Scribd
Upload
2 views

Discourse and Its Definitions

Discourse is a complex concept that encompasses language use, social practices, and cognitive processes, evolving significantly across various disciplines. It can be understood through pragmatic and socio-historical frameworks, highlighting its role in communication and power dynamics. The study of discourse, emerging in the 1960s, requires an interdisciplinary approach to analyze its functions and impact in academic and professional contexts.

Uploaded by

runduogao211
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2 views

Discourse and Its Definitions

Discourse is a complex concept that encompasses language use, social practices, and cognitive processes, evolving significantly across various disciplines. It can be understood through pragmatic and socio-historical frameworks, highlighting its role in communication and power dynamics. The study of discourse, emerging in the 1960s, requires an interdisciplinary approach to analyze its functions and impact in academic and professional contexts.

Uploaded by

runduogao211
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Discourse and Its Definitions

Introduction
The concept of "discourse" has evolved significantly over time, becoming a
central focus in linguistics, philosophy, sociology, and other disciplines.
Discourse is not merely about language but includes the ways in which
language is used to construct meaning, shape social interactions, and reflect
cultural norms and ideologies. Its multifaceted nature makes it a complex and
dynamic phenomenon, encompassing language use, social practices, and
cognitive processes. This article synthesizes key insights to explore the
definitions, origins, and dimensions of discourse, as well as its role in
academic and professional settings. By understanding discourse, researchers
can examine how language functions as a tool for communication, identity
formation, and power negotiation.

---

Defining Discourse
The term "discourse" originates from the French and English linguistic
traditions and has been widely adopted in various fields, each interpreting it
in unique ways. Despite its broad usage, the meaning of discourse remains
diverse and context-dependent. To provide clarity, discourse can be
understood in two primary frameworks:

1. Pragmatic Understanding:
In pragmatic terms, discourse refers to the process of contextualizing texts
and producing speech acts that are situated in specific communicative
contexts. Scholars like Yule and Brown emphasize that discourse involves the
interaction between speakers and listeners, where meaning is co-constructed
based on context, intention, and interpretation. For example, a conversation
between a doctor and a patient is shaped by the situational context, the roles
of the participants, and the purpose of the interaction.

2. Socio-Historical Understanding:
From a socio-historical perspective, discourse refers to the verbal practices
of large social communities, such as the legal discourse of lawyers, the
political discourse of leaders, or the literary discourse of writers. Michel
Foucault views discourse as a mechanism through which power and
knowledge are produced and maintained in society. For instance, the
discourse of colonialism shaped perceptions of power and race, influencing
historical narratives and policies.

Teun A. van Dijk expands these definitions by describing discourse as a


multidimensional social phenomenon that operates on four levels:
- Linguistic Object: Discourse includes meaningful sequences of words or
sentences, such as conversations, speeches, or written texts.
- Social Practice: It encompasses activities like lectures, debates, or rituals
that involve the use of language in social contexts.
- Cultural Product: Discourse manifests in cultural artifacts like novels, films,
or advertisements, reflecting societal values and ideologies.
- Mental Representation: It includes cognitive processes such as opinions,
knowledge, or mental models that shape how individuals interpret and
produce language.

Thus, discourse transcends the boundaries of language as a static system,


emphasizing its dynamic use in specific contexts and its role in shaping social
and cultural interactions.

---

Origins and Evolution of Discourse Studies


The study of discourse, referred to as Discourse Analysis (DA) or Discourse
Studies (DS), emerged in the 1960s as a response to the limitations of
traditional linguistic approaches that focused solely on sentence-level
grammar. Discourse studies are inherently interdisciplinary, drawing from
anthropology, sociolinguistics, formal linguistics, and psychoanalysis to
analyze language use in real-world contexts.

Key Milestones in Discourse Studies


1. Zellig S. Harris (1952):
Harris introduced the term "discourse" to analyze linguistic units beyond the
sentence level. His work laid the foundation for studying how sentences
connect to form coherent texts and conversations.

2. Structuralism and Pragmatics:


Ferdinand de Saussure's structuralist approach emphasized the grammatical
rules governing language, treating it as a system of signs. In contrast, Ludwig
Wittgenstein's pragmatic theory highlighted language as a situated activity,
where meaning arises from its use in specific "language games." For example,
the phrase "Can you pass the salt?" functions as a request rather than a
question in a dining context.

3. Speech Act Theory:


John Austin and John Searle developed the theory of speech acts, which
emphasizes the interplay between "saying" and "doing" in communication. For
instance, when a judge declares, "I hereby sentence you," the utterance
performs the act of sentencing, demonstrating how language can enact social
realities.
Discourse in Opposition
Discourse is often contrasted with related linguistic concepts to clarify its
scope:
- Discourse vs. Sentence: While sentences are isolated grammatical units,
discourse focuses on larger linguistic structures, such as conversations or
narratives, that convey meaning in context.
- Discourse vs. Language: Saussure viewed language as a static system of
rules, whereas discourse emphasizes language as a dynamic tool for
communication and meaning-making.
- Discourse vs. Text: A text is a tangible product of discourse, such as a written
article or speech transcript, while discourse refers to the broader social
activity that produces texts.

---

Functions of Discourse
Discourse serves multiple functions, which vary depending on the context,
purpose, and audience of communication. These functions highlight the
versatility and complexity of discourse in shaping human interaction.

1. Cognitive and Emotive Functions


Discourse performs both cognitive and emotive functions, particularly in
academic and professional settings.
- Cognitive Function: Discourse facilitates the discovery and dissemination of
knowledge, enabling logical argumentation and critical analysis. For instance,
a scientific paper uses discourse to present hypotheses, evidence, and
conclusions in a structured manner.
- Emotive Function: Discourse also expresses emotions, values, and attitudes,
adding depth to communication. In debates or persuasive essays, emotive
language engages the audience and reinforces the speaker's stance.

This duality highlights the complexity of academic language, which combines


rationality with expressivity to achieve its communicative goals.

2. Message and Impact


Discourse can be categorized into two types of texts based on its
communicative purpose:
- Text as Message: Found in academic and scientific writing, where the focus is
on clarity, precision, and adherence to linguistic norms. For example, a
research article prioritizes factual accuracy and logical coherence.
- Text as Impact: Found in literature and journalistic essays, where language is
used creatively to evoke emotions and persuade audiences. For instance, a
political speech may use rhetorical devices to inspire action and influence
public opinion.

3. Social Practice
Discourse is deeply embedded in social practices, reflecting the ideologies,
values, and power dynamics of specific communities. For example, critical
discourse analysis examines how language is used to communicate ideology
and maintain social control. A news headline like "Immigrants flood the
border" reflects a specific ideological framing that shapes public perception.

---

Discourse in Academic and Professional Contexts


Academic discourse is a specialized form of written and spoken
communication characterized by its complexity, versatility, and
multidimensional nature. It serves as a medium for knowledge exchange,
professional development, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Registers, Genres, and Disciplines


- Registers: Registers are defined by contextual factors such as the field of
discourse, the mode of delivery (spoken or written), and the tenor (formal or
informal). For example, a conference presentation uses a formal register
tailored to an academic audience.
- Genres: Genres are recognizable communicative events with specific
rhetorical actions and social purposes. Examples include scientific articles,
textbooks, and policy briefs, each with its unique conventions and structures.
- Disciplines: Disciplines represent the subject matter of academic discourse,
such as economics, linguistics, or law. Each discipline has its own specialized
vocabulary, methodologies, and argumentative styles.

Genre Colonies
Genres often overlap across disciplinary boundaries, forming "genre colonies"
that reflect the interconnectedness of academic and professional
communication. For instance, the hybrid academic-journalistic variety
combines rigorous analysis with accessible language to engage broader
audiences, as seen in popular science articles.

---

Theoretical Perspectives on Discourse


Discourse studies have been shaped by two major strands of linguistic theory:

1. Structuralism:
Structuralism focuses on the grammatical rules governing language as a
system. It views discourse as a structured entity that can be analyzed to
uncover patterns and relationships.

2. Pragmatics:
Pragmatics emphasizes language use in specific contexts, viewing meaning
as a product of social interaction. It investigates how speakers use language
to achieve communicative goals, such as persuading, requesting, or
apologizing.

Mikhail Bakhtin's theory of polyphonic discourse bridges these perspectives,


highlighting the dialogic nature of language. According to Bakhtin, meaning
emerges from the interaction of multiple voices and perspectives within a
discourse, making it inherently dynamic and context-sensitive.

---

Conclusion
Discourse is a multifaceted concept that encompasses language use, social
practices, and cognitive processes. Its study requires an interdisciplinary
approach, integrating insights from linguistics, sociology, philosophy, and
other fields. By examining discourse as a product of social practices,
researchers can uncover the mechanisms through which meaning is
negotiated and communicated in various contexts. As discourse continues to
evolve, its analysis will remain a vital tool for understanding the complexities
of human communication.

---

References
- Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays.
- Bhatia, V. (2014). Genre Analysis: Theory and Method.
- van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical Discourse Studies: A Socio-Cognitive Approach.
- Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The Linguistic Sciences
and Language Teaching.
- Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations.
- Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words.
- Saussure, F. de (1916). Course in General Linguistics.

You might also like