The document discusses the evolution of education from a traditional teacher-centered approach to a student-centered model influenced by technology. It emphasizes the importance of defining clear learning outcomes and aligning curriculum design, teaching, and assessment to these outcomes to enhance student learning. Additionally, it outlines the significance of both immediate and deferred outcomes in assessing student competencies and the overall effectiveness of educational programs.
The document discusses the evolution of education from a traditional teacher-centered approach to a student-centered model influenced by technology. It emphasizes the importance of defining clear learning outcomes and aligning curriculum design, teaching, and assessment to these outcomes to enhance student learning. Additionally, it outlines the significance of both immediate and deferred outcomes in assessing student competencies and the overall effectiveness of educational programs.
the term educare or educere which meant to draw out. ▪ However, perpetuating the belief that education is a pouring in process wherein the teacher was the infallible giver of knowledge and the student was the passive recipient. ▪ The advent of technology caused a change of perspective in education, nationally and internationally. ▪ The teacher ceased to be the sole source of knowledge. ▪ With knowledge explosion, students are surrounded with various sources of facts and information accessible through user-friendly technology. ▪ The teacher become facilitator of knowledge who assists in the organization, interpretation and validation of acquired facts and information. ▪ A process of curriculum design, teaching, learning and assessment that focuses on what students can actually do after they are taught. ▪ A comprehensive approach to organizing and operating an education system that is focused on and defined by the successful demonstration of learning sought from each students(W. Spady, 1994:2). ▪ As approach that focuses and organizes the educational system around what is essential for all learners to know, value and do to achieve a desired level of competence at the time of graduation (CHED Implementation Handbook, 2013) ▪ Clarity and focus about outcomes ▪ Learners are certain about their goals and are always given significant, culminating exit outcomes. ▪ Designing backwards ▪ Using the major learning outcomes as the focus and linking all planning, teaching and assessment decision directly to these outcomes. ▪ Consistent, high expectations of success Helping students to succeed by providing them with encouragement to engage deeply with the issues they are learning and to achieve the set of high challenging standard. ▪ Expanded opportunity ▪ Developing curriculum that allows every learner to progress in his/her own pace and that caters to individual needs and differences. ▪ It is distinguished from other reforms by its focus on outcomes, thereby enabling it to address the pressing worldwide concerns on accountability, and effectively pairs legislative control with institutional autonomy. ▪ Makes it imperative to lay down what are the intended learning outcomes of an institution, and commit its educational resources until the goals are achieved. ▪ It aims to organize a Work-Integrated Education (WIE) at the program level to links students and faculty with the industry and eventually engage leaders of the profession and industry to enrich the teaching and learning activities. ▪ It is student-centered. ▪ It places the students at the center of the process by focusing on Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) ▪ It is faculty-driven ▪ It encourages faculty responsibility for teaching, assessing program outcomes and motivating participation from the students. ▪ It is meaningful ▪ It provides the data to guide the teacher in making valid and continuing improvement in instruction and assessment activities. ▪ Identification of the educational objectives of the subject/course. ▪ Educational objectives are the broad goals that the subject/course expects to achieve. ▪ Define in general terms the knowledge, skills and attitudes that the teacher will help the students to attain. ▪ Objectives are stated from the point of view of the teacher such as to develop, to provide, to enhance, to include, etc. ▪ Listing of learning outcomes specified for each subject/course objective. ▪ Learning outcomes are stated as concrete active verbs such as: to demonstrate, to explain, to differentiate, to illustrate, etc. ▪ A good source of learning outcomes statements is the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives by Benjamin Bloom. ▪ Listing of learning outcomes specified for each subject/course objective. ▪ Taxonomy of Educational Objectives by Benjamin Bloom: ▪ Cognitive ▪ Also called knowledge. ▪ Refers to mental skills. ▪ Psychomotor ▪ Referred to as skills includes manuals or physical skills. ▪ Affective ▪ Known as attitude. ▪ Refers to growth in feelings or emotions from the simplest behavior to the most complex. ▪ Draftingoutcomes assessment procedure. ▪ Enable the teacher to determine the degree to which the students are attaining the desired learning outcomes. ▪ It identifies for every outcome the data that will be gathered which will guide the selection of the assessment tools to be used and at what point assessment will be done. ▪ Focusses classroom instruction on the skills and competencies that students must demonstrate when they exit. ▪ Two types of outcome: ▪ Immediate outcome ▪ Deferred outcome IMMEDIATE OUTCOME ▪ Are competencies/skills acquired upon completion of an instruction, a subject, a grade level, a segment of the program, or of the program itself. ▪ These are referred to as instructional outcomes. ▪ Examples: ▪ Ability to communicate by writing and speaking. ▪ Mathematical problem-solving skills ▪ Skill in identifying objects by using the different senses. DEFERRED OUTCOME ▪ Refer to the ability to apply cognitive, psychomotor and affective skills/competencies in various situations many years after completion of a degree program. ▪ These are referred to as institutional outcomes. ▪ Examples: ▪ Success in professional practice or occupation. ▪ Promotion in a job. ▪ Success in career planning, health and wellness. ▪ Awards and recognition. ▪ Learning outcomes are constructiv ely aligned in a learning program that fits this framework: DIFFERENT LEVELS ▪ Institutional ▪ Program ▪ Course ▪ Learning/instructional/lesson outcomes DIFFERENT LEVELS ▪ Institutional ▪ Institutional Intended Learning Outcomes (ILO) ▪ What the graduates of the university/college are supposed to be able to do. DIFFERENT LEVELS ▪ Program ▪ Program Intended Learning Outcomes (PILO) ▪ What graduates from a particular degree program should be able to do. DIFFERENT LEVELS ▪ Course ▪ Course Intended Learning Outcomes (CILO) ▪ What students should be able to do at the completion of a given course. DIFFERENT LEVELS ▪ Learning/instructional/lesson outcomes ▪ Intended Learning Outcomes (ILO) ▪ What students should be able to do at the completion of a unit of study of a course. ▪ OBTL Instructional Program ▪ The learners take the center stage basic principle of curriculum and instruction. ▪ It is what the students do as evidence of their learning. ▪ Three pronged implication: ▪ For the Learners/Students ▪ It promotes a deep and lifelong learning skills. ▪ For the Teachers ▪ It promotes reflective teaching practices. ▪ For the Institution ▪ It addresses continuous program improvement.