Protocol 3 Math Practices Summary
Protocol 3 Math Practices Summary
2
MP Indicators Students might think or do:
“I tried that approach to solving the problem and it
explain to themselves the meaning of a problem
didn’t work. What’s another way I can try to
look for entry points to its solution
solve it?”
analyze givens, constraints, relationships, and goals
“What’s a useful way to begin working on this
1: Make sense of problems make conjectures about the form and meaning of
problem?”
and persevere in solving the solution
They can set up a series of steps to follow to get
them plan a solution pathway
themselves to the answer.
consider analogous problems
“There’s another problem I’ve done that’s like this
monitor and evaluate progress and change course if that might help me here.”
necessary.
“This isn’t working; I need to try something else.”
“How can I capture important information in a
make sense of quantities and their relationships in diagram or model?”
problem situations “What solution path does this diagram or model
decontextualize -‐ abstract and represent a problem imply?”
situation symbolically and manipulate those symbols “OK, I’ve done all these calculations; now, what
without attending to their referents does that mean in the problem? Does my answer
2: Reason abstractly and
contextualize -‐ pause during problem solving to connect make sense for answering this problem?”
quantitatively
symbolic work back to the context of the problem Given the problem:
Pay attention to the important quantities and There are 3/5 as many boys as girls. If there are 45
relationships between them boys, how many girls are there?,
use representations to highlight those relationships and a student can create a diagram that shows the
the underlying mathematical structure of a problem relationship between the number of boys, of girls,
and of all the children together.
A student can state a rule for a pattern, and can
explain why their rule works for that pattern.
make conjectures and build a logical progression of When someone claims “multiplying two numbers
statements to explore the truth of their conjectures gives you an answer bigger than either the
analyze situations by breaking them into cases numbers,” a student can think about:
3: Construct viable arguments recognize and use counterexamples -‐ what happens when you multiply 2 whole
and critique the reasoning justify conclusions, communicate them to others, numbers;
of others and respond to the arguments of others -‐ what happens when you multiply by a
distinguish correct logic or reasoning from that fraction;
which is flawed, and—if there is a flaw in an argument— -‐ what happens when you multiply 2 fractions
explain what it is as separate possibilities to consider.
© Education Development Center, Inc. 2012 For use with: Protocol #3: Rigorous Mathematics
© Education Development Center, Inc. 2012 For use with: Protocol #3: Rigorous Mathematics