Unit-11
Unit-11
Structure
Objectives
Introduction
Identifying the Parts of a Word
1 1.2.1 The Criteria
1 1.2.2 Morphemes
11.2.3 Free Morphemes and Bound Morphemes
11.2.4 Affixes, Stems and Roots
How are Morphemes Combined into Words?
Let Us Sum Up
Key Words
Some Useful Books
Answers
11.0 OBJECTIVES
identify morphemes,
identify the kinds of information we learn when we learn a word
identify the criteria for defining a word,
analyse the structure of complex and compound words,
identify prefixes, suffixes, roots and stems, and
formulate rules for the combination of morphemes into words on the basis
of some given examples of complex words.
11.1 INTRODUCTION
1. Phonetic/phonologicaI information
For every word that we know, we know how it is pronounced; in other words,
every word is associated with a certain sequence of sounds. A dictionary
encodes this information by giving phonetic symbols within slanting brackets
for the pronunciation of a word, e.g. /bet/ shows the pronunciation of the word
bet.
I
~orphology- 2. Morphological Information
Every word that we have learned has its internal structure, i.e.,a word such as
reads is made of read and -s, or a word such as invitation is made of invite
and -ation.
3. Grammatical Information
, Every word fits into a definite slot in the structure of phrases, clauses, and
sentences. We know that my can come before a noun and not before an article,
e.g. This is my bag and not* this is my a bag. We know whether a word is a
noun or adjective or a verb and the structures that they will occur in.
4. Meaning
For every word we know what it means, e.g, we know that polite is a word
used to mean 'well behaved' ,whereas rude is its opposite in meaning.
In the words given above, the structure is quite simple, since each word is
made up of only two parts. But some words can have many more parts. For
example, the following word consists of five parts:
ungentlemanliness: un+gentle+man+li+ness.
How do we decide how many parts a word has? This is one of the important Words ant1 Their
questions of morphology. Other important questions are: Elements
In dividing whenever into two parts, we are guided by the fact that bath whrir
and ever occur independently as words. The same also applies to homework:
home and work both occur independently as words. We can, therefore set this
up as the first criterion: whenever a word is made up of two or more parts
which also occur independently as words, we can divide the word into parts
which are identical with the independently occurring words. Thus nevertheless
and newspaperman are both made up ofthree parts, or elements, etc.
But what about words like helps, younger and brothers? They arc not made LIP
of two independently occurring words, so what is our criterion for dividing
them into two parts?
It seems fairly clear that our criterion for dividing them into two parts is that,
though they do not consist of two independently occurring words, they do
consist of two parts which also occur elsewhere. One part occurs as an
independent word (namely, help-, young-, and brother- respectively), while
the other part occurs in similar words in a fairly regular way. For example, the
-s of helps occurs in words like works, sleeps, hits, kicks, etc.; the -er of
younger occurs in words like older, taller, sweeter, longer, and so on; the-s of
brothers occurs in sisters, fathers or mothers and lovers. Some other
considerations are also relevant.
We have so far been using the term 'part', 'structural part', 'element', etc to
refer to the constituents of a word. The technical term for a 'structural part' of
a word is 'morpheme'. A morpheme is defined as 'the smallest meaningful
element of a larlguage', or as 'the smallest unit which is grammatically
significant'. Both these definitions are contained in our definition of 'a
structural part' of a word. The additional point to note is that the morpheme is
the smallest part into which a word can be divided. In other words, a
morpheme has no parts.
There is another sense in which morpheme differs from 'a part of a word' as
we have often referred to 'a part of a word' as being 'a portion of a word' with
certain characteristics. A morpheme does not always refer to a portion of a Words and Their
word, though in most cases it is clearly identifiable as a portion. For example, Elements
we can say, without any hesitation, that brothers consists of two morphemes
brother- and -.r. As a grammatical unit, or as a unit of meaning, however, -s is
not actually a morpheme, though it 'represents' a morpheme. The morpheme
it represents is the grammatical unit 'plural number'. This distinction (between
a morpheme and its representation) is necessary at least for two reasons.
For these reasons, we shall henceforth regard morphemes as abstract, and shall
not identify them with portions of a word, even if in most cases they actually
happen to be identical (e.g., the morpheme boy and the portion boy- of boys).
To avoid difficulties in exposition, however, we shall highlight this distinction
(between morphemes and their representations) only in those cases where the
two are not identical. In other cases, we shall still speak of the portions as the
morphemes.
Morphology-I 11.2.3 Free Morphemes and Bound Morphemes
In the examples of wot-ds that we cited above, we came across two types of
morphemes: first, those which can occur by themselves as words, e.g., when-
and -ever in whenever, brother- in brothers, help- in helps, -er in younger, -s
in brothers, etc. Morphemes of the first type, which can occur by themselves
as words are called free morphemes; those of the second type, which cannot
occur by themselves as words but must be bound with a free morpheme, are
called bound morphemes.
Let's capture this information thus:
Words are made up of either a single free morpheme, or a free morpheme and
one or more bound morphemes, or two or more free morphemes (with or
without some bound morphemes), or in some rare cases, of two bound
morphemes. A word made up of a single morpheme (e.g. time, brother, table,
with,etc.) is called a simple word; a word made up of one free morpheme and
one or more bound morphemes is called a complex word, and a word made up
of two or more free morphemes is called a compound word (which we shall
look into in a separate section).
The following diagram will present the above information more clearly:
We notice that all the words have a free morpheme and one or more than one
bound morpheme. We also notice that the bound morphemes are attached, or
affixed, either to the beginning or to the end of the free morpheme. The bound
morphemes are, therefore, said to function as affixes in the structure of a
word. Affixes in English are of two types: prefixes (those which are attached
to the beginning of the free morpheme, e.g., dis-,im-, un-, etc.) and suffixes
(those which are attached to the end of the free morpheme, e.g., -able, -ness,
-s).
Although we have just said that an affix is attached to a free morpheme, this is
not strictly correct. -Take, for example, the word unacceptable. In
unacceptable, the prefix un- is attached not to the free morpheme accept
(since that would give us unaccept, which is not a word of English), but to the
'word' acceptable, which consists of a free morpheme plus a bound
morpheme. We should not, therefore, say that an affix is always attached to a
free morpheme. Strictly speaking, we also cannot say that affixes are attached
to 'words', since 'word' is a vague term and is used loosely to refer to items
without as well as with affixes. We, therefore, require a term to describe the
'portion' to which an affix is attached. The term is stem. Affixes are attached
to stems. For example, in unacceptable, -accetable is the stem to which the
prefix un- is attached, but accept- is the stem to which suffix -able is attached.
A stem can consist of either a single free morpheme, a free morpheme and one
or more bound morphemes, or two (or more) free morphemes. The stem which
consists of a single free morpheme is also called the root, e.g., in
unacceptable, accept is the root, i.e. the free morpheme from which the word
ttnacceptable grows. If the stem consists of two (or more) free morphemes
(e.g. bathroom-), it is called a compound root.
Root, stem, prefix and suffix are the terms that we have used in describing
the structure of a word, i.e., they are the elements of word-structure.
Morphemes are what make up these elements.
'The following table will show the structure of the word unacceptable:
it's exciting to learn how words are formed, don't you think so?
b. disagreeable ....................................................................
endlessly ..........................................................................
.......................................................................................
friendliest .......................................,.................................
.......................................................................................
marriageable ......................................................................
.......................................................................................
passbooks .........................................................................
workers. ...........................................................................
Try to form as many words as you can from the following free
morphemes. Consult a dictionary for this task.
Order 1:
1 Root I Prefix / Stem 1 Suftix
1 Acce~t I un- I acce~t 1 1
I - A - . - - I unaccept J
Order 2: !
I Root I Prefix I Stem I Suffix
Accept
acceptable
In Section 1 1.2.4 we suggested that the correct order was Order 2. 'The reason
given was that pretixing un- to the root -accept produced a 'form unaccept,
which does not exist in English. (* indicates an unacceptable form.) Hence,
Order I is wrong. In Order 2, on the other hand, the suffixation o f able to the
root accept- produces the form ncceptable, which exists in English. The prefix
un: is then attached to the stem -ucceptahle to produce unacceptable.
Let 11snow elaborate this point a little more. How can we state the rule that the
prefix un- cannot be attached to nccc>p!but can be attached to -acceptable? 110
we have to list each and every stem to which un- can be prefixed'? That w i l l
make our task very difficult, as a very, very long list w i l l have to be drawn up.
Moreover, such a list w i l l have to be drawn up for every prefix and every
suffix. making our task almost impossible.
Fortunately, this is not necessary. We can state the rule in terms of the part o f
speech o f the stem. We can say that zln- is prefixed to adjectives: this explains
why un- can be prefixed to -accepfahlc but not to --accep!. We can further
strengthen the rule by saying that when un- is prefixed to an adjective, it
produces the negative meaning.
There are some difficulties about this 'rule' which we must point out. First,
zm- cannot be prefixed to all ad-jectives. e.g.. we cannot say *unhent~!ifi~l,
*imlall *un-.~~l~c.et,
etc. Generally. 1111- i s prefixed only to those adjectives
which do not have a separate and independent word denoting the opposite
~orphologv-
I meaning. Words like beauliful, lall, and s~veuldo have independent words
which denote the opposite meaning, namely, ugly, shorl, and hiller. Secondly,
though un- cannot be prefixed to -accepl, there are verbs which take un- as a
prefix, e.g., undress, untie, unlock, etc. However, the meaning of this prefix
tm- is different from the meaning o f the adjective prefix un- : it means
'reversing or undoing an action' and not 'negative or opposite of the meaning
denoted by the stem', which is the meaning o f the negative prefix. We shall,
therefore, treat the two prefixes un- to be different morphemes.
Rules o f this kind have been formulated for most prefix and suffix morphelnes
in English. Though these rules are not as thoroughly reliable as rules o f
mathematics, they do provide us some guidance in combining morphemes into
words and. therefore, in identifying the structure o f complex words. The
following are some rules o f this kind:
Making use o f such rules, we can see how morphemes are combined into
words. For example, they tell us how the mgrphemes are combined in the
complex word denationalization. The structure o f the word is shown in the
following table:
The above table shows how complex words are formed by attaching prefixes
and sut'fixes at different stages. The morphology o f a language consists largely
o f rules o f this kind, which tell us how the morphemes o f the language are
combined to produce complex words.
Check Your Progress 2 Words and l'lieir
Elements
I. Show how the following words are built up step by step. Use a table to
indicate the structure o f the words, as we have done above.
kindness, foolishness, unfriendly, immeasurably
2. Say which o f the following words can take the suffix +r to form
coinparatives (consult a dictionary in case of doubt).
sweet, beautiful, clever, fair, intelligent
4. Identify the prefixes in the following words in the table given below
and state their meaning (consult a dictionary when in doubt):
destabilize I I
--
5. Identify the sul'fixes in the following words in the table given below
and state their function. Also mention the stems to which the suffixes
are attached along with the part o f speech the stems belong to (consult
a dictionary when in doubt):
----
of the stem
Function of
the suffix i
I critics I I I I
1 develops 1
11.4 LET U S S U M U P
t
Fromkin, V. and Rodman, R. (1974). An Introduction io Lan uage. (Ch.6).
New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston.
11.7 ANSWERS
I. eighteen
kind -ness
foolish -ness
- - 1 un- -friendly
measure measure
1 1 1 immeasurable ( -ly 1
2. sweeter, fairer, cleverer
4. 1R:fIx
#?:%hte action
) destabilize de- reversing the action
1 unkind un- negative
I indecent in- negative
I mismanagement ( mis- 1 in a wrong manner
5- ~ W o r d % S speech
f e m of the
/ ~ o f j ~ i o n o f t h e ~
I
I'
stem
careful care noun -ful forms an adjective
kindly kind adjective -1 forms an adverb
national nation noun , -a1 forms an adjective
critics critic noun -S plural marker
develops develop Verb -S
1 ( present tense, 3'" 1
1 1 1 ( person singular