(Ebook) Adaptive Approximation Based Control: Unifying Neural, Fuzzy and Traditional Adaptive Approximation Approaches by Jay A. Farrell, Marios M. Polycarpou ISBN 9780471727880, 0471727881 download
(Ebook) Adaptive Approximation Based Control: Unifying Neural, Fuzzy and Traditional Adaptive Approximation Approaches by Jay A. Farrell, Marios M. Polycarpou ISBN 9780471727880, 0471727881 download
https://ebooknice.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-6661374
https://ebooknice.com/product/power-system-load-frequency-control-
classical-and-adaptive-fuzzy-approaches-49432982
https://ebooknice.com/product/matematik-5000-kurs-2c-larobok-23848312
https://ebooknice.com/product/sat-ii-success-math-1c-and-2c-2002-peterson-
s-sat-ii-success-1722018
(Ebook) Power System Load Frequency Control: Classical and
Adaptive Fuzzy Approaches by Hassan A. Yousef ISBN
9781315166292, 9781351679572, 9781498745574, 1315166291,
1351679570, 1498745571
https://ebooknice.com/product/power-system-load-frequency-control-
classical-and-adaptive-fuzzy-approaches-5892108
(Ebook) Master SAT II Math 1c and 2c 4th ed (Arco Master the SAT
Subject Test: Math Levels 1 & 2) by Arco ISBN 9780768923049,
0768923042
https://ebooknice.com/product/master-sat-ii-math-1c-and-2c-4th-ed-arco-
master-the-sat-subject-test-math-levels-1-2-2326094
Jay A. Farrell
University of California Riverside
Marios M. Polycarpou
University of Cyprus and University of Cincinnati
WILEY-
INTERSCIENCE
A JOHN WILEY 81SONS, INC., PUBLICATION
Copyright 0 2006 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form
or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as
permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior
written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to
the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax
(978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should
be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 11 1 River Street, Hoboken, NJ
07030, (201) 748-601 1, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http:llwww.wiley.coxn/go/permission.
Limit of LiabilityiDisclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in
preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or
completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of
merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales
representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contnined lierciti m,iy not be
suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the
publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including
but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
For general information on our other products and services or for technical support, please contact our
Customer Care Department within the United States at (800) 762-2974, outside the United States at
(317) 572-3993 or fax (317) 572-4002.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may
not be available in electronic formats. For more information about Wiley products, visit our web site at
www.wiley.com.
Farrell, Jay.
Adaptive approximation based control : unifying neural, fuzzy and traditional adaptive
approximation approaches / Jay A. Farrell, Marios M. Polycarpou.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN-I 3 978-0-471-72788-0 (cloth)
ISBN-I0 0-471-72788-1 (cloth)
1. Adaptive control systems. 2. Feedback control systems. I. Polycarpou, Marios. 11. Title.
TJ217.F37 2006
629.8'3Wc22
2005021 385
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
To our families and friends.
CONTENTS
...
Preface Xlll
1 Introduction 1
1.I Systems and Control Terminology 1
1.2 Nonlinear Systems 3
1.3 Feedback Control Approaches 4
1.3.1 Linear Design 4
1.3.2 Adaptive Linear Design 6
1.3.3 Nonlinear Design 9
1.3.4 Adaptive Approximation Based Design 11
1.3.5 Example Summary 13
1.4 Components of Approximation Based Control 15
1.4.1 Control Architecture 15
1.4.2 Function Approximator 16
1.4.3 Stable Training Algorithm 17
1.5 Discussion and Philosophical Comments 18
1.6 Exercises and Design Problems 19
2 Approximation Theory 23
2.1 Motivating Example 24
2.2 Interpolation 29
vii
Viii CONTENTS
3 Approximation Structures 71
3.1 Model Types 72
3.1.1 Physically Based Models 72
3.1.2 Structure (Model) Free Approximation 73
3.1.3 Function Approximation Structures 74
3.2 Polynomials 75
3.2.1 Description 75
3.2.2 Properties 77
3.3 Splines 78
3.3.1 Description 78
3.3.2 Properties 83
3.4 Radial Basis Functions 84
3.4.1 Description 84
3.4.2 Properties 86
3.5 Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller 87
3.5.1 Description 88
3.5.2 Properties 89
3.6 Multilayer Perceptron 93
3.6.1 Description 93
3.6.2 Properties 95
3.7 Fuzzy Approximation 96
3.7.1 Description 96
3.7.2 Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Systems 104
3.7.3 Properties 105
CONTENTS ix
References 40 1
Index 417
PREFACE
During the last few years there have been significant developments in the control of highly
uncertain, nonlinear dynamical systems. For systems with parametric uncertainty, adaptive
nonlinear control has evolved as a powerful methodology leading to global stability and
tracking results for a class of nonlinear systems. Advances in geometric nonlinear control
theory, in conjunction with the development and refinement of new techniques, such as
the backstepping procedure and tuning functions, have brought about the design of control
systems with proven stability properties. In addition, there has been a lot of research
activity on robust nonlinear control design methods, such as sliding mode control, Lyapunov
redesign method, nonlinear damping, and adaptive bounding control. These techniques are
based on the assumption that the uncertainty in the nonlinear functions is within some
known, or partially known, bounding functions.
In parallel with developments in adaptive nonlinear control, there has been a tremendous
amount of activity in neural control and adaptive fuzzy approaches. In these studies, neural
networks or fuzzy approximators are used to approximate unknown nonlinearities. The
input/output response of the approximator is modified by adjusting the values of certain
parameters, usually referred to as weights. From a mathematical control perspective, neural
networks and fuzzy approximators represent just two classes of function approximators.
Polynomials, splines, radial basis functions, and wavelets are examples of other function
approximators that can be used-and have been used-in a similar setting. We refer to
such approximation models with adaptivity features as adaptive approximators, and control
methodologies that are based on them as adaptive approximation based control.
Adaptive approximation based control encompasses a variety of methods that appear
in the literature: intelligent control, neural control, adaptive fuzzy control, memory-based
control, knowledge-based control, adaptive nonlinear control, and adaptive linear control.
xiii
xiv PREFACE
(UAVs). The control design is based on the approximation based backstepping methodol-
ogy.
Acknowledgments. The authors would like to thank the various sponsors that have sup-
ported the research that has resulted in this book: the National Science Foundation (Paul
Werbos), Air Force Wright-Patterson Laboratory (Mark Mears), Naval Air Development
Center (Marc Steinberg), and the Research Promotion Foundation of Cyprus. We would
like to thank our current and past employers who have directly and indirectly enabled this
research: University of California, Riverside; University of Cyprus; University of Cincin-
nati; and Draper Laboratory. In addition, we wish to acknowledge the many colleagues,
collaborators, and students who have contributed to the ideas presented herein, especially:
P. Antsaklis, W. L. Baker, J.-Y. Choi, M. Demetriou, S. Ge, J. Harrison, P. A. Ioannou, H. K.
Khalil, P. Kokotovic, F. L. Lewis, D. Liu, M. Mears, A. N. Michel, A. Minai, J. Nakanishi,
K. Narendra, C. Panayiotou, T. Parisini, K. M. Passino, T. Samad, S. Schaal, M. Sharma,
J.-J. Slotine, E. Sontag, G. Tao, A. Vemuri, H. Wang, S. Weaver, Y. Yang, X. Zhang, Y.
Zhao, and P. Zufiria. Finally, we would like to thank our families for their constant support
and encouragement throughout the long period that it took for this book to be completed.
Jay A. Farrell
Marios M. Polycarpou
INTRODUCTION
This book presents adaptive function estimation and feedback control methodologies that
develop and use approximations to portions ofthe nonlinear functions describing the system
dynamics while the system is in online operation. Such methodologies have been proposed
and analyzed under a variety of titles: neural control, adaptive fuzzy control, learning
control, and approximation-based control. A primary objective of this text is to present the
methods systematically in a unifying framework that will facilitate discussion of underlying
properties and comparison of alternative techniques.
This introductory chapter discusses some fundamental issues such as: (i) motivations
for using adaptive approximation-based control; (ii) when adaptive approximation-based
control methods are appropriate; (iii) how the problem can be formulated; and (iv) what
design decisions are required. These issues are illustrated through the use of a simple
simulation example.
Researchers interested in this area come from a diverse set of backgrounds other than
control; therefore, we start with a brief review of terminology standard to the field of
control systems, as depicted in Figure 1.1. The plant is the system to be controlled. The
plant will by modeled herein by a typically nonlinear set of ordinary differential equations.
The plant model is assumed to include the actuator and sensor models. The control system
is designed to achieve certain control objectives. As indicated in Figure 1.1, the inputs
to the control system include the reference input yc(t) (which is possibly passed through
Adaptive Approximation Based Control: Unifiing Neural, Fuzzy and Truditional Adaptive 1
Approximation Approaches. By Jay A. Farretl and Marios M. Polycarpou
Copyright @ 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2 INTRODUCTION
-YJt)
Prefilter Control
System
u(t)
Plant - Y (t)
a prefilter to yield a smoother function y d ( t ) and its first T time derivatives y ! ’ ( t ) for
i = 1, . . . ,T ) and a set of measurable plant outputs y ( t ) . The control system processes
its inputs to produce the control system output u ( t ) that is applied to the plant actuators to
affect the desired change in the plant output. The control system output u(t)is sometimes
referred to as control signal orplant input. Figure 1.1 depicts as a block diagram a standard
closed-loop control system configuration.
The control system determines the stability of the closed-loop system and the response
to disturbances d ( t ) and initial condition errors. A disturbance is any unmodeled physical
effect on the plant state, usually caused by the environment. A disturbance is distinct from
measurement noise. The former directly and physically affects the system to be controlled.
The latter affects the measurement of the physical quantity without directly affecting the
physical quantity. The physical quantity may be indirectly affected by the noise through
the feedback control process.
Control design typically distinguishes regulation from tracking objectives. Regulation
is concerned with designing a control system to achieve convergence of the system state,
with a desirable transient response, from any initial condition within a desired domain of
attraction, to a single operating point. In this case, the signal yc(t) is constant. Tracking is
concerned with the design of a control system to cause the system output y ( t ) to converge
to and accurately follow the signal y d ( t ) . Although the input signal y c ( t ) to a tracking
controller could be a constant, it typically is time-varying in a manner that is not known
at the time that the control system is designed. Therefore, the designer of a tracking
controller must anticipate that the plant state may vary significantly on a persistent basis. It
is reasonable to expect that the designer of the open-loop physical system and the designer
of the feedback control system will agree on an allowable range of variation of the state
of the system. Herein, we will denote this operating envelope by V.The designer of the
physical system ensures safe operation when the state of the system is in V.The designer
ofthe controller must ensure that the state the system remains in V.Implicitly it is assumed
that the state required to track Yd lies entirely in V.
To illustrate the control terminology let us consider the example of a simple cruise control
system for automobiles. In this case, the control objective is to make the vehicle follow
a desired speed profile y c ( t ) , which is set by the driver. The measured output y ( t ) is the
sensed vehicle speed and the control system output u ( t ) is the throttle angle and/or fuel
injection rate. The disturbance d ( t ) may arise due to the wind or road incline. In addition to
disturbances, which are external factors influencing the state, there may also be modeling
errors. In the cruise control example, the plant model describes the effect of changing
the throttle angle on the actual vehicle speed. Hence, modeling errors may arise from
simplifications or inaccuracies in characterizing the effect of changing the throttle angle
on the vehicle speed. Modeling errors (especially nonlinearities), whether they arise due
NONLINEAR SYSTEMS 3
Introductory textbooks in control systems provide linear-based design and analysis tech-
niques for achieving the above objectives and discuss some basic robustness and imple-
mentation issues [61, 66, 86, 1401. The theoretical foundations of linear systems analysis
and design are presented in more advanced textbooks (see, for example, [lo, 19,39, 130]),
where issues such as controllability, observability, and model reduction are examined.
Most dynamic systems encountered in practice are inherently nonlinear. The control system
design process builds on the concept of a model. Linear control design methods can some-
times be applied to nonlinear systems over limited operating regions (i.e., 2)is sufficiently
small), through the process of small-signal linearization. However, the desired level of
performance or tracking problems with a sufficiently large operating region 2)may require
in which the nonlinearities be directly addressed in the control system design. Depending
on the type of nonlinearity and the manner that the nonlinearity affects the system, various
nonlinear control design methods are available [121, 134, 159, 234, 249, 2791. Some of
these methods are reviewed in Chapter 5.
Nonlinearity and model accuracy directly affect the achievable control system perfor-
mance. Nonlinearity can impose hard constraints on achievable performance. The challenge
of addressing nonlinearities during the control design process is further complicated when
the description of the nonlinearities involves significant uncertainty. When portions of the
plant model are unknown or inaccurately defined, or they change during operation, the con-
trol performance may need to be severely limited to ensure safe operation. Therefore there
is often an interest to improve the model accuracy. Especially in tracking applications this
will typically necessitate the use of nonlinear models. The focus of this text is on adaptively
improving models of nonlinear effects during online operation.
In such applications the level of achievable performance may be enhanced by using
adaptive function approximation techniques to increase the accuracy of the model of the
nonlinearities. Such adaptive approximation-based control methods include the popular
areas of adaptive fuzzy and neural control. This chapter introduces various issues related to
adaptive approximation-based control. This introductory discussion will direct the reader
to the appropriate sections of the text where more detailed discussion of each issue can be
found.
4 INTRODUCTION
in a manner such that y ( t ) accurately tracks an externally generated reference input signal
yd(t). Therefore, the control objective is achieved if the tracking error Q(t) = y ( t ) - y d ( t )
is forced to zero. The performance specification is for the closed-loop system to have a
rate of convergence corresponding to a linear system with a dominant time constant T of
about 5.0 s. With this time constant, tracking errdrs due to disturbances or initial conditions
should decay to zero in approximately 15 s (= 37). The system is expected to normally
operate within y E 120,601, but may safely operate on the region 23 = {y E [0, loo]}. Of
course, all signals in the controller and plant must remain bounded during operation.
However, the plant model is not completely accurate. The best model available to the
control system designer is given by
where f,(y) = -y and go(y) = 1.0 0 . 3 ~The + . actual system dynamics are not known or
available to the designer. For implementation of the following simulation results, the actual
dynamics will be
f(y) = -1 -0.01y2
Therefore, there exists significant error between the design model and the actual dynamics
over the desired domain of operation.
This section will consider four alternative control system design approaches. The ex-
ample will allow a concrete, comparative discussion, but none of the designs have been
optimized. The objective is to highlight the similarities, distinctions, complexity, and com-
plicating factors of each approach. The details of each design have been removed from this
discussion so as not to distract from the main focus. The details are included in the problem
section of this chapter to allow further exploration. These methodologies and various others
will be analyzed in substantially greater detail throughout the remainder of the book.
y ( t ) = h ( y ( t ) , u ( t )=
) -y(t) + (1.0 + O . S y ( t ) ) u ( t ) (1.3)
so that the linearized closed-loop system is stable (stability concepts are reviewed in Ap-
pendix A) and has the desired tracking error convergence rate. This controller is designed
based on the idea of small-signal linearization and is approximate, even relative to the model.
Section 1.3.3 will consider feedback linearization, which is a nonlinear design approach
that exactly linearizes the model using the feedback control signal.
FEEDBACK CONTROL APPROACHES 5
For the scalar system g = h(y, u), an operatingpoint is a pair of real numbers (y*, u')
such that h(y*, u*)= 0. If y = y* and u = u*, then jr = 0. In a more general setting,
the designer may need to linearize around a time-varying nominal trajectory ( y * ( t ) , u * ( t ) ) .
Note that operating points may be stable or unstable (see the discussion in Appendix A). An
operating point analysis only indicates the values of y at which it is possible, by appropriate
choice of u, for the system to be in steady state. For our example, the set of operating points
is defined by (y', u*)such that
u*= - Y*
+
1 0.3y*'
Therefore, the design model indicates that the system can operate at any y E D.
The operating point analysis does not indicate how u ( t ) should be selected to get con-
vergence to any particular operating point. Convergence to a desired operating point is an
objective for the control system design. In a linear control design, the best available model
is linearized around an operating point and a linear controller is designed for that linearized
model. If we choose the operating point (y*, u') = (40, fi)
as the design point, then the
linearized dynamics are (see Exercise 1.1)
1
-by = ---by
13
+ 13&,
where by = y - 40 and bu = u - 3. The linear controller
40 0.2(s+ L,
U ( S )= --
13 13s
l3 F(s)
used with the design model results in a stable system that achieves the specification at
y* = 40. In the above, s is the Laplace variable, U ( s ) denotes the Laplace transform of
u ( t ) ,C(t)= y ( t ) - y d ( t ) , and y d ( t ) is the reference input. Ofcourse, D is large enough that
a linear controller designed to achieve the specification at one operating point will probably
not achieve the specification at all operating points in D or for yd(t) varying with time over
the region D.
Figure 1.2 shows the performance using the linear controller of eqn. (1.4) for a series
of amplitude step inputs changing between yd = 20 and yd = 60. Note that the response
exhibits two different convergence rates indicated by T~ and 7 2 . One is significantly slower
than the desired 5 s. Therefore, the linear controller does not operate as designed. There
are two reasons for this. First, there is significant error between the design model and the
actual dynamics of the system. Second, an inherent assumption of linear design is that
the linear controller will only be used in a reasonably small neighborhood of the operating
point for which the controller was designed. The degree of reasonableness depends on the
nonlinear system of interest. For these two reasons, the actual linearized dynamics at the
two points y* = 20 and yc = 60 are distinct from the linearized dynamics of the design
model at the design point y* = 40. The design methodology to determine eqn. (1.4) relied
on cancelling the pole of the linearized dynamics. With modeling error, even for a linear
system, the pole is not cancelled; instead, there are two poles. One near the desired pole
and one near the origin. The second pole is dominant and yields the slowly converging
error dynamics.
Improved performance using linear methods could be achieved by various methods.
First, additional modeling efforts could decrease the error between the actual dynamics
and the design model, but may be expensive and will not solve the problem of operating
far from the linearization point. Second, high gain control will decrease the sensitivity to
6 INTRODUCTION
65
I I t I
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Time, t
Figure 1.2: Performance of the linear control system of eqn. (1.4) with the dynamic system
of eqn. (1.1). The solid curve is y ( t ) . The dashed curve is yd(t).
modeling error, but will result in a higher bandwidth closed-loop system as well as a large
control effort. Third, gain scheduling methods (although not truly linear) address the issue
of limiting the use of a linear controller to a region about its design point by switching
between a set of linear controllers as a function of the system state. Each linear controller
is designed to meet the performance specification (for the design model) on a small region
of operation Di. The regions Q are defined such that they cover the region of operation 2)
(i.e., D C U z , D i ) . Gain scheduling a set of linear controllers does not address the issue
of error between the actual system and the design model.
U
1
= - (-a - by
C
+ y d + 0.2(Yd - y)) , (1.6)
where yd E C ' ( D ) (i.e., the first derivative of yd exists and is continuous within the region
D),and a , b, care parameter estimates of a * , b', and c*, respectively. Note that if ( a ,b, c) =
(a', b', c*), then exact cancellation occurs and the resulting error dynamics are
s = -0.29,
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
“I beg your pardon, my love—” he would have stopped her; but
she saw what in particular had offended him, and ran on.
“I am your wife, I know. But I am a person, too; and I own that I
would rather be with people who—who respect me for what I am in
myself, as well as for what you have made me. Forgive me for
saying so; it is rather natural, I think. And it happens that I should
like to see my parents again, and my sisters. It is six months since I
was at Blackheath. So that would be an opportunity, and a reason—
while you were at the Rectory.”
“You wish me to go there alone?” She could guess at the scalding
spot beneath his armour-plate.
“I should love to go with you,” she said, “if—if it could be
managed.”
“I may mention to you,” he said coldly, “that you will not find an
old acquaintance there. Since his mother’s death my young relative,
Tristram Duplessis, has bestirred himself. He has sold the cottage.”
She had not been prepared for an attack in flank, and blenched
before it. Then she told her fib. “My reason against going with you
had nothing to do with Mr. Duplessis,” she said; and, watching her,
he did not believe her.
He turned to his papers. “It shall be as you wish, my love,” he
said. “I will write to Constantia. It may well be that I shall not care
to resume a broken habit. Are you going up to dress? If so, and if
you should happen to see Wilbraham, would you tell him that I am
ready?”
She hovered about his studious back, as if on the brink of
speech; but thought better of it and went slowly out of the room.
Intensely conscious of her going, he cowered at his desk, looking
sideways—until he heard the door close. Then he began to read,
with lips pressed close together.
In the hall Mrs. Germain almost ran into the arms of Wilbraham,
who, scarlet in the face and wet as with rain, was racing to his room.
“By jove, I beg your pardon, Mrs. Germain!”
“You only made me jump,” she laughed. “Have you been playing
all this time?”
“I know, I know! It was Gunner’s fault, upon my honour.”
“It always is Lord Gunner’s fault. Mr. Germain asked me to tell
you that he was ready.”
“Good Lord!” cried the unhappy youth. “And I’m sw—as hot as
anything.”
“Go and change,” she said kindly. “I’ll go back to him.”
He was fervent. “You are an angel! But I’ve told you that before.”
Their eyes met; they laughed together. He pelted upstairs.
“Mr. Wilbraham will be with you in a second,” she said, entering
the library again. Had she seen him spring round as she came in? No
doubt of it. “I left my book down by the lake—and I know you don’t
like that. Do you?”
“No, dearest, no. I confess the foible.” His eyes invited her
nearer. She advanced to his table and stood by him, her hand
touched his shoulder. He was inordinately happy, though he made no
immediate sign. But presently his arm went about her waist, and
then she bent down and leaned her cheek for his kiss. They
remained together, saying nothing, until she heard Wilbraham
coming down, three stairs at a time. Then she slipped away and just
caught him outside the door.
“I had to tell a fib,” she told him. “I said that I had left my book
by the lake.”
“Well!” He looked at her. “I’ll bet that’s not a fib.”
“No,” she laughed. “But it was meant to be. Now I’m going to get
it myself.”
“You are an angel!” he said. “Don’t. I’ll go presently. I should love
to.”
“No. I shall go myself. I deserve it.”
“You deserve—!” He stopped himself. “Look here,” he said, “send
Gunner. No, he’s changing. Send young Chaveney.”
She opened her eyes—fatal use! “Is Mr. Chaveney here? I
thought he said——”
Wilbraham chuckled. “Did you suppose he’d go when it came to
the point? Not he! Why, before we’d played half a set he came to
borrow some clothes off me.”
He glided smoothly into the library. Mrs. Germain fetched her
book.
II
REFLECTIONS ON HONEYMOONS AND SUCHLIKE
The years fly, we know, and come not again, and there’s balm in
that for the wounds they leave. For we forget a good deal, and Hope
is a faithful lover, and never quits us for long together; and then
there’s honest Use-and-Wont, surely our friend. Because you were a
fool yesterday, you’re wise to-day; and if you’re a fool to-morrow—
why, the alternation is established. There’s a progression; it is like
the rotation of crops.
There’s a mort of healing in a brace of longish years. The county,
which had found little Mrs. Germain stiff when she came home from
her honeymoon, now looked to her for stiffness when it felt relaxed.
Her idiosyncrasy was accepted, you see; once admitted to be a
person, she became a personage. And, discovered by the county,
she discovered herself. She found out that she had a character; she
had never known that before, nor had any others who had had to do
with her: Mrs. James, to wit, Miss de Speyne, her husband. The
process of these discoveries ought to entertain us for a chapter, and
its resolution shall be attempted. But the county learned it first,
when it came to rely upon her stiffness. The Chaveneys, the Gerald
Swetebredes, the Trevor-Waynes, the Perceforest people, before the
two years were over, forgot that they had ever eyed each other, with
brows inquiring “Colonial?” or spelling “Hopeless, my dear!” Such
looks had passed, but now, on the contrary, they leaned—some
heavily. Lady Chaveney was one. “She is charming with Guy,” she
said more than once, “quite charming. An influence—in the nicest
way.” She added, once, as if the news was sacred, “I believe he’s
told her everything.” Guy was the Chaveney heir, the florid, assured
youth whom we met just now on our visit; he had been pronounced
“wild” by Mr. Germain; and he had told her everything. She took
herself quite seriously with Guy, in the elder-sister fashion, Mr.
Germain, at first approving, as, at first, he had approved every sign
of her making way. He came, before the end of two years, to feel
differently, lost touch with the sense of his benevolence, felt to be
losing grip of many things. But in the early days he had approved,
there’s no doubt—in those days of stress and taut nerves when,
returning from a honeymoon by much too long, she had found Mrs.
James pervading the great, orderly house, and had, without knowing
it, braced herself for a tussle, and unawares found herself in it, and
amazingly the winner. Her husband had backed her up there, in his
quiet way. Short, quick, breathless work it had been—a fight in
spasms. She had been crossing the hall when the great lady came
out of the Little Library.
“Ah, Mary—A Mrs. Burgess has called, I see—wife of some one in
Farlingbridge. She called while you were out. A politeness very
natural under the circumstances—but not the custom here, I think.
Lady Diana, I happen to know, never—I suppose you will send cards
by the carriage. That would answer the purpose very well. We have
never known the townspeople, you know—in that sort of way. There
is a tenants’ party in the summer. They come to that.”
Mary had listened. She was pale, but her eyes smouldered.
“I can’t do that, Mrs. Germain. I mean, I must return the call.”
“Ah? It will be against my recommendation.”
“I am very sorry. I asked Mrs. Burgess to call when I met her the
other day at Waysford.”
“Really? Waysford? One would meet her there, I suppose. A Sale
of Work?”
“Yes. But I asked her to call upon me. It was kind of her to come
so soon.”
Mrs. James pressed her lips together. So soon! Why, the woman
would fly! “Does my brother know of this, may I ask?”
“I don’t know,” said Mary, out of breath. She was scared, but
meant to go on.
“It will be better that he should be told.”
“If you think it will interest him—yes,” Mary said, and went
upstairs—to stare out of window, clench and unclench her hands.
Mrs. James reported the case to her brother-in-law, and Mary drove,
the next day, to Farlingbridge—her husband with her—and returned
the call. Nothing more was said; nor, when the visit of a Colonel
Dermott, V.C., and his lady, townspeople, too, had to be witnessed,
was a word of warning uttered. But Mrs. James left within a fortnight
of her rout, staying only for the first dinner-party at Southover. That
was how she learned that Mary Middleham had character. It shocked
her; and it was annoying, too, that she could expect no sympathy
from James.
The house-parties for the winter shooting, and those dinner-
parties for the county had to be gone through with somehow. She
set herself squarely to the task, and was glad enough to believe
towards the end of her two years that she was learning the
business. There was little to do, indeed, but be agreeable, but she
found that more than enough. Agreeable she could be when she felt
happy; her nature was as sweet as an apple. But if she felt hurt she
must show it, and she discovered that that was a cardinal sin. Then
there was the language to master, the queer, impertinent, leisurely
laconics of these people—expensive, perfectly complacent, incredibly
idle young men, old men without reticence, airy, free-spoken
women, and girls who unaffectedly ignored her. To cope with such as
these she must be even as they were, or seem so. The quickness of
their give-and-take in conversation, the ripple and flow, the ease of
the thing, asked an alertness of her which excited while it tried her
to death. Perpetually flagging at the game, she spurred herself
perpetually; for she discovered that there is no more deadly sin in
the code than an awkward pause, that being all of a piece with the
end and aim of living—which is smooth running. A woman should die
sooner than drop a conversation, or murder it.
She was at her best with the men, as perhaps she might expect.
She could run, she could walk all day, chatter, laugh outright, seem
to be herself; they paid her the compliment of approving looks. But
among the women she knew that she must be herself, a very
different thing. She felt infinitely small, ill-dressed, ill-mannered,
clumsy, and a dunce. It was from them, however, that she gained
her reputation of being stiff; she had them to thank for that. It had
come to her in a flash of spirit one day in the summer of her first
year, that if ignoring was in the wind, she could ignore with the best.
She chose to ignore Mrs. Chilmarke, Mrs. Ralph Chilmarke, a beauty,
a dainty blonde and a wit. She did it steadily for three days, at what
a cost she could never have guessed when she began it, and her
reward was great. Mrs. Chilmarke respected her for it, and the
Duchess—a duchess was in the house—was frankly delighted, and
said so. She had watched out the match, and had backed the brune.
Under such exertions as these character will out, while it may
slumber through years of pedagogy. But she worked hard at her
lessons directly she had found out what she wanted, and was
tolerably equipped for her tour in France and Italy when the time
came. She made no way with Latin—Mr. Germain had to give that
up; and English literature made her yawn. She insisted on botany,
for reasons unknown to the good gentleman, and became great
friends with the head gardener, a Scotchman, who made the initial
mistake of supposing her a little fool, and was ever afterwards her
obedient servant. Shall we do wrong in putting this study down to
Senhouse’s credit? I think not. Quietly and methodically, after a
method all her own, Mary Germain began to find herself, as they
say. But before she did that her husband had to find her; and he,
poor gentleman, who had had to begin upon their wedding day, was
at the end of his discoveries before he was at the end of his
honeymoon. So far he struggled, but after that he suffered—dumbly
and in secret, within his plate armour. The fact is, there had been
too much honeymoon. His evident discomfort had made her self-
conscious, killed her ease, threatened her gratitude—upon which he
had proposed to subsist—and turned him from an improbable mate
into a rather unsuccessful father of his wife.
October is a bad time for honeymoons; the evenings are so long.
Nevertheless, at Torquay, her mind had been fairly easy about him.
He had liked the hotel. At Saltcombe he had been pretty miserable,
much on her conscience. He had taught her chess, it seems, and if
she had known what she was about, chess might have done pretty
well. But unfortunately she took to chess, and began to beat him at
it by audacious combinations and desperate sallies quite
unwarranted by science. That vexed him sadly. He abandoned the
game, telling her frankly that he could not help being irritated to see
skill out-vailed by temerity. “One plays, you see, my love, for the
pleasure of playing, not to win. That is the first condition of a
pastime.” She told him she was very sorry, and he kissed her. But
after that Villiers used to lay newspapers and reviews on the sitting-
room table while they were dining. She consoled herself with the
remembrance of that kiss on the lips; it was nearly the last of them.
He selected her forehead, from Saltcombe onwards, or her cheek.
From Saltcombe they went down into Cornwall—Truro, Penzance,
Sennen, St. Ives. There it was that she learned to be happy in her
own company. She spent hours alone, scrambling among the rocks,
watching the sea.
Her life was filling, her vistas opening. This was great gain, to
feel the triumph of discovery. She had never been so far afield
before, and the wild splendours of rocks and seas made her at times
like a thing inspired. She was amazed at herself—at the stinging
blood in her which made her heart beat. She used to get up early at
Sennen, steal, hatless, out of the sleeping inn, and fleet over turf to
the edge of the cliffs. There she stood motionless, with unwinking
eyes and parted lips, while the wind enfolded her. All was pure
ecstasy; she was like a nymph—bare-bosomed, ungirdled,
unfilletted, in the close arms of the Country God. From such hasty
blisses she returned drowsy-eyed, glossed with rose-colour, with a
sleek bloom upon her, and ministered to her husband’s needs,
dressed with care, with the neatness which he loved. She sat quietly
by him, hearing but not heeding his measured tones, dreaming of
she knew not what, save that the dreams were lyric, and sang of
freedom in her ears.
They took more tangible shape as they waxed bolder in outline
and scope. There was a tumble-down white cottage on the cliff
beyond the coastguard station; two rooms and a wash-house below
green eaves. It faced the open sea, but lay otherwise snugly below a
jutting boulder, and was so much of a piece with rock and turf that
the sea-pinks had seeded in the roof and encrusted it with emerald
tufts. Her fancy adorned this tenement; she saw herself there in a
cotton gown, alone with wind and sea. What a life! The freedom of
it, the space, the promise! Not a speck could she descry upon the
fair blue field of such a life. Childlike she built upon the airy fabric,
added to it, assured herself of it. Some day, some day she would be
there—free! The thought made her perfectly happy; she felt her
blood glow.
Mr. Germain complained of the damp Cornish air and took her to
St. Ives and Newquay on the way to Southover. Once on the
homeward path, he had no eyes for her in Cornwall; all his hopes
were now set upon the feast he should have of her, queening it
there in his hall—queen by his coronation. She, for her part, was all
for lingering good-byes to her glimpses of the wild. She went
obediently, but carried with her the assurance that she should see
her cottage again; and by some juggling of the mind, in the picture
of it which floated up before her at call, she came to see always near
it the tilt-cart and its occupant, her friend of the open Common. A
community down there! The tilt-cart stood in a hollow of the rocks
within sound and sight of the sea; the Ghost cropped the thyme
above it; Bingo ran barking out of the tent, and, seeing her, lowered
his head and came wriggling for a caress. Above them all, dominant,
stood her friend, bareheaded to the buffeting gale, so clearly at
times that she could see the wind bellying his white trousers or
flacking the points of his rolling collar. His face unfortunately was not
always to be seen; a mist over it baffled her, but egged her on. For a
flash, for a passing second, his bright, quizzing eyes might be upon
her; she could hear the greeting of the dawn laugh from them, and
feel her bosom swell as she answered it, and knew the long day
before them—and every long day to come. What a comradeship that
might be—what a comradeship! She came to thank God daily that
she had such a friend, and to declare stoutly to herself that she had
no need to see him. Friendship was independent of such needs; the
necessities of touching, eyeing, speaking—what were these but
fetters? Lovers might hug such chains and call them leading-strings.
Poor lovers could not walk without them. But friends had their pride
in each other and themselves. Each stood foursquare in the faith of
his friend; the independence of each was the pride of the other. So
far was she from loving Mr. Senhouse that she learned without a
pang of his visit to the Cantacutes in the following summer, of his
painting days with Hertha de Speyne, and was surprised at herself.
It drew the two girls closer together; it gave zest to letter-writing,
and brought Miss Hertha more than once to Southover. Senhouse
was the presiding genius of their fireside talks; between Hertha and
Senhouse Mary began to find herself—a person, with a reasonable
soul in human flesh.
Her wedding-day, and the days that followed it, had dismayed
the flesh; she could not be one to whom marriage was a sacred
mystery, to be unveiled to piercing music. She had cried herself to
sleep—once; but she cried no more. If she had been in love with her
husband, even if she had ever been in love with anybody, she might
have been won over by pity or by passion; but poor Mr. Germain was
incapable of the second, and somewhat to her surprise she found
herself unpersuaded, though she was touched, by the first. She did
pity him, she pitied him deeply, but she could not help him. Esteem
she gave him, gratitude, obedience, meekness, respect. But herself
—after that once—never, never! For that discharging of her
conscience of its poor little trivial, human load had been forced upon
her by pure generosity on her part (she knew it), and had cost her
an agony of shame. And it had chilled him to the bone—she had
seen his passion fade before her eyes, such passion as he had. Her
generosity had stultified her, played the traitor. She never taxed him
with want of magnanimity, didn’t know the word—but she found
herself resolute, and was as much surprised as he was. What dismay
she had, as the honeymoon wore on, was brought her by her own
position, not by her husband’s; that a girl such as she, with
undeniable proofs to hand of her attractiveness of face and person,
with experience of men and their ways, should find herself daughter
to her husband! An indulged, courted, only daughter, if you please—
but certainly a daughter. Here was an anti-climax, to say the least of
it; and her dismay endured through the honeymoon—until Cornish
cliffs gave her happier things to dream of. It disappeared as the
great red flank of Southover House filled up the scene. Tussles with
Mrs. James, the sweets and perils of victory, ordeals of shooting-
parties, dinner-parties, household cares, and, above all, routine—
such drugs as these sent her heart to sleep. By the time she had
been eighteen months a wife she had forgotten that she had never
been other than a maiden.
Now, what of Cratylus, poor Cratylus the mature, who, clasping
his simple Mero (or Marina) to his heart, found that he had to reckon
with her character first? Good, honest man, he had never supposed
her to have one; and the bitter thing was that the finding of her
character woke up his own. He saw himself again in full plate-
armour, cowering behind it, hiding from himself as well as from the
world a terrible deformity—an open sore in his self-esteem which
could never be healed again, which, at every chance of her daily life,
must bleed and ache. Oh, the pity of it, on how light a spring all this
had depended—a hair, a gossamer! Exeter—fatal day of Exeter! He
had believed himself young again. As she clung to him, half-sobbing,
after dinner, he had pressed her to his bosom, called her his bride,
his wife. She had not dared to look at him, had bowed her head,
hidden her face in his shoulder, let him feel the trembling, the wild
beating of her heart. Then her broken confessions; pitiful, pitiful!
What did they amount to, when all was told? But they, and what
followed upon them—his own conduct, his own curse; and her
conduct, and her curse—were his nightmare. He had found out that
he could not live if he must remember them. He fought, literally, for
life; and after a six months’ toil had succeeded in living. He spent
himself in benevolence and care, gave her everything she could
want, before she asked, taught her, prayed for her, watched over
her. She was never out of his thoughts—and, poor girl, without
knowing it, she stabbed him deeply every day.
He had his benevolence to fall back upon. He could be King of
Southover, of the Cophetua dynasty; he could dazzle her, take her
breath away, and have the delight, which he had promised himself,
of seeing her misty eyes and cheeks flushed with wonder. Yes, yes;
but the æsthetic nerve, you see, dulls with use, and the worst of a
king’s homage to a beggar maid is that the more obsequious the
homage the less beggar is the maid. If you set a coronet in her hair
she will blush deliciously for a week; but in two years’ time it will be
there as a matter of course, put there nightly by her woman—and
bang goes your joy of that. So with all the other enrichments of
society, travel, book-learning. The more she had of them, the more
she was able to take for herself. He who put her in the way of
knowledge could not grumble if she acted upon what he had taught
her. Such gifts as his destroy themselves. It had filled his eyes with
tears to see his wilding in the great terraced house, to watch the
little airs of dignity of matronhood, wifehood (alas, poor gentleman!)
flutter about her, and, like birds, take assurance, and alight. Her
cares were charming, too. It was pretty to see her knit her brows
over some tough nugget of Dante’s, exquisite when she came
faltering to him, coaxing for help. But then, naturally, the more help
she had the less she came. It grew to be her pride to get through
alone—her pride and his disaster. No. Tristram Duplessis had been
wiser in his generation than he. If you love to fill a thing you must
take care to keep it pretty empty. Thus it was that King Cophetua
kneeled in vain. He had kneeled too low.
But there’s a balm in the passing years for Cratylus as well as for
Marina. The musical clockwork of Southover, which he had promised
himself, became his. He went about his duties as landlord, county
magnate, patron of reasonable things, tolerably sure of a welcome
home from a pair of kind brown eyes. Kisses might be his if he chose
to call for them, clinging arms, a warm and grateful heart. Such
things had to be his solace; and sometimes they were. And he still
fought for his treasure, against all the odds, with his teeth set hard.
If he had lost grip it was because her muscles were more practised.
He must try another, and another, if he would whirl her in the air. He
must impress her anew, prove to her that he was a man, honour-
worthy and loveworthy. His ambitions were rekindled: that was the
result of his musings. In the spring of the year, when the tulips
blazed in the Italian gardens, and Mary Middleham had been Mary
Germain for a good eighteen months, we heard him speak with
young Mr. Wilbraham of Sir Gregory and the Farlingbridge division of
the county. There was a chance of lighting up the wonder again in a
pair of brown eyes. He hoarded the thought for the month, and by
June had made up his mind. Then he broke it to his Mary. “I will
gladly put my experience at the service of the country,” he told her,
“and convince you, if I can, that I am not too old for a public career.”
She had told him that he wasn’t old at all, and had kissed his
forehead. They happened to be alone for a few days just then; so
that he could draw her down to his knee and talk to her about
himself, and the part she would have to play for him in London. The
house in Hill-street must be reopened.
III
MATTERS OF ELECTION
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebooknice.com