Elective Claims Assignment
Elective Claims Assignment
1. What are the key types of Construction Claims? Provide examples for each. Provide
comparative study of claims in Indian Construction Projects and International
Projects.
Ans - Construction Claim can be defined as a request by either party to the contract,
usually the Contractor, for compensation for damages caused by failure Of the Other party
to fulfil his part of obligations as specified in the contract. The compensation is usually in the
form of the additional payment or an extension of time (EOT).
1. Delay Claim - When the project is delayed due to reasons beyond the contractor's
control.
Example: A project is delayed because the site was not handed over on time by the
client.
3. Acceleration Claim - When the contractor is asked to complete the work faster than
scheduled, leading to additional costs.
Example: The client asks the contractor to finish two months early, so the contractor
hires more labor and works overtime.
4. Variation Claim (Change Order Claim) - When the scope of work is changed,
affecting cost or schedule.
Example: The client changes the design mid-way, and the contractor needs to redo a
section of the structure.
5. Loss and Expense Claim - When the contractor incurs additional costs due to delays
or extended time on site.
Example: Project delay leads to extra costs for site rent, worker accommodation, and
machinery.
6. Payment Claim - When the contractor does not receive timely payments for
completed work.
Example: The contractor submits bills for completed work, but the client delays the
payment without explanation.
2. State the varied causes of different types of construction claims and suggest possible
solutions to rectify them.
Ans - Construction claims typically arise due to issues such as delays, disruptions, non-
compliance, or financial disputes between contractors, owners, or subcontractors.
2. Disruption Claims
Causes Solutions
Inadequate Project Proper Coordination
Management Contract Clauses for Disruption
Changes in Project Scope Claim Documentation
Poor Site Conditions
Causes Solutions
Failure to Meet Specifications Regular Inspections
Use of Substandard Materials Clear Terms in Contracts
Failure to Meet Safety Standards Legal Action or Mediation
Causes Solutions
Incompetence or Inexperience Prequalification of Contractors
Financial Instability Regular Monitoring
Inadequate Labor Management Clear Payment Terms
Causes Solutions
Inaccurate Drawings Preliminary Design Reviews
Design Changes Change Order Management
Third-Party Quality Checks
6. Payment Disputes
Causes Solutions
Delayed Payments Clear Payment Schedules
Disagreements Over Billing Retention Funds
Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
Causes Solutions
Natural Disasters Force Majeure Clause in
Political or Economic Events Contract
Insurance Coverage
Causes Solutions
Substandard Workmanship Quality Control Measures
Defective Materials Warranties
Design Deficiencies Third-Party Testing
3. In a project, delays take place, and the contractor applies for 'extension of time' by
citing various reasons as attributable to the owner, before the expiry of the
contractual completion date. No action is taken on the above by the owner.
Meanwhile, the owner levies liquidated damages on the contractor and recovers the
same from the contractor's bills. Is the owner correct in his action? Comment.
Ans –
Since the contractor applied for an extension of time before the contractual completion
date and cited reasons that were attributable to the owner, it was the owner’s
responsibility to review and respond to that request. Ignoring the application and then
going ahead with levying liquidated damages (LD) is not fair practice.
LD is meant to be imposed only when the delay is due to the contractor’s fault. But here,
the delay was supposedly caused by the owner, and the contractor had already flagged it
in time. Until the extension request is assessed and a decision is made, LD shouldn't be
applied. Recovering it from the contractor’s bills while the matter is unresolved could be
seen as arbitrary and may not hold up if the issue goes into dispute resolution.
So, in short, the owner should have addressed the extension request first. Levying
damages without doing that isn't the correct approach.
4. A project was scheduled to commence on a particular date as per the letter of intent
issued by the owner. Owing to certain reasons attributable to the owner, the
handing-over of the site got delayed. Ultimately, it was handed over to the contractor
after a delay of six months. As the contractor, what action would you like to take?
Notify the owner in writing about the delay in site handover, clearly stating that the
delay is attributable to the owner. This helps in maintaining proper documentation
from the beginning.