Imazato, Nakatsuka Et Al, J Funct Biomater 2023, 14, 236
Imazato, Nakatsuka Et Al, J Funct Biomater 2023, 14, 236
Functional
Biomaterials
Review
Multiple-Ion Releasing Bioactive Surface Pre-Reacted
Glass-Ionomer (S-PRG) Filler: Innovative Technology for
Dental Treatment and Care
Satoshi Imazato 1, *, Toshiyuki Nakatsuka 2 , Haruaki Kitagawa 1 , Jun-Ichi Sasaki 1 , Satoshi Yamaguchi 1 ,
Shuichi Ito 3 , Hiroki Takeuchi 4 , Ryota Nomura 5 and Kazuhiko Nakano 6
Abstract: Surface Pre-Reacted Glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler, which releases strontium (Sr2+ ), bo-
rate (BO3 3− ), fluoride (F− ), sodium (Na+ ), silicate (SiO3 2− ), and aluminum (Al3+ ) ions at high
concentrations, is a unique glass filler that are utilized in dentistry. Because of its multiple-ion
Citation: Imazato, S.; Nakatsuka, T.; releasing characteristics, S-PRG filler exhibits several bioactivities such as tooth strengthening, acid
Kitagawa, H.; Sasaki, J.-I.; Yamaguchi,
neutralization, promotion of mineralization, inhibition of bacteria and fungi, inhibition of matrix
S.; Ito, S.; Takeuchi, H.; Nomura, R.;
metalloproteinases, and enhancement of cell activity. Therefore, S-PRG filler per se and S-PRG
Nakano, K. Multiple-Ion Releasing
filler-containing materials have the potential to be beneficial for various dental treatments and care.
Bioactive Surface Pre-Reacted
Those include restorative treatment, caries prevention/management, vital pulp therapy, endodontic
Glass-Ionomer (S-PRG) Filler:
Innovative Technology for Dental
treatment, prevention/treatment of periodontal disease, prevention of denture stomatitis, and perfo-
Treatment and Care. J. Funct. ration repair/root end filling. This review summarizes bioactive functions exhibited by S-PRG filler
Biomater. 2023, 14, 236. and its possible contribution to oral health.
https://doi.org/10.3390/
jfb14040236 Keywords: dental; bioactive; ion release; glass filler; prevention; S-PRG
based on biological, chemical, or mixed actions, as described in the policy statement for
bioactive restorative materials proposed by FDI World Dental Federation [7].
Usage of particles that can release specific components is an effective method for
achieving bioactive functions in dental materials [2,4,5]. For example, Surface Pre-Reacted
Glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler, a fine glass powder which releases multiple ions, is one of
promising technologies. To date, a large number of in vitro and in vivo studies have re-
ported the ability of S-PRG filler and S-PRG filler-containing materials to provide bioactive
effects. In this review, bioactive functions exhibited by S-PRG filler and its benefits for
various dental treatments and care are summarized.
Figure 1. Surface
Figure Pre-Reacted
1. Surface Glass-ionomer
Pre-Reacted (S-PRG)
Glass-ionomer filler.filler.
(S-PRG) (A) S-PRG fillerfiller
(A) S-PRG is composed of three
is composed of three
layers: outer SiO2 coating layer, pre-reacted glass-ionomer phase, and inner functional glass core.
layers: outer SiO2 coating layer, pre-reacted glass-ionomer phase, and inner functional glass core.
(B) S-PRG filler releases multiple ions: strontium (Sr2+),2+borate (BO33−), 3fluoride (F−), sodium (Na+),
(B) S-PRG filler releases multiple ions: strontium (Sr ), borate (BO3 − ), fluoride (F− ), sodium (Na+ ),
silicate (SiO3 ), and
2− aluminum (Al ) ions.
3+
silicate (SiO3 2− ), and aluminum (Al3+ ) ions.
The pre-reacted glass-ionomer phase surrounding the glass core allows the S-PRG filler
to release fluoride ions (F−). Additionally, because specially fabricated fluoro-boro-aluminosilicate
glass is used as the core material, S-PRG filler releases five other ions: strontium (Sr2+ ),
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 236 3 of 18
Figure 1. Surface Pre-Reacted Glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler. (A) S-PRG filler is composed of three
borate (BO3 3− ), sodium (Na+ ), silicate (SiO3 2− ), and aluminum (Al3+ ) ions (Figure 1B). The
layers: outer SiO2 coating layer, pre-reacted glass-ionomer phase, and inner functional glass core.
concentrations of the six ions released into water from S-PRG filler, especially BO3 3− , Sr2+ ,
(B) S-PRG filler releases
andmultiple ions: strontium
F− , are relatively (Sr2+
high [8], much ), borate
greater than (BO
3−), fluoride (F−), sodium (Na+),
those3 liberated from unreacted filler of
silicate (SiO3 ), and aluminum
2− (Alglass-ionomer
conventional 3+ ) ions. cement (Figure 2). Notably, the six ions do not form salts and
are found separately in the eluate.
Figure 2. Comparison of ion release from S-PRG filler and conventional glass-ionomer filler. Release
Figure 2. Comparison of ion release from S-PRG filler and conventional glass-ionomer filler. Release
of ions from S-PRG filler or unreacted filler of conventional glass-ionomer cement was determined
of ions from S-PRG filler afteror unreacted
stirring for 24 h infiller of water
distilled conventional
(mixing ratioglass-ionomer cement
of 1:1). The concentration was determined
of fluoride ions in the
after stirring for 24 h ineluate
distilled water using
was measured (mixing ratioionofelectrode,
a fluoride 1:1). Theandconcentration
those of other ions of fluoride
were measuredions
usinginanthe
eluate was measured using a fluoride ion electrode, and those of other ions were measured using
inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer.
an inductively coupled3.plasma
Bioactiveatomic
Functions emission
Exhibited spectrometer.
by S-PRG Filler
Owing to the release of multiple ions, S-PRG filler exhibits various bioactive functions,
3. Bioactive Functions Exhibited
which bybelow.
are described S-PRG Filler
Owing to the release
3.1. Toothof multiple ions, S-PRG filler exhibits various bioactive func-
Strengthening
tions, which are describedIonsbelow.
released from S-PRG filler contribute to the strengthening of enamel and dentin,
improving their acid resistance. It is well known that fluoride ions strengthen the tooth
substrate through the formation of fluorapatite. The release of F− from S-PRG filler at high
3.1. Tooth Strengthening
concentrations is effective in providing such effects.
Uo et al. [9] revealed that the strontium content in enamel and dentin became 100 times
Ions released from S-PRG
greater filler contribute
after immersion in the eluateto the strengthening
of S-PRG filler compared withof that
enamel
beforeand dentin,
immersion.
improving their acidIt was
resistance. It is wellthat
further demonstrated known
Al3+ , BOthat
3−
3 , andfluoride
Sr2+ wereions strengthen
taken up the1 htooth
by enamel after of
immersion in the eluate, and Sr showed remarkable incorporation
substrate through the formation of fluorapatite. The release of F from S-PRG filler at high - of up to 7900 ppm after
28 days [10]. Strontium enhances the acid resistance of teeth by converting hydroxyapatite
concentrations is effective in providing
to strontium-apatite such
[11,12]. Uo eteffects.
al. [9] investigated the local structure of Sr taken up by
Uo et al. [9] revealed that the strontium content
teeth using X-ray absorption fine structure in enamel
analysis and that
and determined dentin became
the structure of Sr100
in the enamel and dentin after immersion in the eluate of S-PRG filler was similar to that of
times greater after immersion in the eluate of S-PRG filler compared with that before im-
synthetic Sr-incorporated hydroxyapatite, suggesting that Sr released from S-PRG filler can
mersion. It was further demonstrated
be incorporated that
into the Ca siteAl
of 3+ , BO33−, and Sr2+ were taken up by enamel
hydroxyapatite.
after 1 h of immersion inHiraishi et al. [13]
the eluate, andexamined
Sr showedthe interaction
remarkableof borateincorporation
ions released fromof S-PRG
up to filler
7900
with the apatite of enamel and dentin and revealed that the borate ion adsorbed in the
ppm after 28 days [10].
enamelStrontium
and dentin wasenhances the acid
in a tetra-coordinated resistance
form, of teeth
which possesses a bufferby converting
capacity, helps
protect the tooth structure against acid attacks, and promotes remineralization.
enamel and dentin was in a tetra-coordinated form, which possesses a buffer capacity,
helps protect the tooth structure against acid attacks, and promotes remineralization.
Nemoto et al. [15] reported that the eluate of S-PRG filler upregulated the mRNA
Nemoto et al.expression
[15] reported that the eluate of S-PRG filler upregulated the mRNA
level of the osteogenic differentiation marker (i.e., alkaline phosphatase) in
expression level ofhuman
the osteogenic differentiation
bone marrow-derived marker
stromal cells. (i.e.,
As a alkaline phosphatase)
consequence, in hu-
the S-PRG filler eluate
man bone marrow-derived
promoted the stromal cells. As
mineralization a consequence,
of the the [15].
extracellular matrix S-PRG fillereteluate
Ishigure al. [16] pro-
reported
that the eluate
moted the mineralization of theofextracellular
S-PRG filler promoted the proliferation
matrix [15]. Ishigure etofal.
dental
[16] pulp stem cells
reported thatand
enhanced their alkane phosphatase activity. These results suggest that S-PRG filler can
the eluate of S-PRG filler promoted the proliferation of dental pulp stem cells and en-
biologically promote apatite formation and hard tissue formation, as well as chemically.
hanced their alkane phosphatase activity. These results suggest that S-PRG filler can bio-
logically promote 3.4.
apatite formation
Inhibition and
of Bacteria andhard
Fungi tissue formation, as well as chemically.
Numerous studies have demonstrated antibacterial effects of the S-PRG filler eluate
against bacteria
3.4. Inhibition of Bacteria and Fungiin human saliva and dental plaque, such as streptococci, Enterococcus faecalis,
Actinomyces israelii, Propionibacterium acnes, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Fusobacterium
Numerous studies have
nucleatum [17].demonstrated antibacterial effects of the S-PRG filler eluate
against bacteria in human Nomura saliva andrevealed
et al. [18] dentalthat
plaque, such
the S-PRG aseluate
filler streptococci, Enterococcus
inhibited Streptococcus mutans
growth in a dose-dependent manner, especially before the logarithmic growth phase. The
growth of S. mutans in the absence of S-PRG filler eluate reached a stationary phase 7 h
after incubation, whereas the time for S. mutans growth was extended in the presence
of S-PRG filler eluate. The ions mainly responsible for such effects are considered to be
Nomura et al. [18] revealed that the S-PRG filler eluate inhibited Streptococcus mutans
growth in a dose-dependent manner, especially before the logarithmic growth phase. The
growth in a dose-dependent manner, especially before the logarithmic growth phase. The
growth of S. mutans in the absence of S-PRG filler eluate reached a stationary phase 7 h
growth of S. mutans in the absence of S-PRG filler eluate reached a stationary phase 7 h
after incubation, whereas the time for S. mutans growth was extended in the presence of
after incubation, whereas the time for S. mutans growth was extended in the presence of
S-PRG filler eluate. The ions mainly responsible for such effects are considered to be BO33−
S-PRG
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, filler
14, 236 eluate. The ions mainly responsible for such effects are considered to be BO3
3−
5 of 18
and F−−. Borate ions have been used as a preservative in the ophthalmic field, and fluoride
and F . Borate ions have been used as a preservative in the ophthalmic field, and fluoride
ions at high concentrations are also known to inhibit bacteria. Miki et al. [19] investigated
ions at high concentrations are also known to inhibit bacteria. Miki et al. [19] investigated
S. mutans growth in the presence
3− and −
of Na++, SiO32− , Sr2+, BO33−, Al3+, or F− at the concentrations
S. mutans growthBO in 3the presence of Na , SiO 2−, Sr2+, BO33−, Al3+, or F− at the concentrations
F . Borate ions have been used as a preservative in the ophthalmic field, and
3
released from the experimental resin composites containing S-PRG filler at 55.9 vol% and
released from thefluoride experimental
ions at resin composites containing
high concentrations S-PRGtofiller
are also known at 55.9
inhibit vol%Miki
bacteria. and et al. [19]
determined that BO 33− and F− significantly inhibited the growth. +
investigated S. mutans growth in the presence of Na , SiO 2− , Sr2+ , BO 3− , Al3+ , or F− at
determined that BO3 and F significantly inhibited the growth.
3− − 3 3
Kitagawa et the al. [20] reportedreleasedthat even lowthe concentrations ofcomposites
BO33− or F−−, at which
Kitagawa et al. concentrations
[20] reported that even from low experimental resin
concentrations of BO33− or Fcontaining
, at which S-PRG filler
bacterial growth was at 55.9not affected,
vol% can inhibit
and determined thatS. BO
mutans
3
3 − glucose
and F − metabolism
significantly and
inhibited acid
the pro-
growth.
bacterial growth was not affected, can inhibit S. mutans glucose metabolism and acid 3− orpro-− , at which
duction. A detailed study conducted
Kitagawa byreported
et al. [20] Nomura et even
that al. [18]
lowclarified that the
concentrations eluate
of BO 3 of FS-
duction. A detailed study conducted by Nomura et al. [18] clarified that the eluate of S-
PRG filler prominently bacterialdownregulated
growth was notoperons affected,related
can inhibitto S.S.mutans
mutans sugar
glucosemetabolism,
metabolism and acid
PRG filler prominently downregulated
production. A detailed operons
study conducted related by to S. mutans
Nomura et al. sugar
[18]and metabolism,
clarified thatop-
the eluate of
such as the pdh operon encoding the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex the glg
such as the pdh operon S-PRG encoding
filler the pyruvate
prominently downregulateddehydrogenase
operons complex
related to S.and
mutansthe sugar
glg op-metabolism,
eron encoding a putative glycogen synthase. According to such effects, when cultured
eron encoding a such putative
as theglycogen
pdh operon synthase.
encoding According
the pyruvateto such effects,complex
dehydrogenase when cultured
and the glg operon
with the 20–25% S-PRG filler eluate, glucan synthesis by S. mutans was inhibited (Figure
with the 20–25% encoding S-PRG filler eluate,glycogen
a putative glucan synthase.
synthesisAccordingby S. mutans was
to such inhibited
effects, when(Figure
cultured with the
4), and the biofilm formed
20–25% S-PRG was determined
filler eluate, glucanto be sparse,bywith
synthesis S. less was
mutans extracellular
inhibited matrix4), and the
(Figure
4), and the biofilm formed was determined to be sparse, with less extracellular matrix
(Figure 5). biofilm formed was determined to be sparse, with less extracellular matrix (Figure 5).
(Figure 5).
Figure 4. InhibitionFigure
of S. mutans glucan of
4. Inhibition
synthesis
S. mutans
by glucan
S-PRG filler eluate. S. mutans MT8148 (1.0 × 1077 MT8148
S. mutans
Figure 4. Inhibition of S. mutans glucan synthesis by S-PRGsynthesis by S-PRG
filler eluate. filler
S. mutans eluate. (1.0
MT8148 × 10
CFU/mL) was incubated
(1.0 × 10
for
7 18 h at 37 °Cincubated
with the addition of 1%
18 h at 37of◦ C1%
sucrose without (left) or with
CFU/mL) was incubated forCFU/mL) was
18 h at 37 °C with theforaddition with the addition
sucrose withoutof 1% sucrose
(left) or without
with (left) or
(right) the 25% S-PRG filler
withfiller
eluate.
(right)
Arrow:
the 25%
S. mutans
S-PRGS.filler
cell,Arrow:
eluate.
Arrowhead:
S. mutans
glucan formed. glucan formed.
cell, Arrowhead:
(right) the 25% S-PRG eluate. Arrow: mutans cell, Arrowhead: glucan formed.
Figure 5. Inhibition of biofilm formation by S-PRG filler eluate. S. mutans NCTC10449 suspension
Figure 5. InhibitionFigure
of biofilm formation
5. Inhibition by S-PRG
of biofilm fillerbyeluate.
formation S-PRGS. mutans
filler eluate.NCTC10449 suspension
S. mutans NCTC10449 suspension sup-
supplemented with 1% sucrose was incubated for 24 h without (left) or with the 20% S-PRG filler
supplemented withplemented
1% sucrose was
with 1%incubated
sucrose wasfor 24 h without
incubated for 24 h(left) or with
without (left)the 20%the
or with S-PRG filler filler eluate
20% S-PRG
eluate (right). In the presence of the 20% S-PRG filler eluate, S. mutans biofilm formation was in-
eluate (right). In the presence
(right). ofpresence
In the the 20%ofS-PRG
the 20%filler eluate,
S-PRG fillerS. mutans
eluate, biofilmbiofilm
S. mutans formation was was
formation in- inhibited.
hibited.
hibited.
Ions released from S-PRG filler are effective in inhibiting bacteria related to periodontal
disease and suppressing their pathogenic factors. It was reported that the eluate of S-PRG
filler inhibited the growth of P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans [21],
and suppressed the hemagglutination and gingipain activity of P. gingivalis [21,22]. It
was also determined that the coaggregation of P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum, essential for
subgingival biofilm formation, can be prevented in the presence of S-PRG filler eluate [22].
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 236 6 of 18
Tamura et al. [23] reported that the eluate of S-PRG filler decreased the amount of
hydrogen peroxide and catalase activity in Candida albicans. Furthermore, the S-PRG
filler eluate prevented the growth and biofilm formation of C. albicans and inhibited their
dimorphism conversion. The eluate of S-PRG filler also suppressed the activity to produce
secreted aspartyl proteinases, which are major pathogenic factors of C. albicans.
Several studies have demonstrated that resin composites containing S-PRG filler ex-
hibit antibacterial effects against oral bacteria [4,5]. Miki et al. [19] examined the inhibitory
effects of experimental resin composites containing different ratios of S-PRG filler on
S. mutans growth and reported that the specimens containing S-PRG filler at 28.0 vol%
or greater inhibited bacterial growth on their surfaces. They further demonstrated that
the inhibitory effects were mainly attributed to the release of BO3 3− and F− . It was also
reported that the eluate of S-PRG filler suppressed the adherence of S. mutans [22], and thus,
S. mutans biofilm formation was inhibited on the surface of resin composites containing
S-PRG filler (Figure 6). An in situ study assessing plaque accumulation on resin compos-
ites placed in human mouths for 24 h showed significant suppression of dental plaque
maturation on the surface of resin composites containing S-PRG filler [29] (Figure 7).
er. 2023, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 17
ter. 2023, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 17
placed in human mouths for 24 h showed significant suppression of dental plaque matu-
placed
J. Funct. Biomater.
ration inthe
14,
2023,on human
236 mouths
surface forcomposites
of resin 24 h showed significant
containing suppression
S-PRG of (Figure
filler [29] dental plaque
matu-7). 8 of 18
ration on the surface of resin composites containing S-PRG filler [29] (Figure 7).
Figure 6. Inhibitory effects of S. mutans biofilm formation on resin composites containing S-PRG
Figure Figure
6. Inhibitory effects6. Inhibitory effects
of S. mutans of S. mutans
biofilm formationbiofilm
on formation on resin composites
resin composites containing containing
S-PRG S-PRG
filler. Reproduced with permission from Imazato et al. [4]. Copyright: Japanese Society for Dental
filler. Reproduced filler.
with Reproduced
permission with
frompermission
Imazato etfrom Imazato
al. [4]. et al. [4].Japanese
Copyright: Copyright: Japanese
Society for Society
Dentalfor Dental
Materials and Devices.
Materials
Materials and Devices. and Devices.
Figure 7. Plaque
Figure 7. Plaque accumulated accumulated
on resin composites on after
resin placement
composites in after placement
a human mouthin a for
human
24 h.mouth
Re- for 24 h.
Figure 7. with
produced Plaque Reproduced
accumulated
permission with
fromon permission from
resin composites
Imazato Imazato et al.
after placement
et al. [4]. Copyright: [4]. Copyright:
Japanese in aSocietyJapanese
humanfor mouth Society
Dental 24 h. Re- Materials
for Dental
forMaterials
produced
and Devices. and Devices.
with permission from Imazato et al. [4]. Copyright: Japanese Society for Dental Materials
and Devices.
An investigation of demineralization in the tooth structure surrounding filling materi-
An investigation of demineralization
als revealed in the tooth structure
that S-PRG filler-containing resin compositessurrounding
inhibited filling mate-
the demineralization
An investigation
rials revealed thatofS-PRG of demineralization
filler-containing
wall and outer lesions resin in the tooth
composites
in enamel structure
and dentin inhibitedsurrounding filling
the demineralization
and increased mate-
the surrounding tooth
rials revealed that
of wall and outer hardness S-PRG filler-containing
lesions in[30].enamel
Lai etand resin
dentin
al. [31] composites
and increased
investigated inhibited the demineralization
the surrounding tooth
the anti-demineralization effectshard-
of restorations
of wall
ness [30].andLaiouter lesions
et al.using
[31] S-PRGin enamel andanti-demineralization
dentin
filler-containing
investigated the resinand increased
composites the surrounding
(Beautifil
effects II)
of and toothusing
adhesives
restorations hard-
(FL-Bond II) on
ness [30]. Lai et al.
the [31]
rootinvestigated
surfaces. Usingthe anti-demineralization
an oral biofilm reactor
S-PRG filler-containing resin composites (Beautifil II) and adhesives (FL-Bond II) on the and effects
pH of
cycling restorations
artificial using
caries model, they
S-PRG
root surfaces. demonstrated
filler-containing
Using that thereactor
resinbiofilm
an oral composites combination
(Beautifil
and pH of II)
Beautifil IIartificial
and adhesives
cycling and FL-Bond cariesII model,
(FL-Bond exhibited
II) on athe
they cumulative
root surfaces. effectan
Using to inhibit
oral demineralization
biofilm reactor andof root
pH dentin
cycling adjacent to restoration.
artificial caries model, they
demonstrated that the combination of Beautifil II and FL-Bond II exhibited a cumulative
demonstrated It has been reported that S. mutans
II and contains esterases that can potentially degrade
effect to inhibit that the combination
demineralization of Beautifil
of root dentin adjacent FL-Bond II exhibited
to restoration.
resin-based restorative materials [32]. Gautam et al. [33] revealed by in vitro test that
a cumulative
effect It to
hasinhibit
been demineralization
reported that of root dentin adjacent to restoration.
degradation by S. mutans
S. mutans contains
was reducedesterases that can potentially
for resin composites containing S-PRG degrade filler (Beautifil
It has been
resin-based restorative reported
II) compared
that
materials S.
with
mutans
[32]. Gautam
other
contains esterases
et al. [33]
commercial resinrevealed
that
composites.
can
by inOnpotentially
vitro
thetest
other
degrade
that deg-Yoshihara
hand,
resin-based
radation restorative
by S. mutans
et al. wasmaterials
[34] reduced
reported [32].
for Gautam ofetmany
resin composites
production al. [33] revealed
on theby
containing
holes in vitro
S-PRG
surface test(Beautifil
filler
of S-PRG that deg-
filler-containing
radation by S. mutans
II) compared withresin other was reduced
composites
commercial for resin
afterresin
immersion composites
composites.in lactic containing
OnacidtheatotherpH 4.0S-PRG filler
for 3Yoshihara
hand, (Beautifil
days, while etnoal. change in
II) compared
[34] reported with otherintegrity
surface
production commercial
of many resinon
washoles
detected composites.
for
theother Onofthe
conventional
surface other
S-PRG resinhand, Yoshihara
composites.
filler-containing et
Theyresin al.
described that
[34] reported
composites production
after immersionofinmany
lacticholes onpH
acid at the4.0surface of S-PRG
for 3 days, whilefiller-containing resin
no change in surface
composites after immersion in lactic acid at pH 4.0 for 3 days, while no change in surface
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 236 9 of 18
such surface alteration was caused by dissolution of S-PRG filler. Although several clinical
studies revealed their excellent performance [35,36], long-term surface durability of S-PRG
filler-containing resin composites remains to be investigated in detail.
Recently, CAD/CAM resin composite blocks containing S-PRG filler have been de-
veloped for the restoration of primary molar teeth. Nakase et al. [37] reported that S-PRG
filler-containing CAD/CAM resin composite blocks demonstrated acceptable physical
properties and wear performance for clinical use. Moreover, an S-PRG filler-containing
CAD/CAM resin composite crown is advantageous for primary tooth restoration because it
can be cemented using a conventional glass-ionomer cement through the chelation reaction
between Sr and polycarboxylic acid [38].
caries [58]. The potential of S-PRG filler-containing toothpaste to remineralize the deminer-
alized enamel surface has also been shown in situ [59]. Experimental toothpaste containing
5% S-PRG filler showed remineralizing effects similar to those of toothpaste containing
1500 ppm F, even showing greater activity to recover mineral loss in the subsurface regions.
Moecke et al. [60] investigated the remineralizing effects of experimental varnishes
containing S-PRG filler. They revealed that the varnish containing 40% S-PRG filler more
effectively promoted the remineralization of demineralized bovine enamel compared with
the varnish containing 5% sodium fluoride.
Figure 9. Proliferation
Figureof9.osteoblastic
Proliferation ofcells on the
osteoblastic material
cells surface.
on the material (A)(A)
surface. Experimental S-PRG
Experimental S-PRG ce- ceme
(B) calcium silicate-based cement (ProRoot MTA), (C) reinforced zinc oxide cement, and (D) gla
ment, (B) calcium silicate-based cement (ProRoot MTA), (C) reinforced zinc oxide cement, and
(D) glass-ionomer cement. MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded on the set specimen and cultured for 24 h.
ionomer cement. MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded on the set specimen and cultured for 24 h.
5. Ion Release Profile of S-PRG Filler-Containing Materials
To of
5. Ion Release Profile provide
S-PRGclinical benefits for restorative treatments,
Filler-Containing Materials sustained or controlled release
of active components is essential for agent-releasing bioactive materials. Figure 10 shows
To provide clinical
the releasebenefits for
profile of six ionsrestorative treatments,
from commercially sustained
available S-PRG or controlled
filler-containing resin com- relea
posites, an S-PRG filler-containing resin cement for luting, and an S-PRG filler-containing
of active components is essential for agent-releasing bioactive materials. Figure 10 show
bonding agent in a two-step self-etch adhesive. All materials demonstrated continuous
the release profile of six
release ions
of six from
ions for up tocommercially
440 days, with the available
release of Sr2+S-PRG
and BO3filler-containing
3− at high concen- res
trations for the resin composites and the resin cement. The
composites, an S-PRG filler-containing resin cement for luting, and an S-PRG3−filler-cobonding agent containing
S-PRG filler exhibited a different release pattern and released a large amount of BO3 .
taining bonding Continuous
agent in release
a two-step
of fluorideself-etch adhesive.
for 440 days Allformaterials
was confirmed demonstrated
all restorative materials. co
tinuous release of six ions for up to 440 days, with the release of Sr2+ and BO33− at hi
concentrations for the resin composites and the resin cement. The bonding agent contai
ing S-PRG filler exhibited a different release pattern and released a large amount of BO
Continuous release of fluoride for 440 days was confirmed for all restorative materials.
The ion release profile of a coating resin containing S-PRG filler is depicted in Figu
J.J.Funct.
Funct.Biomater.
Biomater.2023,
2023,14,
14,x236
FOR PEER REVIEW 13 13
ofof1718
Figure 10. Ion release profile of commercially available S-PRG filler-containing restorative materials.
Cumulative concentrations of ions released from (A) resin composites (Beautifil II), (B) flowable-type
Figure 10. Ion release profile of commercially available S-PRG filler-containing restorative materials.
resin composites (Beautifil Flow Plus), (C) resin cement for luting (ResiCem EX), and (D) bonding
Cumulative concentrations of ions released from (A) resin composites (Beautifil II), (B) flowable-
agent
type in acomposites
resin two-step self-etch adhesive
(Beautifil (FL-Bond
Flow Plus), II). The
(C) resin disc-shaped
cement cured
for luting specimen
(ResiCem EX),(15
andmm diameter,
(D) bond-
1 mm thickness) was immersed in 5 mL of distilled water, which was replaced periodically.
ing agent in a two-step self-etch adhesive (FL-Bond II). The disc-shaped cured specimen (15 mm The
diameter, 1 mm thickness) was immersed in 5 mL of distilled water, which was replaced periodi-of
concentration of fluoride ions in the eluate was measured using a fluoride ion electrode, and those
otherThe
cally. ionsconcentration
were measured using anions
of fluoride inductively coupled
in the eluate wasplasma
measuredatomic emission
using spectrometer.
a fluoride ion electrode,
and those of other ions were measured using an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spec-
The ion release profile of a coating resin containing S-PRG filler is depicted in Figure 11.
trometer.
The concentrations of all ions released from the coating resin were much greater than those
released from the restorative materials, and a large amount was released within 100 days,
except for Sr2+ , which showed relatively constant release pattern.
J.J. Funct.
Funct. Biomater.
Biomater. 2023,
2023,14,
14,236
x FOR PEER REVIEW 14
14 of 17
of 18
Figure 11. Ion release profile of coating resin containing S-PRG filler. Cumulative concentrations
of ions released from commercial coating resin containing S-PRG filler (PRG Barrier Coat). The
Figure 11. Ion release profile of coating resin containing S-PRG filler. Cumulative concentrations of
disc-shaped cured specimen (15 mm diameter, 1 mm thickness) was immersed in 5 mL of distilled
ions released from commercial coating resin containing S-PRG filler (PRG Barrier Coat). The disc-
water, which was replaced periodically. The concentration of fluoride ions in the eluate was measured
shaped cured specimen (15 mm diameter, 1 mm thickness) was immersed in 5 mL of distilled water,
using
whicha was
fluoride ion electrode,
replaced and those
periodically. of other ions were
The concentration measured
of fluoride ionsusing
in theaneluate
inductively coupled
was measured
plasma atomic emission spectrometer.
using a fluoride ion electrode, and those of other ions were measured using an inductively coupled
plasma atomic emission spectrometer.
6. Conclusions
A large number of in vitro and in vivo (animal) studies have been conducted to assess
6. Conclusions
the bioactive functions exhibited by S-PRG filler and S-PRG filler-containing materials. In
A large number of in vitro and in vivo (animal) studies have been conducted to assess
addition to commercial products containing S-PRG filler, many reports on experimental
the bioactive functions exhibited by S-PRG filler and S-PRG filler-containing materials. In
materials are available. The S-PRG filler has the potential as a bioactive material to con-
addition to commercial products containing S-PRG filler, many reports on experimental
tribute to the success of various dental treatments and care. The main concern is that a
materials are available. The S-PRG filler has the potential as a bioactive material to con-
limited number of clinical studies on the benefits of bioactive functions exhibited by S-PRG
tribute
filler andto S-PRG
the success
filler of various dental
containing treatments
materials and care.
is available. MostThe main
of the concern
evidence is that a
described
limited number of clinical studies on the benefits of bioactive functions
in this review is based on in vitro or animal studies. Although several studies evaluated exhibited by S-
PRG filler and S-PRG filler containing materials is available. Most of the
long-term action of ion-release from S-PRG filler, it is well known that the bench-to-clinic evidence de-
scribed in this review is based on in vitro or animal studies. Although several
translation is not so simple. Future research in clinical settings and their accumulation are studies eval-
uated long-term
expected action
to elucidate of ion-release
further from S-PRG
the practicality filler, it
and efficacy ofisbioactive
well known
S-PRGthat thefor
filler bench-
oral
to-clinic translation
health promotion. is not so simple. Future research in clinical settings and their accumu-
lation are expected to elucidate further the practicality and efficacy of bioactive S-PRG
filler for
Author oral health promotion.
Contributions: Conceptualization, S.I. (Satoshi Imazato), T.N. and K.N.; investigation, S.I.
(Satoshi Imazato), H.K., J.-I.S., H.T. and R.N.; methodology, H.K., S.Y., S.I. (Shuichi Ito) and R.N.;
Author
data Contributions:
curation, Conceptualization,
S.I. (Satoshi Imazato), T.N., H.K., S.I. (Satoshi
H.T. andImazato), T.N. and K.N.; draft
K.N.; writing—original investigation, S.I.
preparation,
(Satoshi
S.I. Imazato),
(Satoshi H.K.,
Imazato), J.-I.S.,
T.N., H.K.H.T.
andand R.N.;writing—review
J.-I.S.; methodology, H.K., and S.Y., S.I. (Shuichi
editing, Ito) and
S.I. (Satoshi R.N.;
Imazato),
data R.N.
S.Y., curation, S.I. (Satoshi
and K.N.; Imazato),
supervision, T.N., H.K.,
S.I. (Satoshi H.T. and
Imazato), K.N.;
S.I. writing—original
(Shuichi Ito) and K.N.;draft preparation,
funding acquisi-
S.I. (Satoshi
tion, Imazato),
S.I. (Satoshi T.N.,and
Imazato) H.K.K.N.
and All
J.-I.S.; writing—review
authors have read andandagreed
editing,toS.I.
the(Satoshi Imazato),
published S.Y.,
version of
R.N.manuscript.
the and K.N.; supervision, S.I. (Satoshi Imazato), S.I. (Shuichi Ito) and K.N.; funding acquisition,
S.I. (Satoshi Imazato) and K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the
Funding:
manuscript. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (21K19593 to S. Imazato)
from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
Funding: This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (21K19593 to S. Ima-
Data
zato) Availability
from the Japan Statement: The
Society for data
the that support
Promotion the findings of this study are available from the
of Science.
corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Data Availability Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the
Conflicts authorThe
of Interest:
corresponding uponauthors declare
reasonable no conflict of interest.
request.
1. Imazato, S. Bio-active restorative materials with antibacterial effects: New dimension of innovation in restorative dentistry. Dent.
References
Mater. J. 2009, 28, 11–19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
1.
2. Imazato, S.;
Imazato, S. Ma,
Bio-active restorative
S.; Chen, materials
J.H.; Xu, H.H. with antibacterial
Therapeutic polymers foreffects:
dentalNew dimension
adhesives: of innovation
Loading resins withinbio-active
restorative dentistry.
components.
Dent. Mater. J. 2009, 28, 11–19.
Dent. Mater. 2014, 30, 97–104. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 236 15 of 18
3. Imazato, S.; Kitagawa, H.; Tsuboi, R.; Kitagawa, R.; Thongthai, P.; Sasaki, J.I. Non-biodegradable polymer particles for drug
delivery: A new technology for “bio-active” restorative materials. Dent. Mater. J. 2017, 36, 524–532. [CrossRef]
4. Imazato, S.; Kohno, T.; Tsuboi, R.; Thongthai, P.; Xu, H.H.; Kitagawa, H. Cutting-edge filler technologies to release bio-active
components for restorative and preventive dentistry. Dent. Mater. J. 2020, 39, 69–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Imazato, S.; Kitagawa, H. Dental resin-based materials with antibacterial properties: Contact inhibition and controlled release. In
Oral Biofilms and Modern Dental Materials: Advances toward Bioactivity; Ionescu, A.C., Hahnel, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland,
2021; pp. 127–140.
6. Spagnuolo, G. Bioactive dental materials: The current status. Materials 2022, 15, 2016. [CrossRef]
7. Schmalz, G.; Hickel, R.; Price, R.B.; Platt, J.A. Bioactivity of dental restorative materials: FDI Policy Statement. Int. Dent. J. 2023,
73, 21–27. [CrossRef]
8. Ito, S.; Iijima, M.; Hashimoto, M.; Tsukamoto, N.; Mizoguchi, I.; Saito, T. Effects of surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer fillers on
mineral induction by phosphoprotein. J. Dent. 2011, 39, 72–79. [CrossRef]
9. Uo, M.; Wada, T.; Asakura, K. Structural analysis of strontium in human teeth treated with surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer
filler eluate by using extended X-ray absorption fine structure analysis. Dent. Mater. J. 2017, 36, 214–221. [CrossRef]
10. Ogawa, A.; Wada, T.; Mori, Y.; Uo, M. Time dependence of multi-ion absorption into human enamel from surface prereacted
glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler eluate. Dent. Mater. J. 2019, 38, 707–712. [CrossRef]
11. Dedhiya, M.G.; Young, F.; Higuchi, W.I. Mechanism for the retardation of the acid dissolution rate of hydroxyapatite by strontium.
J. Dent. Res. 1973, 52, 1097–1109. [CrossRef]
12. Featherstone, J.D.B.; Shields, C.P.; Khademazad, B.; Oldershaw, M.D. Acid reactivity of carbonated apatites with strontium and
fluoride substitutions. J. Dent. Res. 1983, 62, 1049–1053. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Hiraishi, N.; Sayed, M.; Hill, R.; Tagami, J.; Hayashi, F. Interactions of boron released from surface pre-reacted glass ionomer with
enamel/dentin and its effect on pH. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15734. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Fujimoto, Y.; Iwasa, M.; Murayama, R.; Miyazaki, M.; Nagafuji, A.; Nakatsuka, T. Detection of ions released from S-PRG fillers
and their modulation effect. Dent. Mater. J. 2010, 29, 392–397. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Nemoto, A.; Chosa, N.; Kyakumoto, S.; Yokota, S.; Kamo, M.; Noda, M.; Ishisaki, A. Water-soluble factors eluated from surface
pre-reacted glass-ionomer filler promote osteoblastic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018,
17, 3448–3454. [CrossRef]
16. Ishigure, H.; Kawaki, H.; Shintani, K.; Ueno, K.; Mizuno-Kamiya, M.; Takayama, E.; Hotta, M.; Kondoh, N.; Nikaido, T. Effects
of multi-components released from S-PRG filler on the activities of human dental pulp-derived stem cells. Dent. Mater. J.
2021, 40, 1329–1337. [CrossRef]
17. Yoneda, M.; Suzuki, N.; Hirofuji, T. Antibacterial effect of surface pre-reacted glass ionomer filler and eluate–mini review. Pharm.
Anal. Acta 2015, 6, 349.
18. Nomura, R.; Morita, Y.; Matayoshi, S.; Nakano, K. Inhibitory effect of surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) eluate against
adhesion and colonization by Streptococcus mutans. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5056. [CrossRef]
19. Miki, S.; Kitagawa, H.; Kitagawa, R.; Kiba, W.; Hayashi, M.; Imazato, S. Antibacterial activity of resin composites containing
surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler. Dent. Mater. 2016, 32, 1095–1102. [CrossRef]
20. Kitagawa, H.; Miki-Oka, S.; Mayanagi, G.; Abiko, Y.; Takahashi, N.; Imazato, S. Inhibitory effect of resin composite containing
S-PRG filler on Streptococcus mutans glucose metabolism. J. Dent. 2018, 70, 92–96. [CrossRef]
21. Kono, Y.; Tamura, M.; Cueno, M.E.; Tonogi, M.; Imai, K. S-PRG filler eluate induces oxidative stress in oral microorganism:
Suppression of growth and pathogenicity, and possible clinical application. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 816. [CrossRef]
22. Yoneda, M.; Suzuki, N.; Masuo, Y.; Fujimoto, A.; Iha, K.; Yamada, K.; Iwamoto, T.; Hirofuji, T. Effect of S-PRG eluate on biofilm
formation and enzyme activity of oral bacteria. Int. J. Dent. 2012, 2012, 814913. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Tamura, M.; Cueno, M.E.; Abe, K.; Kamio, N.; Ochiai, K.; Imai, K. Ions released from a S-PRG filler induces oxidative stress in
Candida albicans inhibiting its growth and pathogenicity. Cell Stress Chaperones 2018, 23, 1337–1343. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Mendes Soares, I.P.; Anselmi, C.; Guiné, I.; Fernandes, L.O.; Pires, M.L.B.A.; de Souza Costa, C.A.; Scheffel, D.L.S.; Hebling, J.
Inhibitory activity of S-PRG filler on collagen-bound MMPs and dentin matrix degradation. J. Dent. 2022, 124, 104237. [CrossRef]
25. Salim, I.; Seseogullari-Dirihan, R.; Imazato, S.; Tezvergil-Mutluay, A. The inhibitory effects of various ions released from S-PRG
fillers on dentin protease activity. Dent. Mater. J. 2023, 42, 99–104. [CrossRef]
26. Yamaguchi-Ueda, K.; Akazawa, Y.; Kawarabayashi, K.; Sugimoto, A.; Nakagawa, H.; Miyazaki, A.; Kurogoushi, R.; Iwata, K.;
Kitamura, T.; Yamada, A.; et al. Combination of ions promotes cell migration via extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2
signaling pathway in human gingival fibroblasts. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 19, 5039–5045. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Takeuchi, H.; Kato, Y.; Sasaki, N.; Tanigaki, K.; Yamaga, S.; Mita, E.; Kuboniwa, M.; Matsusaki, M.; Amano, A. Surface pre-reacted
glass-ionomer eluate protects gingival epithelium from penetration by lipopolysaccharides and peptidoglycans via transcription
factor EB pathway. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0271192. [CrossRef]
28. Naoum, S.; Ellakwa, A.; Martin, F.; Swain, M. Fluoride release, recharge and mechanical property stability of various fluoride-
containing resin composites. Oper. Dent. 2011, 36, 422–432. [CrossRef]
29. Saku, S.; Kotake, H.; Scougall-vilchis, R.J.; Ohashi, S.; Hotta, M.; Yamamoto, K. Antibacterial activity of composite resin with
glass-ionomer filler particles. Dent. Mater. J. 2010, 29, 193–198. [CrossRef]
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 236 16 of 18
30. Zhou, Y.; Hiraishi, N.; Shimada, Y.; Wang, G.; Tagami, J.; Feng, X. Evaluation of tooth demineralization and interfacial bacterial
penetration around resin composites containing surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler. Dent. Mater. 2021, 37, 849–862.
[CrossRef]
31. Lai, Y.J.; Takahashi, R.; Lin, P.Y.; Kuo, L.; Zhou, Y.; Matin, K.; Chiang, Y.C.; Shimada, Y.; Tagami, J. Anti-demineralization effects of
dental adhesive-composites on enamel-root dentin junction. Polymers 2021, 13, 3327. [CrossRef]
32. Bourbia, M.; Ma, D.; Cvitkovitch, D.G.; Santerre, J.P.; Finer, Y. Cariogenic bacteria degrade dental resin composites and adhesives.
J. Dent. Res. 2013, 92, 989–994. [CrossRef]
33. Gautam, A.K.; Thakur, R.; Shashikiran, N.D.; Shilpy, S.; Agarwal, N.; Tiwari, S. Degradation of resin restorative materials by
Streptococcus mutans: A pilot study. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2017, 41, 225–227. [CrossRef]
34. Yoshihara, K.; Nagaoka, N.; Maruo, Y.; Sano, H.; Yoshida, Y.; Van Meerbeek, B. Bacterial adhesion not inhibited by ion-releasing
bioactive glass filler. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, 723–734. [CrossRef]
35. Ozer, F.; Patel, R.; Yip, J.; Yakymiv, O.; Saleh, N.; Blatz, M.B. Five-year clinical performance of two fluoride-releasing giomer resin
materials in occlusal restorations. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2022, 34, 1213–1220. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Toz-Akalin, T.; Öztürk-Bozkurt, F.; Kusdemir, M.; Özsoy, A.; Yüzbaşıoğlu, E.; Özcan, M. Clinical evaluation of low-shrinkage
bioactive material giomer versus nanohybrid resin composite restorations: A two-year prospective controlled clinical trial. Oper.
Dent. 2023, 48, 10–20. [CrossRef]
37. Nakase, Y.; Yamaguchi, S.; Okawa, R.; Nakano, K.; Kitagawa, H.; Imazato, S. Physical properties and wear behavior of CAD/CAM
resin composite blocks containing S-PRG filler for restoring primary molar teeth. Dent. Mater. 2022, 38, 158–168. [CrossRef]
38. Akimoto, N.; Sakamoto, T.; Kubota, Y.; Kondo, Y.; Momoi, Y. A novel composite-to-composite adhesive bond mechanism. Dent.
Mater. J. 2011, 30, 523–527. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Han, L.; Okamoto, A.; Fukushima, M.; Okiji, T. Evaluation of a new fluoride-releasing one-step adhesive. Dent. Mater. J. 2006,
25, 509–515. [CrossRef]
40. Han, L.; Okiji, T. Evaluation of the ions release / incorporation of the prototype S-PRG filler-containing endodontic sealer. Dent.
Mater. J. 2011, 30, 898–903. [CrossRef]
41. Horiuchi, S.; Kaneko, K.; Mori, H.; Kawakami, E.; Tsukahara, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Hamada, K.; Asaoka, K.; Tanaka, E. Enamel
bonding of self-etching and phosphoric acid-etching orthodontic adhesives in simulated clinical conditions: Debonding force and
enamel surface. Dent. Mater. J. 2009, 28, 419–425. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Kaga, M.; Kakuda, S.; Ida, Y.; Toshima, H.; Hashimoto, M.; Endo, K.; Sano, H. Inhibition of enamel demineralization by buffering
effect of S-PRG filler-containing dental sealant. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2014, 122, 78–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Ma, S.; Imazato, S.; Chen, J.-H.; Mayanagi, G.; Takahashi, N.; Ishimoto, T.; Nakano, T. Effects of a coating resin containing S-PRG
filler to prevent demineralization of root surfaces. Dent. Mater. J. 2012, 31, 909–915. [CrossRef]
44. Kawasaki, K.; Kambara, M. Effects of ion-releasing tooth-coating material on demineralization of bovine tooth enamel. Int. J.
Dent. 2014, 2014, 463149. [CrossRef]
45. Shiiya, T.; Mukai, Y.; Tomiyama, K.; Teranaka, T. Anti-demineralization effect of a novel fluoride-releasing varnish on dentin. Am.
J. Dent. 2012, 25, 347–350. [PubMed]
46. Mukai, Y.; Kamijo, K.; Fujino, F.; Hirata, Y.; Teranaka, T.; Ten Cate, J.M. Effect of denture base-resin with prereacted glass-ionomer
filler on dentin demineralization. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2009, 117, 750–754. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47. Murayama, R.; Nagura, Y.; Yamauchi, K.; Moritake, N.; Iino, M.; Ishii, R.; Kurokawa, H.; Miyazaki, M.; Hosoya, Y. Effect of a coat-
ing material containing surface reaction-type pre-reacted glass-ionomer filler on prevention of primary enamel demineralization
detected by optical coherence tomography. J. Oral Sci. 2018, 60, 367–373. [CrossRef]
48. Funato, Y.; Matsuda, Y.; Okuyama, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Komatsu, H.; Sano, H. A new technique for analyzing trace element uptake
by human enamel. Dent. Mater. J. 2015, 34, 240–245. [CrossRef]
49. Hirayama, K.; Hanada, T.; Hino, R.; Saito, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Arakaki, M. Material properties on enamel and fissure of surface
pre-reacted glass-ionomer filler-containing dental sealant. Pediatr. Dent. J. 2018, 28, 87–95. [CrossRef]
50. Wang, Y.; Kaga, M.; Kajiwara, D.; Minamikawa, H.; Kakuda, S.; Hashimoto, M.; Yawaka, Y. Ion release and buffering capacity of
S-PRG filler-containing pit and fissure sealant in lactic acid. Nano Biomed. 2011, 3, 275–281.
51. Patil, S.S.; Kontham, U.R.; Kontham, R.K.; Patil, S.S.; Kamble, S.P. Fluoride release and fluoride-recharging ability of three different
sealants. J. Indian Soc. Pedod. Prev. Dent. 2020, 38, 247–252.
52. Hirayama, N.; Karaki, T.; Onaga, M.; Usuba, R.; Idaira, Y.; Asada, Y. Comparisons of retention rate and caries preventive effect
between sealant containing S-PRG filler and resin-based sealant in children. Jpn. J. Pediatr. Dent. 2019, 57, 54–65. (In Japanese)
53. Penha, K.J.S.; Roma, F.R.V.O.; Filho, E.M.M.; Ribeiro, C.C.C.; Firoozmand, L.M. Bioactive self-etching sealant on newly erupted
molars: A split-mouth clinical trial. J. Dent. 2021, 115, 103857. [CrossRef]
54. Iijima, M.; Kawaguchi, K.; Kawamura, N.; Ito, S.; Saito, T.; Mizoguchi, I. The effects of single application of pastes containing
ion-releasing particles on enamel demineralization. Dent. Mater. J. 2017, 36, 461–468. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Iijima, M.; Ishikawa, R.; Kawaguchi, K.; Ito, S.; Saito, T.; Mizoguchi, I. Effects of pastes containing ion-releasing particles on dentin
remineralization. Dent. Mater. J. 2019, 38, 271–277. [CrossRef]
56. Okuwaki, T.; Sugimura, R.; Kurokawa, H.; Tsujimoto, A.; Takamizawa, T.; Miyazaki, M.; Garcia-Godoy, F. Effect of ion-releasing
filler-containing gel application on dentin remineralization using optical coherent tomography. Am. J. Dent. 2021, 34, 286–292.
[PubMed]
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 236 17 of 18
57. Amaechi, B.T.; Kasundra, H.; Joshi, D.; Abdollahi, A.; Azees, P.A.A.; Okoye, L.O. Effectiveness of S-PRG filler-containing
toothpaste in inhibiting demineralization of human tooth surface. Open Dent. J. 2018, 12, 811–819. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
58. Amaechi, B.T.; Key, M.C.; Balu, S.; Okoye, L.O.; Gakunga, P.T. Evaluation of the caries-preventive effect of toothpaste containing
surface prereacted glass-ionomer filler. J. Investig. Clin. Dent. 2017, 8, e12249. [CrossRef]
59. Vertuan, M.; França da Silva, J.; Ferreira, A.M.; Braga, A.S.; Magalhães, A.C. Effect of a toothpaste containing surface pre-reacted
glass-ionomer filler on the remineralization of artificial carious enamel lesions in situ. Caries Res. 2022, 56, 447–454. [CrossRef]
60. Moecke, S.E.; Silva, A.G.C.S.; Andrade, A.C.M.; Borges, A.B.; Torres, C.R.G. Efficacy of S-PRG filler varnishes on enamel caries
remineralization. J. Dent. 2022, 119, 104074. [CrossRef]
61. Kawashima, S.; Shinkai, K.; Suzuki, M. The effect of multi-ion releasing filler contents on the dentin bond strength of an adhesive
resin developed for direct pulp-capping. Dent. Mater. J. 2015, 34, 841–846. [CrossRef]
62. Kawashima, S.; Shinkai, K.; Suzuki, M. Effect of an experimental adhesive resin containing multi-ion releasing fillers on direct
pulp-capping. Dent. Mater. J. 2016, 35, 479–489. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
63. Sato, F.; Suzuki, M.; Shinkai, K. Pulp tissue reaction to a self-adhesive, resin-based direct pulp capping material containing surface
pre-reacted glass-ionomer filler. Dent. Mater. 2021, 37, 972–982. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
64. Takahashi, Y.; Okamoto, M.; Komichi, S.; Imazato, S.; Nakatsuka, T.; Sakamoto, S.; Kimoto, K.; Hayashi, M. Application of a direct
pulp capping cement containing S-PRG filler. Clin. Oral Investig. 2019, 23, 1723–1731. [CrossRef]
65. Okamoto, M.; Ali, M.; Komichi, S.; Watanabe, M.; Huang, H.; Ito, Y.; Miura, J.; Hirose, Y.; Mizuhira, M.; Takahashi, Y.; et al.
Surface pre-reacted glass filler contributes to tertiary dentin formation through a mechanism different than that of hydraulic
calcium-silicate cement. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1440. [CrossRef]
66. Li, L.; Peng, X.; Qin, Y.; Wang, R.; Tang, J.; Cui, X.; Wang, T.; Liu, W.; Pan, H.; Li, B. Acceleration of bone regeneration by activating
Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway via lithium released from lithium chloride/calcium phosphate cement in osteoporosis. Sci.
Rep. 2017, 24, 45204. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
67. Ali, M.; Okamoto, M.; Komichi, S.; Watanabe, M.; Huang, H.; Takahashi, Y.; Hayashi, M. Lithium-containing surface pre-reacted
glass fillers enhance hDPSC functions and induce reparative dentin formation in a rat pulp capping model through activation of
Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Acta Biomater. 2019, 96, 594–604. [CrossRef]
68. Ali, M.; Okamoto, M.; Watanabe, M.; Huang, H.; Matsumoto, S.; Komichi, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Hayashi, M. Biological properties of
lithium-containing surface pre-reacted glass fillers as direct pulp-capping cements. Dent. Mater. 2022, 38, 294–308. [CrossRef]
69. Yassen, G.H.; Huang, R.; Al-Zain, A.; Yoshida, T.; Gregory, R.L.; Platt, J.A. Evaluation of selected properties of a new root repair
cement containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer fillers. Clin. Oral Investig. 2016, 20, 2139–2148. [CrossRef]
70. Miyaji, H.; Mayumi, K.; Miyata, S.; Nishida, E.; Shitomi, K.; Hamamoto, A.; Tanaka, S.; Akasaka, T. Comparative biological
assessments of endodontic root canal sealer containing surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler or silica filler. Dent. Mater.
J. 2020, 39, 287–294. [CrossRef]
71. Thein, H.S.S.; Hashimoto, K.; Kawashima, N.; Noda, S.; Okiji, T. Evaluation of the anti-inflammatory effects of surface-reaction-
type pre-reacted glass-ionomer filler containing root canal sealer in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages. Dent.
Mater. J. 2022, 41, 150–158. [CrossRef]
72. Hirata-Tsuchiya, S.; Suzuki, S.; Nakamoto, T.; Kakimoto, N.; Yamada, S.; Shiba, H. Surgical sealing of laterally localized accessory
root canal with resin containing S-PRG filler in combination with non-surgical endodontic treatment: A case report. Dent. J. 2020,
8, 131. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
73. Xiong, B.; Shirai, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Abiko, Y.; Furuichi, Y. The potential of a surface pre-reacted glass root canal dressing for
treating apical periodontitis in rats. Int. Endod. J. 2021, 54, 255–267. [CrossRef]
74. Iwamatsu-Kobayashi, Y.; Abe, S.; Fujieda, Y.; Orimoto, A.; Kanehira, M.; Handa, K.; Venkataiah, V.S.; Zou, W.; Ishikawa, M.;
Saito, M. Metal ions from S-PRG filler have the potential to prevent periodontal disease. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 2017, 3, 126–133.
[CrossRef]
75. Mayumi, K.; Miyaji, H.; Miyata, S.; Nishida, E.; Furihata, T.; Kanemoto, Y.; Sugaya, T.; Shitomi, K.; Akasaka, T. Antibacterial
coating of tooth surface with ion-releasing pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) nanofillers. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06147. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
76. Miyaji, H.; Mayumi, K.; Kanemoto, Y.; Okamoto, I.; Hamamoto, A.; Kato, A.; Sugaya, T.; Akasaka, T.; Tanaka, S. Ultrasonic
irrigation of periodontal pocket with surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) nanofiller dispersion improves periodontal
parameters in beagle dogs. J. Oral Biosci. 2022, 64, 222–228. [CrossRef]
77. Sudbery, P.; Gow, N.; Berman, J. The distinct morphogenic states of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol. 2004, 12, 317–324. [CrossRef]
78. Tsutsumi, C.; Takakuda, K.; Wakabayashi, N. Reduction of Candida biofilm adhesion by incorporation of prereacted glass
ionomer filler in denture base resin. J. Dent. 2016, 44, 37–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
79. Takakusaki, K.; Fueki, K.; Tsutsumi, C.; Tsutsumi, Y.; Iwasaki, N.; Hanawa, T.; Takahashi, H.; Takakuda, K.; Wakabayashi,
N. Effect of incorporation of surface pre-reacted glass ionomer filler in tissue conditioner on the inhibition of Candida albicans
adhesion. Dent. Mater. J. 2018, 37, 453–459. [CrossRef]
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 236 18 of 18
80. Tonprasong, W.; Inokoshi, M.; Tamura, M.; Uo, M.; Wada, T.; Takahashi, R.; Hatano, K.; Shimizubata, M.; Minakuchi, S. Tissue
conditioner incorporating a nano-sized surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler. Materials 2021, 14, 6648. [CrossRef]
81. Hatano, K.; Inokoshi, M.; Tamura, M.; Uo, M.; Shimizubata, M.; Tonprasong, W.; Wada, T.; Takahashi, R.; Imai, K.; Minakuchi, S.
Novel antimicrobial denture adhesive containing S-PRG filler. Dent. Mater. J. 2021, 40, 1365–1372. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.