CVL292 Sp25 Project
CVL292 Sp25 Project
SO(1) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles
of engineering, science, and mathematics.
SO(2) an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with
consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental,
and economic factors
SO(4) Ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make
informed judgments, with consideration of the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic,
environmental, and societal contexts.
SO(5): Ability to function effectively on a team, providing leadership, creating a collaborative and
inclusive environment, establishing goals, planning tasks, and meeting objectives.
SO(7): Ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies
4. Project Narrative
4.1. Description:
As part of CVL292 course project, groups of 3 students from same major (AE or CVL) will focus on
addressing a specific challenge within Kuwait based on the United Nations Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs). Each group will choose a topic based on their assigned group number.
The project requires extensive research to present the issue comprehensively, including its
background, current impact, and any existing efforts to address it. The groups will then propose
an innovative solution, which could range from policy recommendations to technological
innovations, aimed at mitigating the identified challenge. This solution should be practical,
sustainable, and consider Kuwait's unique context with a strong emphasis on ethical
considerations.
Topic Selection Process based on group number:
4.3. Deliverables:
- Deliverable 1: Technical Report
• Technical Requirements
✓ Introduction: Must include group information, the selected topic (related to the
assigned SDGs), an overview of the topic, and a description of the SDGs in relation to
the relevant challenge.
✓ Explain the topic in detail and its relationship with the SDGs. Include specific
information about the location, timeframe, and key stakeholders involved.
✓ Discuss the ethical and professional duties of engineers concerning the project,
referencing the NSPE (National Society of Professional Engineers) Code of Ethics [SO4-
PI4a].
✓ Assess the challenge's effects on society, the environment, and the economy [SO4-
PI4b].
✓ Propose two innovative solutions to address the issue effectively.
✓ References: Properly cite all references using APA format.
• A technical report covering all required sections (introduction, context, solutions, ethics, and
conclusion) should be submitted.
• The report must be well-organized and formatted according to academic standards, including a
cover page with group details and consistent formatting throughout.
• Include a list of references in APA format.
• Handwritten submissions are not allowed. The report must be typed and formatted
professionally in Word then saved as a PDF and submitted as PDF.
• Figures, charts, and tables must be included in the report to support the solutions and analysis.
• The report must be submitted by the due date: Week 13, Monday 28/04/2025, by 11:59 pm.
• Students must work within their group and ensure the report is collaborative.
5. Project Management
5.1. Project planning
Project Deliverable Deliverable Type Due Date
1-
2-
Notes:
✓ Students have the full responsibility of:
o submitting the required documents within the deadline
o verifying that the correct files are submitted
o verifying that the submitted files are not corrupted
✓ Softcopies are required to be uploaded into Turnitin when applicable.
✓ The regulations mentioned in the course syllabus apply. Please ensure you are fully aware of all
sections in the syllabus, especially (but not limited to) the following: APA style, plagiarism, AI
usage, group work, group submission, and forming groups.
6. Project Grading
6.1. Grading Distribution
Weight
PD 1 15%
Project
PD 2 15%
Total 30%
Technical Design:
•No standards or •Standards or codes are •Relevant standards or •All relevant standards and codes
Standards and codes are mentioned but not fully codes are clearly referenced are thoroughly researched and
Codes referenced or used utilized or explained, and applied correctly, with properly referenced, with clear
(5% - only If in the report and there may be errors appropriate explanations for explanations for their use and
required) in their use their use impact on the project.
Propose •The student did •The student provided •The student provided more •The student provided more than
multiple Design not provide more more than one solution than one solution that are one solution that are well-
solutions than one solution that is partially documented and partially documented and justified.
(20%) for the project. documented and not justified
well justified.
Select a •Unable to perform •Partially analyze the •Analyze the different •Successfully analyze and evaluate
solution analysis nor to different solutions, but solutions and provide a clear all solutions. Select the optimum
considering select a solution. not able to provide a methodology on how to one using appropriate
risks, solid method on how to select a solution. methodology. Use the insights and
constraints and select a solution. the gained knowledge to re-assess
making the design.
appropriate
trade-offs
(15%)
Analyze the •Unable to •Moderately able to •Able to show good •Able to show thorough
impact of understand the understand the wider understanding of the understanding of immediate and
engineering wider impacts of impacts of engineering widespread effects of long-term effects of engineering
solutions in engineering design design solutions. engineering design solutions, design solutions.
global, solutions. •Partially able to assess but with somewhat limited •Able to consider and understand
economic, •Unable to assess the impact of simple perspective about long term the impact of engineering design
environmental, the impact of engineering design factors. solutions on users and non-users
and societal engineering design solutions on users and •Able to consider and locally and globally.
contexts solutions on non-users. understand the impact of •Able to thoroughly analyze the
(10% - only If immediate users. •Moderately able to engineering design solutions economic, environmental, and
required) •Unable to assess assess the economic, on some, but not all, users social impacts of engineering
the economic, environmental, and and non-users. design solutions.
environmental, and social impacts of •Able to show good
social impacts of engineering design understanding of the general
engineering design solutions. economic, environmental,
solutions. and social impacts of
engineering design solutions.
Make informed •The student does •The student •The student evaluates the • The student provides a
judgments with not evaluate the demonstrates limited relevancy of their solution comprehensive and insightful
consideration relevancy of their evaluation of the towards sustainability and evaluation of the relevancy of their
of the impact solution towards relevancy of their ethics. solution towards sustainability and
of engineering sustainability and solution towards •Student provides well- ethics.
solutions in ethics. sustainability and ethics defined and appropriate •Student provides innovative and
global, •Student provides •Student provides examples of how their creative examples of how their
economic, minimal or no limited or unclear project addresses project addresses sustainability
environmental, examples of how examples of how their sustainability and targeted and targeted SDGs.
societal their project project addresses SDGs.
contexts and addresses sustainability and
other relevant sustainability and targeted SDGs.
SDGs targeted SDGs.
(10% - only If
required)
•The student •The student displays •The student effectively •The student displays the results
struggles to display the results using visual displays the results using using clear and well-constructed
the results using representations, but appropriate visual visual representations (tables,
appropriate visual with some errors or representations (tables, graphs, sketches) without any
representations inconsistencies. graphs, sketches) with minor errors.
(tables, graphs, •There may be errors, if any. •There is a deep understanding
Analyze and
sketches). challenges in effectively •There is a clear and insightful interpretation of the
interpret
•There is difficulty in interpreting the understanding and displayed results
collected data
interpreting the displayed results interpretation of the •The student demonstrates the
(10%)
displayed results •Partial ability to relate displayed results ability to relate the results to
•Limited or no some of the results to •The student demonstrates theoretical concepts
analysis of the theoretical concepts. the ability to relate some of *There is evidence of critical
results in relation to the results to theoretical thinking
theoretical concepts.
concepts.
Use •Unable to draw •Demonstrate some •Ability to draw conclusions •Ability to draw conclusions about
engineering conclusions about difficulties to draw about the results and the results, errors, and to come up
judgment to the results and conclusions about the comments on some errors. with creative suggestions about
draw comments on some results and comments improving the solution procedure.
conclusions errors. on some errors.
about the
results
(10%)
Formatting •Weak English with •Good English with •Very good English with few •Excellent English with no
and language many grammatical some grammatical and grammatical and language grammatical and language
(5%) and language language mistakes. mistakes. mistakes.
mistakes. •Illustrations are of •Illustrations are of •Illustrations are of great quality
•No illustrations, bad quality, resolution, acceptable quality and and resolution, sized correctly,
equations, or size and dimension. resolution. and in the right place.
tables are utilized •No captioning or •Mistakes in captioning or •No mistakes in captioning or
in the document. labeling for labeling the illustrations. labeling the illustrations.
illustrations. Equations are correctly Equations are correctly
Equations are badly formatted with minor formatted.
formatted. mistakes.
• Poor language skills, • Acceptable language • Good language skills, • Excellent language skills,
Presentation Skills gestures, etc. skills, gestures, etc. gestures, etc. gestures, etc.
(20% – Individual) • Student showed poor • Student showed adequate • Student showed good • Student showed
(Only If required) presentation skills presentation skills presentation skills outstanding presentation
skills
Appendix A