Scribd
Upload
6 views

PROJECT EVALUATION FORMAT (2) (2)

Uploaded by

akashrajput178172
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views

PROJECT EVALUATION FORMAT (2) (2)

Uploaded by

akashrajput178172
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

LAKSHMI NARAIN COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY,

BHOPAL
FM- 1301
Project No: Date:
PROJECT EVALUATION PLAN
1. TEAM DETAILS
 Project :Major/Minor: Group No:
 Name of Students :(S.1) (S.2)
(S.3) (S.4)
 Branch : Semester: Session :
 Guide’s Name : Specialization:

2. PROJECT DETAIL
 Project Title: Approved Date:
 Tools Required :
 Starting Date : Expected date of completion:
S. No. Date Details of Works Grade Suggestion For Remark
Carried out Improvement

S.1
Phase1 S.2
S.3
S.4
S.1
Phase 2 S.2
S.3
S.4
S.1
Phase 3 S.2
S.3
S.4
S.1
Phase 4 S.2
S.3
S.4
S.1
Phase 5 S.2
S.3
S.4
Date of Submission: Date of Presentation: Approved/Not Approved:

3. EVALUATION (by Project Enhancement Cell)

Signature: Individual Innovativeness Overall Grade Any Comments Remarks


Students Performance
(S.1)
(S.2)
(S.3)
(S.4)

 Paper Published /Award (Yes/No)  Recommended for Competition (Yes/No)


 Financial Support (Yes/No)  Any Other (Yes/No)
Please rate the degree to which the following objectives
(5=completely; 4=to a high degree; 3=moderately; 2=minimally; 1=not at all)

1. Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content.


1 2 3 4 5

2. Teaching methods were appropriate for subject matter.


1 2 3 4 5

3. Knowledgeable in Content area.


1 2 3 4 5

4. Clarified content in response to questions.


1 2 3 4 5

5. The Project Fulfill the Objective.


1 2 3 4 5

6. What specific things did you like least about the Project.
1 2 3 4 5

7. Expressed ideas clearly.


1 2 3 4 5

8. Presented useful examples.


1 2 3 4 5

9. Thoroughness of content.
1 2 3 4 5

10. Effectiveness of audiovisual aids.


1 2 3 4 5

11. Responsiveness to questions


1 2 3 4 5

12. Understand a range of techniques that could be applied in each situation


1 2 3 4 5

13. Content was presented in an organize


1 2 3 4 5

14. Content was presented clearly and effectively


1 2 3 4 5

15. Was responsive to questions/comments


1 2 3 4 5

16. Content presented was applicable to my practice


1 2 3 4 5

17. Content met stated objectives


1 2 3 4 5
SIGNATURE

Name
GUIDE PEC MEMBER 1 PEC MEMBER 2 HOD

You might also like