Journal Pone 0272926
Journal Pone 0272926
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Funding: This study was supported by the School concept of “eWOM” as “any positive or negative statement made by potential, actual or former
of Management, Jiujiang University and Center for customer which is available to a multitude of people via the internet” (p. 39). The eWOM
Entreprenureship & Innovation Research Society
information is more likely to be reliable as individuals can experience a neutral opinion about
(grant number: 43120227). The funders have no
role in study design, data collection and analysis, a product or service [5]. Therefore, eWOM information has been discerned as a more power-
decision to publish, or preparation of the ful medium to influence an individual’s decision-making process [6]. Before purchasing a
manuscript. The funders will bear the cost of the product or service, consumers tend to look for more information about the product online
article processing charge of the paper subject to and significantly consider the review comments about the product generated by other con-
the acceptance of the manuscript.
sumers [7]. Consumers rely on eWOM information to minimize their doubts and risk when
Competing interests: No conflict of interest among making a purchase effort [8]. Past research exhibited that eWOM impacted the consumers’
the authors. selection process of goods/services [9] and influenced individuals’ purchasing decisions [10].
Nonetheless, social media websites are considered a relatively new platform for generating
eWOM, allowing online users to develop a connection with other users by sharing their opin-
ions, ideas, and experiences [11]. Through social media engagement, people can now exchange
their viewpoints and share experiences about a product/service with their friends and familiar
people in the network [12]. This reciprocal information-sharing process in social media makes
eWOM information more authentic and dependable for the consumers. The social media-gen-
erated conversations were found to have a robust natural impact on online purchase behavior
[13]. It is observed that online individuals form their purchase decisions based on eWOM
information. Henceforth, it is also critical for them to sort out and screen out the relevant
information available online before using as online users are generally exposed to a boundless
quantity of eWOM information on social media websites. Still, the aspects of eWOM informa-
tion and online purchase intention at social media websites are not well explored in the litera-
ture. More specifically, the roles of eWOM information in triggering consumer behaviors such
as buying intention have not been largely investigated in regard to the eWOM perspective
[14–16]. Furthermore, others [17] argued that the influence of eWOM not only relies on the
information but also depends on online users on social media. Hence, it is of importance to
evaluate the influence of various aspects of eWOM information on consumer purchase inten-
tion from the social media perspective. To achieve this research aim, both Information Adop-
tion Model (IAM) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) have been considered as it is
believed that IAM is an appropriate model to illustrate the aspects of eWOM information. In
contrast, TAM will explain online consumer behavior towards eWOM.
The current paper presents a number of valuable and noteworthy contributions to the cur-
rent literature based on the consumer behavior perspective. Firstly, several studies have exam-
ined the impact of eWOM on consumer purchase intention by considering the TAM model
[18, 19] in which factor: “perceived usefulness” of the TAM model was adopted as a determi-
nant of information adoption and purchase intention. Still, the impact of perceived ease of use
of eWOM on consumer purchase decisions was merely reported in the literature. The novelty
of this study lies in attempting to fill out this gap by analyzing the influence of ease of use of
eWOM on information adoption behavior and purchase intention. Secondly, this study has
considered a recent growing economy: Bangladesh, to draw the study sample as it is observed
that the country has been experiencing a digital transformation across the nation [20], where
eWOM plays a critical role in developing the business growth, especially on online platforms.
Lastly, several studies in Bangladesh were carried out to exhibit the connection of social media
with brand equity [21], consumer behavior [22], and purchase intention [23, 24]. In contrast,
the relationship between various attributes of eWOM and consumer behavioral aspects was
rarely tested in the Bangladesh context, where social media-based businesses have started
flourishing day by day. Henceforth, the current study has filled this void by integrating the
IAM and TAM models to predict consumer purchase intention in Bangladesh. The findings of
this paper also offer theoretical knowledge on the roles of eWOM information on consumer
behavior in social media and strive to contribute to the body of literature through the research
model. Finally, as a means of managerial implications, it has been crucial to examine the
impact of eWOM information on purchase intention in the social media context. Because it
would offer online consumer insights to the marketing managers to develop a better marketing
strategy by leveraging eWOM information.
3.2.2. The relationship of eWOM information credibility with usefulness and ease of
use of eWOM information. In essence, credibility may be defined as the capacity to be
believed from the users’ perspective [55]. Information credibility can be explained as the con-
sumers’ perception and discernment of the genuineness and trustworthiness of the given
information on an electronic platform such as social media [7]. Generally, information credi-
bility indicates the extent to which a person considers the given information believable and
convincing provided by the respective electronic source [56]. The eWOM information credi-
bility measures to what extent an online user considers the review comments or recommenda-
tions from other online users as genuine and factual [57]. Consumers usually tend to prioritize
information that they feel is more believable and credible when it is available on an online plat-
form [58], and internet users are more expected to perceive authentic information as more
useful and credible [59]. The lack of credible information might result in negative customer
perceptions [60]. Other authors [61] argued that the acceptance of review comments by indi-
viduals also relies on their value judgment of the credibility of the provided information in a
message. Other scholars [62] advocated that eWOM has appeared as a significant medium of
customer information in online purchasing. On social media platforms, online users share
their viewpoints, opinions, judgments, and their negative or positive perspectives toward a
particular product. This type of opinion-based eWOM information enhances the online users’
perceived usefulness as they believe that the information is unbiased and credible [63]. As a
result, consumers’ perceptions about perceived ease of use of new information systems are
influenced by reliable sources of information [64]. Therefore, the study proposes the following
hypotheses:
H3: Information credibility (IC) will affect the perceived usefulness of eWOM information
(USE).
H4: Information credibility (IC) will affect the perceived ease of use of eWOM information
(EOU).
3.2.3. The relationship of perceived ease of use of eWOM information (EOU) with the
adoption of eWOM information (INAD) and purchase intention (PI) on social media.
The scholar [36] interpreted the idea of “perceived ease of use” as “the degree to which a per-
son feels that utilizing a given system would be devoid of effort” (p. 320). From a consumer
point of view, perceived ease of use assesses how effortless it is to utilize a specific technology-
based system [65]. In the current paper, perceived ease of use of the information relates to
online consumers’ view that the online information may be readily and seamlessly compre-
hended and utilized to increase the consumer’s performance in the online purchase decision-
making process. Many researchers have indicated that perceived ease of use significantly
impacts behavioral adoption and intention. For example, in his research study, the author [66]
demonstrated that perceived ease of use positively impacted students’ attitudes toward adopt-
ing mobile learning apps. The study of [67] empirically analyzed Omani students’ acceptance
of e-learning systems. They discovered that simplicity of use significantly impacts students’
readiness to embrace e-learning systems. According to the study findings conducted by other
scholars [68], ease of use is a determinant of online intention to purchase wine among online-
based customers. Thus, based on the existing literature, it is believed that if eWOM informa-
tion becomes easier and uncomplicated for online users on social media networks, online cus-
tomers will be more likely to adopt eWOM information and will have an intention towards
purchase the products or services on social media websites. Henceforth, the current paper pos-
tulates the following hypotheses:
H5: Perceived ease of use of eWOM information (EOU) will affect eWOM information adoption
(INAD).
H6: Perceived ease of use of eWOM information (EOU) will affect purchase intention(PI) on
social media.
3.2.5. The relationship of adoption of eWOM information (INAD) with purchase inten-
tion (PI) in social media. The Information adoption can be referred to as a process through
which individuals are purposefully involved in making use of the given information [70].
Information adoption has been regarded as one of the critical factors in impacting consumers’
intention towards making a purchasing decision [16]. The adoption of eWOM information is
based on the information adoption procedure that indicates the degree of the online users’ uti-
lization process of given information [75]. It is highly likely that individuals who adopt
eWOM information tend to leverage it when making an actual buying decision [75]. Online
users, who are likely to utilize and adopt eWOM information, tend to have buying intentions
[11]. Consumers will develop a firm purchase intention if they get involved in eWOM infor-
mation [76]. Several studies reported a positive connection between eWOM and purchase
intention in the online platform [77–79]. Therefore, based on the discussion on the connection
between eWOM information and purchase intention, the following hypothesis is postulated:
H9: The adoption of eWOM information (INAD) will affect consumers’ purchase intention (PI)
on Social Media.
Based on the above hypotheses, the following figure is proposed as the conceptual model of
the study (please refer to Fig 1):
4.2. Measures
A survey instrument was developed based on earlier research which included relevant infor-
mation related to social media usage and verified in two stages. Initially, the questionnaire set
was delivered to researchers and professionals in the business and IT industries who have
expert knowledge on such topics to ensure its simplicity and relativeness with the field. The
experts’ recommendations and opinions have been utilized to improve the questionnaire.
Later, pilot testing was performed on a small sample of 35 respondents having university
degrees and using social media-related applications, who were asked for their thoughts to min-
imize the complexity and ambiguity of the questionnaire. Cronbach’s Alpha test was used to
calculate reliability. All the variables are evaluated without any change as they all surpassed the
threshold value of the Cronbach alpha reliability (0.70). In the final analysis, the data from the
pilot research were not used.
In this study, the questionnaires consisted of two distinct parts: part A is about the partici-
pants’ demographic information. Part B comprises the item-wise Likert questions on
dependent and independent variables derived from various previous studies. For measuring
constructs of eWOM information quality, three items were adopted from [84]; four items are
used for measuring eWOM information credibility, which is adopted from [85]; three items
are considered for measuring eWOM information usefulness, which is adopted from [34]; two
items are considered for measuring eWOM information ease of use, which is adopted from
[36]. Four items have been adopted for the measurement of eWOM information adoption
[86]. Finally, four items were adopted from [87] to measure the purchase intention on social
media websites. Participants were asked to rate the items prepared based on the five-point rat-
ing Likert scale (starting with strongly disagree to strongly agree).
5. Results
5.1. Respondents’ profile
The demographic profile of respondents has been taken into consideration based on gender,
age, level of education, and social media user experience (Table 1). Overall, the survey results
showed that 61.81% of the participants were males, 42.13% were between the ages of 25 and
30, 56% were studying at the postgraduate level, and 63.19% had 1–3 years of usage experience
of social media.
Confirmatory Factor analysis has been employed to evaluate the validity and reliability of
overall and individual measurement constructs. In CFA, predetermined hypotheses are esti-
mated to lead to a certain outcome based on an underlying causal explanation. In order to
evaluate the measurement model, outer loading constructs reliability and construct validity
were examined. To determine the correlation between the latent measures and the reflective
indicators, the values of the outer loadings were evaluated where indicators with outer loading
of 0.6 or above were considered [90]. Cronbach’s alpha values were used to determine the
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272926.t001
construct’s reliability, where all values demonstrated satisfactory results, exceeding the 0.60 cri-
terion [90]. The current study has employed convergent and discriminant validity to verify
construct validity. While evaluating convergent validity, values of AVEs were between 0.565
and 0.753, and the CR values are also found within 0.796 to 0.869, which correlates to the
threshold value explained by other scholars [90] (see Table 2).
= 0.204, t-values = 3.996, significance p < 0.000), therefore confirming H1 and H2. Again, per-
ceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of eWOM information were influenced by eWOM
information credibility (β = 0.476, t-values = 6.691, significance p < 0.000 and β = 0.341, t-val-
ues = 5.396, significance p < 0.000), thereby validating H3 and H4. Ease of use of eWOM has
shown significant influence on both eWOM information adoption and purchase intention (β
= 0.424, t-values = 8.514, significance p < 0.000 and β = 0.203, t-values = 3.703, significance
p < 0.000), and confirmed the H5 and H6.
Again, eWOM perceived usefulness had positive and significant influence on both eWOM
information adoption and purchase intention (β = 0.317, t-values = 5.913, significance
p < 0.000 and β = 0.327, t-values = 6.196, significance p < 0.000), and confirmed the H7 and
H8. Finally, H9 is accepted as eWOM information adoption and purchase intention are found
significant (β = 0.221, t-values = 3.227, significance p < 0.05).
The determination coefficient (R2 value) is the most broadly utilized measure to analyze the
structural equation model. The R2 value measures the goodness of the structural model. The
R2 value of 0.37 means that the model explains that 37.0 percent of the variance in young con-
sumers’ behavior intention towards social media can be explained by the predictors in this
study. Furthermore, the study assessed effect sizes (f2) and predictive relevance by employing
the Stone- Geisser Q2 value. The “ƒ2” effect size is utilized to measure the degree to which each
latent exogenous variable influences the latent endogenous variables, where the satisfactory
effect size values are 0.35, 0.15, and 0.02 deemed as substantial, medium, and small effect sizes,
respectively [90]. Again, research authors [90] suggested that predictive relevance Q2 values
should be greater than 0, which means that the exogenous variables have predictive signifi-
cance over the endogenous variables and the model is predictively relevant. Table 5 summa-
rizes the acceptable values for predictive relevance Q2, effect sizes (f2), and coefficient of
determination R2.
Table 5. Predictive relevance Q2, effect sizes (f2), and coefficient of determination R2.
R2 Q2 f2 Decision
Purchase Intention 0.37 0.219
eWOM Information Adoption 0.047 Small
eWOM Information Adoption 0.389 0.227
Perceived Ease of Use of Information 0.246 Medium
Perceived Usefulness of Information 0.138 Small
Perceived Ease of Use of Information 0.351 0.26
Information Quality of Information 0.064 Small
Information Credibility of Information 0.301 Medium
Perceived Usefulness of Information 0.209 0.116
Information Quality of Information 0.045 Small
Information Credibility of Information 0.127 Small
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272926.t005
as a context creates an extended framework of TAM, which has enhanced the model’s predic-
tive ability (R2 = 37%).
The eWOM information quality significantly affects information usefulness and ease of use
which is relevant to the previous studies [93–95]. The eWOM information quality significantly
affects information usefulness and ease of use which is relevant to the previous studies [93–
95]. With regard to the online-based platform, users are more willing to take advantage of
information quality if they believe that the system delivers clear, comprehensible, and current
information and the content is of high quality [96]. The results from the structural equation
model also indicated that the eWOM information credibility significantly affects information
usefulness and ease of use which is significant to earlier studies [97]. The credibility of the pro-
vided information is crucial for improving the benefit of a delivery channel when information
overflow makes selection challenging for consumers, and consumers feel that if an online plat-
form is convenient and efficient, it has the ability to manage successful transactions [93]. Infor-
mation on social media is primarily commercialized, making verifying information’s quality,
traceability, and credibility difficult. Therefore, reviews on social media platforms greatly assist
online users in determining the traceability, authenticity, and quality of online businesses,
which in turn encourage them to make a decision. In addition to the reviews provided by con-
sumers, the firm’s engagement in social media communication will help improve its credibility
in affecting consumer perceptions [98].
As hypothesized, perceived ease of use had a statistically significant positive effect on behav-
ioral intention to order in social media based on an eWOM review [97, 99]. The result shows
that customers with a positive mindset towards adopting new technologies and who believe
that technologies are simple to use may enhance their interest in technology adoption. And if
the actual content is simple and fast retrievable, young consumers become more interested in
staying on the platform. Thus, they will likely continue adopting it [97]. From the outcomes of
this study, it has also been revealed that PEU positively influences users’ behavioral intention,
which is consistent with previous research studies [73, 100]. Young consumers will enjoy shar-
ing eWOM on social networks if the social media content is simple and easy to use, combines
consumer-focused technology with socialization patterns, and doesn’t limit capabilities for
users to post, share, and maintain relationships [2].
Perceived usefulness is significantly related to information adoption, which is significant to
previous studies [101–103]. The perceived usefulness of harnessing social media in accom-
plishing tasks may be interpreted as the adoption of information by users that would help
them better complete their tasks [104]. Information that is useful is considered the critical
determining factor influencing individuals to adopt that information [101, 102]. Again, per-
ceived usefulness is significantly associated with behavioral intention [105]. In particular,
while communicating on the eWOM platform, its usefulness substantially influences people’s
perception of using technology and their intention to adopt eWOM [106]. Individuals using
social networks are introduced to a large volume of eWOM information, which might lead to
a higher inclination to incorporate information that seems beneficial to them [71].
Furthermore, it has been noted that information adoption is significantly and positively
related to online purchase intention, which supports earlier studies [71, 107]. Information
adoption is commonly acknowledged as something that will enable or hinder decisions [108].
The usefulness of information is crucial in purchasing decisions since it aids consumers in
determining and understanding products, services, and associated aspects of their purchasing
decisions [102]. When individuals adopt information about the rival brand and the attributes
and benefits of a product or service, this enhances their buying decisions since it facilitates
them in evaluating their options [107]. The finding revealed that information adoption partly
mediates the suggested relationship [107].
In comparison to direct effects, the mediation analysis revealed that the impact of perceived
ease of use and perceived usefulness on behavioral intention was mediated by information
adoption. Although the contrast between the direct effects of perceived ease of use and per-
ceived usefulness on behavioral intention and the indirect effects through information adop-
tion indicates that the indirect effect was lower, however, the partial mediation and significant
relationship reveal that information adoption has a significant role in affecting consumers’
behavioral intention. Overall, the results of the current study point to the importance of
eWOM contents in social media, i.e., quality and credibility, as well as to perceived usefulness
and ease of use associated with information adoption, which eventually affects behavioral
intention toward ordering in social media based on eWOM review.
The current research findings offer the marketing managers a viewpoint to realize the sig-
nificance of the effect of eWOM information on online purchase intention among social
media users. As this research reports that online purchase intention among social media users
is connected with eWOM information, hence it does indicate that marketers create brands by
leveraging social media platforms. The research findings suggest that both eWOM information
credibility and quality enhance the ease of use and usefulness of eWOM information that
would affect adoption and purchase intention. So, marketers need to place reliable and quality
information about their products or services on social media websites so that it might lead to
developing a better impression in online consumers’ mindsets. To enhance the online con-
sumers’ likelihood to purchase, marketers should focus on uploading useful and understand-
able content to promote their product/services on social media websites to enhance online
consumers’ propensity to buy the product. Social media users usually seek more information
before making a purchase decision online; thus, business firms may think of developing fan
pages to share the latest update about product/service and presenting genuine and complete
information to online consumers on social media websites. Furthermore, business managers
and marketers should close track and monitor the consumer-generated eWOM on social
media to keep themselves updated about consumers’ current viewpoints. To do this, business
firms can hire online customer managers, who will assist online consumers by providing help-
ful, authentic, trustworthy, quality, and intelligible information as per consumer’s require-
ments so that consumers would provide positive eWOM about the company or product,
which will affect other consumers’ purchasing behaviors on social media websites.
university students in Bangladesh, which might not represent the entire population. Thus, con-
sidering samples from different age groups in future studies would be more helpful in produc-
ing more reflective and generalizable findings. Also, age can be regarded as a moderating
variable to capture the differential age effect on the relationship between eWOM information
and online consumer behavior. Finally, the study has drawn samples from Bangladeshi univer-
sity students; hence future studies may adopt samples from developing and developed coun-
tries to understand the influence of cultural differences on the relationship between
determinants of eWOM information and social media consumer behavior. Also, to generate a
greater degree of generalization of the study findings, the current study has not solely focused
on a particular product category which might also be considered a limitation of the study.
Future studies might consider the specific product category to reveal the impact of eWOM-
related characteristics on consumer buying behavior.
Supporting information
S1 Dataset.
(CSV)
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: H. M. Kamrul Hassan, Ahmed Al Asheq.
Data curation: Md. Atikur Rahaman, H. M. Kamrul Hassan.
Formal analysis: Md. Atikur Rahaman, H. M. Kamrul Hassan, Ahmed Al Asheq.
Funding acquisition: Md. Atikur Rahaman.
Investigation: H. M. Kamrul Hassan.
Methodology: H. M. Kamrul Hassan, Ahmed Al Asheq.
Project administration: Md. Atikur Rahaman, H. M. Kamrul Hassan.
Resources: Md. Atikur Rahaman.
Software: Md. Atikur Rahaman, H. M. Kamrul Hassan.
Supervision: H. M. Kamrul Hassan.
Validation: Md. Atikur Rahaman, H. M. Kamrul Hassan, K. M. Anwarul Islam.
Visualization: Md. Atikur Rahaman, H. M. Kamrul Hassan, K. M. Anwarul Islam.
Writing – original draft: H. M. Kamrul Hassan, Ahmed Al Asheq.
Writing – review & editing: Md. Atikur Rahaman, Ahmed Al Asheq, K. M. Anwarul Islam.
References
1. Ngarmwongnoi C., Oliveira J. S., AbedRabbo M., & Mousavi S. (2020). The implications of eWOM
adoption on the customer journey. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(7), 749–759.
2. Bilal M., Jianqiu Z., Dukhaykh S., Fan M., & Trunk A. (2021). Understanding the Effects of eWOM
Antecedents on Online Purchase Intention in China. Information, 12(5), 192.
3. Liu S. Q., Ozanne M., & Mattila A. S. (2018). Does expressing subjectivity in online reviews enhance
persuasion? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35(4), 403–413.
4. Hennig-Thurau T., Gwinner K. P., Walsh G., & Gremler D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via
consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?
Journal of interactive marketing, 18(1), 38–52.
5. Doh S. J., & Hwang J. S. (2009). How consumers evaluate eWOM (electronic word-of-mouth) mes-
sages. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 12(2), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0109 PMID:
19072076
6. Tien D. H., Rivas A. A. A., & Liao Y. K. (2019). Examining the influence of customer-to-customer elec-
tronic word-of-mouth on purchase intention in social networking sites. Asia Pacific Management
Review, 24(3), 238–249.
7. Jiang G., Liu F., Liu W., Liu S., Chen Y., & Xu D. (2021). Effects of information quality on information
adoption on social media review platforms: Moderating role of perceived risk. Data Science and Man-
agement, 1(1), 13–22.
8. Wang S., Cunningham N. R., & Eastin M. S. (2015). The impact of eWOM message characteristics on
the perceived effectiveness of online consumer reviews. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 15(2),
151–159.
9. See-To E. W., & Ho K. K. (2014). Value co-creation and purchase intention in social network sites: The
role of electronic Word-of-Mouth and trust–A theoretical analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 31,
182–189.
10. Erkan I., & Evans C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase inten-
tions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47–55.
11. Erkan I., & Evans C. (2018). Social media or shopping websites? The influence of eWOM on consum-
ers’ online purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(6), 617–632.
12. Zha X., Yang H., Yan Y., Liu K., & Huang C. (2018). Exploring the effect of social media information
quality, source credibility and reputation on informational fit-to-task: Moderating role of focused immer-
sion. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 227–237.
13. Roy G., Datta B., & Mukherjee S. (2019). Role of electronic word-of-mouth content and valence in influ-
encing online purchase behavior. Journal of Marketing Communications, 25(6), 661–684.
14. Leong C. M., Loi A. M. W., & Woon S. (2021). The influence of social media eWOM information on pur-
chase intention. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 1–13.
15. Anubha (2021). Mediating role of attitude in halal cosmetics purchase intention: an ELM perspective.
Journal of Islamic Marketing, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-
2021-0112
16. Cheung C. M., & Thadani D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A liter-
ature analysis and integrative model. Decision support systems, 54(1), 461–470.
17. Knoll J. (2016). Advertising in social media: a review of empirical evidence. International journal of
Advertising, 35(2), 266–300.
18. Sardar A., Manzoor A., Shaikh K. A., & Ali L. (2021). An Empirical Examination of the Impact of eWom
Information on Young Consumers’ Online Purchase Intention: Mediating Role of eWom Information
Adoption. SAGE Open, 11(4), 1–12.
19. Song B. L., Liew C. Y., Sia J. Y., & Gopal K. (2021). Electronic word-of-mouth in travel social network-
ing sites and young consumers’ purchase intentions: an extended information adoption model. Young
Consumers. 22(4), 521–538.
20. Humida T., Al Mamun M. H., & Keikhosrokiani P. (2021). Predicting behavioral intention to use e-learn-
ing system: A case-study in Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh. Education and Informa-
tion Technologies, 1–25.
21. Hafez M. (2021). The Role of Social Media Marketing on Overall Brand Equity in the Telecommunica-
tion Sector in Bangladesh: A Moderated Mediation Model of Brand Love and Value Co-Creation. Inter-
national Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 12(3), 1–15.
22. Eti I. A., Horaira M. A., & Bari M. M. (2021). Power and stimulus of social media marketing on con-
sumer purchase intention in Bangladesh during the COVID-19. International Journal of Research in
Business and Social Science, 10(1), 28–37.
23. Sarker P. M., & Khayer A. (2021). Factors Affecting Bangladeshi Customers’ Intention to Adopt Social
Shopping: A Partial Least Square (PLS) Approach. BUFT Journal of Business & Economics, 2, 115–
133.
24. Al Amin M., Nowsin N., Hossain I., & Bala T. (2020). Impact of social media on consumer buying
behaviour through online value proposition: A study on e-commerce business in Bangladesh. BUFT
Journal of Business & Economics, 1, 209–228.
25. Gvili Y., & Levy S. (2018). Consumer engagement with eWOM on social media: The role of social capi-
tal. Online Information Review, 42(4), 482–505.
26. Herrero A., & Martı́nez P. (2021). Determinants of electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites
about negative news on CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(3), 583–597.
27. Zhou S., Yan Q., Yan M., & Shen C. (2020). Tourists’ emotional changes and eWOM behavior on
social media and integrated tourism websites. International Journal of Tourism Research, 22(3), 336–
350.
28. Barreda A. A., Bilgihan A., Nusair K., & Okumus F. (2015). Generating brand awareness in online
social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 600–609.
29. Alboqami H., Al-Karaghouli W., Baeshen Y., Erkan I., Evans C., & Ghoneim A. (2015). Electronic word
of mouth in social media: the common characteristics of retweeted and favourited marketer-generated
content posted on Twitter. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 9(4), 338–358.
30. Bronner F., & De Hoog R. (2011). Vacationers and eWOM: who posts, and why, where, and what?
Journal of travel research, 50(1), 15–26.
31. Nonaka I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1),
14–37.
32. Watts S., & Wyner G. (2011). Designing and theorizing the adoption of mobile technology-mediated
ethical consumption tools. Information Technology & People, 24(3), 257–280.
33. Zhu D. H., Chang Y. P., & Luo J. J. (2016). Understanding the influence of C2C communication on pur-
chase decision in online communities from a perspective of information adoption model. Telematics
and Informatics, 33(1), 8–16.
34. Sussman S. W., & Siegal W. S. (2003). Informational influence in organizations: An integrated
approach to knowledge adoption. Information systems research, 14(1), 47–65.
35. Petty R. E., & Cacioppo J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion Communication
and persuasion (pp. 1–24): Springer.
36. Davis F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information
technology. MIS quarterly, 319–340.
37. Shen X. L., Cheung C. M., & Lee M. K. (2013). What leads students to adopt information from W ikipe-
dia? An empirical investigation into the role of trust and information usefulness. British Journal of Edu-
cational Technology, 44(3), 502–517.
38. Shu M., & Scott N. (2014). Influence of social media on Chinese students’ choice of an overseas study
destination: An information adoption model perspective. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 31
(2), 286–302.
39. Khwaja M. G., Mahmood S., & Jusoh A. (2020). Online information bombardment! How does eWOM
on social media lead to consumer purchase intentions? International Journal of Grid and Utility Com-
puting, 11(6), 857–867.
40. Kamal S. A., Shafiq M., & Kakria P. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through
an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society, 60, 101212.
41. Lee H., Kim J. W., & Hackney R. (2011). Knowledge hoarding and user acceptance of online discus-
sion board systems in eLearning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1431–1437.
42. Park E., & Kim K. J. (2014). An integrated adoption model of mobile cloud services: exploration of key
determinants and extension of technology acceptance model. Telematics and Informatics, 31(3),
376–385.
43. Özkan S., Bindusara G., & Hackney R. (2010). Facilitating the adoption of e-payment systems: theo-
retical constructs and empirical analysis. Journal of enterprise information management, 23(3), 305–
325.
44. Tarhini A., Arachchilage N. A. G., & Abbasi M. S. (2015). A critical review of theories and models of
technology adoption and acceptance in information system research. International Journal of Technol-
ogy Diffusion (IJTD), 6(4), 58–77.
45. Alenazy W. M., Al-Rahmi W. M., & Khan M. S. (2019). Validation of TAM model on social media use
for collaborative learning to enhance collaborative authoring. IEEE Access, 7, 71550–71562.
46. Kumar V. R., Lall A., & Mane T. (2017). Extending the TAM model: Intention of management students
to use mobile banking: Evidence from India. Global Business Review, 18(1), 238–249.
47. Elwalda A., Lü K., & Ali M. (2016). Perceived derived attributes of online customer reviews. Computers
in Human Behavior, 56, 306–319.
48. Chen C. C., & Chang Y. C. (2018). What drives purchase intention on Airbnb? Perspectives of con-
sumer reviews, information quality, and media richness. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1512–
1523.
49. Dancer H., Filieri R., & Grundy D. (2014). eWOM in online customer support communities: Key vari-
ables in information quality and source credibility. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Prac-
tice, 15(4), 290–305.
50. Savolainen R. (2011). Judging the quality and credibility of information in Internet discussion forums.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1243–1256.
51. Filieri R., & McLeay F. (2014). E-WOM and accommodation: An analysis of the factors that influence
travelers’ adoption of information from online reviews. Journal of travel research, 53(1), 44–57.
52. Zheng Y., Zhao K., & Stylianou A. (2013). The impacts of information quality and system quality on
users’ continuance intention in information-exchange virtual communities: An empirical investigation.
Decision support systems, 56, 513–524.
53. Kim M. J., Chung N., Lee C.-K., & Preis M. W. (2016). Dual-route of persuasive communications in
mobile tourism shopping. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 293–308.
54. Lee S. W., Sung H. J., & Jeon H. M. (2019). Determinants of continuous intention on food delivery
apps: extending UTAUT2 with information quality. Sustainability, 11(11), 3141.
55. Yin C., Sun Y., Fang Y., & Lim K. (2018). Exploring the dual-role of cognitive heuristics and the moder-
ating effect of gender in microblog information credibility evaluation. Information Technology & People,
31(3). 741–769.
56. Chen X., Tao D., & Zhou Z. (2019). Factors affecting reposting behaviour using a mobile phone-based
user-generated-content online community application among Chinese young adults. Behaviour &
Information Technology, 38(2), 120–131.
57. Cheng, X., & Zhou, M. (2010). Study on effect of eWOM: A literature review and suggestions for future
research. Paper presented at the 2010 International conference on management and service science.
58. Verhellen Y., Dens N., & De Pelsmacker P. (2013). Consumer responses to brands placed in youtube
movies: The effect of prominence and endorser expertise. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research,
14(4), 287–303.
59. Song S., Zhang Y., & Yu B. (2020). Interventions to support consumer evaluation of online health infor-
mation credibility: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 104321. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104321 PMID: 33202372
60. Hajli N. (2018). Ethical environment in the online communities by information credibility: a social media
perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 799–810.
61. Sweeney J. C., Soutar G. N., & Mazzarol T. (2012). Word of mouth: measuring the power of individual
messages. European Journal of Marketing, 46(1/2), 237–257.
62. Matute J., Polo-Redondo Y., & Utrillas A. (2016). The influence of EWOM characteristics on online
repurchase intention: Mediating roles of trust and perceived usefulness. Online Information Review.
63. Yeap J. A., Ignatius J., & Ramayah T. (2014). Determining consumers’ most preferred eWOM platform
for movie reviews: A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 31,
250–258.
64. Li C. Y. (2013). Persuasive messages on information system acceptance: A theoretical extension of
elaboration likelihood model and social influence theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 264–
275.
65. Hajiheydari N., & Ashkani M. (2018). Mobile application user behavior in the developing countries: A
survey in Iran. Information Systems, 77, 22–33.
66. Qashou A. (2021). Influencing factors in M-learning adoption in higher education. Education and infor-
mation technologies, 26(2), 1755–1785.
67. Al-Emran M., & Teo T. (2020). Do knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing really affect e-learn-
ing adoption? An empirical study. Education and information technologies, 25(3), 1983–1998.
68. Bonn M. A., Kim W. G., Kang S., & Cho M. (2016). Purchasing wine online: The effects of social influ-
ence, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and wine involvement. Journal of Hospitality Mar-
keting & Management, 25(7), 841–869.
69. de Luna I. R., Liébana-Cabanillas F., Sánchez-Fernández J., & Munoz-Leiva F. (2019). Mobile pay-
ment is not all the same: The adoption of mobile payment systems depending on the technology
applied. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 931–944.
70. Cheung C. M., Lee M. K., & Rabjohn N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption
of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet research, 146, 931–944.
71. Abedi E., Ghorbanzadeh D., & Rahehagh A. (2019). Influence of eWOM information on consumers’
behavioral intentions in mobile social networks: Evidence of Iran. Journal of Advances in Management
Research, 17(1), 84–109.
72. Kucukusta D., Law R., Besbes A., & Legohérel P. (2015). Re-examining perceived usefulness and
ease of use in online booking: The case of Hong Kong online users. International Journal of Contempo-
rary Hospitality Management, 27(2), 185–198.
73. Moslehpour M., Pham V. K., Wong W.-K., & Bilgiçli İ. (2018). E-purchase intention of Taiwanese con-
sumers: Sustainable mediation of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Sustainability, 10
(1), 234.
74. Ventre I., & Kolbe D. (2020). The impact of perceived usefulness of online reviews, trust and perceived
risk on online purchase intention in emerging markets: A Mexican perspective. Journal of International
Consumer Marketing, 32(4), 287–299.
75. Daowd A., Hasan R., Eldabi T., Rafi-ul-Shan P. M., Cao D., & Kasemsarn N. (2020). Factors affecting
eWOM credibility, information adoption and purchase intention on Generation Y: a case from Thailand.
Journal of enterprise information management, 34(3), 838–859.
76. Yusuf A. S., & Busalim A. H. (2018). Influence of e-WOM engagement on consumer purchase inten-
tion in social commerce. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(4), 493–504.
77. Choi Y. (2021). A Study of the Antecedents of e-WOM in Social Commerce Platform. International
Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), 12(1), 62–76.
78. Liao S.-H., Hu D.-C., Chung Y.-C., & Huang A.-P. (2021). Risk and opportunity for online purchase
intention–A moderated mediation model investigation. Telematics and Informatics, 62, 101621.
79. Rimadias S., Herlambang A., Muladi A., & Dharma H. (2021). The role of E-WOM in social media on
purchase intention on the Shopee e-commerce platform in Indonesia Synergizing Management, Tech-
nology and Innovation in Generating Sustainable and Competitive Business Growth (pp. 93–98):
Routledge.
80. Gray D. E. (2013). Doing Research in the Real World: Sage Publishing Ltd.
81. Collis J., & Hussey R. (2013). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgradu-
ate students: Macmillan International Higher Education.
82. Hanzaee K. H., & Esmaeilpour F. (2017). Effect of restaurant reward programs on customers’ loyalty:
evidence from Iran. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(1), 140–155.
83. Etikan I., Musa S. A., & Alkassim R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive
sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
84. Park D.-H., Lee J., & Han I. (2007). The effect of online consumer reviews on consumer purchasing
intention: The moderating role of involvement. International journal of electronic commerce, 11(4),
125–148.
85. Prendergast G., Ko D., & Siu Yin V. Y. (2010). Online word of mouth and consumer purchase inten-
tions. International journal of Advertising, 29(5), 687–708.
86. Fang Y. H. (2014). Beyond the credibility of electronic word of mouth: Exploring eWOM adoption on
social networking sites from affective and curiosity perspectives. International journal of electronic
commerce, 18(3), 67–102.
87. Coyle J. R., & Thorson E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web
marketing sites. Journal of advertising, 30(3), 65–77.
88. Bagozzi R. P., & Yi Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation mod-
els. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(1), 8–34.
89. Musil C. M., Jones S. L., & Warner C. D. (1998). Structural equation modeling and its relationship to
multiple regression and factor analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 21(3), 271–281. https://doi.org/
10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199806)21:3<271::aid-nur10>3.0.co;2-g PMID: 9609512
90. Hair J. F. Jr, Hult G. T. M., Ringle C. M., & Sarstedt M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares struc-
tural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): Sage publications.
91. Fornell C., & Larcker D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables
and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39–50.
92. Henseler J., Ringle C. M., & Sarstedt M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in
variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1),
115–135.
93. Kang J.-W., & Namkung Y. (2019). The role of personalization on continuance intention in food service
mobile apps: A privacy calculus perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Man-
agement, 31(2), 734–752.
94. Riana D., Hidayanto A. N., Hadianti S., & Napitupulu D. (2021). Integrative Factors of E-Health Labora-
tory Adoption: A Case of Indonesia. Future Internet, 13(2), 26.
95. Spatar D., Kok O., Basoglu N., & Daim T. (2019). Adoption factors of electronic health record systems.
Technology in Society, 58, 101144.
96. Roca J. C., Chiu C.-M., & Martı́nez F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An
extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of human-computer studies, 64
(8), 683–696.
97. Filieri R., Acikgoz F., Ndou V., & Dwivedi Y. (2020). Is TripAdvisor still relevant? The influence of
review credibility, review usefulness, and ease of use on consumers’ continuance intention. Interna-
tional Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(1), 199–223.
98. Šerić M., & Praničević D. G. (2018). Consumer-generated reviews on social media and brand relation-
ship outcomes in the fast-food chain industry. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 27(2),
218–238.
99. Cho Y. C., & Sagynov E. (2015). Exploring factors that affect usefulness, ease of use, trust, and pur-
chase intention in the online environment. International Journal of Management & Information Systems
(IJMIS), 19(1), 21–36.
100. Chua E. L., Chiu J. L., & Chiu C. L. (2020). Factors influencing trust and behavioral intention to use
Airbnb service innovation in three ASEAN countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entre-
preneurship, 14(2), 175–188.
101. Hussain S., Ahmed W., Jafar R. M. S., Rabnawaz A., & Jianzhou Y. (2017). eWOM source credibility,
perceived risk and food product customer’s information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 66,
96–102.
102. Shen X. L., Zhang K. Z., & Zhao S. J. (2016). Herd behavior in consumers’ adoption of online reviews.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2754–2765.
103. Zhang J., Ito N., Wu W., & Li Z. (2017). “Don’t Let Me Think!” Chinese Adoption of Travel Information
on Social Media: Moderating Effects of Self-disclosure Information and Communication Technologies
in Tourism 2017 (pp. 639–653): Springer.
104. Ayeh J. K. (2015). Travellers’ acceptance of consumer-generated media: An integrated model of tech-
nology acceptance and source credibility theories. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 173–180.
105. Israel K., Zerres C., & Tscheulin D. K. (2019). Presenting hotels in virtual reality: does it influence the
booking intention? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 10(3), 473–493.
106. Yang F. X. (2017). Effects of restaurant satisfaction and knowledge sharing motivation on eWOM
intentions: the moderating role of technology acceptance factors. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism
Research, 41(1), 93–127.
107. Dang V. T., Wang J., & Vu T. T. (2020). An integrated model of the younger generation’s online shop-
ping behavior based on empirical evidence gathered from an emerging economy. PloS one, 15(5),
e0232213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232213 PMID: 32374783
108. Zhao J., Wang J., Fang S., & Jin P. (2018). Towards sustainable development of online communities
in the big data era: A study of the causes and possible consequence of voting on user reviews. Sus-
tainability, 10(9), 3156.