Celedio, Chelly - Educ327-Module 2- Lesson 1& 2 2023
Celedio, Chelly - Educ327-Module 2- Lesson 1& 2 2023
The Teacher as a
Knower of Curricula 2
Learning Outcomes:
Exercise 3: “My
Perspective”
Step 1: Interview at least 3 teachers and 3 “common tao” in your locality (face to
face or online). Ask them to define curriculum on their own perspective.
Step2: Create your own definition of curriculum out from the definition given by
the teachers and by the “common tao”. Use the table below.
__________________________________________________________________________________
What is/are their basis in defining the curriculum? Do they have the same
perspective of what curriculum is?
1. Robert Hutchins
2. Arthur Bestor
Curriculum from Traditional Points of View
✔ Believes that the mission of the school should be intellectual training
which include Math, Science, History and Foreign Language
3. Philip Phenix
4. Joseph Schwab
✔ The sole source of curriculum is a discipline, thus the subject areas
such as Science, Mathematics, Social Studies, English and many
more. In college, academic discipline are labeled as humanities,
sciences, languages, mathematics among others. He coined the word
discipline as a ruling doctrine for curriculum development.
From a traditional view, curriculum is mostly written documents such as syllabus,
course of study, books and references where knowledge is found but is used
as a means to accomplish intended goals.
1. John Dewey
SUMMARY:
Activity 3
C. Self-Reflect
Pick up a daily newspaper and read today’s headline. Choose one and
reflect on this headline that relates to curriculum and to your becoming a
curricularist. Write your answer in at least two paragraphs.
___________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
Great job! I know that you really learned our lesson. You can now
proceed to the next lesson which is about Approaches to the School
Curriculum.
1. Exercise 3
2. Activity 3k
Module
The Teacher as a
Knower of Curricula 2
Module 2 describes the school curriculum in terms of its
definition, its nature and scope, which are needed by the
teacher as a knower. This module provides a wider perspective
for the teachers about the curriculum, in terms of curriculum
approach, curriculum development process, some curriculum
models and the foundations upon which curriculum is anchored.
Lesson
Approaches to the School Curriculum
2.2
Content Focus
Three Ways of Approaching a Curriculum
It is quite common for traditionalists to equate a curriculum to a topic outline, subject matter, or
concepts to be included in the syllabus or a book. For example, a primary school mathematics
curriculum consists of topics on addition, multiplication, subtraction, division, distance, weight and
many more. Another example is in secondary school science that involves the study of biological
science, physical science, environmental science and earth science. Textbooks tend begin with
biological science such are plants and animals’ physical science with the physical elements, force and
motion; earth science with the layers of the earth and environmental science with the interaction of
the biological and physical science and earth’s phenomena, Climate vegetation followed by
economic activities such as agriculture, mining: industries, urbanization and so forth. ‘
Exercise
If curriculum is equated as content, then the focus will be the body of knowledge to be
1 using appropriate teaching method. There can be a likelihood that teaching
transmitted to students
will be limited to the acquisition of facts, concepts and principles of the subject matter, however, the
content or subject matter can also be taken as a means to an end.
All curricula have content regardless of their design or models. The fund of knowledge is the
repository of accumulated discoveries and inventions of man from the explorations of the earth and
Activity 1
as products of research. In most educational setting, curriculum is anchored on a body of
knowledge or discipline.
l. Topical Approach; where much content is based on knowledge, and experiences are included;
2. Concept Approach with fewer topics in clusters around major and sub-concepts and their
interaction, with relatedness emphasized;
There are some suggested criteria in the selection of knowledge or subject matter. (Scheffer, 1970 in
Bilbao, et a1 2015)
1. Significance. Content should contribute to ideas, concepts, principles and generalization that
should attain the overall purpose of the curriculum. It is significant if content becomes the means of
developing cognitive, affective or psychomotor skills of the learner. As education is a way of
preserving culture, content will be significant when this will address the cultural context of the
learners.
2. Validity. The authenticity of the subject matter forms its validity. Knowledge becomes obsolete
with the fast-changing times. Thus there is a need for validity check and verification at a regular
interval, because content which may be valid in its original form may not continue to be valid in the
current times.
3. Utility. Usefulness of the content in the curriculum is relative to the learners who are going to use
these. Utility can be relative to time. It may have been useful in the past, but may not be useful now
or in the future. Questions like: Will I use this in my future job? Will it add meaning to my life as a
lifelong learner? Or will the subject matter be useful in solving current concerns?
4. Learnability. The complexity of the content should be within the range of experiences of the
learners. This is based on the psychological principles of learning. Appropriate organization of
content standards and sequencing of contents are two basic principles that would influence
learnability.
5. Feasibility. Can the subject content be learned within the time allowed, resources available,
expertise of the teachers and the nature of the learners? Are there contents of learning which can
be learned beyond the formal teaching-learning engagement? Are there opportunities provided to
learn these?
6. Interest. Will the learners take interest in the Content? Why? Are the contents meaningful? What
value will the contents have in the present and future life of the learners? Interest is one of the
driving forces for students to learn better.
The selection of the subject matter or content, aside from the seven criteria mentioned earlier, may
include the following guide.
Palma in 1952 proposed that the contents in the curriculum should be guided by Balance,
Articulation, Sequence, Integration and Continuity. However, in designing a curriculum contents
Hunkins and Ornstein (2018) added an important element which is Scope, hence from BASIC to
BASICS initials of Balance, Articulation, Sequence, Integration, Continuity.
● Balance. Content should be fairly distributed in depth and breadth. This will guarantee that
significant contents should be covered to avoid too much or too little of the contents
needed with in the time allocation.
● Articulation. As the content complexity progresses with the educational levels, vertically or
horizontally, across the same discipline smooth connections or bridging should be provided.
This will assure no gaps or overlaps in the content. Seamlessness in the content is desired
and can be assured if there is articulation in the curriculum. Thus, there is a need off team
among writers and implementers of curriculum.
● Sequence. The logical arrangement of the content refers to sequence or order. This can be
done vertically for deepening the content or horizontally for broadening the same content.
In both ways, the pattern usually is from easy-to complex, what 'is known to the unknown,
what is current to something in the future.
● Integration. Content in the curriculum does not stand alone or in isolation. It has some
ways of relatedness or connectedness to other contents. Contents should be infused in
other disciplines whenever possible. This will provide a wholistic or unified view of
curriculum instead of segmentation. Contents which can be integrated to other disciplines
acquire a higher premium than when isolated.
● Continuity. Content When viewed as a curriculum should continuously flow as it was
before, to where it is now, and where it will be in the future. It should be perennial. It
endures time. Content may not be in the same form and substance as seen in the past since
changes and developments in curriculum occur. Constant repetition, reinforcement and
enhancement of content are all elements of continuity.
● Scope. The breadth and depth of the curriculum content are vital in a curriculum. Scope
consists of all the contents, topics, learning experiences comprising the-curriculum. In
layman’s term scope refers to coverage. The scope shall consider the cognitive level,
affective domain and psychomotor skills in identifying the contents. Other factors will be
considered but caution is given to overloading of contents. “More contents is not always
better.”
2. Curriculum as a Process
We have seen that the curriculum can be approached as content. On the other hand, it can also be
approached as a process. Here, curriculum is not seen as a physical thing or a noun, but as a verb or
an action. It is the interaction among the teachers, students and content. As a process, curriculum
happens in the classroom as the questions asked by the teacher and the learning activities engaged
in by the students. It is an active process with emphasis on the context in which the processes occur.
Used in analogy of a recipe in a cookbook, a recipe is the content While the ways of cooking are the
process.
Curriculum as a process is seen as a scheme about the practice of teaching. It is not a package of
materials or a syllabus of content to be covered. The classroom is only part of the learning
environment where the teacher places action using the content to achieve an outcome.
Hence the process of teaching and learning becomes the central concern of teachers to emphasize
critical thinking, and heads-on, hands-on teaming and many others. '
As a process, curriculum links to the content. While content provides materials on what to teach, the
process provides curriculum on how to teach the content. When accomplished, the process will
result to various curriculum experiences for the learners. The intersection of the content and process
is called the Pedagogical Content Knowledge or PCK. It will address the question: If you have this
content, how will you teach it?
This section will not discuss in detail the different teaching strategies from where learning
experiences are derived. Rather, it will describe how the process as a descriptor of curriculum is
understood. The content is the substance of the curriculum; how the contents will be communicated
and learned will be addressed by the process.
To teachers, the process is very critical. This is the other side of the coin: instruction,
implementation, teaching. These three words connote the process in the curriculum. When
educators ask teachers: What curriculum are you using? Some of the answers will be: 1. Problem
based. 2. Hands-on, Minds-on 3. Cooperative Learning 4. Blended Curriculum 5. On-line 6. Case-
based and many more. These responses approach curriculum as a Process. These are the ways of
teaching, ways of managing the content, guiding learning, methods of teaching and learning and
strategies of teaching or delivery modes. In all of these, there are activities and actions that every
teacher and learner do together or learners are guided by the teacher. Some of the strategies are
time tested traditional methods while others are emerging delivery modes.
1. Curriculum process in the form of teaching methods or strategies are means to achieve the end.
2. There is no single best process or method. Its effectiveness will depend on the desired learning
outcomes, the learners, support materials and the teacher.
3. Curriculum process should stimulate the learners’ desire to develop the cognitive, affective,
psychomotor domains in each individual.
5. Every method or process should result to learning outcomes which can be described as cognitive,
affective and psychomotor.
6. Flexibility in the use of the process or methods should be considered. An effective process will
always result to learning outcomes.
7 Both teaching and learning are the two important processes in the implementation of the
curriculum.
3. Curriculum as a Product
Besides viewing curriculum as content that is to be transmitted, or process that gives action using
the content, it has also been viewed as a product. In other Words, product is what the students
desire to achieve as learning outcomes.
The product from the curriculum is a student equipped with the knowledge, skills and values to
function effectively and efficiently. The real purpose of education is to bring about significant
changes in students’ pattern of behavior. It is important that any statement of objectives or intended
outcomes of the school should be a statement of changes to take place in the students. Central to
the approach is the formulation of behavioral objectives stated as intended learning outcomes or
desired products so that content and teaching methods may be organized and the results evaluated.
Products of learning are operationalized as knowledge, skills, and values.
Curriculum product is expressed in the form of outcomes which are referred to as the achieved
learning outcomes. There may be several desired learning outcomes, but if the process is not
successful, then no learning outcomes will be achieved. These learned or achieved learning
outcomes are demonstrated by the person who has meaningful experiences in the curriculum. All of
these are result of planning, tent and processes in the curriculum.