@english - Madhyamm Crippling Aid Work
@english - Madhyamm Crippling Aid Work
Insularity often stems from contempt, and the kind now being exhibited by U.S. President Donald
Trump and his administration is no exception. Withdrawing from international commitments has
become a defining feature of Mr. Trump’s foreign policy, and the latest decision to freeze foreign
assistance adds to the list of drastic moves, following the withdrawal from WHO and the Paris Accord.
This decision will disrupt established global aid structures and have dire consequences for the millions
who rely on U.S. assistance for survival. While the full impact is yet to unfold, it is clear to those in the
development sector that a cascade of negative repercussions is imminent. On his first day in office,
Mr. Trump imposed a 90-day freeze on foreign assistance, citing inefficiencies and ideological
opposition to USAID. His administration argues that USAID misallocates funds and operates at odds
with his policies. Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency, went so far as to
label USAID a viper’s nest of radical-left Marxists who hate America. The official USAID website has
been stripped of its content, but announced that all personnel would be placed on administrative
leave, with only a few exceptions for mission-critical staff. The administration also ordered the rapid
repatriation of overseas USAID personnel within 30 days.
USAID was established in 1961 as an independent agency under the Foreign Assistance Act, designed
to provide global humanitarian and development aid. According to the U.S. government’s official
spending tracker (USASpending.gov), USAID was allocated $44.2 billion in the 2024 budget. While this
amounts to just 0.4% of the total U.S. federal budget, media reports indicate that it accounted for
nearly 42% of all humanitarian aid tracked by the UN in 2024. USAID funds a range of programmes
which include health care, food aid (including assistance to Gaza), and policy advocacy. The agency
has maintained a strong presence in India since the 1960s, supporting initiatives in education,
immunisation, HIV/TB prevention, polio eradication, and child health. Though direct financial aid to
India has declined in recent years, USAID contributions still amounted to over $150 million for the
latest fiscal year. However, in many conflict-ridden regions, USAID remains a lifeline. Withdrawing
from international aid efforts is more than a bureaucratic shift: it risks leaving millions without food,
medical assistance and critical resources. The decision reflects an inward-looking approach that
dismisses the interconnectedness of global affairs. As the U.S. retreats from its historical leadership in
international development, the world will be left grappling with the consequences of this reckless
policy shift. [Practice Exercise]
Red/blue coloring of words in the sentence indicates subject verb relationship; where ‘red’
denotes ‘subject’ and ‘blue’ denotes ‘verb’.
Vocabulary
1. Crippling (adjective) – Devastating, 12. Following (preposition) – After, as a result
damaging, disabling, paralyzing, weakening of, subsequent to, in the wake of
8. Stem from (phrasal verb) – Originate from, 20. Impose (verb) – Enforce, apply, implement,
arise from, result from, be caused by dictate
24. USAID (noun) – United States Agency for 34. Advocacy (noun) – Support, promotion,
International Development, a U.S. defense, backing
government organization that provides
global humanitarian aid 35. Immunisation (noun) – Vaccination,
inoculation, disease prevention, medical
( )
protection
25. Misallocate (verb) – Misuse, wrongly
36. Eradication (noun) – Elimination, removal,
distribute, divert, mishandle
destruction, extermination
28. A viper’s nest (phrase) – A place full of 39. Bureaucratic (adjective) – Administrative,
danger, betrayal, or hostility governmental, procedural, official
29. Strip (of) (verb) – Remove, take away, 40. Reflect (verb) – Indicate, show, reveal,
deprive, dismantle demonstrate