Scribd
Upload
4 views4 pages

Aedt 103 Assignment 2

Technological advancements in farm mechanization and biotechnology have significantly transformed rural agricultural practices and societies, enhancing productivity while also creating socioeconomic challenges. Mechanization has led to increased efficiency but resulted in labor displacement and growing inequalities among farmers. Biotechnology promises higher yields and improved food security, yet raises concerns about environmental impacts and corporate control over agriculture, necessitating policies that support small farmers and equitable access to technology.

Uploaded by

musimwamunashe4
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views4 pages

Aedt 103 Assignment 2

Technological advancements in farm mechanization and biotechnology have significantly transformed rural agricultural practices and societies, enhancing productivity while also creating socioeconomic challenges. Mechanization has led to increased efficiency but resulted in labor displacement and growing inequalities among farmers. Biotechnology promises higher yields and improved food security, yet raises concerns about environmental impacts and corporate control over agriculture, necessitating policies that support small farmers and equitable access to technology.

Uploaded by

musimwamunashe4
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

MANICALAND STATE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES

FACULTY OF AGRIBUSINESS AND APPLIED SOCIAL

SCIENCES

NAME: Musimwa Munashe Evidence

REG NO: M24CIZ

LEVEL: 1.2

PROGRAM: Agricultural Economics & Development

MODULE: Introduction to Agricultural Sociology(AEDT103)

LECTURER: Mr Stanlake Mangezi

Qsn: How technological advancements like farm mechanization and biotechnology


transformed rural agricultural practices and rural societies?
Technological advancements have consistently acted as catalysts for societal
transformation, and the realm of agriculture is no exception. Farm mechanization and
biotechnology, two prominent technological forces, have profoundly reshaped rural
agricultural practices and, consequently, the fabric of rural societies. These innovations,
while promising increased efficiency and productivity, have also triggered complex
socioeconomic shifts, creating both opportunities and challenges for rural communities.

Farm mechanization, encompassing the introduction of machinery such as tractors,


harvesters, and irrigation systems, revolutionized agricultural practices by significantly
reducing manual labor and increasing productivity. Before mechanization, farming was
labor-intensive, reliant on human and animal power. The introduction of machinery
allowed farmers to cultivate larger areas of land with fewer workers, leading to higher
yields and reduced costs. This spurred a shift away from subsistence farming towards
commercial agriculture, enabling farmers to produce surplus crops for market (Ruttan,
2002). The increased efficiency also fueled the growth of related industries like
manufacturing and transportation, creating new economic opportunities. The
development of the "Green Revolution" in the mid-20th century, driven by the
introduction of high-yielding crop varieties and accompanied by mechanization, further
amplified these effects, particularly in developing nations (Hazell, 2009).

However, the impact of mechanization on rural societies was not uniformly positive. The
displacement of agricultural labor led to increased unemployment and migration from
rural areas to urban centers in search of work. This exacerbated existing inequalities,
concentrating land ownership in the hands of a few and widening the gap between
wealthy landowners and landless laborers. Small-scale farmers, unable to afford the
expensive machinery, often struggled to compete with larger, mechanized operations,
leading to the consolidation of farms and the decline of traditional farming practices
(Friedmann, 1986). Moreover, the reliance on fossil fuels to power machinery increased
the environmental footprint of agriculture, contributing to air pollution and climate
change.

Biotechnology, encompassing techniques like genetic modification (GM) and genetic


engineering, presented another wave of transformative changes. The development of GM
crops, engineered to exhibit desirable traits such as pest resistance, herbicide tolerance,
and enhanced nutritional content, promised increased yields, reduced pesticide use, and
improved food security (Paarlberg, 2002). This technology has also fostered the growth
of the seed industry, creating new opportunities for researchers, manufacturers, and
distributors. The potential for increased crop yields, especially in areas with challenging
environmental conditions, attracted significant investment and adoption, particularly in
developed nations.

Similar to mechanization, the adoption of biotechnology brought both benefits and


challenges to rural societies. Proponents argued that GM crops could contribute to
sustainable agriculture by reducing the need for pesticides and herbicides, thereby
minimizing environmental damage. However, critics raised concerns about the potential
risks of GM crops, including the possibility of unintended ecological consequences such
as the emergence of herbicide-resistant weeds and the impact on biodiversity (Altieri,
2000). Furthermore, the control of biotechnology by large multinational corporations
raised concerns about the power dynamics within the agricultural sector, potentially
marginalizing small farmers and reinforcing existing inequalities. The high cost of GM
seeds and the intellectual property rights associated with them often put them out of reach
for smallholder farmers in developing countries, limiting their access to the technology
and hindering their ability to compete. The potential for corporate control over the food
supply also became a major concern.

The transformation of rural agricultural practices through mechanization and


biotechnology has, therefore, created a complex and multifaceted impact on rural
societies. While these technologies have undeniably increased agricultural productivity
and contributed to global food security, they have also triggered profound
socio-economic changes. These changes include shifts in labor patterns, land ownership,
and the structure of agricultural markets. It is crucial to acknowledge that these
technologies have exacerbated existing inequalities and created new challenges,
necessitating careful consideration of their social and environmental consequences.
Addressing these challenges requires policies that support small farmers, promote
sustainable agricultural practices, and ensure equitable access to technology.
REFERENCE

Altieri, M. A. (2000). Ecological impacts of transgenic crops on agroecosystem health.


Bio Science, 50(12), 1067-1071.

Friedmann, H. (1986). Family enterprise in agriculture: Structural and ideological


aspects. American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1306-1339.

Hazell, P. B. R. (2009). The Asian Green Revolution. International Food Policy


Research Institute (IFPRI).

Paarlberg, R. (2002). The Politics of Precaution: Genetically Modified Crops in


Developing Countries. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Ruttan, V. W. (2002). Technology, growth, and development: An induced innovation


perspective. Oxford University Press.

You might also like