Ch 2-Analyzing the Marketing Communication Process
Ch 2-Analyzing the Marketing Communication Process
The sender’s goal is to encode the message in such a way that is familiar to the
target audience. Many symbols have universal meaning, such as the familiar
circle with a line through it to denote no parking, no smoking, and so forth.
The target market may consist of individuals who have specific needs and
for whom the communication must be specifically tailored. This often requires
person-to person communication and is generally accomplished through
personal selling. Other forms of communication, such as advertising, may be
used to attract the audience’s attention to the firm, but the detailed message
is carried by a salesperson who can respond to the specific needs of the
individual customer. Life insurance, financial services, and real estate are
examples of products and services promoted this way.
A second level of audience aggregation is represented by the group.
Marketers often must communicate with a group of people who make or
influence the purchase decision. For example, Companies marketing their
products and services to other businesses or organizations must understand
who is on the purchase committee, what aspect of the decision each
individual influences, and the criteria each member uses to evaluate a
product. Advertising may be directed at each member of the buying center,
and multilevel personal selling may be necessary to reach those individuals
who influence or actually make decisions.
Marketers look for customers who have similar needs and wants and thus
represent some type of market segment that can be reached with the same
basic communication strategy. Very small, well-defined groups of customers
are often referred to as market niches. They can usually be reached through
personal-selling efforts or highly targeted media such as direct mail.
The next level of audience aggregation is market segments, broader
classes of buyers who have similar needs and can be reached with similar
messages. As market segments get larger, marketers usually turn to broader-
based media such as newspapers, magazines, and TV to reach them.
Marketers of most consumer products attempt to attract the attention of
large numbers of present or potential customers (mass markets) through
mass communication such as advertising or publicity. Mass communication is
a one-way flow of information from the marketer to the consumer.
2.4. THE RESPONSE PROCESS
Perhaps the most important aspect of developing effective communication
programs involves understanding the response process the receiver may go
through in moving toward a specific behavior (like purchasing a product) and
how the promotional efforts of the marketer influence consumer responses. In
many instances, the marketer’s only objective may be to create awareness of
the company or brand name, which may trigger interest in the product. In other
situations, the marketer may want to convey detailed information to change
consumers’ knowledge of and attitudes toward the brand and ultimately change
their behavior.
The response process
Traditional response hierarchy models
Alternative response hierarchies
The cognitive response approach
2.4.1. Traditional Response Hierarchy Models
A number of models have been developed to depict the stages a consumer may
pass through in moving from a state of not being aware of a company, product,
or brand to actual purchase behavior. The following Figure shows four of the
best-known response hierarchy models. While these response models may
appear similar, they were developed for different reasons. The traditional
response hierarchy models comprises the following models
AIDA model Innovation Adoption Model
Hierarchy of effects model Information processing model
The AIDA model: was developed to represent the stages a salesperson must
take a customer through in the personal-selling process. This model depicts the
buyer as passing successively through attention, interest, desire, and
action. The salesperson must first get the customer’s attention and then arouse
some interest in the company’s product or service. Strong levels of interest
should create desire to own or use the product. The action stage in the AIDA
model involves getting the customer to make a purchase commitment and
closing the sale. To the marketer, this is the most important stage in the selling
process, but it can also be the most difficult. Companies train their sales reps in
closing techniques to help them complete the selling process.
Hierarchy of effects model: The model developed by Robert Lavidge and Gary
Steiner as a paradigm for setting and measuring advertising objectives. Their
hierarchy of effects model shows the process by which advertising works; it
assumes a consumer passes through a series of steps in sequential order from
initial awareness of a product or service to actual purchase. A basic premise of
this model is that advertising effects occur over a period of time. Advertising
communication may not lead to immediate behavioral response or purchase;
rather, a series of effects must occur, with each step fulfilled before the
consumer can move to the next stage in the hierarchy.
This stage is important since most promotional campaigns are designed not to
motivate consumers to take immediate action but rather to provide information
they will use later when making a purchase decision. Each stage of the response
hierarchy is a dependent variable that must be attained and that may serve as
an objective of the communication process. As shown in Figure 5-4, each stage
can be measured, providing the advertiser with feedback regarding the
effectiveness of various strategies designed to move the consumer to purchase.
The information processing model may be an effective framework for planning
and evaluating the effects of a promotional campaign.
All four models assume a similar ordering of these three stages. Cognitive
development precedes affective reactions, which precede behavior. One might
assume that consumers become aware of and knowledgeable about a brand,
develop feelings toward it, form a desire or preference, and then make a
purchase. While this logical progression is often accurate, the response
sequence does not always operate this way. Over the past two decades,
considerable research in marketing, social psychology, and communications has
led to questioning of the traditional cognitive →affective → behavioral sequence
of response. Several other configurations of the response hierarchy have been
theorized.
As with the standard learning model, this response hierarchy is likely to occur
when the consumer is involved in the purchase situation; it is particularly
relevant for post-purchase situations. For example, a consumer may purchase
tires recommended by a friend and then develop a favorable attitude toward the
company and pay close attention to its ads to reduce dissonance.
Ray suggests this hierarchy tends to occur when involvement in the purchase
decision is low, there are minimal differences among brand alternatives, and
mass-media (especially broadcast) advertising is important.
1.Product/Message Thoughts
The first category of thoughts comprises those directed at the product or service
and/or the claims being made in the communication. Much attention has focused
on two particular types of responses, counterarguments and support arguments.
Counterarguments are thoughts the recipient has that are opposed to the
position taken in the message. Other consumers who see this ad may generate
support arguments, or thoughts that affirm the claims made in the message.
The likelihood of counter arguing is greater when the message makes claims
that oppose the receiver’s beliefs. Counterarguments relate negatively to
message acceptance; the more the receiver counter argues, the less likely he or
she is to accept the position advocated in the message. Support arguments, on
the other hand, relate positively to message acceptance. Thus, the marketer
should develop ads or other promotional messages that minimize counter
arguing and encourage support arguments.
2. Source-Oriented Thoughts
A second category of cognitive responses is directed at the source of the
communication. One of the most important types of responses in this category is
source derogations, or negative thoughts about the spokesperson or
organization making the claims. Such thoughts generally lead to a reduction in
message acceptance. If consumers find a particular spokesperson annoying or
untrustworthy, they are less likely to accept what this source has to say. Of
course, source-related thoughts are not always negative. Receivers who react
favorably to the source generate favorable thoughts, or source bolsters. As
you would expect, most advertisers attempt to hire spokespeople their target
audience likes so as to carry this effect over to the message.
3. Ad Execution Thoughts
The third category of cognitive responses consists of the individual’s thoughts
about the ad itself. Many of the thoughts receivers have when reading or
viewing an ad do not concern the product and/or message claims directly.
Rather, they are affective reactions representing the consumer’s feelings toward
the ad. These thoughts may include reactions to ad execution factors such as
the creativity of the ad, the quality of the visual effects, colors,
Ad execution-related thoughts can be either favorable or unfavorable.
They are important because of their effect on attitudes toward the
advertisement as well as the brand. In recent years, much attention has
focused on consumers’ affective reactions to ads, especially TV commercials.
Attitude toward the ad (A→ ad) represents the receivers’ feelings of
favorability or un-favorability toward the ad. Advertisers are interested in
consumers’ reactions to the ad because they know that affective reactions
are an important determinant of advertising effectiveness, since these
reactions may be transferred to the brand itself or directly influence purchase
intentions. One study found that people who enjoy a commercial are twice as
likely as those who are neutral toward it to be convinced that the brand is the
best.
Consumers’ feelings about the ad may be just as important as their attitudes
toward the brand (if not more so) in determining an ad’s effectiveness. The
importance of affective reactions and feelings generated by the ad depend on
several factors, among them the nature of the ad and the type of processing
engaged in by the receiver. Many advertisers now use emotional ads designed to
evoke feelings and affective reactions as the basis of their creative strategy. The
success of this strategy depends in part on the consumers’ involvement with the
brand and their likelihood of attending to and processing the message. We end
our analysis of the receiver by examining a model that integrates some of the
factors that may account for different types and levels of cognitive processing of
a message.
2. Message Appeals
Comparative Advertising. It is the practice of either directly or
indirectly naming competitors in and ad and comparing one or more
specific attributes.
May be especially useful for new brands
Often used for brands with small market share
Frequently use in political advertising
Fear Appeals. Fear is an emotional response to a threat that expresses,
or at least implies, some sort of danger. Ads sometimes use fear appeals
to evoke this emotional response and arouse individuals to take steps to
remove the threat.
May stress physical danger or threats to health
May identify social threats: disapproval or rejection
May backfire if the level of threat is too high
Humor Appeals. Humorous ads are often the best known and best
remembered of all advertising messages.
They can attract and hold attention
They are often the best remembered
They put the consumer in a positive mood
2.5.3. Channel Factors
The final controllable variable of the communication process is the channel, or
medium, used to deliver the message to the target audience. While a variety of
methods are available to transmit marketing communications, they can be
classified into two broad categories, personal and non-personal media.
Personal versus Non-personal Channels
There are a number of basic differences between personal and non-personal
communications channels. Information received from personal influence
channels is generally more persuasive than information received via the mass
media. Reasons for the differences are summarized in the following comparison
of advertising and personal selling: From the standpoint of persuasion, a sales
message is far more flexible, personal, and powerful than an advertisement. An
advertisement is normally prepared by persons having minimal personal contact
with customers. The message is designed to appeal to a large number of
persons.