The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology

ISSN 2616-7433 Vol. 6, Issue 6: 12-18, DOI: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060603

The impact of artificial intelligence on people's daily

life
Yunxin Du
The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, The United Kingdom

Abstract: This study uses empiricism and quantitative methods to analyze how AI impacts daily life,
exploring potential threats, coexistence, and collaboration with humans, along with AI applications. An
online survey with a “Likert scale” targeted individuals aged 18+, using QR codes and links. SPSS
20.0 analyzed the data, revealing AI’s positive influence in work, education, and daily applications.
While AI affects job displacement, its overall impact is minor outside of work. The study suggests
promising adaptation, coexistence, and collaboration between AI and humans, pointing towards a
positive future direction.

Keywords: AI applications, Ethics, Coexistence, Daily Life, Education, Work, Study, Technology,
Substitution

1. Introduction

1.1 Project Background

In the realm of modern technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a pivotal force,
reshaping various facets of society. From the automation of mundane tasks to the enhancement of
complex decision-making processes, AI has seeped into the very fabric of our daily lives. As we stand
on the brink of a new era, characterized by the convergence of human intellect and machine capabilities,
it is imperative to delve into the profound ways AI is influencing our existence.

1.2 Research Motivation

The motivation for this research emanates from the recognition of AI as a transformative agent with
the potential to significantly alter our work, learning, and personal lives. While the discourse on AI
often focuses on its technological advancements and system-specific impacts, there is a conspicuous
gap in understanding its broader implications on human life. This research aims to address this void by
exploring the intricate relationship between AI and the everyday lives of individuals.

1.3 Problem Statement

The primary issues this research intends to address include:

 The extent to which AI applications across various domains affect different groups of people in
their daily lives.
 The potential substitution threats AI poses to current and future human tasks and roles.
 The challenges and opportunities associated with the future coexistence and collaboration
between AI and humans.
 The overarching trends in AI development and their projected impact on various aspects of
human life.

1.4 Research Aims and Objectives

This study is designed with the following aims and objectives:

 To examine the hypothesis that AI has both positive and negative impacts on daily life.
 To analyze the potential threats AI poses to human coexistence and collaboration.

Published by Francis Academic Press, UK

-12-
 The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology
ISSN 2616-7433 Vol. 6, Issue 6: 12-18, DOI: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060603

 To identify areas where AI is likely to be integrated into everyday life.

 To broaden the understanding of AI development and application for the betterment of humanity.

2. Main Text

2.1 The extent to which AI applications across various domains affect different groups of people in
their daily lives

In the medical field, machine learning methods are applied in various areas such as neurology,
ophthalmology, oncology, etc., assisting doctors in predicting patients’ health outcomes and facilitating
research and evaluation of diagnostic methods [1]. IBM Watson technology aids in analyzing and
managing medical data, MRI technology provides high-quality imaging data for patients, and Doctor
AI offers fast and accurate medical advice and diagnoses for patients [22][28][42].
In the leisure and entertainment domain, collaborative filtering (CF) technology recommends
personalized songs in music software based on individual preferences. AI techniques combined with
the Minimax algorithm can provide near-perfect strategies for online board game players [30].
Additionally, there are AI movie recommendation systems integrating ABC (Artificial Bee Colony)
and k-means algorithms [6][19].
In the business sector, Open Data Nation (ODN) collects data on the behavior of millions of
individuals and businesses to predict issues and provide insurance underwriters with highly accurate
risk scores through machine learning models [43]. RPA technology enhances the efficiency of
shopping bots, while AI in CRM improves service efficiency and profitability for enterprises [15][33].
In the field of education, Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) and Adaptive Hypermedia Systems
(AHS) offer timely personalized classroom teaching for students, aiding them in mastering knowledge
more effectively [18]. AI-assisted learning (AI-AL) technology provides personalized learning plans
through advanced data analysis [5][14].
However, some pessimists argue that the application of AI in work and life may lead to a decrease
in available human jobs and an increase in wealth inequality among different societal groups [27].
Concerns about “technological unemployment” arise with AI applications in the workplace,
particularly in manufacturing where robot applications reduce employment, posing a threat to current
American workers by as much as 47% [9][10].
In the realm of learning, such as adaptive learning, there may be limitations on students’ perceptual
choices and interests, especially when assistance is excessive [8]. Furthermore, AI technologies like
IBM Watson may not guarantee alignment of learning objectives with students’ individual learning
styles, potentially leading to a decline in learning interests. Additionally, the application of AI in
non-work settings, such as unsupervised contexts, may pose potential threats to society, for example
through fraudulent activities like phishing using AI techniques to steal personal information.

2.2 The potential substitution threats AI poses to current and future human tasks and roles

AI exhibits capabilities surpassing humans in decision-making, particularly in achieving

quantifiable objectives [32]. Jarrahi (2018) notes that human-AI collaborative decision-making
significantly reduces error rates, for instance, decreasing errors by 85% in the diagnosis of lymph node
cancer cells [17]. Research by Locsin and Ito (2018) indicates that humanoid robots are more accurate
and efficient than humans in task execution, potentially leading to AI replacing low-skilled jobs
[25][41]. However, AI lacks human self-awareness, understanding, and control abilities, as Lu, Li,
Chen, Kim and Serikawa (2018) argue that AI can only operate effectively in specific domains, such as
the application of deep neural networks (DNN) or recurrent neural networks (RNN) in speech
recognition [23].
In the field of education, AI educational models enhance students’ practical analysis and innovation
skills with intelligent tools like machine learning [40]. ‘robotic tutoring’ can serve as a substitute for
teachers, offering round-the-clock interdisciplinary course guidance [31]. However, the effectiveness of
AI in enhancing students’ soft skills is limited, and online education lacking face-to-face interaction
may not improve learning efficiency for all students [24][26].
In non-work life, AI such as Google Duplex can perform simple interactive tasks, AlphaGo

Published by Francis Academic Press, UK

-13-
 The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology
ISSN 2616-7433 Vol. 6, Issue 6: 12-18, DOI: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060603

surpasses humans in the gaming realm, and Smart Travel Assistants (STTs) can create personalized
travel plans based on individual data [16]. However, the application of STTs requires travelers' consent
to safeguard their privacy and data security.
In the face of AI’s substitution potential, McGovern (2018) asserts that embracing and learning to
apply AI is the only way to avoid being replaced [29]. Frey and Osborne (2017) suggest enhancing
human creative thinking and professional skills [10]. Decker, Fischer and Ott (2017) believe that by
developing skills integrated with technological changes, humans can evade potential AI substitution [7].
Berg, Buffie, and Zanna (2018) propose that enhancing abstract reasoning abilities and expanding
unique values can prevent AI substitution [4]. Atalay, Phongthiengtham, Sotelo and Tannenbaum
(2018) argue that by elevating educational levels, humans can strengthen their abilities for
non-traditional analytical tasks, slowing down AI substitution [2]. Kopytov, Roussanov and
Taschereau-Dumouchel (2018) concur that reducing AI substitution can be achieved by acquiring
higher skills [21]. P. Verma (2018) suggests that as long as humans develop capabilities at the same or
faster pace, they won’t be replaced by AI since human data can determine AI [38]. Kaplan and
Haenlein (2019) propose that in order to adapt to the flexibility of future work and avoid the changes in
job types brought about by AI, employees can develop new professional skills through lifelong learning
[20]. Ma and Siau (2018) advocate for providing students with training and opportunities to acquire and
develop soft skills in educational life [26]. Taddeo and Floridi (2018) highlight that in non-work life,
the key to addressing new issues caused by AI is the rational control and use of AI’s value [35].

2.3 The challenges and opportunities associated with the future coexistence and collaboration
between AI and humans

In the future work scenarios, the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is gradually changing
traditional work modes. For instance, AI robots like “Lowry” significantly enhance efficiency and
quality in the clothing manufacturing industry through precise fabric tracking and sewing techniques
[39]. Furthermore, the integration of AI algorithms simplifies workflows, boosts productivity,
especially in the medical field, where AI rapidly processes and analyzes millions of images to assist
doctors in better meeting patient needs [36]. However, as automation levels increase, the labor market
may face challenges since automation could lead to reduced demand for human labor, triggering mass
unemployment issues. Hence, creating new jobs and tasks that combine with AI technology becomes
crucial [3].
In the field of education, AI is becoming a powerful auxiliary tool for language teaching, providing
students with immersive learning experiences through the combination of AR technology and
educational games [13]. AI robots not only enable synchronous online education in different
environments to enhance the effectiveness of distance learning but also strengthen students’
decision-making abilities in multicultural backgrounds through collaboration with educators [24].
Although the prospects for AI in education are extensive, direct involvement and guidance from
teachers remain indispensable in courses requiring practical operations and interpersonal interactions
[37].
In people's non-work lives, the application of AI also shows enormous potential. AI technology can
create highly personalized interactive audio blogs by integrating rich content resources and enhance the
accuracy of identifying the authenticity of masterpieces in the art field through the collection of
extensive datasets [11]. Additionally, AI tools like “intelligent agents” will assist humans in completing
specific creative cognitive tasks such as virtual painting construction [34]. However, as AI’s
application in non-work life deepens, we must also address the ethical and societal issues it raises,
requiring us to apply intelligent technologies reasonably and seek proper solutions [12].

2.4 The overarching trends in AI development and their projected impact on various aspects of
human life

AI development is moving towards AI 2.0 with internet-based collective intelligence. Industrial AI

robots will expand in sectors like chemicals, transportation, and metal processing. Robot numbers will
surge, reaching or surpassing 1:1 ratios globally. Advancements in neural networks, smart tech, and
ethics are vital. Preventing system chaos from design errors is crucial, averting cost losses and
productivity dips.
In education, AI will be widely used for multilingual learning, providing new digital behaviors
through updated language resources, real-time tracking in and out of class, and various translation tools.

Published by Francis Academic Press, UK

-14-
 The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology
ISSN 2616-7433 Vol. 6, Issue 6: 12-18, DOI: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060603

AI’s integration with emotion recognition and advanced speech will enable robot teachers, offering
high-quality, cost-effective education. As computing costs drop and capacity grows, AI will advance
rapidly. AI-driven MOOCs will expand, offering personalized education through student activity data.
Yet, challenges remain in securing private student information in online databases.
In non-work life, AI like neural networks will enhance weather forecasts and optimize microgrid
controls for energy efficiency. In VR gaming, AI will boost immersion, blurring lines between virtual
and real worlds. Smart homes using AI can aid elderly care, but widespread adoption faces hurdles due
to aging demographics and AI complexity.
After a thorough literature review, it’s evident that AI more profoundly affects work life than
learning and personal life. The benefits usually surpass drawbacks, with AI’s substitution effects more
noticeable at work. AI demonstrates heightened adaptability and future growth across daily life,
indicating positive trends ahead.

2.5 Research method

This research uses quantitative methods to analyze AI’s impact on individuals in work, education,
and daily life. Grounded in empirical philosophy, an online questionnaire via “Wenjuanxing” gathered
data objectively. It contained 35 questions on AI basics, applications, attitudes, and expectations.
During the experimental phase, the research team conducted a pilot study, gathering feedback from
15 participants with diverse backgrounds. This feedback facilitated meticulous refinement of the
questionnaire, enhancing its acceptability and data quality. The final questionnaire was distributed
through social media platforms like WeChat, reaching the target sample group successfully. Out of 420
questionnaires distributed, 395 were returned, resulting in 259 valid responses, achieving an effective
response rate of 94% and an efficiency rate of around 66%.
In the data analysis phase, comprehensive statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 20.0
software. Sample analysis revealed that participants predominantly fell within the 25-34 age range
(49.8%), with a majority having attained a bachelor's degree or higher (45.9%) and working as office
employees (69.5%)(See table 1).
Table 1: Basic data analysis of respondents
Respondents
Characteristic variable
number Percentage (%)
Male 116 44.8
Gender
Female 143 55.2
18 to 24 79 30.5
25 to 34 129 49.8
Age
35 to 44 40 15.4
45 or older 11 4.2
Below High school 8 3.1
High school 28 10.8
Education
Secondary school 34 13.1
level
Junior college 70 27.0
Bachelor or above 119 45.9
Student 67 25.9
Occupation Work staff 180 69.5
Non-work staff 12 4.6
Reliability analysis indicated high internal consistency of the questionnaire, with all Cronbach’s α
coefficients exceeding 0.7, demonstrating good reliability.
Validity analysis, conducted through factor analysis, confirmed the structural validity of the
questionnaire, with factor loadings exceeding 0.5 and cumulative variance explained surpassing 60%.
Correlation analysis unveiled significant relationships between AI applications and individuals’
perceptions of its impact. For instance, positive correlations were found between AI application in
work environments and positive impact perceptions (correlation coefficient 0.421), while negative
correlations existed with negative impact perceptions (correlation coefficient -0.512)(see table 2).

Published by Francis Academic Press, UK

-15-
 The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology
ISSN 2616-7433 Vol. 6, Issue 6: 12-18, DOI: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060603

Table 2: Correlation analysis result table of AI application in work environments

AI will have positive AI will have negative
impacts on work life impacts on work life
AI is widely used in work life Correlation 0.421** -0.512**
areas Sig 0.000 0.000
The regression analysis further confirms the positive and negative impacts of artificial intelligence
applications on the quality of work life, with an R-squared value ranging from 0.336 to 0.354,
indicating that the model has a good explanatory power(see table 3).
Table 3: Regression analysis results table of the impacts of AI applied in work life
OLS OLS
AI will have positive impacts on AI will have negative impacts
work life on work life
AI is widely used in work life 0.2310*** -0.1330**
areas 4.450 -2.42
AI is currently applied in daily 0.1251** -0.0471*
work life 2.080 -1.9200
_cons 1.151*** -2.521***
11.450 (-6.48)
R-squared 0.336 0.354
Adi-R-squared 0.321 0.324
F 243.21*** 289.54***
The research findings suggest that AI applications yield both positive and negative effects in work,
education, and non-work life domains. Specifically, in work environments, a significant positive
correlation was observed between AI application and positive impact perceptions (correlation
coefficient 0.421), while a similar correlation was found in non-work life domains (correlation
coefficient 0.365). Furthermore, the emergence of AI substitution phenomena was positively correlated
with attitudes towards avoiding AI substitution (correlation coefficient 0.251 to 0.362).
In conclusion, the study supports the following assertions, AI applications across various life
domains have both positive and negative impacts on human daily life; the emergence of AI substitution
phenomena promotes strategies to mitigate AI substitution; individuals’ attitudes towards AI
applications significantly influence the coexistence and development of AI with human life; and future
trends in AI development hold potential positive and negative impacts on human daily life. These
conclusions provide an empirical foundation for understanding AI’s role in modern society, offer
critical insights for the future development and application of AI technology, and underscore the
importance of considering ethical and societal implications when advancing AI applications.

3. Conclusion

In the conclusion of this study, a comprehensive analysis was conducted incorporating the results of
the questionnaire survey, sample characteristics, AI application domains, validity and reliability
analysis, as well as correlation and regression analyses, leading to a series of clear findings. The
research revealed that although the response rate of the questionnaire survey was high, the effective
response rate was relatively low, possibly due to the length of the questionnaire and the time required
for completion. Sample analysis indicated a slightly higher participation of female individuals
compared to males, with the majority holding at least a bachelor’s degree, and the sample mainly
composed of working professionals. In the domain of AI applications, usage in work environments
surpassed that in learning and non-work settings, possibly due to selection bias. Validity and reliability
analyses indicated good quality of the questionnaire items and a reliable dataset.
Correlation and regression analyses unveiled significant relationships between the perceptions of
the impact of AI applications in work, learning, and non-work settings, with regression analysis
supporting the research hypothesis and confirming the positive impact of AI applications in enhancing
quality of life. Although the application of AI in daily life has brought both positive and negative
impacts, overall, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. People’s acceptance attitudes and adaptive
developments towards AI play a crucial role in the coexistence and collaborative development of AI.
Based on these findings, future research directions and recommendations were proposed. Firstly,

Published by Francis Academic Press, UK

-16-
 The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology
ISSN 2616-7433 Vol. 6, Issue 6: 12-18, DOI: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060603

given the broad spectrum of AI application domains, future studies should delve into representative
domains for in-depth exploration. Secondly, to obtain more accurate analyses of the impacts of AI
applications, it is recommended to broaden the scope of survey participants. Furthermore, based on the
feedback from this study, it is suggested that future research conducts large-scale pilot testing to
optimize questionnaire design, making it more time-efficient, concise, and targeted. Moreover, the
continuous advancement of AI technology necessitates future research to focus on how AI can adapt to
and propel development across different domains, especially in environmental and developmental
analyses. Considering the rapid progression of AI, it is advised that future research delves into the
long-term effects of AI on specific domains or technological applications, as well as its potential to
alter human lifestyles and work practices. Finally, with the ongoing proliferation of AI technology,
future research should consider its ethical and societal impacts to ensure technological developments
align with human values.
Through these conclusions and recommendations, this study provides an empirical basis for
understanding the role of AI in modern society and offers a crucial reference framework for the
development and application of future AI technologies.

References

[1] Atanasov, P., Gauthier, A., & Lopes, R. (2018). Applications of Artificial Intelligence Technologies
In Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review. Value in Health, 21, S84.
[2] Atalay, E., Phongthiengtham, P., Sotelo, S., & Tannenbaum, D. (2018). New technologies and the
labor market. Journal of Monetary Economics, 97, 48-67.
[3] Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: the ambiguous labor market
impact of automating prediction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 31-50.
[4] Berg, A., Buffie, E. F., & Zanna, L. F. (2018). Should we fear the robot revolution?(The correct
answer is yes). Journal of Monetary Economics, 97, 117-148.
[5] Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2019). Education 2.0: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the
Test. Beijing International Review of Education, 1(2-3), 528-543.
[6] Deshmukh, P., & Kale, G. (2018). A survey of music recommendation system. International Journal
of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJSRCSEIT),
3(3), 1721-1729.
[7] Decker, M., Fischer, M., & Ott, I. (2017). Service Robotics and Human Labor: A first technology
assessment of substitution and cooperation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 87, 348-354.
[8] Easterday, M. W., Aleven, V., Scheines, R., & Carver, S. M. (2017). Using tutors to improve
educational games: A cognitive game for policy argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(2),
226-276.
[9] Frank, M. R., Autor, D., Bessen, J., Brynjolfsson, E., Cebrian, M., Deming, D… Rahwan, I. (2019).
Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(14), 6531-6539.
[10] Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to
computerisation. Technological forecasting and social change, 114, 254-280.
[11] Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence, deepfakes and a future of ectypes. Philosophy &
Technology, 31(3), 317-321.
[12] Fogliano, F., Fabbrini, F., Souza, A., Fidélio, G., Machado, J., & Sarra, R. (2019). Edgard, the
Chatbot: Questioning Ethics in the Usage of Artificial Intelligence through Interaction Design and
Electronic Literature. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 11582, 325-341.
[13] Godwin-Jones, R. (2016). Emerging Technologies Augmented Reality and Language Learning:
From annotated vocabulary to place-based mobile games. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3),
9-19.
[14] Goh, W. W. B., & Sze, C. C. (2019). AI Paradigms for Teaching Biotechnology. Trends in
biotechnology, 37(1), 1-5.
[15] Heo, M., & Lee, K. J. (2018). Chatbot as a new business communication tool: The case of naver
talktalk. Business Communication Research and Practice, 1(1), 41-45.
[16] Huang, C. D., Goo, J., Nam, K., & Yoo, C. W. (2017). Smart tourism technologies in travel
planning: The role of exploration and exploitation. Information & Management, 54(6), 757-770.
[17] Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: human-AI symbiosis in
organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577-586.
[18] Kavitha, P., Moorthy, B. K., Sudharshan, P. S., & Aarthi, T. (2018, February). Mapping Artificial
Intelligence and Education. 2018 International Conference on Communication, Computing and

Published by Francis Academic Press, UK

-17-
 The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology
ISSN 2616-7433 Vol. 6, Issue 6: 12-18, DOI: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060603

Internet of Things (IC3IoT), 165-168.

[19] Katarya, R. (2018). Movie recommender system with metaheuristic artificial bee. Neural
Computing and Applications, 30(6), 1983-1990.
[20] Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the
interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1),
15-25.
[21] Kopytov, A., Roussanov, N., & Taschereau-Dumouchel, M. (2018). Short-run pain, long-run gain?
Recessions and technological transformation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 97, 29-44.
[22] Landini, L., Positano, V., & Santarelli, M. (2018). Advanced image processing in magnetic
resonance imaging. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
[23] Lu, H., Li, Y., Chen, M., Kim, H., & Serikawa, S. (2018). Brain intelligence: go beyond artificial
intelligence. Mobile Networks and Applications, 23(2), 368-375.
[24] Lin, P. H., Wooders, A., Wang, J. T. Y., & Yuan, W. M. (2018). Artificial Intelligence, the Missing
Piece of Online Education?. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 46(3), 25-28.
[25] Locsin, R. C., & Ito, H. (2018). Can humanoid nurse robots replace human nurses?. Journal of
Nursing, 5(1), 1.
[26] Ma, Y., & Siau, K. L. (2018). Artificial Intelligence Impacts on Higher Education. In Proceedings
of the Thirteenth Midwest Association for Information Systems Conference, 42, 1-5.
[27] Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on
society and firms. Futures, 90, 46-60.
[28] Mehta, N., & Devarakonda, M. V. (2018). Machine learning, natural language programming, and
electronic health records: The next step in the artificial intelligence journey?. Journal of Allergy and
Clinical Immunology, 141(6), 2019-2021.
[29] McGovern, P. D. (2018). Embracing artificial intelligence is the only way to avoid
obsolescence. Bmj, 363, k5208.
[30] Millington, I. (2019). AI for Games (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[31] Müller, S., Bergande, B., & Brune, P. (2018). Robot Tutoring: On the Feasibility of
UsingCognitive Systems as Tutors in Introductory Programming Education: A Teaching Experiment.
Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference of Software Engineering Education, 45-49.
[32] Parry, K., Cohen, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). Rise of the machines: A critical consideration of
automated leadership decision making in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 41(5),
571-594.
[33] Quan, X. H. I., & Sanderson, J. H. (2018). Understanding the Artificial Intelligence Business
Ecosystem. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 46(4), 22-25.
[34] Samsonovich, A. V. (2018). On semantic map as a key component in socially-emotional
BICA. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 23, 1-6.
[35] Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). How AI can be a force for good. Science, 361(6404), 751-752.
[36] Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial
intelligence. Nature medicine, 25(1), 44.
[37] Verma, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence and its scope in different areas with special reference to
the field of education. Artificial Intelligence, 3(1), 5-10.
[38] Verma, P. (2018). The natural impact of artificial intelligence. International Journal of Critical
Infrastructure Protection, 22, 150-151.
[39] Venkatesh, A. N. (2018). Industry 4.0: Reimagining the Future of Workplace (Five Business Case
Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Robots, Virtual Reality in Five Different
Industries). International Journal of Engineering, Business and Enterprise Applications
(IJEBEA), 26(1), 05-08.
[40] Wartman, S. A., & Combs, C. D. (2018). Medical education must move from the information age
to the age of artificial intelligence. Academic Medicine, 93(8), 1107-1109.
[41] Xu, M., David, J. M., & Kim, S. H. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution: opportunities and
challenges. International journal of financial research, 9(2), 90-95.
[42] Zaninovic, N., Elemento, O., & Rosenwaks, Z. (2019). Artificial intelligence: its applications in
reproductive medicine and the assisted reproductive technologies. Fertility and sterility, 112(1), 28-30.
[43] Zhang, X. P. S., & Kedmey, D. (2018). A Budding Romance: Finance and AI. IEEE MultiMedia,
25(4), 79-83.

Published by Francis Academic Press, UK

-18-