Holistic Approach To Music Education
Holistic Approach To Music Education
This paper originates from a research project investigating the effects of a 'holistic' approach
to music education in the secondary school. It is based upon a case study involving the work
of one secondary school music department where a 'holistic' approach to the music programme
is adopted in that the work in the curriculum at Key Stages 3 and 4 is used as the basis for
extended curricular work. It is concluded that the holistic approach offers an interesting and
in many ways educationally beneficial alternative to the more traditional separatist approach
to the curriculum and extended curriculum
Introduction
In Wales the National Curriculum for music is ordered into three areas of musical
activity contained in the Attainment Targets: Performing, Composing and Appraising.
The revised National Curriculum Order for music (Wales) (Welsh Office, 1995)
advocated a holistic approach to the delivery of the Progammes of Study for these
Attainment Targets. The integrated nature of musical activity was emphasised. It is
argued in this paper that this integration should not apply to work in the classroom
alone. Pupils' musical skills, knowledge and understanding cannot be fully developed
by classroom music making in isolation. For a significant number of pupils, however,
especially those from less affluent backgrounds, their practical involvement in music
making outside the classroom may be very limited or non-existent. The National
Curriculum for music offered an opportunity for schools to extend a holistic approach
to planning for the totality of their pupils' musical experience in school. In many
schools this has been taken no further than planning units of work for the delivery of
the Programmes of Study. The suggestion is made here that an opportunity exists to
extend the holistic approach to music education to embrace all music making activity
within the school.
In the past, the role of the curricular, day to day, music making in schools has
tended to be thought of, and therefore planned for, separately from the extra or
extended curriculum. Extra-curricular music has, by definition, been regarded as
outside the curriculum and therefore outside the province of the class music lesson.
Extended curricular work, whilst implying a continuation of the curriculum, has
similarly often consisted primarily of work with choirs and orchestras. This has often
led to a restriction upon the number and ability range of pupils who can be involved in
these activities and a resultant elitism in extra-curricular activity. Frequently, only the
musical minority within the school, those having access to instrumental or vocal
tuition, are involved to any great extent. A truly holistic approach to the music
programme within the school would present a different scenario. Here, the work in
the curriculum would be the originator of the extended curriculum by, for example,
drawing choral work from class singing activities, taking forward pupils' compositions
for performance at school concerts or adopting a more flexible approach to the
formation of instrumental ensembles so that classroom instrumental work could be
developed. The benefits this work brought in terms of pupils' developing musical
skills, knowledge and understanding would then be felt in the curriculum with a
concomitant raising of standards of achievement. With this approach, a less elitist
music programme could be initiated, one in which a larger number of pupils' musical
education would be furthered.
Since the earliest stages of the formulation of a National Curriculum for music
education in schools, emphasis has been placed on the importance of making school
music accessible to all pupils, yet one area where this philosophy might not be said to
have permeated fully is that of extra-curricular musical activity. Paynter, when
discussing the historical background of the general music curriculum, commented
that in the past: 'direct involvement with the real artistic excitement of music found
no place in the general curriculum and was relegated to out-of-timetable sessions,
mainly for talented instrumentalists' (1992: 10). This situation may be changing with
regard to the main curriculum, but has it changed all that much in extra-curricular
activity? Too often in schools the extra-curricular programme is still mainly the
province of the musically gifted or those with access to individual or small group
instrumental or vocal tuition. We as music teachers so often propound the following
arguments in favour of our subject when fighting for timetabling, resources or just
plain status:
• the developmental benefits of music for children, both physically and emotionally
• the motivational and confidence building aspects of participation in music
• the positive social benefits.
If we take these arguments to their logical conclusion, we are saying that aesthetic
education, including music, is a vital part of children's development and that all
children should have equal access to this education within school. It must then be
obvious that to reap the full benefits from their music education, all pupils should
have access to equal involvement in the music programme outside the classroom as
well as within it. This is not to say that the exceptional musical ability of some children
should be stifled or its development retarded but neither should they be 'hot-housed'
at the expense of the musical experience of the majority.
'How to achieve this Utopia?' is the obvious question which follows. As music
teachers, we are now used to drawing up schemes of work which define the course of
study our pupils are to follow over an entire Key Stage. Units of work are devised
which integrate elements of the Programmes of Study for the three Attainment
Targets and allow for continuity and progression within Key Stage 3, or which fulfil
the requirements of the examination syllabus at Key Stage 4. How about if we took
matters one stage further and thought holistically about the entire musical experience
with which we could provide pupils during that period: if we planned the extra-
curricular with the curriculum, taking as the foundation of the extra-curricular work
that which we aim to begin in the classroom and developing this into our extra-
curricular programme? As Paynter says: 'If we accept that a school teacher's basic
obligation is to contribute to the education of all the pupils, then it is reasonable to see
the classroom and the general music lessons as the point from which everything else
will grow'(1982: 69).
It may be that to adopt this philosophy we will have to take a broader view of the
totality of music within schools but this may lead to surprising developments. As
72
73
classroom could be made apparent to them by its public confirmation within the
extra-curricular programme, perhaps this would go some way towards alleviating the
problem witnessed by so many music teachers: that the subject does not seem of
relevance or importance to pupils' every day lives. So often, classroom music
'repeatedly fails to obtain a general hold on the musical development of the majority
of pupils and is considered by many pupils to be irrelevant to anything that really
concerns them' (ibid: 118).
Fletcher (1987) and Reimer (1989) are among writers who speak of the constant
pressure upon music teachers to fulfil dieir curricular and extra-curricular roles. They
also speak of the outcome of this pressure which is that some areas of work inevitably
are neglected. If one fuses the two areas so that the extra-curricular in fact becomes
the 'extended curriculum'(Moore et al., 1995: 47) the benefits may involve a lessening
of the strain upon music teachers who are no longer trying to reconcile two conflicting
roles but are dealing with the delivery of their subject within the school as an entity.
An ample justification for this approach could be taken from Paynter's comment that;
'like music itself, a curriculum must have an essential unity to which all its elements
relate convincingly' (1992: 20). Why should this statement relate solely to the
classroom curriculum? Why should it not be taken to describe the work of the
department in total?
This unified approach is also given support by the National Curriculum: 'activities
are often referred to as extra-curricular. Where the activities are part of a school's
policy and curriculum intention, the term 'extended curriculum' is more precise and
appropriate' (Moore et al., 1995,: 47); and 'pupils should be given opportunities to
use sounds and respond to music as individuals, in pairs, in groups and as a class. The
corporate nature of music-making is thus underlined and the wide range of activities
in curriculum and extended curriculum opportunities are embraced by the National
Curriculum' (Stephens, 1995: 7). The communal approach to extended curricular
work may, and indeed should, lead to pupils taking the initiative in originating ideas
for the extended curriculum. As Adams et al. state: 'activities and tasks may be
initiated by pupils as well as teachers' (1995: 31).
The holistic approach, developing music from the classroom outwards, has
particular benefits for the composition part of the programme. The public approval of
a piece of music composed in class can work wonders for a student's self-esteem.
This, in turn, can transform a previously uncooperative pupil into a motivated and
enthusiastic class member:
among the greatest virtues the arts offer is the rise in self-esteem that comes from
creation. As a student struggles to express him/herself or communicate through
the arts, that sense of identity eliminates the desire to be noticed in less attractive
ways. (Gulbenkian, 1982: 78)
If composers in the real world compose for an audience, why should we downgrade
the composition work of our pupils to the status of only being good enough for the
classroom. Certainly, we are focusing on process in the majority of our classroom
composition work but there should also be a place for the products of this work to be
displayed to a wider audience than merely the peer group, just as art work is displayed
around schools, this place is surely the school concert. The process then becomes
cyclical, as Swanwick explains: 'Because products are the public, essential means of
sharing experience we gain feedback and reinforcement which stimulates and moti-
vates us. This is crucial for further development' (1979: 107). This may mean that we
have to accept what Small (1977) describes as 'a lowering of standards in skill
74
75
76
the talent and motivation to join in was not to be an option. This also had an effect on
the allocation of funding for peripatetic tuition as it was decided to focus on areas
which would be of most use to the total work of the music department, hence the
employment of voice and jazz teachers.
There is always an element of 'cutting one's coat according to one's cloth' in every
music teacher's job and the manner in which this holistic philosophy can be
implemented will vary widely according to the school and its philosophy. As Fletcher
says: 'The role of the secondary school music teacher depends fundamentally on the
type of children with whom he or she is dealing and the philosophy of the school that
houses them'(1987: 135).
What follows is a brief description of the approach one music department adopted
when preparing for a performance at the end of the autumn term 1996, in an attempt
to implement a holistic philosophy given their school's own particular children and
philosophy. The central tenet was to try to involve as many pupils of as wide a range
of abilities as possible and to carry forward for performance work from the classroom,
wherever possible.
Choral work
The choral work is integrated into the main music curriculum by selecting vocal
pieces for the performing elements of some units of work which can subsequently be
worked on as choral pieces in the extended curriculum. All classes are taught the
songs to be performed at concerts as part of their music lessons. Year groups are then
rehearsed separately at lunchtimes and, in the final weeks before a concert, all those
pupils who have attended year group rehearsals are combined and rehearsed as a
choir. It is felt that this makes the choir more accessible to all pupils. The intention
behind this is to make the choir a reflection of classroom practice, thereby involving as
many pupils as possible.
The aim is that the choice of material for the choir should be primarily driven by
the curriculum. However, the religious requirements of the school sometimes require
that other considerations take precedence. Even if the choral work cannot be linked to
the theme of a unit of work, there are general strands running through the Performing
and Appraising Programmes of Study, such as performing with fluency and expres-
sion, demonstrating a sense of ensemble, listening to and analysing music from a
variety of styles, which are applicable to all music.
The choral pieces selected for the concert in question also contained vocal solos
which were performed by two pupils from the year 10 GCSE class. The department
places a lot of emphasis on performance, including improvisation, at the beginning of
the GCSE course. One pupil was discovered to have natural vocal talent during these
improvisation sessions and, despite having severe emotional and behavioural pro-
blems, worked hard during lessons to learn one of the solos. This is an example of a
pupil acquiring a skill in class which he was then able to bring into the extended
curriculum. The pupil concerned is now having voice lessons with the peripatetic
voice teacher. The experience of involvement in this extended curricular work has also
had emotional and motivational benefits for him which have been noticed in class.
This also exemplifies the point made in the Gulbenkian report (1982: 78) about the
emotional benefits of active involvement in the arts and Swanwick's (1979: 107)
remarks concerning the motivational benefits of performance. In musical terms, the
pupils benefit from this approach in that a greater number of them have access to the
experience of performing in a choir, helping them to develop skills required by the
77
National Curriculum such as their ability to sing as part of a group and to develop
their vocal technique. The soloists were also able to practise their solo and ensemble
performance skills, something that will be required of them at GCSE.
78
holistic approach, the impending concert was used as a 'carrot' for this pupil to
produce some composition work for GCSE. He has problems with perseverance so
was given an open project but told that he had to have something to perform at this
concert. This was an attempt to encourage him to take responsibility for his own work
and also to show him the relationship between the work he produced and the
extended curriculum. He actually completed three songs for the occasion which will
probably make up his GCSE composition portfolio. The tape demonstrates his
growing ability to perform with fluency and expression and his developing composi-
tion skills. He also appears to have gained self-esteem from the performance and the
peer approval.
INSTRUMENTAL WORK
The instrumental work produced for the concert was either produced directly from
the curriculum as in the Certificate of Education groups performance of 'Wonderwall'
discussed below or as an amalgam of work from the classroom and with visiting
instrumental teachers. At all times instrumental teachers are linked into work in the
curriculum increasingly at Key Stage 4 and the foundation of the jazz group is
allowing this to be increasingly the case at Key Stage 3.
JAZZ GROUP
The jazz group is currently in the very early stages of development. It is being
developed as an attempt to solve the problem of low numbers of pupils playing
instruments in year 7 (apart from guitar and keyboard), as mentioned previously. As
there are very few string players, two at present, and the situation is not much better
in years 8 and 9, orchestral work is not possible.
The Head of Department therefore decided that a jazz group might be more
suitable for this school, as it allows all pupils to participate at their own level and is
more flexible in terms of the instrumental combinations possible. The aim is to make
this group as non-elitist as possible and to make it accessible to instrumentalists as
soon as they can play a few notes so that as many pupils as possible can be included. It
is also planned to include singers and keyboard players in the future, to maximise the
use of resources. Since the November concert a further six year 7 pupils have
progressed sufficiently to join and it is hoped that this is the shape of things to come.
The improvisation involved in jazz is an important element of the Programme of
Study for composing at Key Stage 3 and similarly of syllabuses at Key Stage 4. It is,
therefore, an activity that is revisited frequently in the music curriculum and can be
developed both within the classroom curriculum and the extended curriculum. To
this end, the peripatetic jazz specialist also works with the jazz group once a week.
Pupils appear to find particular gratification in the combination of performing and
composing through improvisation which this group allows. Public performance gives
both a goal towards which pupils must work and public affirmation of the develop-
ment of their improvisation skills. The pieces chosen for the concert included one
composition written for the group by the jazz teacher allowing scope for simple
improvisation and his own arrangement of Gershwin's ' Summertime'. The group are
developing a good sense of ensemble and a feel for the rhythmic elements of jazz.
They are starting to develop confidence in their improvisation during performance,
although there is still much work to be done in this area. This is an area where the
holistic approach is particularly effective as these skills were developed through
79
individual work in class music lessons, particularly when class pieces were based
around the same scale or chords as a jazz group piece. Similarly, the players growing
expertise and confidence in improvisation will be fed back into the curriculum to
stimulate other pupils and enhance the musical experience in lessons.
Conclusions
There are problems with this approach to music education. One tends to take more
gambles in performance than with select groups of musicians and, as with all gambles,
the outcome is uncertain. In this respect, the difficulty for music teachers is the
uncertainty of the outcome of the performance. Inevitably, the standard of some
performances is lower than if one only displays the musical cream performing works
by established composers. If one includes everybody, it is possible that some pupils
will not have the maturity and self control to behave properly or to rise to the occasion
in performance. The approach also involves a huge commitment of time and energy.
In fact, in some ways it is more demanding than the conventional approach because
everything counts. One cannot coast through class lessons and save oneself for the
choir and orchestra rehearsals because the class lessons are going to produce the work
for performance. Also, with a larger and more varied cohort of pupils involved in
rehearsals and performances, control and discipline can be even more testing than
usual. Having said this, there are huge benefits to be gained from this approach. The
80
primary benefit is the positive feedback into the curriculum. Broad involvement in the
extended curriculum gives pupils a chance to hone and develop skills acquired within
the curriculum and practise them in new contexts. The insights thus acquired are
then brought back into the curriculum and used to develop further work. Thus, the
cyclical process of drawing from and feeding back into the curriculum is initiated.
The result should be a steady and continuous development of the musical skills,
knowledge and understanding of pupils in the school and a corresponding rise in
standards of achievement in all areas of musical activity within the school.
As mentioned earlier, the manner in which this holistic approach could be
implemented will vary greatly according to the circumstances of the school. The
evidence discussed in this article is the result of one school's approach to imple-
menting this philosophy. The music department considers that it is a valid option for
their particular school and that it offers the best all-round musical education to these
children. The socially disadvantaged background of many of the children means that
they have little involvement in aesthetic activity outside school. The holistic approach
to the curriculum gives maximum exposure to musical activity within the school to as
many pupils as possible.
It is considered that this approach to music education, whilst possibly not
universally applicable, presents an interesting alternative to the traditional separatist
approach to curricular and extra/extended curricular music in schools. It is also an
approach which is in accordance with the holistic intentions of the National
Curriculum for music. The approach could be particularly beneficial to pupils in
schools in socially disadvantaged areas. It offers undoubted benefits to the majority of
pupils' musical development which could bring about an improvement in standards of
musical achievement throughout the school.
References
ADAMS, D., ADAMS, K., BREWER, M., READ, L., and STEPHENS, J. (1995). Planning for music in
the classroom. In G. Pratt andJ. Stephens (eds), (1995).
FLETCHER, P. (1987). Education and Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GULBENKIAN, C. (1982). The Arts in Schools. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
HANSARD. (1982). House of Lords Debate on The Arts in Schools Report, Calouste Gulbenkian
Foundation. London: HMSO.
MOORE, G., SMITH, J., and STEPHENS, J. (1995). Support for the music curriculum, In G. Pratt and
J. Stephens (eds), (1995).
Paynter, J. (1982). Music in the Secondary School Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
(1992). Sound and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PLUMMERIDGE, C. (1991). Music Education in Theory and Practice. London: Falmcr.
PRATT, G. (1995). Performing; composing; listening and appraising. In G. Pratt andJ. Stephens
(eds), (1995).
REIMER, B. (1989). A Philosophy of Music Education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
SMALL, C. (1980). Music-Society-Education. London: J. Calder.
STEPHENS, J. (1995). The National Curriculum for Music. In G. Pratt and J. Stephens (eds),
(1995).
STROMAN, S. and MICHAEL, M. (1990). Creative Jazz Education. London: Stainer and Bell.
SWANWICK, K. (1979). A Basis For Music Education. Berks: N.F.E.R.
(1994). Musical Knowledge. New York: Routledge.
WELSH OFFICE (1995). Music in the National Curriculum (Wales). Cardiff: A.C.A.C.
WITKIN, R. M. (1974). The Intelligence of Feeling. London: Heinemann.
81