0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views

Project Proposal Rubrics

The document is a rubric for evaluating project proposal papers and presentations, outlining criteria for scoring in various categories such as problem background, goals and objectives, intervention strategies, resources, sustainability, impact assessment, presentation organization, and oral communication. Each category includes levels of performance from excellent to beginning, with specific descriptors for each level. The total points available for the paper is 30 and for the presentation is 20.

Uploaded by

cenizajkkb
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views

Project Proposal Rubrics

The document is a rubric for evaluating project proposal papers and presentations, outlining criteria for scoring in various categories such as problem background, goals and objectives, intervention strategies, resources, sustainability, impact assessment, presentation organization, and oral communication. Each category includes levels of performance from excellent to beginning, with specific descriptors for each level. The total points available for the paper is 30 and for the presentation is 20.

Uploaded by

cenizajkkb
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Rubric for Project Proposal Paper

Group No:
Section:

Paper During Defense (30 points)

Criteria Excellent (5) Proficient (4) Developing (3) Beginning (2) SCORE
The background clearly
identifies a significant The background identifies a The background
The background is vague,
Problem globalization issue, provides globalization issue with some addresses the issue but
missing key details about
Background strong context, and context and justification lacks clear context and
the identified issue.
effectively justifies the need provided. justification.
for intervention.
Goals and objectives are Goals and objectives are Goals and objectives are
Goals and objectives are
Goals and specific, measurable, and somewhat clear but may lack present but poorly
unclear, vague, or
Objectives aligned with the identified specificity or alignment with defined or unrelated to
missing.
problem. the problem. the problem.
The intervention strategies The strategies are
The strategies are generally The strategies are
Intervention are clear, realistic, and incomplete, requiring
clear but may lack some unclear, impractical, or
Strategies include detailed steps for more details or steps for
detail or practical steps. missing.
implementation. implementation.
Detailed resources (e.g.,
budget, materials, Resources are identified with Resources are briefly
Support and Resources are unclear,
partnerships) are clearly some details, but justification mentioned with limited
Resources incomplete, or missing.
outlined with realistic may be lacking. details or justification.
justifications.
The project demonstrates
The project considers The project shows
long-term sustainability with The project lacks
Sustainability clear strategies for
sustainability but may lack limited sustainability
sustainability strategies.
detailed strategies. planning.
maintaining its success.
The project outlines clear The project includes some
The project presents
methods for evaluating its methods for evaluation but The project lacks clear
Impact Assessment success and measuring lacks detailed assessment
minimal evaluation
evaluation methods.
strategies.
outcomes. strategies.

Rubric During Presentation (20 points)

Needs SCORE
Excellent (10 Proficient (8 Developing (6
Criteria Improvement (4
points) points) points)
points)
Presentation is highly
organized, follows Presentation is
logical structure, and organized and clear Presentation lacks Presentation is
Presentation and uses clear language with few errors; structure and clarity; disorganized, unclear,
Organization with minimal errors; some visual aids or contains multiple and difficult to
includes visuals or references may be language errors. understand.
references if included.
necessary.
Presenter(s)
demonstrate clear Presenter(s) Presenter(s) show
Presenter(s) are
articulation, communicate clearly limited clarity or
Oral unclear, disorganized,
confidence, and but may lack strong engagement; some
Communication or disengaged from
mastery of the topic; engagement or points may be
the audience.
engages the audience confidence. confusing.
effectively.

You might also like