Quasi Contract
Quasi Contract
Meaning of Quasi-Contract
Definition of Quasi-Contract
According to Salmond, "A quasi-contract is not a real contract, but a contract implied by law, under
which a person incurs obligations even without entering into an agreement."
If a person supplies necessities (food, clothing, medical aid) to someone incapable of contracting
(like a minor or a mentally ill person), the supplier can claim reimbursement from the person's
property.
Example: A shopkeeper provides food to a 14-year-old orphan. The shopkeeper can claim
reimbursement from the minor's property.
Case Law: Chappell v. Cooper (1844) - A mentally ill person was provided with necessities. The
court allowed reimbursement from the person's estate.
If a person pays on behalf of another who is legally bound to pay, they can claim reimbursement.
Example: A neighbor pays property tax on behalf of an absent owner. The neighbor can claim
reimbursement.
Case Law: Gopal Singh v. Hazarilal (1926) - A tenant paid tax on behalf of the landlord and was
reimbursed.
If a person lawfully does something for another expecting compensation, and the other person
benefits, they must pay.
Example: A mistakenly delivers valuable goods to B, who uses them. B must either return the goods
or compensate A.
Case Law: State of West Bengal v. B.K. Mondal & Sons (1962) - A company supplied materials for
government work and was compensated.
A person who finds lost goods must take reasonable care and return them. The finder can claim
compensation for expenses.
Example: A finds B's lost wallet and spends Rs.500 on advertisements. B must reimburse A.
Case Law: Hollins v. Fowler (1875) - A person sold found goods without attempting to return them
and was held liable.
If someone receives money or goods by mistake or coercion, they must return it.
Example: A bank mistakenly credits Rs.10,000 into B's account. B must return the money.
Case Law: Saraswati Devi v. Sekharji (1960) - A person who received excess payment had to return
it.
Conclusion
Quasi-contracts ensure justice when one party benefits unfairly at another's expense. Unlike regular
contracts, they arise by law to prevent unjust enrichment.