Scribd
Upload
3 views3 pages

display_pdf (10)

The court granted bail to the petitioners, Sankar, Ajithkumar, and Vijaykumar, who are accused of offences under sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) BNS. The petitioners, who have been in judicial custody for 10 days, claimed innocence and the prosecution did not file any objections. The bail conditions include executing a bond, daily reporting to the police, and not tampering with evidence.

Uploaded by

crazyvicky0007
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3 views3 pages

display_pdf (10)

The court granted bail to the petitioners, Sankar, Ajithkumar, and Vijaykumar, who are accused of offences under sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) BNS. The petitioners, who have been in judicial custody for 10 days, claimed innocence and the prosecution did not file any objections. The bail conditions include executing a bond, daily reporting to the police, and not tampering with evidence.

Uploaded by

crazyvicky0007
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE No.

6, MADURAI

PRESENT : Mrs. P. Subbulakshmi, B.A,L.L.M.,


Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai

Tuesday, 15th day of April, 2025


Crl.M.P.No. 2304 of 2025

1) Sankar (29/2025)
S/o.Natarajan

2) Ajithkumar @ Thakkali (26/2025)


S/o.Natarajan

3) Vijaykumar @ Katta Vijay (26/2025)


S/o.Duraipandi .. Petitioners/Accused

Vs.

State
Rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Police,
Mattuthavani Police Station,
Madurai City.
Crime No.328 of 2025 .. Respondent
Offences : U/s.296(b), 118(1) & 351(3) BNS
D.O.R. : 06/04/2025

This petition is coming on this today for final hearing before this
court in the presence of the Mr.R.Arumugam, the learned counsel for the
Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, represented for
State, upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the both sides
argument, this court delivers the following:-

ORDER

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioners u/s.480 of


BNSS Act seeking bail for offences punishable u/s. 296(b), 118(1) &

Crl.M.P.No.2304 of 2025 Pg. No.1 of 3


351(3) BNS .

2. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners


were remanded to the judicial custody on 06/04/2025. But the petitioners
are innocent and they had not committed any offence as alleged by the
prosecution and false case is fabricated against them and the petitioners
are ready to abide any conditions as imposed by this court. The
petitioners are ready and willing to furnish substantial sureties for their
due appearance, and therefore the petition may be allowed.

3. After receiving the petition, the court has issued notice on


07/04/2025 vide D.No.654/2025. After receiving the notice, the
prosecution did not file any reply.

4. Heard the petitioners' side and perused entire records.

5. After hearing the petitioners' side and on perusal of records,


it is seen that the petitioners are in the judicial custody for the period of
10 days. Further, though sufficient opportunity has given, the prosecution
did not file any reply and it shows that the prosecution does not have any
serious objection to allow this petition. In view of the above, this court is
inclined to allow the petition subject to:

1. The petitioners shall execute a bail bond for Rs.10,000/-


each (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for
like sum ;
2. Thereafter, the petitioners shall appear and sign before
the respondent police daily morning at 10.00 a.m for a
period of 15 days ;
3. The petitioners shall attend in accordance with the
conditions of the bond executed ;
4. The petitioners shall not commit an offence similar to
the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the
commission of which they are suspected; and

Crl.M.P.No.2304 of 2025 Pg. No.2 of 3


5. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper
with the evidence.
Digitally signed by
SUBBULAKSHMI
SUBBULAKSHMI PARAMASIVAN
PARAMASIVAN
Date: 2025.04.15
Dictated by me to the Steno-Typist and typed by him 19:19:40 +0530
in computer directly and corrected and pronounced
by me in the open Court on this 15 th day of April,
Judicial Magistrate No.VI,
2025. Madurai.

Crl.M.P.No.2304 of 2025 Pg. No.3 of 3

You might also like