3. Code Of Professional Conduct Notes
3. Code Of Professional Conduct Notes
LEARING UNIT 3
·
CODE OF PROFESSIONAL
CONDUCT
INTRODUCTION
DEFINITIONS
GENERAL APPLICATION OF THE CODE
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
A professional accountant shall be straightforward, honest, fair and truthful in all his/her
dealings.
> Should not be associated with information they believe:
-
&
Should not allow bias, conflict of interest, or undue influence of others to override or
compromise professional or business judgements.
#
Section 112
>
-
Maintain : Maintain professional knowledge and skill at a level which ensures that clients
or employers receive competent professional service.
>
-
Carry out : Act diligently and in accordance with the applicable technical and professional
standards.
>
-
Lifelong learning : Must remain up to date with the relevant technical, professional and
business developments.
Section 113 >
-
Ensure that those working under the authority of the professional accountant have
appropriate training and supervision.
>
-
Should not undertake or continue with an engagement which the professional accountant
is not competent to perform unless he obtains advice and assistance which enables the
professional accountant to carry out the engagement satisfactorily.
The professional accountant shall not disclose confidential information acquired as a result of
a professional or business relationship without the proper authority or unless there is a legal or
professional duty to do so.
Professional Scepticism
There is a requirement that a professional accountant in public practice should apply professional
scepticism when carrying out their work.
This requires the professional accountant to apply a questioning mind over the:
• Information provided by clients (Could they be possibly misleading me?); and
• The reliability of the supporting documentation (Could this document possibly be falsified?)
• Professional scepticism requires the professional accountant to remain alert for possible
fraud.
• All professional accountants should adhere to the five fundamental principles in Part I of the
Code of Professional Conduct (CPC).
• Situations may arise, through a range of facts and circumstances, that can threaten a
professional accountant’s ability to comply with fundamental principles:
1. The professional accountant should identify the threats to compliance with the
fundamental principles.
2. When the professional identifies a threat to compliance with the fundamental principles,
the accountant shall evaluate whether the threat is at an acceptable level.
3. If not, the threat must be addressed!!!!
Threats to the Fundamental Principles
-
Threat that a financial interest or other interest will influence the professional accountant’s
judgement or behaviour and lead him to act in his own self-interest.
For example:
• A professional accountant having a direct financial interest in a client.
• A professional accountant having a close business relationship with a client,
• A professional accountant having access to confidential information that might be used
for personal gain.
Threat that the professional accountant will not appropriately review the work due to having self-
prepared the work or someone in the same firm.
For example:
• A professional accountant who prepared the financial statements, is now part of the audit team
responsible for auditing those financial statements.
• A firm is responsible for providing assurance over the financial statements where the same firm
was responsible for implementing internal controls over the financial statements.
An advocacy threat is created when a professional accountant promotes a client’s (or employer)
position to a point that the professional accountant’s objectivity is compromised.
For example:
• A professional accountant values a client’s shares and then leads the negotiations on the sale
of the company.
• A professional accountant acting as an advocate on behalf of a client in litigation or disputes
with third parties.
For example:
• The professional accountant accepts gifts from the client.
• There is an immediate- or close relationship between a member of the audit team and an
employee of the client responsible for the preparation of the financial statements.
• There is a long association between the engagement partner/manager and the client.
The professional accountant will be deterred from acting objectively because of actual or
perceived pressure.
For example:
• A professional accountant in business fails to report fraud out of fear that he might be
dismissed.
• An audit firm is being threatened with dismissal from the engagement.
• Pressure to accept an inappropriate decision on an accounting matter, is exerted by the
client’s financial manager on a young, inexperienced audit manager.
CONCRPTUAL FRAMEWORK
• It is not possible and practical to write a rule for every type of scenario that can threaten a
professional accountant’s compliance with the fundamental principles.
• The conceptual framework was established to uphold the fundamental principles (much like
the framework of a house uploads the walls and the roof of the house).
• The conceptual framework should be used when the professional accountant has identified
that his/her compliance with the fundamental principles is being threatened due to something
that has not happened yet.
Em
Evaluating Threats
• The professional accountant should evaluate whether the threat to the fundamental principle
is at an acceptable level.
• There might always be a threat to the professional accountant complying with the
fundamental principles. Might not be possible to completely remove the threat.
• Acceptable level: Complying with the fundamental principles.
• Apply the reasonably informed third-party test to determine whether he/she complies with the
fundamental principles (threat at an acceptable level).
m
Addressing the threats
Step 1: Identify the • Juan’s wife (immediate family member) holds a significant financial investment in JH
Manufacturers. Juan is assisting his client, CompTech (Pty) Ltd, to evaluate whether to invest
threat in JH Manufacturers.
• This could possibly create a self-interest threat to Jaun’s Objectivity.
Conclusion:
The threat is therefore NOT at an acceptable level.
Evaluating the threat
• Existence of separate functions in the firm
• Policies and Procedures to limit access to client files
• Confidentiality agreements signed by staff
• Separation of confidential information by the firm
• Training and communication provided by the firm
Step 3: Addressing Because the threat is not at an acceptable level, the professional accountant is required to address
the threat the threat by:
1.Removing facts or circumstances creating the threat
Remove Juan from the engagement.
Have his wife dispose of her financial interest.
A professional accountant is entitled to be remunerated fairly but must charge appropriate fees
(e.g., not over or undercharged).
fee quotes to Alpha Group (Pty) Ltd (which is based on the number of hours they would
need to complete the engagement) was reduced by 25%.
threat > This could possibly create a self-interest threat to Professional Competence and Due Care.
-
Explanation: This may make it difficult to perform to prepare the financial statement in
accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) (Technical and
professional standards).
Note: Professional accountant quoting a fee lower than a competitor is not a threat, but the
fact that the professional accountant might breach professional behaviour does create a
threat.
Step 2: Evaluate the Factor to consider:
threat Does the client know what services they will receive?
? Are the fees charged determined by a regulator board?
The threat is not at an acceptable level as the work will not be performed with the required
degree of skill and supervision as can be expected of a professional accountant (in
accordance with Technical and professional standards).
Having an appropriate reviewer review the work (this will cost more)
Contingent Fees:
• Contingent fees are fees calculated on a predetermined basis dependent on the outcome of
the work or services performed.
• Contingent fees are acceptable for a range of non-assurance services.
• Contingent fees for assurance services are not permitted.
• Contingent fees for tax returns are not permitted.
Referral Fees/commissions:
A professional accountant may receive or pay fair referral fees, but it should not compromise
compliance with the fundamental principles.
(S340) INDUCEMENTS LIKE GIFTS AND HOSPITALITY
Your client offered you and your partner have been offered an all-expenses paid holiday to
Step 1: Identify the Mauritius. This constitutes gifts and hospitality.
threat > This could possibly create a self-interest threat, and familiarity threat to Integrity, Objectivity and
-
Professional Behaviour.
>
-
Possible intimidation threat if the client threatens to expose the professional accountant who has
accepted the gift.
Explanation:
⑧
This could cause the professional accountant to not be straightforward and honest in
his/her business dealings (Integrity).
⑧ This could influence the professional accountant’s ability to act with professional
judgement and professional scepticism (Objectivity).
&
If the public found out, this could bring disrepute to the profession / could be contrary to laws
and regulations (Professional Behaviour).
Factor to consider:
Step 2: Evaluate the > Intention of person(s) giving the gift/hospitality
threat >
-
Value of the gift and/or hospitality
-
> Laws and regulations prohibiting the acceptance of such gifts and hospitality.
If the professional accountant or third party conclude that the gifts and hospitality is made to
influence the behaviour of the person receiving the gift or hospitality = threat not at an acceptable
level.
Conclusion:
>
-
The threat is not at an acceptable level as the value of the gifts and hospitality is clearly not trivial
(value).
>
-
Defining NOCLAR
*
• Act or Omission (Action taken or the lack thereof)
• Intentional or unintentional (It does not matter if you broke the law on purpose or not)
• Committed by:
- Client; or
- Employer; or
- Those charged with governance, management or other individuals working for
or under the direction of a client or employer;
• that is contrary to the prevailing laws or regulations, being;
- all laws and regulations which affect material amounts and disclosure in financial
statements;
- other laws and regulations that are fundamental to the entity’s business
The impact of non-compliance:
Non-compliance might result in fines, litigation or other consequences, potentially materially
affecting the financial statements.
Such non-compliance has wider public interest implications in terms of potentially causing
substantial harm to:
• Investors (shareholders);
• Creditors;
• Employees; or
• General Public
Causing substantial harm results in serious adverse consequences to any of the parties in financial
and non-financial terms.
Explanation:
• There is a self-interest threat as the professional accountant might place his personal interest
(in a promotion or a client) ahead of his integrity (to do the right thing) and professional
behaviour (comply with relevant laws and regulations).
• There is an Intimidation threat as the professional accountant might be threatened by a client
or an employer for loss of employment/income if the professional accountant reports the non-
compliance.
Step 2: Addressing the • Discuss the NOCLAR with those charged with governance
matter • Comply with relevant laws and regulations regarding the reporting
(disclosure) of NOCLAR
• Advice management to rectify, remediate or mitigate the consequences
of the NOCLAR
• Consider action to reduce the risk of re-occurrence
• Take actions to deter (prevent) if NOCLAR has not yet happened
• Consider whether the matter should be disclosed to the appropriate
authority
Step 3: Determining
whether further action
is needed
Step 4: Determine • Disclosing to the appropriate authority would not be allowed if doing so
whether to disclose would be contrary to law and regulation.
the matter to the • In deciding to disclose the matter, the professional accountant should
appropriate authority consider the actual or potential harm of the matter to stakeholders.