial Ply ¾” Rs. 55 Rs. 67 Rs. 85
Thick (Sft)
27 Lasani Board ½” (Sft) Rs. 32 Rs. 40 Rs. 58
Lasani Board ½” Thick Rs. 40 Rs. 60 Rs. 85
(Sft)
28 Chennab Sand (Cft) Rs. 28 Rs. 33.5 Rs. 48
29 Sargodha Crush (Cft) Rs 37.5 Rs. 42.5 Rs. 110
12
Furthermore, rates difference for various types of labor is as follows:
SR# Item description 1st Bi-Annual 1st Bi-Annual 15-June 2022 Market
MRS 2019- Per MRS 2022- Based Rates
Day (64) Per Day (65) (Market Based)
1 Gate Keeper Rs. 593 Rs. 800 Rs. 1000
2 Bahishti Rs. 618 Rs. 850 Rs. 1000
3 Electrician Rs. 675 Rs. 1100 Rs. 1500
4 Carpenter Rs. 675 Rs. 1100 Rs. 1500
5 Mason Rs. 675 Rs. 1100 Rs. 1500
6 Fabricator Rs. 675 Rs. 1100 Rs. 1500
7 Helper Rs. 593 Rs. 800 Rs. 1000
8 Site Engineer (Per Rs. 227 Rs. 303 Rs. 325
Hour)
9 Surveyor (Per Hour) Rs. 82 Rs. 107 Rs. 125
10 Foreman (Per Hour) Rs. 89 Rs. 107 Rs. 325
11 Asphalt/ Concrete Plant Rs. 101 Rs. 132 Rs. 155
Engineer (Per Hour)
Now from the historical data, above factors of escalation are concluded with the help of
which survey form shall be prepared in next chapter of methodology. Effects of escalation in
different regions of world is found out from historical data as per Table # 1 while effects on
cost shall be determined from case study of real time construction project in Pakistan in next
chapter.
Similarly, from the date we got from MRS Pakistan as per Table # 2 & 3, escalation in given
period is determined for material and labor cost which shall help in finding cost index factor.
13
CHAPTER – 3 Methodology
3.1 Description
Research paradigm or research methodology is defined as the way forward to carry out the
research work as per accordance with scientific principles. Importance or significance of any
research work depends on the objective of study should be well defined and how the results
in researched work carried out describes the objectives with relevant facts and proofs
[Saunders, M. N., 2011].
Data collection is the key process in any research-based study which is done by many
resources like interviews, survey forms, brain storming, professional’s reviews, etc. Data
collection necessary to find out the answer about objectives of study and to analyze and
evaluate the basic hypothesis of any research work [N. Z. Muhammad, A. Keyvanfar, M. Z.
A. Majid, A. Shafaghat, A. M. Magana, S. Balubaid, 2015].
For this research work, the methodology approach selected is divided in four phases which is
as follows:
● At very first stage qualitative research approach is used and more than 30 research
papers, books, cases, articles are reviewed and analyzed which indicates more than 75
points who acts as a reason for over costing problem. Many case studies are written as
reference in above chapter which declares this issue as a global problem and explain
the main reasons behind it as per research work conducted in different countries like
India, Pakistan, Iran, Egypt, etc.
● After critical analysis and evaluation, 15 points are selected at second stage and
recorded in questionnaire and it is filled by more than 30 professionals i.e., field
experts, engineers, project managers, construction managers, site engineers, material
experts, planning engineers, etc. in order to obtain the most important fifteen factors
in criticality arrangement which are acting as back- bone of this problem with special
reference to construction industry of Pakistan. These professionals can be called as
“Target Population”.
For this purpose, sample size distribution method was used. It is a method used in
research work, to select a population of relevant units, experts to investigate the
problem which is under consideration in research work. These fifteen most important
14
factors are written in close-end type of questions categorized with 5-point scale
method and analysis will be made with the help of statistical tools. Attached
questionnaire is converted into the google sheets and link was shared in circle of
experts and engineers who filled out this questionnaire. Questionnaire is design from
highly agree (1st Point), neutral (3rd point) to highly disagree (5th point). So, the points
having value close to 1 are regarded as most critical points which cause time and cost
overrun.
Experts working in different domains having experience range from 2 years to 35
years were involved in this phase and all the relevant details are described in detail in
next chapter.
● At third stage, a building project located at Raiwind Road, Lahore for apartment
purposes is selected & reviewed in order to investigate the effects of escalation as per
second objective of study of this research work. Bill of material for finishing items
approved by senior management of project under consideration is attached in results
chapter showing comparison between rates of almost 40 items is attached to show that
how the prices are increased in almost 1 year timeline.
● At 4th and last stage, a cost index is generated with the help of market rate system
analysis published by Finance Department of Government of Punjab, two times in a
year. For this purpose, reference of rates of material and labor involved in
construction is described with the help of tables in chapter 2 in details. All the items
are fixed for three times tenures i.e., January 2019, January 2022 and June 2022. 1 st
Bi-annual is valid from 1st January of relevant year to 30 th June of that year and 2nd Bi-
annual is valid for 1st July of relevant year to 31st December of that year. But in case
of 2022, an exponentially surge in prices of material is recorded, so with the basic
theme of upgraded rates according to prevailing market conditions, third rate column
is also added to clearly highlight the current situation and how it effects the building
construction. Third column is locked up to the date of 15th June 2022.
15
3.3 Survey Form
Annexure A
Part-I
Name:
Designation:
Company Name:
Email ID:
● Client
● Contractor
● Consultant
● 0 to 5 years
● 5 to 10 years
● 10 - 15 years
● >15 years
16
● More than 100 million PKR
● C-A
● C-B
● C-1
● C-2
● C-3
● C-4
● C-5
● C-6
Part 2
17
[21,28,33,35]
8 Poor planning and
scheduling
[20,29,30,35,36]
9 Political Instability
[15,20,21,29,30]
10 Lack of Proper
Procurement Plan
[18,19,29,30,42]
11 Inaccurate Engineering
Estimates [9,21,29,30,32]
12 Project Location [15,47]
13 Unseen Weather
Conditions
[15,16,29,30,34,40]
14 Strikes [15, 47]
15 Material Shortage
[16,45,48]
Number of Buildings: 3
Number of Floors: Basement, Ground Floor and 11 floors with roof top. (Total 14 floors)
18
Total Covered Area: 10, 25,000 square feet
Facilitates: Gated/24-hour security available, gym, sports area, mosque, commercial zone,
swimming pool, children playing area, etc.
19
Chapter 4 Results & Discussion
Likert Scale is usually used to analyze the results. It may have 3 or 4 options, 5 options, 7 or
even 9 options in order to analyze the data depending on the requirements of research work.
It is best to get a personalized professional opinion and behavior of expert towards the study
objective and furthermore, Likert scale is easier to use, more accurate as it gives true
reflection of respondent’s answer about survey being conducted as per his field of expertise.
Summary of data received is highlighted as:
Relativ
Highly
Highly Disagre e
5 Point Scale Agree Neutral Disagre
Agree e Averag
e
e Index
Main Factors 1 2 3 4 5
Fluctuation in material
60 9 1 0 0 1.16
prices
Inflation 67 3 0 0 0 1.04
Design Errors 38 17 4 4 7 1.93
20
Late Design Approval and
25 21 11 6 7 2.27
Availability
Less Productivity of Work
7 12 19 12 20 3.37
Force
Poor Cash Flows 24 21 11 10 4 2.27
Poor Site Management 4 8 34 21 3 3.16
Poor planning and
13 24 21 6 6 2.54
scheduling
Political Instability 25 27 11 3 4 2.06
Lack of Proper Procurement
5 15 31 14 5 2.99
Plan
Inaccurate Engineering
9 14 25 13 9 2.99
Estimates
Project Location 2 12 38 12 6 3.11
Unseen Weather Conditions 10 21 23 9 7 2.74
Strikes 5 14 27 13 11 3.16
Material Shortage 9 18 24 8 11 2.91
Where as Relative Average Index (A.I) formula is used to categorize the important
and critical factors to classify the all factors as per their criticality and significance.
R.A.I = (S x N) / T
and
R.A.I = Relative Average Index
S = Scale
N = Number of respondents respond for specific scale
T = Total Number of Respondents
R.A.I factor value close to 1 will be considered more critical and going up further will
reduce the criticality of factor, so it gives an easy approach to categorize the most
important factors as per 1st objective of this research study.
As per table # 5 exhibits there are following three factors with relative average index
closest to one:
1. Inflation
2. Fluctuation in material prices
21
3. Design errors
22
23
With reference to attached file above, a huge increase of 33.7% of initial cost is observed
which have negative impact on project. To minimize the cost factor, following measurements
are taken by stakeholders of project.
1. Downsizing of staff
2. Reduction in overtime of labor
3. By lowering the specifications and quality of some materials like paint, tiles, etc.
4. Overall progress is slow down and project is almost 25% behind the initially approved
schedule.
5. Increasing the cost of apartments up to 15%.
For preparation of cost index, rate analysis of some items is finalized as per MRS 1st Bi-
Annual 2019 and 2022 respectively. Four items are selected with references cited properly at
the end of every sheet. which are:
1. Plane Cement Concrete used for flooring purposes of ratio 1:2:4 (Cement:Sand:Aggregate)
4. Plane Cement Concrete used for flooring purposes of ratio 1:4:8 (Cement: Sand:
Aggregate)
Figure 4.2- Rate Analysis of 1:2:4 Concrete as per MRS Rates Jan-2022
24
Figure 4.3- Rate Analysis of 1:2:4 Concrete as per MRS Rates Jan-2019
25
Figure 4.4- Rate Analysis of Plaster as per MRS Rates Jan-2022
26
Figure 4.5- Rate Analysis of Plaster as per MRS Rates Jan-2019
27
28
Figure 4.6- Rate Analysis of Brick Work as per MRS Rates Jan-2022
29
Figure 4.7- Rate Analysis of Brick Work as per MRS Rates Jan-2019
30
Figure 4.8- Rate Analysis of 1:4:8 Concrete as per MRS Rates Jan-2022
31
Figure 4.9- Rate Analysis of 1:4:8 Concrete as per MRS Rates Jan-2019
32
Table # 6: Cost Index Factor
Description Base Year- Jan, Interest Year- Cost Index % Cost Index
2019 Jan 2022 Factor
PCC 1:2:4 226.08 289.15 27.89 1.27
Plaster 25.56 36.37 42.29 1.42
Brick Work 9” 222.78 314.40 41.12 1.41
PCC 1:4:8 179.30 231.72 29.23 1.29
Where as
And
C.I.F = 1 + (C.I/100)
As per above attached rate analysis in figures, cost index for above four items as per table # 6
shows the increase in cost value from given period in percentage. So, 3rd objective of study is
met with derivation of cost index factor for following four materials which well explains the
escalation in terms of cost.
33
Chapter 5 Conclusions
1. As per data gathered after survey and results as shown above in the table, three most
critical factors which are the root cause of time and cost overrun are inflation, fluctuation in
material prices and design errors.
2. Due to these above-mentioned crucial factors, cost overrun occurs and it cause negative
results on any project which impacts the infrastructural and economic progress of a
society/country.
3. 25% to 42% increase in rate of items under consideration for this research work is
observed.
Recommendations
Cost index factors for construction industry of Pakistan has not properly worked out yet as
compare to India and other countries. This research work is first step toward this domain and
further research can be carried out in this domain for every year. Petrol price hike after June
2022 will further increase the prices so an updated research work in this domain will be a
fruitful attempt in order to highlight the cost escalation with respect to construction industry
of Pakistan.
34
References
1. Sweis, G., Sweis, R., Hammad, A. A., & Shboul, A. (2008). Delays in construction
projects: The case of Jordan. International Journal of Project Management, 26(6),
665-674.
2. Anaman, K.A. and Osei-Amponsah, C. Analysis of the Causality Links Between the
Growth of the Construction Industry and the Growth of the Macro Economy in Ghana
Construction Management and Economics, 25(9),951–961, 2007.
3. Olawale, Y., & Sun, M. (2012). PCIM: Project control and inhibiting-factors
management model. Journal of management in engineering, 29(1), 60-70.
4. Frimpong, Y.; Oluwoye, J.; Crawford, L. 2003. Causes of delay and cost overrun in
construction of groundwater projects in a developing country; Ghana as a case study,
Inter- national Journal of Project Management 21(5): 321–326.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00055-8
5. Dey, P. K.; Tabucanon, M. T.; Ogunlana, S. O. 1996. Petroleum pipeline construction
planning: a conceptual framework, International Journal of Project Management
14(4): 231–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00092-5
6. Majid, M. Z. A., Zakaria, W. Z., Lamit, H., Keyvanfar, A., Shafaghat, A., and Bakti,
E. B. Construction Information Systems for Executive Management in Monitoring
Work Progress. Journal of Advanced Science Letter. 15(PP): 169–171, 2012.
7. Gajewska, E., & Ropel, M. (2011). Risk Management Practices in a Construction
Project–a case study. Swedia, Chalmers University of Technology.
8. Keung, C. C., & Shen, L. Y. (2012). Measuring the networking performance for
contractors in practicing construction management. Journal of Management in
Engineering, 29(4), 400-406.
9. Azhar, N.; Farooqui, R. U.; and Ahmed, S. M.; (2008), “Cost Overrun Factors in
Construction Industry of Pakistan,” Advancing and Integrating Construction
Education, Research & Practice, 499-508.
10. Trigunarsyah, B. (2004). Constructability practices among construction contractors in
Indonesia. Journal of construction engineering and management, 130(5), 656-669.
11. Flyvbjerg, B.; Skamris Holm, M. K.; and Buhl, S. L. (2003), “How Common and
How Large Are Cost Overruns in Transport Infrastructure Projects?” Transport
Reviews, 23, 71-88.
12. International construction market survey 2017, Building Momentum.
35
13. https://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/final-results-census-2017
14. Simon Jackson, Project cost overruns and risk management in Greenwood,
proceedings of association of research in construction management, 18 th
annual ARCOM conference, Northumber University, Newcastle, UK, 2 nd-4th
September 2002.
15. Kaliba, C.; Muya, M.; and Mumba, K. (2009), “Cost Escalation and Schedule Delays
in
Road Construction Projects in Zambia,” International Journal of Project Management,
27, 522-531.
16. Sweis, J. G., Sweis, R., Rumman. A., Hussein, A. R., and Dahiyat, E. S., (2013). Cost
Overruns in Public Construction Projects: The Case of Jordan. Journal of American
Science 2013; 9 (7s), 134-141.
17. Ameh, O.J., A.A. Soyingbe and K.T. Odusami, 2010. Significant factors causing cost
overruns in telecommunication projects in Nigeria. J. Construction Dev. Countries,
15: 49-67.
18. Salunkhe, A. A. and Patil, S. R., (2014). Effect of Construction delays and cost
escalation
on construction projects: Indian Scenario. International Journal of Research in
Engineering and Technology, Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | Jan-2014. 543-547.
19. Vafaiee, M.; Saleh Owlia, M.; Vahdat, M. A. Procurement management challenges in
gas projects of Iran, In Proc. of 10th International Conference on Industrial
Engineering and Operations Management, 9–10 January 2010, Dhaka, Bangladesh. 7
p.
20. Enshassi, A.; Al-Najjar, J.; and Kumaraswamy, M. (2009a), “Delays and Cost
Overruns in the Construction Projects in the Gaza Strip,” Journal of Financial
Management of Property and Construction, 14, 126-151.
21. Nasir, A. R.; Gabriel, H. F.; and Choudhry, R. M. (2012), “Cost and Time Overruns
in Highway Projects of Pakistan,” Sixth International Conference on Construction in
the 21st Century.
22. Gould, F. E., & Joyce, N. (2009). Construction project management. Upper Saddle
River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
23. Al-Khalil M.I. and M.A. Al-Ghafly (1999). Delay in public utility projects in Saudi
Arabia. International Journal of Project Management, 17(2):101-106.
24. Emam, H., P. Farrell and M. Abdelaal (2015). Causes of delay on infrastructure
36
projects in Qatar. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ARCOM Conference, Lincoln,
UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Nottingham, UK (pp.
773-782).
25. França A. and A.N. Haddad (2018). Causes of Construction Projects Cost Overrun in
Brazil. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and
Technology, 9(1):69-83.
26. Hussain S., F. Zhu, Z. Ali, H. Aslam and A. Hussain (2018). Critical delaying factors:
public sector building projects in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Buildings, 8(1):1-16.
27. Alhajri A. and A. Alshibani (2018). Critical Factors behind Construction Delay in
Petrochemical Projects in Saudi Arabia. Energies, 11(7):1-18
28. Sohu S., A.H. Abdullah, S. Nagapan, N.A. Memon, R. Yunus and M.F. Hasmori
(2019). Causative factors of cost overrun in building projects of Pakistan.
International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 10(9):23-27.
29. Memon A.H., I.A. Rahman and A.A.A. Azis (2011). Preliminary study on causative
factors leading to construction cost overrun. International Journal of Sustainable
Construction Engineering and Technology, 2(1):57-71.
30. Sarwar, M.K., M.A. Khan and Z. Iqbal (2002). Feed resources for livestock in
Pakistan. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 4: 186-192.
31. Niazi G.A. and N. Painting (2017). Significant factors causing cost overruns in the
construction industry in Afghanistan. Procedia Engineering, 182:510-517.
32. A.S. Ali*, S.N. Kamaruzzaman, 2010: Cost performance for building construction
projects in Klang valley. Journal of Building Performance, volume 1, issue1.
33. Long Le-Hoai, Young Dai Lee, and Jun Yong Lee, 2008: delay and cost overruns in
Vietnam large construction projects: a comparison with other selected countries.
KSCE J Civ Eng 2008;12(6):367–77.
34. Garry D.Creedy, Risk factors leading to cost overrun in the delivery of highway
construction project. Proceeding of Queensland University of technology research
week international conference, 4-8 July 2005, Brisbane, Australia.
35. Abdulaziz A Bubshait; Yaser A AL-Juwariah, factors contributing to construction
cost in Saudi Arabia, Cost engineering; May 2002; 44,5: ABI/INFORM Global pg.30.
36. Serdar Durdyev *, Syuhaida Ismail and Nooh Abu Bakar, 2012: Factors causing cost
overruns in construction of residential projects; case study of turkey. International
Journal of Science and Management.
37. Author: Low Sui Pheng. Chapter: Project Time Management Page #: 79-96. Book:
37
Project Management for the Built Environment, October: 2018. DOI:10.1007/978-
981-10-6992-5_6
38. Eda Buchner, Project Cost Management at the Conference of Professional Training
Presentation for Oil company medium level managers from Libya in October 2015 in
Istanbul, Turkey.
39. Yana Derenskaya, Project Scope Management Process, January, 2018. Baltic Journal
of Economic Studies 4(1):118-125. DOI:10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-118-125
40. Peter Morris and William F. Willson, Measuring and Managing Cost Escalation,
2006. AACE International Transactions CSC:06.
41. Saunders, M. N. (2011). Research methods for business students, 5/e. Pearson
Education India.
42. Sanjeet Kumar and Surabattuni Murali Factors affecting overruns construction cost
and time: A case study, Internal Journal of Recent technology and Engineering, 1 st
May 2021.
43. N. Z. Muhammad, A. Keyvanfar, M. Z. A. Majid, A. Shafaghat, A. M. Magana, S.
Balubaid, “Assessment of Cost Escalation factors for Building and Civil Engineering
Projects in Nigerian Construction Industry: a Multiple Regression Approach”, Jurnal
Teknologi, Vol. 74, No. 4, pp. 85-91, 2015.
44. N. Al-Hazim, Z. A. Salem, “Delay and Cost Overrun in Road Construction Projects
in Jordan”, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp.
288-293, 2015
45. P. Jadhav, D. Desai, A. Gupta, “Analysis of Construction Cost Overrun Causes by
Contractor’s View”, Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Vol. 2, No. 8, pp.
908-910, 2016
46. H. A. Vu, J. Wang, L. Min, S. H. Mai, “Research on Cost Overrun Risk of
Construction Phase of Vietnam Highway International Contracting Project”,
Scientific Research Publishing, Vol. 8, pp. 86-98, 2016.
47. D. Bhatia, E. M. R. Apte, “Schedule Overrun and Cost Overrun in the Construction
of Private Residential Construction Project: Case Study of Pune India”, International
Journal of Technical Research and Applications, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 174-177,
2016
48. D. S. Tejale, S. D. Khandekar, J. R. Patil, “Analysis of construction project cost
overrun by statistical method”, International Journal of Advanced Research in
Computer Science and Management Studies, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 349-355, 2015.
38
49. Islam R, Ghani ABA, Mahyudin E, Manickam N. Determinants of factors that
affecting inflation in Malaysia. Int J Econ Financial Issues 2017;7(2):355–64.
50. Johnson RM, Babu RII. Time and cost overruns in the UAE construction industry: a
critical analysis. Int J Construct Manage 2018:1–10.
51. Zarenski E. Inflation in construction 2019 – what should you carry? Retrieved
Ffromhttps://edzarenskicom/2018/02/15/inflation-in-construction-2019-what-should-
you-carry, 2019.
52. Alinaitwe H, Apolot R, Tindiwensi D. Investigation into the causes of delays and cost
overruns in Uganda’s public sector construction projects. J Construct Develop
Countries 2013;18(2):33.
53. Bourne LS. The geography of housing / Larry S. Bourne. London: Edward Arnold;
1981.
54. Shah RK., 2016 An exploration of causes for delay and cost overrun in construction
projects: a case study of Australia, Malaysia & Ghana. J Adv College Eng Manage
2016;2(1):41–55.
55. Altaf M, Musarat MA, Khan A, Shoukat Z, Salahuddin U., 2019 Change Order
Impact on Construction Industry of Pakistan. Paper presented at the AWAM
International Conference on Civil Engineering, 2019.
56. Diugwu IA, Etuk EH, Baba DL, Mohammed M, Yakubu HA., 2017 Modelling the
effect of time overrun and inflation rate on completion cost of construction projects in
Nigeria. Int J Sustain Construct Eng Technol 2017;8(2):18–28.
57. Oghenekevwe O, Olusola O, Chukwudi US., 2014 An assessment of the impact of
inflation on construction material prices in Nigeria. PM World J 2014;3(4):1–22.
58. Tang CF., 2014 The effect of real wages and inflation on labour productivity in
Malaysia. Int Rev Appl Econ 2014;28(3):311–22.
59. Leavitt D, Ennis S, McGovern P.The cost escalation of rail projects: Using previous
experience to re-evaluate the calspeed estimates; 1993.
60. Olawale YA, Sun M. Cost and time control of construction projects: inhibiting factors
and mitigating measures in practice. Construct Manage Econ 2010;28 (5):509–26.
61. Kaliba C, Muya M, Mumba K. Cost escalation and schedule delays in road
construction projects in Zambia. Int J Project Manage 2009;27(5):522–31.
62. https://finance.punjab.gov.pk/system/files/Material%201-2022%20New.pdf (1st Bi-
Annual 2022 Market Rate System Book- Material Rates published by Finance
Department of Government of Punjab).
39
63. https://finance.punjab.gov.pk/system/files/3.%20Material%201-19_0.pdf (1st Bi-
Annual 2019 Market Rate System Book- Material Rates published by Finance
Department of Government of Punjab).
64. https://finance.punjab.gov.pk/system/files/2.%20Labour%201-19_0.pdf (1st Bi-
Annual 2019 Market Rate System Book- Labor Rates published by Finance
Department of Government of Punjab).
65. https://finance.punjab.gov.pk/system/files/Labour%201-2022.pdf (1st Bi-Annual 2022
Market Rate System Book- Labor Rates published by Finance Department of
Government of Punjab).
40