Model Predictive Control: Theory, Computation, and Design, 2nd Edition Rawlings James B. instant download
Model Predictive Control: Theory, Computation, and Design, 2nd Edition Rawlings James B. instant download
https://ebookmass.com/product/model-predictive-control-theory-
computation-and-design-2nd-edition-rawlings-james-b/
https://ebookmass.com/product/process-control-modeling-design-and-
simulation-2nd-edition-b-wayne-bequette/
https://ebookmass.com/product/predictive-control-daniel-lequesne/
https://ebookmass.com/product/philosophy-and-model-theory-tim-button/
https://ebookmass.com/product/ebook-pdf-data-mining-and-predictive-
analytics-2nd-edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/engineering-computation-an-introduction-
using-matlab-and-exce-2nd-edition-musto/
https://ebookmass.com/product/tidal-energy-systems-design-
optimization-and-control-1st-edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/organization-theory-and-design-13th-
edition-daft/
Model Predictive Control:
Theory, Computation, and Design
2nd Edition
ISBN 9780975937730
9 780975 937730
Model Predictive Control:
Theory, Computation, and Design
2nd Edition
James B. Rawlings
Department of Chemical Engineering
University of California
Santa Barbara, California, USA
David Q. Mayne
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Imperial College London
London, England
Moritz M. Diehl
Department of Microsystems Engineering and
D
Department of Mathematics
University of Freiburg
Freiburg, Germany
b Hi
No ll Publishing
First Edition
First Printing August 2009
Electronic Download November 2013
Electronic Download (2nd) April 2014
Electronic Download (3rd) July 2014
Electronic Download (4th) October 2014
Electronic Download (5th) February 2015
Second Edition
First Printing October 2017
Electronic Download October 2018
Electronic Download (2nd) February 2019
To Cheryl, Josephine, and Stephanie,
In the eight years since the publication of the first edition, the field
of model predictive control (MPC) has seen tremendous progress. First
and foremost, the algorithms and high-level software available for solv-
ing challenging nonlinear optimal control problems have advanced sig-
nificantly. For this reason, we have added a new chapter, Chapter 8,
“Numerical Optimal Control,” and coauthor, Professor Moritz M. Diehl.
This chapter gives an introduction into methods for the numerical so-
lution of the MPC optimization problem. Numerical optimal control
builds on two fields: simulation of differential equations, and numeri-
cal optimization. Simulation is often covered in undergraduate courses
and is therefore only briefly reviewed. Optimization is treated in much
more detail, covering topics such as derivative computations, Hessian
approximations, and handling inequalities. Most importantly, the chap-
ter presents some of the many ways that the specific structure of opti-
mal control problems arising in MPC can be exploited algorithmically.
We have also added a software release with the second edition of
the text. The software enables the solution of all of the examples and
exercises in the text requiring numerical calculation. The software is
based on the freely available CasADi language, and a high-level set of
Octave/MATLAB functions, MPCTools, to serve as an interface to CasADi.
These tools have been tested in several MPC short courses to audiences
composed of researchers and practitioners. The software can be down-
loaded from www.chemengr.ucsb.edu/~jbraw/mpc.
In Chapter 2, we have added sections covering the following topics:
• economic MPC
• MPC with discrete actuators
We also present a more recent form of suboptimal MPC that is prov-
ably robust as well as computationally tractable for online solution of
nonconvex MPC problems.
In Chapter 3, we have added a discussion of stochastic MPC, which
has received considerable recent research attention.
In Chapter 4, we have added a new treatment of state estimation
with persistent, bounded process and measurement disturbances. We
have also removed the discussion of particle filtering. There are two
vi
vii
viii
ix
JBR DQM
Madison, Wisconsin, USA London, England
Acknowledgments
Both authors would like to thank the Department of Chemical and Bio-
logical Engineering of the University of Wisconsin for hosting DQM’s
visits to Madison during the preparation of this monograph. Funding
from the Paul A. Elfers Professorship provided generous financial sup-
port.
JBR would like to acknowledge the graduate students with whom
he has had the privilege to work on model predictive control topics:
Rishi Amrit, Dennis Bonné, John Campbell, John Eaton, Peter Findeisen,
Rolf Findeisen, Eric Haseltine, John Jørgensen, Nabil Laachi, Scott Mead-
ows, Scott Middlebrooks, Steve Miller, Ken Muske, Brian Odelson, Mu-
rali Rajamani, Chris Rao, Brett Stewart, Kaushik Subramanian, Aswin
Venkat, and Jenny Wang. He would also like to thank many colleagues
with whom he has collaborated on this subject: Frank Allgöwer, Tom
Badgwell, Bhavik Bakshi, Don Bartusiak, Larry Biegler, Moritz Diehl,
Jim Downs, Tom Edgar, Brian Froisy, Ravi Gudi, Sten Bay Jørgensen,
Jay Lee, Fernando Lima, Wolfgang Marquardt, Gabriele Pannocchia, Joe
Qin, Harmon Ray, Pierre Scokaert, Sigurd Skogestad, Tyler Soderstrom,
Steve Wright, and Robert Young.
DQM would like to thank his colleagues at Imperial College, espe-
cially Richard Vinter and Martin Clark, for providing a stimulating and
congenial research environment. He is very grateful to Lucien Polak
and Graham Goodwin with whom he has collaborated extensively and
fruitfully over many years; he would also like to thank many other col-
leagues, especially Karl Åström, Roger Brockett, Larry Ho, Petar Koko-
tovic, and Art Krener, from whom he has learned much. He is grateful
to past students who have worked with him on model predictive con-
trol: Ioannis Chrysochoos, Wilbur Langson, Hannah Michalska, Sasa
Raković, and Warren Schroeder; Hannah Michalska and Sasa Raković,
in particular, contributed very substantially. He owes much to these
past students, now colleagues, as well as to Frank Allgöwer, Rolf Find-
eisen Eric Kerrigan, Konstantinos Kouramus, Chris Rao, Pierre Scokaert,
and Maria Seron for their collaborative research in MPC.
Both authors would especially like to thank Tom Badgwell, Bob Bird,
Eric Kerrigan, Ken Muske, Gabriele Pannocchia, and Maria Seron for
their careful and helpful reading of parts of the manuscript. John Eaton
x
Visit https://ebookmass.com today to explore
a vast collection of ebooks across various
genres, available in popular formats like
PDF, EPUB, and MOBI, fully compatible with
all devices. Enjoy a seamless reading
experience and effortlessly download high-
quality materials in just a few simple steps.
Plus, don’t miss out on exciting offers that
let you access a wealth of knowledge at the
best prices!
xi
again deserves special mention for his invaluable technical support dur-
ing the entire preparation of the manuscript.
Added for the second edition. JBR would like to acknowledge the
most recent generation of graduate students with whom he has had the
privilege to work on model predictive control research topics: Doug Al-
lan, Travis Arnold, Cuyler Bates, Luo Ji, Nishith Patel, Michael Risbeck,
and Megan Zagrobelny.
In preparing the second edition, and, in particular, the software re-
lease, the current group of graduate students far exceeded expectations
to help finish the project. Quite simply, the project could not have been
completed in a timely fashion without their generosity, enthusiasm,
professionalism, and selfless contribution. Michael Risbeck deserves
special mention for creating the MPCTools interface to CasADi, and
updating and revising the tools used to create the website to distribute
the text- and software-supporting materials. He also wrote code to cal-
culate explicit MPC control laws in Chapter 7. Nishith Patel made a
major contribution to the subject index, and Doug Allan contributed
generously to the presentation of moving horizon estimation in Chap-
ter 4.
A research leave for JBR in Fall 2016, again funded by the Paul A.
Elfers Professorship, was instrumental in freeing up time to complete
the revision of the text and further develop computational exercises.
MMD wants to especially thank Jesus Lago Garcia, Jochem De Schut-
ter, Andrea Zanelli, Dimitris Kouzoupis, Joris Gillis, Joel Andersson,
and Robin Verschueren for help with the preparation of exercises and
examples in Chapter 8; and also wants to acknowledge the following
current and former team members that contributed to research and
teaching on optimal and model predictive control at the Universities of
Leuven and Freiburg: Adrian Bürger, Hans Joachim Ferreau, Jörg Fis-
cher, Janick Frasch, Gianluca Frison, Niels Haverbeke, Greg Horn, Boris
Houska, Jonas Koenemann, Attila Kozma, Vyacheslav Kungurtsev, Gio-
vanni Licitra, Rien Quirynen, Carlo Savorgnan, Quoc Tran-Dinh, Milan
Vukov, and Mario Zanon. MMD also wants to thank Frank Allgöwer, Al-
berto Bemporad, Rolf Findeisen, Larry Biegler, Hans Georg Bock, Stephen
Boyd, Sébastien Gros, Lars Grüne, Colin Jones, John Bagterp Jørgensen,
Christian Kirches, Daniel Leineweber, Katja Mombaur, Yurii Nesterov,
Toshiyuki Ohtsuka, Goele Pipeleers, Andreas Potschka, Sebastian Sager,
Johannes P. Schlöder, Volker Schulz, Marc Steinbach, Jan Swevers, Phil-
ippe Toint, Andrea Walther, Stephen Wright, Joos Vandewalle, and Ste-
fan Vandewalle for inspiring discussions on numerical optimal control
xii
xiii
xiv Contents
C Optimization 729
C.1 Dynamic Programming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 729
C.1.1 Optimal Control Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 731
C.1.2 Dynamic Programming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 733
C.2 Optimality Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 737
C.2.1 Tangent and Normal Cones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 737
C.2.2 Convex Optimization Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . 741
C.2.3 Convex Problems: Polyhedral Constraint Set . . . 743
C.2.4 Nonconvex Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 745
C.2.5 Tangent and Normal Cones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 746
C.2.6 Constraint Set Defined by Inequalities . . . . . . . 750
C.2.7 Constraint Set; Equalities and Inequalities . . . . . 753
C.3 Set-Valued Functions and Continuity of Value Function . 755
C.3.1 Outer and Inner Semicontinuity . . . . . . . . . . . 757
C.3.2 Continuity of the Value Function . . . . . . . . . . . 759
C.4 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 767
Visit https://ebookmass.com today to explore
a vast collection of ebooks across various
genres, available in popular formats like
PDF, EPUB, and MOBI, fully compatible with
all devices. Enjoy a seamless reading
experience and effortlessly download high-
quality materials in just a few simple steps.
Plus, don’t miss out on exciting offers that
let you access a wealth of knowledge at the
best prices!
Exploring the Variety of Random
Documents with Different Content
Temperament Credulity,
Enthusiasm,
Superstition,
Timidity,
Imagination,
Poetic frenzy.
Excitement Sympathy,
Exalted joy,
Deep grief,
Love,
Hatred,
Protracted anxiety,
Delirium of fever,
Delirium of alcohol,
Delirium of narcotics,
Exhaustion,
Disease of the brain.
The second class, which are spectres or ghosts of the eye, may
be scientifically explained by the laws which govern the material
world. These are the only substantial ghosts which I can grant to my
friend. The objects themselves exist, and are exactly as they appear.
The philosopher regards them as interesting exceptions to general
rules, from peculiar combinations of natural causes. The unlearned
will term them preternatural phenomena, simply because they are of
uncommon occurrence. But which among the works of divine
creation is not a phenomenon? We may think we know a law of
nature, but can we analyse it? Novelty and magnitude astonish, but
that which is familiar excites not our surprise. We gaze with delight
on the progress of an eclipse; we watch with wonder the eccentric
course of the comet; but we look on the sun in its meridian glory
with a cold and apathetic indifference. Yet do they all alike display
Divine Omnipotence, and the expansion of a vegetable germ, the
bursting of a flower, is as great a miracle as the overwhelming of a
deluge, the annihilation of a mighty world.
To discriminate between these classes is not difficult: we may
prove their nature by simple experiment. Optical illusions will be
doubled by a straining or altering of the axes of the eyes; and, by
turning round, as they are removed from the axis of vision, they will
disappear.
So, indeed, will those of the second class, which are real objects
converted into phantoms by mental excitement or disorder.
But in the purely metaphysical ghost or phantom, the change of
position or locality will not essentially dispel the illusion, (the
spectrum following, as it were, the motion of the eye;) because it
exists in the mind itself, either as a faint or transient idea, or a mere
outline, fading perhaps in a brighter light, or as the more permanent
and confirmed impression of insanity, (unchanged even by “brilliant
glare,”) or from the day-dream of the castle-builder, to the deep and
dreadful delusion of the maniac.
Among the mute productions of nature, there are eccentricities
and rarities, which, in default of analysis or explanation, would not
fail of being referred to some supernatural agency: as Leo Afer,
according to Burton, accounts for the swarms of locusts once
descending at Fez, in Barbary, and at Arles, in France, in 1553. “It
could not be from natural causes; they cannot imagine whence they
come, but from heaven. Are these and such creatures, corn, wood,
stones, worms, wool, blood, &c. lifted up into the middle region by
the sunbeams, as Baracellus the physician disputes, and thence let
fall with showers, or there engendered? Cornelius Gemma is of that
opinion, they are there conceived by celestial influences: others
suppose they are immediately from God, or prodigies raised by arts
and illusions of spirits which are princes of the ayre.”
Over Languedoc there once burst an awful and supernatural
cloud, from which fell immense snow-flakes like glittering stars.
There is nothing strange in this, for the shape of the snow-flake is
ever that of an asteroïd. But then there came pouring down gigantic
hail-stones, with their glassy surface impressed with the figures of
helmets, and swords, and scutcheons. This too may be the effect of
very sudden and irregular congelation; but this law was not known,
and therefore its result was a mystery.
Among the wonders seen by the great traveller, Pietro della Valla,
was the bleeding cypress-tree, which shadows the tomb of Cyrus, in
Italy. Under the hollow of its boughs, in his day, it was lighted with
lamps and was consecrated as an oratory. To this shrine resorted
many a devout pilgrim, impressed with a holy belief in the miracle.
And what was this but the glutinous crimson fluid, exuding from the
diseased alburnum of a tree, which the woodmen indeed term
bleeding, but which the ancient Turks affirmed, or believed, to be
converted on every Friday into drops of real blood?
The red snow, which is not uncommon in the arctic regions, is
thus tinted by very minute cryptogamic plants; and the fairy ring is
but a circle of herbage poisoned by a fungus.
In Denbighshire (I may add) the prevalent belief is, that the
shivering of the aspen is from sympathy with that tree in Palestine,
which was hewn into the true cross.
The simple stratification of vapours, especially during sudden
transitions of temperature, may produce very interesting optical
phenomena; not by refraction or reflection, but merely by partial
obscuration of an object. We have examples of these illusive spectra
in the gigantic icebergs seen by Captain Scoresby, and other arctic
voyagers, which assumed the shape of towers, and spires, and
cathedrals, and obelisks, that were constantly displacing each other
in whimsical confusion and endless variety, like the figures of a
kaleidoscope. Phipps thus describes their majestic beauty: “The ice
that had parted from the main body, they had now time to admire,
as it no longer obstructed their course; the various shapes in which
the broken fragments appeared were indeed very curious and
amusing. One remarkable piece described a magnificent arch, so
large and completely formed, that a sloop of considerable burden
might have sailed through it without lowering her masts. Another
represented a church, with windows, pillars, and domes.”
We may scarcely wonder at the mystifications of nature, when
she assumes these gorgeous eccentricities, as have been witnessed
also in the barren steppes of the Caraccas, on the Orinoko, where
the palm-groves appear to be cut asunder; in the Llanos, where
chains of hills appear suspended in the air, and rivers and lakes to
flow on arid sand; in the lake of the Gazelles, seen by the Arabs and
the African traveller; and the lakes seen by Captain Munday, during
his tour in India.
The very clearness of the atmosphere, like that which floats
around the Rhine, renders distance especially distinct; but
mountainous regions, from the attraction of electric clouds, afford
the highest examples of atmospheric beauty and effect. London and
other cities, however crowded with lofty buildings, are not deficient
in these aërial illusions. Even from the bridge of Blackfriars I have
seen a cumulo stratus cloud so strangely intersect the steeples and
the giant chimneys of London, as distinctly to represent a sea-port,
with its vessels and distant mountains.
We have among us several minor illusions, which are only less
imposing because more familiar; and though often occurring, few
are recorded with scientific accuracy. The phosphorescence of the
marshes, the ignis fatuus, Will o’Wisp, Jack o’ the Lanthorn, or Friar
Rush, and the corpse-candles, are mere luminous exhalations,
strained into the marvellous by the vulgar, and thus set down as
heralds of mortality. The dancing-light of luminous flies has been
termed the green light of death; and, if you wish for more,
Astrophel, read the “Armorican Magazine” of John Wesley, or the
quaint volume of Burton, and thereabouts where he writes in this
fashion: “The thickness of the aire may cause such effects, or any
object not well discerned in the dark, fear and phantasie will suspect
to be a ghost or devil. Glowwormes, firedrakes, meteors, ignis
fatuus, which Plinius calls Castor and Pollux, with many such that
appear in moorish grounds, about church-yards, moist valleys, or
where battles have been fought, the causes of which read in
Goclenius, Velcurius, Finkius, &c.”
The Parhelia, or mock suns, are produced by the reflection of the
sun’s light on a frozen cloud. How readily these phenomena are
magnified you may learn from ancient and modern records. In 1223
four suns were seen of crimson, inclosed in a wide circle of crystal
colour. This is natural: but then comes the miracle. In the same year
two giant dragons were seen in the air, flapping their monstrous
wings and engaging in single combat, until they both fell into the
sea and were drowned! Then, in 1104, there were seen four white
circles rolled around the sun: and in 1688, two suns and a reversed
rainbow appeared at Bishop’s Lavington, in Wiltshire: and in
February, 1647, there is an account and sketch of three suns, and an
inverted rainbow, which Baxter terms “Binorum Pareliorum
Φαινομενον.” And because there were two lunar and one solar
eclipses in 1652, it was called, as Lily records, “Annus tenebrum,” or
“the dark year.”
The Corona, or halo around the sun, moon, and stars, is easily
illustrated by the zone formed by placing, during a frost, a lighted
candle in a cloud of steam or vapour.
The Aurora Borealis is arctic electricity, and is beautifully imitated
by the passage of an electric flash through an exhausted glass
cylinder.
The rainbow is a combination of natural prisms breaking the light
into colours; and it may be seen in the cloud, or in the spray of the
ocean, or in the beautiful cascades of Schaffhausen, Niagara, or
Terni, or indeed in any foaming spray on which the meridian
sunbeams fall, or even in the dewy grass, lying, as it were, on the
ground.
When the sun shines on a cloud, there is always a bow produced
visible to all who are placed at the proper angle. The lunar rainbow
is achromatic, or destitute of colour, because reflected light is not
easily refracted into colour. In a brilliant sunset the floods of light
around him often indicate the gradation of prismatic colouring.
Cast. In some waterfalls I have seen the Iris form a complete
circle; as in the Velino at Terni, and in others, especially in Ionia and
Italy. A perfect illusion is produced, for the bow seems to approach
the spectator and then recede, as if Juno were sending her
messenger on some special mission. There are many minds which
would yield with delight to this conviction, and such probably was
the illusion of Benvenuto Cellini—was it not? “This resplendent light
is to be seen over my shadow till two o’clock in the afternoon, and it
appears to the greatest advantage when the grass is moist with
dew. It is likewise visible in the evening at sunset. This phenomenon
I took notice of when I was at Paris, because the air is exceedingly
clear in that climate, so that I could distinguish it there much plainer
than in Italy, where the moists are much more frequent, &c.” A
consciousness of superior talent, and probably the homage which
was paid him even by the members of the holy conclave, were the
springs of this flattering vision.
Ida. The beauty of these must light up even the fancy of a child,
yet a holier feeling will ever inspire a Christian philosopher, when the
bow is seen in the cloud, for it was the sign of the covenant. There
is, indeed, something in the glories of the firmament which never
fails to elevate my own thoughts, and I can readily sympathise with
the Spanish religionists of the fifteenth century, and with the North
Americans, who gaze upon the beautiful constellation of the
“Southern Cross,” insulated as it is from all other stars in its own
dark space; in solemn belief that it is the great symbolical banner
held out by the Deity in approval of their faith.
Ev. The “Fata Morgana,” in the straits of Reggio, presents a
perfect scene of enchantment; when the shouts of “Morgana,
Morgana,” echo from rock and mountain, as the wondering people
flock in crowds to the shore. During this splendid illusion, gigantic
columns, and cloud-capt towers, and gorgeous palaces, and solemn
temples, are floating on the verge of the horizon, and sometimes
beneath this picture of a city, on the very bosom of the water, a
fainter spectrum may be seen, which is a reflected image of the
other. These spectra are usually colourless, but if certain watery
vapours are floating in the air, they are beautifully fringed with the
three primitive colours of the prism. Such also is the illusion of the
Calenture, or sylvan scenes of the ocean.
Cast. Let us seek these wonders of the waters, Astrophel;
perchance we might, in some enchanted hour, see even beneath yon
Severn flood the grotto of Sabrina, with its green and silver weeds,
its purple shells and arborescent corallines; and, if we dive into the
depths of the sea, might we not light on the palace of Amphitrite,
and, while the Nereids and Tritons were mourning over the
desolation of a shipwreck, hear the echo of some Ariel’s song “full
fathom five,” undulating through the water; or realise the
overwhelming of Maha-Velipoor, in the curse of Kehama:
“Their golden summits in the noontide ray,
Shone o’er the dark green deep, that roll’d between;
For domes, and pinnacles, and spires were seen
Peering above the sea.”
“If in Naples
I should report this now, would they believe me?”
Tempest.
Ev. So, you see, the effect of novelty is never more powerfully
displayed than by unusual impressions on the finer senses; that
appearances which the eye perceives, and which the mind cannot
explain, become phantoms, involving some special motive of wonder
or dismay.
So eccentric impressions on the mechanism of the internal ear
may be equally illusive. We have ghosts of the ear as well as of the
eye.
As ignorance has often warped the optical phenomena which
certain atmospheric changes may produce, so peculiar and unusual
sounds may be accounted for on equally erroneous principles,
especially if they chance to resemble sounds which are the effects of
daily or common causes.
As the Hebrew bards hung their harps by the waters of Babylon,
the Irish were wont, during their mourning for the death of a chief,
to loosen their harp-strings, and hang them on the trees; and while
the wind swept the strings, they ever believed that the harp itself
sympathized in their sorrow.
Thus, when the lament, or “ullaloo,” of these wild Milesians
boomed along the mountain glens, mingled with the coione, or
funeral song, and the poetical cadence blended with the winds, how
easy to impart to it a more than human source; and thus the dismal
coronach among the Scottish Highlands may be mystified into the
“boding scream of the Banshee.”
It is a classical question whether the rebel giant, Typhœus, was
crushed by Jupiter beneath the island of Inarime, or Mount Ætna;
but it might readily be believed by the Sicilian, who had read this
mythological tale, that the volcanic convulsions arose from the vain
struggles for freedom of this monster, who sent forth flames from his
mouth and eyes.
Within a mountain of Stony Arabia, to the north of Tor, very
strange noises are often heard as of the striking of an harmonic
hammer, or the sound of a humming-top, which completely infuriate
the camels on the mountain when they hear it. The Arabs believe
these sounds to proceed from a subterranean convent of monks, the
priest of which, to assemble them to prayer, strikes with a hammer
on the nakous, a metallic rod suspended in the air. M. Teetzen, who
visited the spot, assures us that the cause of all this is the mere
rolling of volumes of sand from the summit and sides of the
mountain.
In the last century, I remember there was a legend current in the
west of England, of the “Bucca,” a demon whose howling was heard
amid the blast which swept along the shore. It was a sure
foreboding of shipwreck. The prophecy was often but too fully
verified, but the voice of the demon was merely the premonitory
gale from one certain quarter, which is always the avant-courier of a
tempest.
I remember, when I was a child, the prevalent belief in Horsham,
that, at a certain hour of the night, the ghost of Mrs. Hamel was
heard groaning in her vault, beneath the great eastern window, and
it required some self-possession to walk, at midnight, around this
haunted tomb; for few would believe that the noises were nothing
more than the wind sweeping along the vaulted aisles of the church.
Those very extraordinary impositions on the sense of hearing at
Woodstock, in the truth of which, Astrophel, your faith was so firm,
were resorted to to create terror, and effect a political purpose. In
“the genuine History of the good Devil of Woodstock,” written in
1649, we are told of the pealing of cannon, the barking of dogs, and
neighing of horses, and other mysterious sounds, which certainly
created the greatest wonder and anxiety, until “funny Joe Collins”
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.
ebookmasss.com