2. Profession and ethics
2. Profession and ethics
0 Profession and
Ethics
Professional:
A person practicing a profession in area of
expertise.
Professionalism:
The content of profession with moral and ethical
behaviors. Professionals follow their code of conduct,
and standards and norms.
5
Professional attitude & Behavior
Professional associations:
Many professions have professional associations that provide oversight
and support for members. These associations offer professional
development opportunities, networking events, and resources for
members. They also establish ethical codes and standards for members
to follow and provide disciplinary action when these standards are not met.
This helps to maintain the integrity and sacrosanctity of the profession.9
2.1 Profession and Characteristics
Ethical codes and standards:
Professions have ethical codes and standards that guide the behavior of
members and promote professional conduct. It is one of the core
characteristics of a profession. These codes and standards may include
requirements for confidentiality, informed consent, and avoiding conflicts
of interest. They are intended to protect the public and ensure that
professionals act in the best interests of their clients or customers. They
contain the obligations of members, and disciplinary actions if they
go against these codes.
12
2.2 Professional Institution
13
2.2 Professional Institution
14
2.2 Professional Institution
15
Relation Between Client,
Consultant and Contractor
17
18
• Three main parties involved Employer , Engineer
Contractor.
• Employer enters into agreement with Engineer and
Contractor separately.
• No direct relation between Engineer and the
Contractor
• They work together to implement the contract
agreement
• The Engineer - not a party to the Contract and required
to act impartially despite being employed by the
Employer.
20
• Two main parties involved Employer &
Contractor.
• Employer enters into agreement with Contractor
• Engineer is representative of employer
• No direct relation between Engineer and the
Contractor
• They work together to implement the contract
agreement
Client evaluation to consultant:
Positively:
if the knowledge provided by consultant was valuable for the client.
Negatively:
sometimes client wants to be in control and keep the consultant on a
short leash.
consultant will benefit from the delay in project that delays in
completion of project and more consultancy fees for supervision.
Some of the Consultant staff are supporting the Contractor even he is
violating his contractual obligation.
Client and Consultant evaluation to contractor:
26
Personal Integrity:
• Hiding conflict of interest, Accepting extra offer from client/contractor,
Disclosing client’s confidential information, Inconsistency in saying and
doing (hypocrite), Making judgment based on partial knowledge, like
determining the brand of cement or steel rod or
wire/transformer/turbine based on advertisement, rather than on test-
data. Inability to detect (and correct) apparent flaws in
drawings/designs, Inability to make appropriate judgment in a particular
situation.
Criminal offense:
• Forging document, Falsifying data, Accepting/offering bribes,
Abuse/misuse/disuse of authority: use of official property (vehicle,
building, equipment) for personal purpose, asking office personnel to do
personal works, nepotism), Plagiarism, Plotting against firm, client, other
engineers
27
Code of Conduct:
• Forgetting to sign on documents, Disregard
for code of conduct, standards, bylaws, and
norms, Advertisement in
newspaper/TV/Radio, Part time work as a
salesman, Attempt of undue influence,
Intentionally misleading public, client,
employer, Accepting offer from potential
client/contractor
Negligence:
• Using different coefficients from
engineering handbooks, without checking
their applicability in particular conditions,
Allowing breach of terms and conditions at
construction sites, Not checking
documents properly for formatting,
contents, etc. before submission.
28
Law
It is described as the set of rules and regulation, created by
the government to govern the whole society.
The law is universally accepted, recognized
and enforced. It is created with the purpose
of maintaining social order, peace, justice
in the society and to provide protection to
the general public and safeguard their
interest.
It is made after considering ethical
principles and moral values.
The law is made by the judicial system of
the country. Every person in the country is
bound to follow the law.
It clearly defines what a person must or must not do. So,
in the case of the breach of law may result in the punishment
or penalty or sometimes both.
29
2.4. Ethics, Code of Ethics and Engineering Ethics
1. Maintaining
Public Safety
2. Integrity
and Honesty
3. Promotes Public Confidence and Trust in the
Profession
4. Protects Clients and Employers from Harm
5.Promotes Ethical Decision-making in Circumstances
of Uncertainty 34
Morals
The word “Morality” originates from the
Latin word “mos” meaning “custom”. Morals
are the principles or habits with respect to
right or wrong of one’s own conduct. They
are not imposed by anyone. Morals are
what you think is good and bad personally.
Though morals are not imposed, they can be understood as the
preaching of our inner self. Depending on a few factors, our mind
filters things as good or bad. These are the ideas that help frame our
personality so that we can distinguish between what is right and
what is wrong.
A moral is the code of conduct that you develop over time and set for
yourself to follow, just like
Being good to everyone, Speaking only the truth
Avoid cheating, Being a nice human being etc. 35
Ethics vs Moral
44
6. Engineers shall act in such a manner as to
uphold and enhance the honor, integrity, and
dignity of the engineering profession and shall
act with zero tolerance for bribery, fraud, and
corruption.
7. Engineers shall continue their professional
development throughout their careers, and
shall provide opportunities for the
professional development of those engineers
under their supervision.
45
NEC code of ethics
47
6.Personal responsibility: All individuals will be personally
responsible for all works performed in connection with
his/her engineering profession.
48
Moral dilemma on ethical
decision making
50
Characteristics of Ethical Decision Making
Ethical decisions hold paramount the safety, health
and welfare of the public, over financial profit.
Ethical decisions uphold and enhance the honor,
integrity and dignity of the profession,
Ethical decisions uphold integrity
– free from conflict of interest
– Abide by all prevailing laws, rules, regulations
– Follows guidelines, directives, bylaws, codes
– Follows applicable codes of conduct
–Fair, honest, transparent, aspires highest quality
and open communication
51
Ethical decisions reflect loyalty to client,
organization, and society
Respect: culture, social customs, practices, self
respect of others, customer, environment
Concern: Concern to the benefit of all
stakeholders: Client, public, government, material
suppliers, worker, contractor, consultant, funding
agency
52
The steps of the ethical decision making process
53
The steps of the ethical decision making process
1. Gather the facts
2. Define the ethical issues
3. Identify the affected parties (stakeholders)
4. Identify the consequences
5. Identify the obligations (principles, rights, justice)
6. Consider your character and integrity
7. Think creatively about potential actions
8. Check your gut
9.Decide on the proper ethical action and be
prepared to deal with opposing arguments 54
Gather the facts
Don’t jump to conclusions without the facts
Questions to ask: Who, what, where, when, how,
and why.
However, facts may be difficult to find because of
the uncertainty often found around ethical issues
Some facts are not available
Assemble as many facts as possible before
proceeding
Clarify what assumptions you are making!
55
Define the ethical issue(s)
56
Identify the affected parties
Identify all of the stakeholders
Who are the primary or direct stakeholders?
Who are the secondary or indirect stakeholders?
Why are they stakeholders for the issue?
Perspective-taking -- Try to see things through the
eyes of those individuals affected
57
Identify the consequences
Think about potential positive and negative consequences for
affected parties by the decision (Focus on primary stakeholders to
simplify analysis until you become comfortable with the process).
What are the magnitude of the consequences and the probability
that the consequences will happen.
Short term vs. Long term consequences – will decision be valid
over time.
Broader systemic consequences – tied to symbolic and secrecy
Symbolic consequences – Each decision sends a message.
Secrecy consequences – What are the consequences if the
decision or action becomes public?
Did you consider relevant cognitive barriers/biases?
Consider what your decision would be based only on
consequences – then move on and see if it is similar given other
considerations.
58
Identify the relevant principles, rights, and justice
issues
Obligations should be thought of in terms of principles and rights involved
A) What obligations are created because of particular ethical principles you
might use in the situation?
Examples: Do no harm; Do unto others as you would have them do unto
you; Do what you would have anyone in your shoes do in the given context.
B) What obligations are created because of the specific rights of the
stakeholders?
What rights are more basic vs. secondary in nature? Which help protect an
individual’s basic autonomy?
What types of rights are involved – negative or positive?
C) What concepts of justice (fairness) are relevant – distributive or procedural
justice?
Did you consider any relevant cognitive barriers/biases?
Formulate the appropriate decision or action based solely on the above
analysis of these obligations.
59
Consider your character & integrity
Consider what your relevant community members
would consider to be the kind of decision that an
individual of integrity would make in this situation.
What specific virtues are relevant in the situation?
Disclosure rule – what would you do if the New York
Times reported your action and everyone was to read
it.
Think about how your decision will be remembered
when you are gone.
Did you consider any relevant cognitive
biases/barriers?
What decision would you come to based solely on
character considerations?
60
Think creatively about potential actions
Be sure you have not been unnecessarily forced
into a corner
You may have some choices or alternatives that
have not been considered
If you have come up with solutions “a” and “b,” try
to brainstorm and come up with a “c” solution that
might satisfy the interests of the primary parties
involved in the situation.
61
Check your gut
Even though the prior steps have argued for a
highly rational process, it is always good to “check
your gut.”
Intuition is gaining credibility as a source for good
decision making – knowing something is not
“right.” Particularly relevant if you have a lot of
experience in the area – expert decision-making.
62
Decide on your course of action and prepare
responses to those who may oppose your position
Consider potential actions based on the consequences,
obligations, and character approaches.
Do you come up with similar answers from the
different perspectives?
Do the obligation and character help you “check” the
consequentiality preferred action?
How can you protect the rights of those involved (or
your own character) while still maximizing the overall
good for all of the stakeholders?
What arguments are most compelling to you to justify
the action ethically? How will you respond to those
with opposing viewpoints?
63
How to Resolve Ethical Dilemmas
• Identify relevant facts
• Identify relevant issue(s)
• Identify primary stakeholders
• Identify possible solutions
• Evaluate each possible solution
• Compare and assess consequences
• Decide on solution
• Take action
64
Forms of unethical conduct
1. Favoritism
2. Yes boss culture
3. Gifts, meals, services or entertainment
4. Compromise on quality
5. Conflict of interest
6. Bribery
7. Unfair conduct/ decision
8. Fraud
65
Reasons making difficult to follow
codes of conduct
1. Corrupt politics /politicians in country
2. Weak system( Muscle power and money being
more powerful than system)
3. Low morale of the engineers
4. Very strict code of conduct
66
How to Evaluate Solutions : Some Theories
67
Eternal law of ethics
The eternal law of moral is the set of standards of
goods behaviors based on the nature and the
scriptures.
By studying the nature and scriptures, common sets of
moral standards are set.
The set of morals standards should be obvious to
anyone who takes time to study the nature of
scriptures. Everyone should act in accordance with the
common set of standards.
It is the law which God in the creation of man infused
into him for his direction and preservation.
These laws are general rules or principles. “Do onto
others as you would have others do onto you” is an
example.
68
69
Utilitarian law of ethics
The professional or individuals should act in the
way to creating the greatest benefits for the
largest numbers of people.
It sit based upon the outcomes or results of the
act.
This law of ethics arose from the teleology theory.
In Greek, ‘teleo’ means outcome or result.
Person will do the right thing if
the consequences of his or her actions are good.
Additionally, if an action by a person was an act
that was “not good,” but the consequences turned
out to be “good,” under some theories of
teleological reasoning, the act may be deemed a
good ethical act.
So a person should be aware of his or her act for
its results or outcomes.
70
Universalism law of ethics
This law of ethics is based upon the motive or intent of the
doers.
It states that the professionals must have good motives
behind their doings.
This law comes from ‘Deontological theory’, wherein ‘Doen’
in Greek means duties and obligations.
Ethical Actions follow universal moral laws. Such as don't lie,
cheat, steal
It Just requires that people follow the rules and do their duty.
For example, in the case of universal human rights protection,
these rights are regarded to be applicable to all human
beings.
A professional as an engineer, has duties and obligations
towards the societies they live in. 71
Distributive justice law of ethics
Law based upon the primacy of justice equal to all.
Rules and laws apply to all people. The
professionals must have back in the mind that the
law applies equally to all.
The outgrowth of equality today is the result of
this law.
72
Personal liberty law of ethics
• This law of ethics is based upon the personal liberty.
• This law states that any act which violates
anybody’s personal liberty even if the act creates
greater benefits for the larger number of people is
not accepted.
• Any action of professional or individual must not
violates anybody’s liberty at all.
73
Engineering
The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
(ABET) defines engineering as:
“the profession in which a knowledge of the mathematical
and natural sciences gained by study, experience, and practice
is applied with judgment to develop ways to utilize,
economically, the materials and forces of nature for the benefit
of mankind.”
74
Engineer & Scientist Scientist: uses his creative talent in
developing new, fundamental concepts of the universe.
Engineer: uses his creative talent to apply those fundamental
concepts in new ways.
76
Engineering Cycle
Iron Triangle of
Engineering
In 2023 the average $1000 laptop will have the same computing power
as a human brain.
25 yrs. after that same average laptop will have the power of all the
1/6/2024
human brains currently on Earth. 77
Resources
Engineers employ two types of natural resources
materials and
energy.
Most resources are limited,
new resources
efficient utilization
78
Contribution
Results of engineering
activities contribute to
the welfare of mankind
by:
– furnishing food, shelter,
and comfort
– making work,
transportation and
communication easier
and safer
– making life pleasant and
rewarding
79
Functions
Research
Development
Design
Construction
Production
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Management
80
Responsibilities
81
Liability and Negligence
82
Tort liability
Sometimes while performing engineering duties,
engineers happen to harm or damage to other
unconcerned, nonrelated person or property.
The engineer performs job more attentively
towards their clients, but even doing so, they
happen to cause damages or harms to those who
are not related to the jobs at all.
83
That happens because of unnecessary negligence in
doing jobs.
Incidental negligence seeks compensation for the
damages.
The kind of negligence that harm unrelated person
or property and seek compensation is a tort liability.
A "tort" is some kind of wrongful act that causes
harm to someone else.
84
Negligence and Liabilities
Negligence in duty results in liabilities to stakeholder whose life,
health or property is damaged. Conditions for establishment
of professional negligence:
Duty: Unless there is a contractual duty to perform a work
there is no negligence in the performance of the work.
Breach: Unless there is a breach of the terms and conditions
of an agreement, professional negligence cannot be proved.
Damages: Unless there is a specific damage to the claimant,
professional negligence cannot be established.
Proximate cause: There should be direct (one-to-one)
relation between the specific action of a professional and the
damage resulted by the action to the claimant.
85
Three sources of liability:
a) Liabilities due to contract: liable to fulfill all terms of contract; if
there is no contract, legally, there is no liability under this
category. An engineer is liable for loss of damage due to breach
of contract clauses. Contract law imposes liability on a party for
promises that the first has made to another party; liability
related to loss of a single person’s life/property.
b) Liabilities due to criminal law: liable to follow all prevailing
laws of nation, breach of law related to design, construction and
implementation of design can result in criminal case, whether
there is damage or not. Criminal law imposes liability on a party
due to illegal/ criminal acts; defendant has a liability to the
government/state.
86
c)Liabilities due to tort: liable to prevent
customers/users of products and services from loss
or damage; even if there is no specific contract and
no laws have been breached, an engineers can be
held liable for loss or damage to the customer due
to the use of services and products designed,
constructed, or implemented by the engineer. Pre-
information or pre-warning or disclaimer can
prevent an engineer from liability due to tort. Tort
provision is a legal mechanism for compensating
individuals injured by others, whether deliberate or
not; directed toward the compensation of
individuals, rather than the public. 87
Two types of liability:
Vicarious Liability:
Vicarious liability is a word which combined with two
elements which are vicarious and liability. Vicarious
means felt or experienced by reading or watching
about somebody else to do something rather than by
doing it yourself.
And, liability means the state of being legally
responsible for something. Therefore, vicarious can be
defined as a concept used to impose strict liability on a
person who does not have primary liability, that is, not
at fault.
Vicarious liability is not a tort. Literally, it means that
one person is liable for the torts of another. The
employer is liable for the torts of his employee.
88
Vicarious liability:
A company or a contractor/sub-contractor is liable for the
acts of its own and its employees. Three tests are used to
ascertain the degree of vicarious liability.
– Control test: degree of liability depends on level of control a
company has on its staff or contractor; the more control a
company has over a person (employee) the more liable the
company is.
– Business integration test: degree of liability depends on level
of business integration; the more the work of a person is
integrated into the work of a company, the more liable the
company is for the acts of the person, even if the person is
not a direct employee of the company.
– Multiple test: Control test, business integration test, and
other related factors are taken into consideration to
determine the degree of liability.
89
Partnership Liability:
90
Liabilities of an engineer in project design
Fitness for purpose: The design of a project (overall and component-wise)
should be proper to serve the purpose of the project.
Negligent misstatement: The designers and professionals are expected not
to make any negligent or unsubstantiated misstatements.
Statutes, bylaws and building regulations/codes: It is the duty of the
designers and professionals to make themselves fully aware of the statutes,
bylaws and codes related to their professional practice.
Examination of site above and below the ground: Before finalizing a
design, a designer should know the conditions of the site above and below
the ground.
Public and private rights: The design of a project should not contradict
with the public and private rights of the client and others who may be
affected by the design implementation.
91
Plans, drawings and specifications: The design should
include detailed plan, drawing, and specification of each
component of the project and equipment
Materials (quantity, quality and availability): The details of
the quantity and quality of materials to be used in a project
should be specifically mentioned. The availability of the
materials should be kept in mind while selecting the material
types.
Novel, risky design and employers’ interference in design: A
designer may choose to use novel and risky design, and may
decide to incorporate employer/client’s idea in the design.
However, the designer is ultimately responsible for the safety
& fitness for purpose of the design implementation.
Revision of design during construction: Even if the design is
revised during construction, the designer is ultimately
responsible for the safety & fitness for purpose of the design
implementation.
92
Liabilities of engineers in project construction and
implementation
Completion of project in time, within budget
With quality: material, workmanship, method of
construction
Consistency: in quality, form
Safety and welfare of project workers, people living
in and around project area, and people travelling
through or visiting the project area
Follow applicable laws, rules, regulations,
guidelines, conventions, codes and bylaws
Meet social obligations
93
Cases:
94
Case:
Case: A client came to a designer’s and asked to
design a multistoried building. The soil type is found
not suitable for that type of structure. The designer
hesitated to design a building. The revealed his/her
intention as that he/she actually is not going to build
that structure but he/she wanted to collect fund from
outside sources on behalf of that design and he/she
wanted to utilize that money in other business.
Problem: What should a designer do in such
situation?
95
Case:
• An election is to be held next month. One of the MPs
(Member of Parliament) of your constituency comes to you
and requests you to divert some of the budget to have a
feasibility survey of different road routes in your district to
give positive impression of his initiatives to the people
residing there. Being a technical executive officer of the
district, what would you do?
96
Case:
• A student got NQ in the ABC subject and was barred to seat
in the final exam conducted by the university. The students
claimed to the teacher that he didn’t find the opportunity
to make up this NQ giving the betterment exam. Student
threats teacher and teacher felt uncomfortable to continue
the classes keeping such tension on the mind. How would
you judge the role of student and teacher in this case?
97
Case:
• A production company invited you to attend a one
day interaction program to be organized at Hotel
Yak and Yeti, Kathmandu. A program includes
advertisement of the products, free distribution of a
hand bag and a dinner party. Will you attend that
program or not? Give reasons.
98